diff --git a/doc/governance.rst b/doc/governance.rst index a6db1f6bf769c..351fbc9a95802 100644 --- a/doc/governance.rst +++ b/doc/governance.rst @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ conclude one month from the call for the vote. Any vote must be backed by a :ref:`SLEP `. If no option can gather two thirds of the votes cast, the decision is escalated to the TC, which in turn will use consensus seeking with the fallback option of a simple majority vote if no consensus can be found -within a month. This is what we hereafter may refer to as “the decision making -process”. +within a month. This is what we hereafter may refer to as "**the decision making +process**". Decisions (in addition to adding core developers and TC membership as above) are made according to the following rules: @@ -151,13 +151,25 @@ are made according to the following rules: * **Changes to the API principles and changes to dependencies or supported versions** happen via a :ref:`slep` and follows the decision-making process outlined above. -* **Changes to the governance model** use the same decision process outlined above. - - If a veto -1 vote is cast on a lazy consensus, the proposer can appeal to the community and core developers and the change can be approved or rejected using the decision making procedure outlined above. +Governance Model Changes +------------------------ + +Governance model changes occur through an enhancement proposal or a GitHub Pull +Request. An enhancement proposal will go through "**the decision-making process**" +described in the previous section. Alternatively, an author may propose a change +directly to the governance model with a GitHub Pull Request. Logistically, an +author can open a Draft Pull Request for feedback and follow up with a new +revised Pull Request for voting. Once that author is happy with the state of the +Pull Request, they can call for a vote on the public mailing list. During the +one-month voting period, the Pull Request can not change. A Pull Request +Approval will count as a positive vote, and a "Request Changes" review will +count as a negative vote. If two-thirds of the cast votes are positive, then +the governance model change is accepted. + .. _slep: Enhancement proposals (SLEPs)