You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If training is interrupted and then resumed, it will continue from the last epoch number.
However, when recording training results with TensorBoard, the newly recorded epochs start from 0 again, as shown in the image below:
Here, {"Epoch": epoch} starts from 0. Is there a specific reason or intent behind this design choice?
Using "relative" or "wall" in TensorBoard can partially address this, but it doesnβt allow for side-by-side comparison with other runs that have the same epoch count.
Is there a way to modify this so that the epoch numbering continues from the last epoch number instead of resetting to 0?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
If training is interrupted and then resumed, it will continue from the last epoch number.

However, when recording training results with TensorBoard, the newly recorded epochs start from 0 again, as shown in the image below:
In the examples from https://github.com/speechbrain/speechbrain/tree/develop/recipes/Voicebank/enhance (and others behave similarly), for instance, in MetricGANβs train.py:
Here,
{"Epoch": epoch}starts from 0. Is there a specific reason or intent behind this design choice?Using "relative" or "wall" in TensorBoard can partially address this, but it doesnβt allow for side-by-side comparison with other runs that have the same epoch count.
Is there a way to modify this so that the epoch numbering continues from the last epoch number instead of resetting to 0?
All reactions