Commit 3526a32
committed
bug #44732 [Mime] Relaxing in-reply-to header validation (ThomasLandauer)
This PR was submitted for the 6.1 branch but it was squashed and merged into the 4.4 branch instead.
Discussion
----------
[Mime] Relaxing in-reply-to header validation
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 6.1
| Bug fix? | no
| New feature? | ?
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix #37361
| License | MIT
| Doc PR | not necessary
@nicolas-grekas
1. Is it OK to just use `UnstructuredHeader`?
2. Some tests at `IdentificationHeaderTest` are irrelevant now (but still pass) - should I remove them? And create some new test cases in `UnstructuredHeaderTest`? Or rely on every aspect being tested with other headers there, and don't add anything?
Commits
-------
04ddc12 [Mime] Relaxing in-reply-to header validation2 files changed
Lines changed: 16 additions & 2 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
141 | 141 | | |
142 | 142 | | |
143 | 143 | | |
144 | | - | |
145 | | - | |
| 144 | + | |
| 145 | + | |
146 | 146 | | |
147 | 147 | | |
148 | 148 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
243 | 243 | | |
244 | 244 | | |
245 | 245 | | |
| 246 | + | |
| 247 | + | |
| 248 | + | |
| 249 | + | |
| 250 | + | |
| 251 | + | |
| 252 | + | |
| 253 | + | |
| 254 | + | |
| 255 | + | |
| 256 | + | |
| 257 | + | |
| 258 | + | |
| 259 | + | |
246 | 260 | | |
0 commit comments