You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 3.4 branch (closes#36627).
Discussion
----------
[Validator] fix lazy property usage.
| Q | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch? | 3.4
| Bug fix? | yes
| New feature? | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tickets | Fix#36343
| License | MIT
| Doc PR |
This attempts to fix a large regression introduced in #36343, which broke recursing values returned from `getter` Constraints, because they are now wrapped in in a `LazyProperty`. The `LazyProperty` needs to be evaluated because some checks are done on the type of `$value`, i.e `is_array` etc... in `validateGenericNode`.
I'm concerned that the original PR didn't really add sufficient test coverage for the introduction of `LazyProperty`, and I'm not 100% sure that I've caught all the cases where the `instanceof` check are needed in this PR.
For the tests, I added the `@dataProvider getConstraintMethods` to every test that hit the problem area of code.
~~The only issue is that my fixed has broken the test introduced in #36343, `testGroupedMethodConstraintValidateInSequence`.~~
~~I think I need @HeahDude to help me work through this. Maybe there is a more simple solution, one that doesn't require doing `instanceof LazyPropery` checks in multiple places, because this feels very brittle.~~
EDIT: fixed that test.
Commits
-------
281861e [Validator] fix lazy property usage.
0 commit comments