Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Simplified UserPasswordEncoderCommand #7539

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
javiereguiluz opened this issue Feb 26, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Simplified UserPasswordEncoderCommand #7539

javiereguiluz opened this issue Feb 26, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
good first issue Ideal for your first contribution! (some Symfony experience may be required) Security
Milestone

Comments

@javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member

Not sure if we show the details of this command ... but if we do, we must update it because it was simplified to show a choice list of possible user classes.

See symfony/symfony#20677

@javiereguiluz javiereguiluz added good first issue Ideal for your first contribution! (some Symfony experience may be required) Security labels Feb 26, 2017
@javiereguiluz javiereguiluz added this to the 3.3 milestone Feb 26, 2017
@ogizanagi
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think the command was documented somewhere. But maybe a simple note could be added in the "How to Manually Encode a Password" page for the cases someone is seeking how to manually encode the password, but does not search the programmatic way (for instance when adding a user to the in_memory provider)

@javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member Author

Closing it as "won't fix" because we already mention the command here http://symfony.com/doc/current/security.html#c-encoding-the-user-s-password and we don't explain the details or show its output ... so there's nothing to update!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Ideal for your first contribution! (some Symfony experience may be required) Security
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants