Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Question about code snippet #118

@cgzones

Description

@cgzones

The following code snippet seems odd to me:

_cleanup_free_ char *pretty = NULL;
union sockaddr_union sa;
socklen_t salen;
int r;
assert(m);
assert(m->socket >= 0);
switch (m->address.sockaddr.sa.sa_family) {
case AF_INET:
sa = (union sockaddr_union) {
.in.sin_family = m->address.sockaddr.sa.sa_family,
.in.sin_port = m->address.sockaddr.in.sin_port,
.in.sin_addr = m->address.sockaddr.in.sin_addr,
};
salen = sizeof(sa.in);
break;
case AF_INET6:
sa = (union sockaddr_union) {
.in6.sin6_family = m->address.sockaddr.sa.sa_family,
.in6.sin6_port = m->address.sockaddr.in6.sin6_port,
.in6.sin6_addr = m->address.sockaddr.in6.sin6_addr,
};
salen = sizeof(sa.in6);
break;
default:
return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
}
r = sockaddr_pretty(&m->address.sockaddr.sa, salen, true, true, &pretty);
if (r < 0)
return r;

The variable sa is assigned but its value (only its size) is never used.

Should the code either look like this:

case AF_INET:
    salen = sizeof(m->address.sockaddr.in);
    break;
case AF_INET6:
    salen = sizeof(m->address.sockaddr.in6);
    break;

or should the variable be used this way:

r = sockaddr_pretty(sa, salen, true, true, &pretty);
        if (r < 0)
                return r;

?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions