Does the new sentence make sense to you? If it is only a matter of duplicate examples , should this be:

You will learn more about declaring examples later.

Was that the original meaning of this sentence? Shouldn't it have been a link to somewhere?

I'm still new to fastapi. I think your wording is definitely clearer, IF we were to add a link it would probably go here https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/tutorial/schema-extra-example/#field-additional-arguments However I can't find any current examples of in document linkage and would prefer not to add something that would break. So I'm thinking the way forward is just to use your wording. Thoughts?

Since I was unsure of the original intent of the text, and I also am unsure of where this should link to and what is the proper syntax for such a link, I created an issue and not a PR.

I think it is better to get an authoritative answer for this issue than take a guess that might not be correct.

BTW, see an example for an internal link in:

https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/blob/master/docs/en/docs/tutorial/dependencies/dependencies-in-path-operation-decorators.md#dependencies-for-a-group-of-path-operations:

[Bigger Applications - Multiple Files](../../tutorial/bigger-applications.md){.internal-link target=_blank}