Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3325 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.72% 95.25% -0.47%
==========================================
Files 33 34 +1
Lines 1309 1327 +18
Branches 388 390 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 1253 1264 +11
- Misses 52 59 +7
Partials 4 4
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
372f3b1 to
4f42ce2
Compare
|
@snitin315 I think better finish this before merge it #3309 (here we finish our options) |
|
It should be good now. Waiting for green CI. |
|
I have not included |
Ideally - yes, but I think we need In theory we can move part of logic |
|
I will update 👍 |
5b4e85e to
d2acaba
Compare
|
Done ✅ |
alexander-akait
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job, let's merge it after #3309
|
MacOS issue, help output is short in CI. |
test/cli/cli.test.js
Outdated
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should generate correct cli flags', (done) => { | ||
| const isMacOS = process.platform === 'darwin'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is problem? Not all output? It means we have bug somewhere...
| }) | ||
| .catch(done); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we add test: using webpack server --config ./path/webpack.config.js with --watch-files-paths-reset --watch-files-paths ${watchDirectory} and do snapshot (you can set stats: false, we will improve it late), as you can see using expect(output.exitCode).toEqual(0); is bad testing, we need snapshot stdout and stderr, it allow use to see what we rewrite watch-files-paths
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We don't log which files are being watched on stderr/stdout
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Though we do log for static, added more snapshots 👍🏻
518685d to
34c46b4
Compare
|
I will rebase in near future. |
|
@snitin315 I will finish it, WIP, also I will add test to ensure we don't lose cli args in future after adding/removing/changes our options |
|
CI is green ✅ |
For Bugs and Features; did you add new tests?
YES
Motivation / Use-Case
#3300 (comment)
Breaking Changes
No
Additional Info
No