Brian LaMacchia
- RE: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- RE: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Carl Wallace
Christian Geuer-Pollmann
David M. Balenson
denis.bider@siol.net
Don Park
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Canonical XML typo?
- Re: XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting?
- ID for Canonical XML
- documents versus protocols
- Re: question on latest spec
- XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting (NOT)
- Re: XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting?
- Re: Very minor comment in the spec.
Donald Eastlake 3rd
Doug Bunting
Elliotte Rusty Harold
Gerald Huck
Gregor Karlinger
- IAIK XML Signature Library (IXSIL) 1.0 Alpha 1 now available
- AW: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- AW: Content of element X509SKI
- AW: Canonical XML typo?
- Content of element X509SKI
- AW: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- AW: AW: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec)
- Schema question
- AW: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec)
- AW: AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations
- AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations
- AW: AW: Status of Implementations
hal@finney.org
Henry S. Thompson
Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-canonical-00.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-canonical-00.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-blake-wilson-xmldsig-ecdsa-00.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-11.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-10.txt
Jeff Cochran
John Boyer
- RE: Canonical XML 3.6
- RE: Canonical XML 3.6
- RE: Canonical XML typo?
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- Character Encoding Question
- RE: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- RE: question on latest spec
- RE: question on latest spec
- RE: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- RE: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- RE: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- RE: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- RE: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: Last Call
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: AW: Status of Implementations
- RE: Last Call
- RE: C14N Last Call
Jonathan Marsh
Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
- RE: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- RE: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- New Version of Cannonical XML Issues List and Spec
- RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- FYI: RE: Character Encoding Question
- Re: Moving Canonical XML along
- RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- Re: ECDSA in XML
- Moving Canonical XML along
- RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- Re: AW: Content of element X509SKI
- Re: AW: Content of element X509SKI
- Closing on Whitespace and Examples 3.4 and 3.7
- Re: minor typos in CR-xmldsig-core-20001031
- Re: PKIXML
- Re: Countersignature capabilities in the current draft
- RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- RE: question on latest spec
- Re: Question about your c14n implementations
- FYI: Update of Participants
- Re: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Draft typos and errors
- Re: DSIG spec question, section 2.3
- Re: Draft typos and errors
- Re: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- Re: file corrupted
- Fwd: Call for Implementation: XML-Signature Syntax and Processing Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Re: XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting?
- Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Re: PKCS
- Re: Second last Call - Re: WD-xmldsig-core-20001012
- RE: Close of XML Signature Last Call
- Close of XML Signature Last Call
- Re: XML Digital SIgnature
- FYI: A P3P Assurance Signature Profile
- Re: AW: AW: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec)
- Re: Second last Call - Re: WD-xmldsig-core-20001012
- Re: minor comments for WD-xmldsig-core-20001012
- FYI: XPath Errata
- Re: minor comments for WD-xmldsig-core-20001012
- Re: AW: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec)
- Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec)
- Requesting Canonical XML Candidate Rec shortly
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: RetrievalMethod issues
- Re: X509Data example minor issue
- Re: Minor XMLDSIG edits
- Re: AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations
- Re: Old Schema to New Schema XSLT?
- Re: AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: LC-104 and LC-105 XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema
- Re: Very minor comment in the spec.
- RE: XMLDigSig WD-2000-09-18
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: PKCS1 in XML DSIG
- RE: XSL Transform
- Brief Report on EESSI Meeting
Juan Carlos Cruellas
- Summary of OID and URI discussion and steps forward
- Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs
- Countersignature capabilities in the current draft
Juergen Brauckmann
Karl Scheibelhofer
- RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- RE: [leslie@thinkingcat.com: Re: OIDs as URI/URNs....]
- RE: Representation of OIDs as URIs
- RE: Representation of OIDs as URIs
- Representation of OIDs as URIs
Ken Goldman
Kevin Regan
- RE: question on latest spec
- RE: question on latest spec
- RE: question on latest spec
- question on latest spec
Lorrie Cranor
Martin J. Duerst
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- Fwd: I18N problem in XML canonicalisation
- Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs
merlin
- Re: Moving Canonical XML along
- Re: AW: Content of element X509SKI
- Re: Content of element X509SKI
- Re: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Countersignature capabilities in the current draft
- Re: DSIG Spec 4.3.3.1 - missing URI
- Re: Requesting Canonical XML Candidate Rec shortly
- Re: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec)
- Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: RetrievalMethod issues
- Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Minor XMLDSIG edits
- X509Data example minor issue
- RetrievalMethod issues
- Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations
- Re: C14N Last Call
Michael Mealling
Mikulin, Lana
mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
muraw3c@attglobal.net
- Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
Olivier DUBUISSON
- Re: Summary of OID and URI discussion and steps forward
- Re: [leslie@thinkingcat.com: Re: OIDs as URI/URNs....]
- Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs
- Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs
OmPlace
Paul Hoffman / IMC
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
Peter Lipp
Petteri Stenius
- RE: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec)
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
Philip Hallam-Baker
Rasmussen Jesper Broe
Rick Jelliffe
rida
Romanosky, Sasha
rsalz@CaveoSystems.com
Simon Blake-Wilson
Stern, David L
Susan Lesch
- Re: minor typos in CR-xmldsig-core-20001031
- minor typos in CR-xmldsig-core-20001031
- minor typos in CR-xml-c14n-20001026
- Re: minor comments for WD-xmldsig-core-20001012
- minor comments for WD-xmldsig-core-20001012
TAMURA Kent
- Re: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
tesi.simone@serenacom.net
tgindin@us.ibm.com
- Re: X509Data example minor issue
- Re: Very minor comment in the spec.
- Re: Very minor comment in the spec.
- Re: Very minor comment in the spec.
The IESG
Tom Gindin
- RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- Re: ECDSA in XML
- Re: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Representation of OIDs as URIs
- Re: ECDSA in XML