> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
>
> Thomas Lockhart <[email protected]> writes:
> > One hesitation I have is the performance hit in mixing FLOAT and
> > NUMERIC; I (probably) don't want to make NUMERIC the "best" numeric
> > type, since it is potentially so slow.
>
> I concur --- I'd be inclined to leave FLOAT8 as the top of the
> hierarchy. But NUMERIC could be stuck in there between int and float,
> no? (int-vs-numeric ops certainly must be promoted to numeric...)
>
Is this topic related to the fact that 1.1 is an FLOAT8 constant in
PostgreSQL ?
I've not understood at all why it's OK.
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
[email protected]
