Claudio Natoli <[email protected]> writes:
> Or, maybe we'll just use the tas() implementation that already exists for
> __i386__/__x86_64__ in s_lock.h. How did I miss that?
> Move along. Nothing to see here.
Actually, I was expecting you to complain that the s_lock.h coding is
gcc-specific. Which compilers do we need to support on Windows?
We might have to fall back to something comparable to the CVS-tip s_lock
support for hppa: inline assembler in s_lock.h for gcc, and a separate
assembly source file for use with vendor compiler(s).
regards, tom lane
