Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to postgrespro.com

Re: vacuumlo issue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: vacuumlo issue
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: vacuumlo issue  (Robert Haas <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see that patch has not made it to any released versions yet.
>> Is it too late to rethink the design?  I propose (a) redefining it
>> as committing after every N objects, and (b) having a limit of 1000
>> or so objects by default.

> I'll dispute the characterization of "utterly brain-dead"; it's better
> than what we had before, which was nothing.  However, I think your
> proposal might be better still.

Not hearing any objections, I will go make that happen.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory usage during sorting
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Gsoc2012 Idea --- Social Network database schema