Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to postgrespro.com

Re: Tuple sampling - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: Tuple sampling
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tuple sampling  (Tom Lane <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-patches
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 17:32:36 -0400,
  Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> slower.  (The datatype conversions induced inside get_next_S are likely
> to outweigh any savings from counting by ints, on most modern hardware.)

You aren't even guarenteed that integer operations are faster. On the Cray
XMP integer math was often done using floating point operations because
they were faster. This limited them to 48 bits instead of instead of 64,
but normally 48 bits was enough. I don't remember if just multiplication
was faster or if all operations were faster.

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP list rewrite
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP list rewrite