Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to postgrespro.com

Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs  (Scott Marlowe <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:27:18AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> If you haven't actually run a heavy benchmark of postgresql on the two
> architectures, please don't make your decision based on other
> benchmarks.  Since you've got both a D920 and an X2 3800, that'd be a
> great place to start.  Mock up some benchmark with a couple dozen
> threads hitting the server at once and see if the Intel can keep up.  It

Or better yet, use dbt* or even pgbench so others can reproduce...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      [email protected]
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Steve Poe
Date:
Subject: Re: Introducing a new linux readahead framework
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs