Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to postgrespro.com

Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation  (Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Aug  4, 2012 at 05:21:06PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 04.08.2012 11:01, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >Missed one point which needs to be handled is pg_upgrade
> 
> I don't think there's anything to do for pg_upgrade. This doesn't
> change the on-disk data format, just the WAL format, and pg_upgrade
> isn't sensitive to WAL format changes.

Correct.

--  Bruce Momjian  <[email protected]>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Word-smithing doc changes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue in Behavior of Interval Datatype