Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to postgrespro.com

Re: Re: Gripe: working on configure now requires Automake installed locally - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: Gripe: working on configure now requires Automake installed locally
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Gripe: working on configure now requires Automake installed locally  (Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes:
>> ... but, shouldn't automake be a requirement on a developers machine if,
>> and only if, they modify either the Makefile.am files *or*
>> configure.in?  Like, it should only be a requirement for a select few of
>> the developers?

> The problem was that I was using the aclocal program, which comes with
> automake and Tom didn't want to install that.

Just to be perfectly clear: I don't have a problem with installing
automake if we come to an agreement that we need to require it as
a build tool.  I do have a problem with requirements creep happening
without discussion/consensus.  For now, I'd like to see if we can
avoid needing automake...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: Big 7.1 open items
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items