Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to postgrespro.com

Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: What's the CURRENT schema ?
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What's the CURRENT schema ?  (Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes:
> PUBLIC can be made less reserved easily.  See patch below.

Well, we could do that, but this patch seems an ugly way to do it;
we have too many classifications of keywords already, and I don't
want to introduce another one.

I'd be inclined to make PUBLIC not a keyword at all, and instead have
the production grantee -> ColId do this in its action:
if (strcmp($1, "public") == 0)    create PUBLIC PrivGrantee nodeelse    create normal PrivGrantee node

An objection to this is that you couldn't make a user named "public"
(with the quotes), since PUBLIC and "public" would look the same to
the action ... but that seems like a good restriction anyway.  I'd
be quite willing to tweak CREATE USER to forbid that name.

I suppose it's a judgment call which is uglier.  Thoughts?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: What's the CURRENT schema ?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues