Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to postgrespro.com

Re: Lock partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Wong
Subject Re: Lock partitions
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Lock partitions  (Tom Lane <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: Lock partitions
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Wong <[email protected]> writes:
>> Sorry for the delay but looks like there's some data coming in.  It also 
>> looks like my kit is starting to be a little dated.  My stored libpq 
>> calls are failing.  I'm getting this message:
> 
>> ERROR:  record type has not been registered
> 
> This is a server-side failure --- could we see how order_status()
> is defined?  What PG version are you testing exactly?

I took pgsqsl snapshot from cvs on Sept 11.  Due to the length of the 
file that order_status() is in and of order_status() itself, here's is a 
url for the file in the svn repository.  order_status() is defined 
starting on line 710:

http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/osdldbt/trunk/dbt2/storedproc/pgsql/c/funcs.c?view=markup

Thanks,
Mark


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: AgentM
Date:
Subject: Re: New version of money type
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Mid cycle release?