On 10/02/2010 10:45 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 16:08, Tom Lane<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander<[email protected]> writes:
>>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 13:36, Andrew Dunstan<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I think the confusion is from the use of "tagged" in the commit
>>> message
>> Possibly Marc should adopt the habit of making the commit messages read
>> like "Stamp 9.0.2", rather than "Tag".
> +1, that sounds like a good idea.
>
Yeah, I agree.
Where are the procedures actually documented?
cheers
andrew
