On 3/17/14, 8:47 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Stehule <[email protected]> writes:
>> 2014-03-17 12:52 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Strobel <[email protected]>:
>>> I've googled the problem and there seem to be more people with similar
>>> problems, so I made this a command line option --no-table-locks and
>>> wrapped it up in as nice a patch against github/master as I can manage
>>> (and I didn't use C for a long time). I hope you find it useful.
>
>> Joe Conway sent me a tip so commit eeb6f37d89fc60c6449ca12ef9e914
>> 91069369cb significantly decrease a time necessary for locking. So it can
>> help to.
>
> Indeed. I think there's zero chance that we'd accept the patch as
> proposed. If there's still a performance problem in HEAD, we'd look
> for some other way to improve matters more.
>
> (Note that this is only one of assorted O(N^2) behaviors in older versions
> of pg_dump; we've gradually stamped them out over time.)
On that note, it's recommended that when you are taking a backup to restore into a newer version of Postgres you create
thedump using the NEWER version of pg_dump, not the old one.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect [email protected]
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
