Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to postgrespro.com

Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Karlsson
Subject Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL  (Michael Paquier <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL
Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in
> [email protected] we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint,
> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same
> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts?

A new version of the patch is attached which treats them as the same for
locking. I think it is correct and improves readability to do so.

--
Andreas Karlsson
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel mode and parallel contexts
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: assessing parallel-safety