Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to postgrespro.com

Re: [HACKERS] obsolete code in pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] obsolete code in pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] obsolete code in pg_upgrade  (Christoph Berg <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/25/17 04:00, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-24 <[email protected]>
>> On 8/23/17 09:36, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I think I agree.  It seems to me that the version of pg_upgrade
>>> shipped with release N only needs to support upgrades to release N,
>>> not older releases.  There's probably room for debate about whether a
>>> pg_upgrade needs to support direct upgrades FROM very old releases,
>>> but we need not decide anything about that right now.
>>>
>>> I think you could go ahead and rip out this code, but as it seems like
>>> a non-critical change, -1 for back-patching it.
>>
>> committed to PG10 and master
> 
> This #define seems to be obsolete now as well:
> src/bin/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade.h:#define TABLE_SPACE_SUBDIRS_CAT_VER 201001111

fixed, thanks

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] locale problem of bgworker: logical replicationlauncher and worker process