On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Markus Wanner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/21/2010 03:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Wait, are we in violent agreement here? An overall limit on the
>> number of parallel jobs is exactly what I think *does* make sense.
>> It's the other knobs I find odd.
>
> Note that the max setting I've been talking about here is the maximum
> amount of *idle* workers allowed. It does not include busy bgworkers.
Oh, wow. Is there another limit on the total number of bgworkers?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
