Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to postgrespro.com

Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzmUnA-jxDQKcz+nAGEkT4D0mW-yS2Rg-ss72b43Uo3S3w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 3:19 PM Tomas Vondra
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm generally OK with most of this - I'd probably keep the single-line
> format, but I don't feel very strongly about that and if others think
> using two lines is better ...
>
> Barring objections I'll get this polished and pushed soon-ish (say,
> early next week).

I see something about starting a new thread on the Open Items page.
Please CC me on this.

Speaking in my capacity as an RMT member: Glad to see that you plan to
close this item out next week. (I had planned on giving you a nudge
about this, but it looks like I don't really have to now.)

Thanks
-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add -Wold-style-definition to CFLAGS?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?