Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to postgrespro.com

Re: New CF app deployment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: New CF app deployment
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1x1tHThKFkFri0PJo-e4Swfueow_JqZyV-ixu72e+BwgA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New CF app deployment  (Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the old system where the patch submitter declared, this message
> contains my patch, is the only one that will work.

I tend to agree. That being said, calling out latest attachments is
also useful (or highlighting that a particular mail has a particular
file attached in general).

We can keep listing the attachment and just remove the automated check of what *kind* of attachment it is.

But when an email has multiple attachments, there should be some kind of indication that this is the case.


The line:

Attachment (attlognum-test.sql) at 2015-02-23 23:09:06 from Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra at 2ndquadrant.com> (Patch: No)

is misleading.

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: get_object_address support for additional object types
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: logical column ordering