Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to postgrespro.com

Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Fixing r-tree semantics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew - Supernews
Subject Re: Fixing r-tree semantics
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Fixing r-tree semantics  (Tom Lane <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: Fixing r-tree semantics
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2005-06-23, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> I looked into the r-tree breakage discussed in this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-03/msg01135.php

See also http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-01/msg00328.php
in which I made most of the same points.

Notice also that contrib/seg and contrib/cube have their own, and
incompatible, idea of what the semantics of &< and &> should be.

-- 
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Fixing r-tree semantics
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing r-tree semantics