fix(compiler-cli): do not drop non-Angular decorators when downleveling #39577
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There is a compiler transform that downlevels Angular class decorators to static properties so that metadata is available for JIT compilation. The transform was supposed to ignore non-Angular decorators but it was actually completely dropping decorators that did not conform to a very specific syntactic shape (i.e. the decorator was a simple identifier, or a namespaced identifier). This commit ensures that all non-Angular decorators are kepts as-is even if they are built using a syntax that the Angular compiler does not understand. Fixes angular#39574
JoostK
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2020
|
@petebacondarwin FYI, presubmit is successful. |
mhevery
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2020
…ng (#39577) There is a compiler transform that downlevels Angular class decorators to static properties so that metadata is available for JIT compilation. The transform was supposed to ignore non-Angular decorators but it was actually completely dropping decorators that did not conform to a very specific syntactic shape (i.e. the decorator was a simple identifier, or a namespaced identifier). This commit ensures that all non-Angular decorators are kepts as-is even if they are built using a syntax that the Angular compiler does not understand. Fixes #39574 PR Close #39577
mhevery
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2020
…ng (#39577) There is a compiler transform that downlevels Angular class decorators to static properties so that metadata is available for JIT compilation. The transform was supposed to ignore non-Angular decorators but it was actually completely dropping decorators that did not conform to a very specific syntactic shape (i.e. the decorator was a simple identifier, or a namespaced identifier). This commit ensures that all non-Angular decorators are kepts as-is even if they are built using a syntax that the Angular compiler does not understand. Fixes #39574 PR Close #39577
|
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is a compiler transform that downlevels Angular class decorators
to static properties so that metadata is available for JIT compilation.
The transform was supposed to ignore non-Angular decorators but it was
actually completely dropping decorators that did not conform to a very
specific syntactic shape (i.e. the decorator was a simple identifier, or
a namespaced identifier).
This commit ensures that all non-Angular decorators are kepts as-is
even if they are built using a syntax that the Angular compiler does not
understand.
Fixes #39574