We are a society strangling in unnecessary words, circular constructions, pompous frills and meaningless jargon.

— William Zinsser, On Writing Well

In The Great Awakening vs The Great Reset Alexander Dugin writes:

The elites must seduce humanity, obtain from it—albeit vaguely— some consent. The Great Awakening calls for a decisive “No”!¹

Consent is what the Globalists want. They want permission, not because they’re polite, but because they know repeated consent slowly eradicates the will to resist. When they get consent they smile knowing it will be easier to get next time.

So the answer to their requests and to their demands, via a throng of useful idiots, should always be a resounding, “No.” It’s a shorter version of “I Will Not Comply.” There’s no need to scream it, yell it or be rude when we use it, but use it we must—without hesitation. With confidence.

One big advantage to using “No” is that 99 percent of elites and their useful idiots will have no trouble understanding what it means and the rest can ask their handlers. It’s concise. To the point. Its meaning is plain and simple.

In addition, its use requires very little energy. With the energy you save you can play with your kids, make love to your spouse, go for a hike in the woods, plant a garden or read subversive essays on Substack.

“All right, then,” your doctor says, “since you’re not vaccinated, let’s remedy that this afternoon.”
“No.”

Simple, right? So short and sweet the recipient of the declaration will be so taken off guard, they’ll have to spend time deciding if they heard you correctly and more time trying to craft an appropriate response to the seldom used tactic of a straightforward, short, direct reply. The beauty of it is both its elegance and its unambiguous meaning.

“I’m sorry, Sir, but you’ll need to wear a mask into the store.”
“No.”

Now you could ignore the person and just walk in, but with a “No” they’ll realize you did hear them and you are not going to comply. Their hesitation may allow you to get to the ice cream section before the SWAT team shows up.

“There in the back,” the male professor says, “Susan, can men get pregnant?”
“No.”

Now Susan might want to add, just for the hell of it, “Can you?”, but this is not a necessity. “No” is sufficient.

Like anything, practice, practice, practice. The more you say “No” the easier it will get even as the situations escalate—not to say they will, but it is good to be ready, to be prepared.

“Hello, Mrs. Jones, we’re with the FBI, we’d just like to ask you a few questions. Don’t worry, you’re not in any trouble. May we come in?”
“No.”

The Globalists need to hear one synchronous “No” from the people of the earth who have realized this is not a fight between East and West, Russia and the U.S., Black and White, Atheist and Theist, no, it is a fight against the Globalist elites who want to eradicate our rich, diverse cultures and traditions for their own nefarious ends. That is the battle.

“Stop eating meat and eat this.”
“No.”

“Leave the countryside and move into our 15 minute cities.”
“No.”

“Use our digital IDs.”
“No.”

“Accept my pronouns!”
“No.”

Use “No” freely. Use if often. Enjoy its use.

Granted, there may come a time when you’ll need to use two words. You’ll know when that time is and what two words to use.²

The Asylum’s first annual “NO!” Convention will take place in January of 2025. Learn all the basics of this extremely versatile word. Seminars will include:  “Beyond No,” “The Joy of No,” “More Joy of No,” “The Most Joy of No Ever,” “The History of No,” “The Future of No,” “Know No,” “No Time for Yes,” “A No is a No is a No,” “The Return of No” and “My Search for the Ultimate No.”

Share

Notes

1. Dugin, Alexander, The Great Awakening vs The Great Reset, Arktos, London, 2021. p. 22 (I will be reviewing this excellent book soon.)

2. The appropriate use of these two words can also be very powerful.