On 2013/01/15 2:20 PM, Damon McDougall wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently, it has become more and more common that the travis builds > fail. They fail not because the test suite fails but because of some > inherent issues with travis itself. Usually, either the git clone > fails or some other simple shell command fails. I consider these > 'failures' as being false negatives. While a false negative once or > twice a month would not be anything to worry about, I feel like this > is happening often enough to render the pull request status extremely > unhelpful. > > I realise the above is merely my opinion, but I feel that I would be > surprised if others did not find the Travis' false negative hit rate > tiresome.
Agreed. > > If practical, I would like to move away from travis and have our test > suite run on a more reliable service. How do others feel about this? > Good--but what is the superior alternative? I know nothing about who offers such services, why they do so, or the quality of the service. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612 _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
