Swami Krishna - Physics of Comets
Swami Krishna - Physics of Comets
indd 1
8/3/10 3:25 PM
Published:
Volume 1:
Volume 2:
Volume 3:
Volume 4:
Volume 5:
Volume 6:
Volume 7:
Volume 8:
An Invitation to Astrophysics
T. Padmanabhan
Volume 9:
Volume 10:
Volume 11:
Volume 12:
*Publication cancelled.
7/12/2010, 2:46 PM
K S Krishna Swamy
World Scientific
NEW JERSEY
7537tp.indd 2
LONDON
SINGAPORE
BEIJING
SHANGHAI
HONG KONG
TA I P E I
CHENNAI
8/3/10 3:25 PM
Published by
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224
USA office: 27 Warren Street, Suite 401-402, Hackensack, NJ 07601
UK office: 57 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9HE
For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright
Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to
photocopy is not required from the publisher.
ISBN-13 978-981-4291-11-8
ISBN-10 981-4291-11-0
Printed in Singapore.
7/12/2010, 2:46 PM
9:59
comets
Foreword
Only in recent years has the true nature of comets become evident.
With this knowledge has come the realization that comets are almost certainly debris left over from the building of the outermost planets. This
material must be typical of the gas and dust in the interstellar cloud from
which the Sun and planetary system evolved. Thus, comets appear to offer
us an opportunity to study primitive matter involved in the origin of the
solar system, material that has been stored in deep freeze for 4.6 109
years. At the same time, the comets provide a link with interstellar solids,
of which they are probably largely composed. The physical and chemical
study of comets has now replaced classical celestial mechanics as the major
focus of observational and theoretical research. Familiar areas of astronomical spectroscopy are approached from a somewhat unusual point of view in
cometary studies, while comets provide an entirely new laboratory for an increased understanding of magneto-hydrodynamics. On the other extreme,
the physics of amorphous ices and other solids can be applied to probe the
internal structure, origin and activity of the comet nuclei. In summation,
the study of comets has now become a manifold discipline with fascinating
potential, particularly as the space age provides new observational input
over the entire electromagnetic spectrum, coupled with the expectation of
direct in situ studies and even the eventual return of samples from cometary
nuclei. The marked progress in this direction is represented by the new results described in this books revised (second) edition. The several missions
to Halleys comet have filled in many lacunae of comet knowledge.
Fred L. Whipple
9:59
Preface
We are in an exciting era of cometary science. This has come about due
to space mission to comets, launch of several satellites and ground based
studies. The first major space adventure was in 1986 when six spacecraft
passed through Comet Halley as close as 500 km from the nucleus. More
recently, the far more adventures venture of the Deep Impact Mission to
Comet Tempel 1 and Stardust Mission to Comet Wild 2 made it possible for
the first time to look at the material in the deeper layers of the cometary
nuclei and to study in the laboratory the collected cometary dust. All
these studies have given rise to exciting and unexpected results which have
raised some fundamental issues about comets and in turn on the solar
system itself. For example, the detection of X-rays from comets was a
real challenge in its understanding. The observed diversity in chemical
composition among comets has direct bearing on the formation conditions
in the solar nebula. The mineralogy of dust in IDPs, comets, meteorites,
asteroids and circumstellar shell of stars are quite similar showing generic
relationship between them.
In view of these exciting developments it is an appropriate time to revise
and update the second edition of the book Physics of Comets published
in 1997. Therefore extensive revision has been carried out in most of the
chapters. Emphasis has been to include all the new results with the hope
that the flavour of excitement may be conveyed to the reader. The general
arrangement, purpose and level of the updated and revised edition of the
book remains the same as that of second edition.
I am especially grateful to my colleagues, H.M. Antia who helped me in
various ways and especially in the preparation of figures and S. Ramadurai
for a thorough reading of the manuscript. I would also like to express my
gratitude to my family and parents for their support and encouragement.
vii
comets
9:59
viii
comets
Physics of Comets
I would like to thank all the publishers and authors who have given permission for the reproduction of figures and tables. The help of Mr. Vivek
Vengurlekar in the preparation of the manuscript is highly appreciated. My
interaction with several astronomers have been very helpful and especially,
the cometary experts like, M.F.AHearn, P.D. Feldman, W.F. Huebner,
M.J. Mumma, C.R.ODell and J. Watanabe.
K S Krishna Swamy
204, Sigma Tower
Plot 32, Gorai Road
Borivali West
Mumbai 400 091, India
9:59
comets
Contents
Foreword
Preface
1.
General Introduction
1.1. Historical Perspective
1.2. Discovery . . . . . . .
1.3. Appearance . . . . . .
1.4. Statistics . . . . . . .
1.5. Importance . . . . . .
1.6. Brightness . . . . . .
1.7. Main Characteristics
1.8. Spacecraft Encounters
1.9. An Overall View . . .
Problems . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . .
2.
vii
1
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
with
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
Comets
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Dynamics
1
4
5
6
9
10
13
19
23
30
30
33
2.1.
2.2.
Orbital Elements . . . . . . . .
Orbit in Space . . . . . . . . .
2.2.1. Relevant equations . .
2.2.2. Orbital elements from
2.2.3. Orbital elements from
Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ix
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
position and velocity
observations . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
33
35
35
40
41
45
46
9:59
comets
Physics of Comets
3.
Physical Aspects
47
3.1.
3.2.
3.3.
3.4.
3.5.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Spectra
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Spectra of Coma
5.1.
47
49
49
50
51
51
54
57
58
59
61
64
64
65
67
68
69
70
72
73
74
75
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Fluorescence Process . . . . . . . . . .
5.1.1. Rotational structure . . . . . .
5.1.2. Vibrational structure . . . . .
5.1.3. Comparison with observations
5.1.4. Case of C2 molecule . . . . . .
5.1.5. Prompt emission lines of OH .
5.1.6. Molecules other than diatomic
76
90
92
93
93
95
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
95
98
101
102
108
114
118
9:59
comets
Contents
xi
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6.2.
6.3.
6.4.
6.5.
6.6.
6.7.
Theoretical Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1.1. From the total luminosity . . . . . . .
6.1.2. From surface brightness distribution .
6.1.3. From number densities . . . . . . . .
6.1.4. Semi-empirical photometric theory . .
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2.1. OH and H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2.2. H2 O, H2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2.3. CN, C2 , C3 , NH . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2.4. CH, NH2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2.5. CO, CO2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2.6. CS, S2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2.7. Ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2.8. Complex molecules . . . . . . . . . .
6.2.9. O, C, N, S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Analysis of Hydrogen Observations . . . . . .
6.3.1. Analysis of Lyman measurements .
6.3.2. Analysis of H observations . . . . .
Related Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.4.1. Gas-phase chemistry in the coma . .
6.4.2. In situ mass spectrometer for ions . .
6.4.3. Temperature and velocity of the coma
Parent Molecules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chemical Diversity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
118
121
121
123
125
125
128
128
130
137
137
138
141
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
gas
. . .
. . .
. . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
142
142
144
149
151
152
152
158
162
166
167
169
169
171
176
183
183
189
191
191
194
196
202
206
207
9:59
xii
comets
Physics of Comets
Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
7.
Dust Tails
7.1. Dynamics . . . . .
7.2. Anti-tail . . . . .
7.3. Dust Trails . . . .
7.4. Sodium Gas Tails
7.5. Dust features . . .
Problems . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . .
8.
213
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
227
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
9.2.
9.3.
9.4.
213
220
222
222
223
225
226
Visible Continuum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.1.1. Albedo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.1.2. Phase function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.1.3. Dust production rate from continuum . . .
9.1.4. Dust production from A()f . . . . . . .
Polarization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.2.1. Linear polarization . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.2.2. Circular polarization . . . . . . . . . . . .
Grain Sizes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Infrared Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.4.1. Dust production from infrared observations
228
228
230
231
232
233
233
234
238
243
246
247
249
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
249
255
256
257
259
261
261
266
268
269
272
9:59
comets
Contents
xiii
9.4.2. Anti-tail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.5. Spectral Feature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.5.1. Silicate signature . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.5.2. Mineralogy of dust particles . . . . .
9.5.3. The C-H stretch feature . . . . . . . .
9.5.4. Ice signature . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.6. Properties Derived from Direct Measurements
9.7. Radiation Pressure Effects . . . . . . . . . . .
9.8. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Ion Tails
Evidence for the Solar Wind . . . . . .
Dynamical Aberration . . . . . . . . . .
Theoretical Considerations . . . . . . .
10.3.1. Comparison with observations
10.4. Instabilities and Waves . . . . . . . . .
10.5. Acceleration of Cometary Ions . . . . .
10.6. Large Scale Structures . . . . . . . . .
10.6.1. Tail rays or streamers . . . . .
10.6.2. Knots or condensations . . . .
10.6.3. Oscillatory structure . . . . . .
10.6.4. Swan-like feature . . . . . .
10.6.5. Bend in the tail . . . . . . . .
10.6.6. Disconnection events . . . . .
10.7. X-rays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10.8. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Nucleus
11.1.
11.2.
11.3.
11.4.
11.5.
11.6.
Morphology . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Theory of Vapourization . . . . . .
Outbursts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Albedo and Radius . . . . . . . . .
Mass, Density and Surface Gravity .
Rotation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
276
278
279
281
288
289
290
294
296
298
299
303
10.1.
10.2.
10.3.
11.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
303
304
308
314
318
321
323
324
325
325
326
326
328
330
335
335
336
339
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
339
340
348
350
353
355
9:59
xiv
Physics of Comets
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Index
359
360
361
365
370
375
376
377
377
381
14.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Origin
12.1.
12.2.
13.
comets
381
384
389
391
396
398
398
399
401
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
401
406
411
416
419
420
423
424
426
431
432
435
Epilogue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 435
Future studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 437
441
9:59
CHAPTER 1
General Introduction
1.1.
Historical Perspective
Among the various objects of the solar system, comets have attracted
and fascinated the common man to a large extent for the last two thousand
years or so. This information comes from the ancient records of paintings or
drawings of comets on caves, clothes, etc. as well as from the observations
of early writers. It was not until the sixteenth century that comets were
demonstrated to be celestial objects. This came from the work of Tycho
Brahe who observed the bright comet of 1577 AD with accurate instruments
and from various locations in Europe. This really revolutionized the ideas
about comets and from then on, observers took a serious view of comets
and started making position measurements.
The complete credit for the discovery that comets are part of the solar system goes to Edmond Halley. Halley, using Newtonian mechanics,
showed that the comets which had appeared in 1531, 1607 and 1682 are
the one and the same with a period of about 75 12 years. He also noticed
that the time interval between the successive perihelion passages was not
the same. He concluded rightly that this could be due to the perturbation
of the cometary orbit produced by the planets Jupiter and Saturn. Following these successes, he predicted that the same comet would return in
1758. As predicted, the comet did appear in 1758, though Halley, dead by
then, was not there to witness the glorious triumph of his prediction. This
comet is therefore named after him. In recent years this comet has been
traced backwards through many centuries by several investigators through
orbit calculations. Through this work, it has been possible to identify every
appearance of the comet as shown by ancient records until about 240 BC.
So far, it seems to have made about twenty-eight appearances.
comets
9:59
Physics of Comets
Fig. 1.1 A portion of the Bayeux tapestry showing the 1066 apparition of Comet Halley.
The tapestry depicts the people pointing at the comet with fear for its effect on King
Harold of England (Report of the Science Working Group. The International Halley,
Watch, NASA, July 1980).
the English King Harold who is being told of the bad omen. Such types
of association of Comet Halley with the occurrence of bad things on Earth
have also been made for many other apparitions. The last apparition of
Comet Halley in 1910 drew wide publicity (Fig. 1.2). It was very bright
and enormous in extent. Actually the Earth passed through the tenuous
gas of this comets tail.
There was also the fear that a comet might collide with the Earth and
bring disastrous consequences. There are several indirect observational evidences, such as the presence of Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, Tunguska
event and so on, which show that such events must have happened on the
Earth in the past. The collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter
during July 1994 has given supporting evidence, although the probability
of such an event happening on the Earth is very small. With the passage of
time some of the fears have been erased from the peoples minds. Today the
appearance of a bright comet in the sky like that of the Comet Ikeya-Seki of
comets
9:59
General Introduction
comets
Fig. 1.2 Some of the newspaper headlines which appeared in The New York Times
during Comet Halleys appearance in 1910 (Report of the Science Working Group, loc,
cit.).
1965, Comet West in 1975, Comet Hale-Bopp in 1995 or the Comet Hyakutake in 1996 is welcomed both by the scientists and the public at large.
Scientists look forward to observing and studying these objects and understanding their nature. The public look forward to viewing a spectacular
and colourful event in the sky.
During early times, comets were studied more from the point of their
dynamics. This was made possible through the efforts of many pioneers in
celestial mechanics. These extensive dynamical studies of various comets
have shown, for the first time, the existence of some important physical
effects like the presence of non-gravitational forces in comets. With the
passage of time, cometary research has evolved from the study of dynamics
9:59
Physics of Comets
to the study of these objects per se. Specifically, in the last three or four
decades, emphasis has been laid more in understanding the origin, physics
and chemistry of these objects. The presence of complex organic molecules
including molecules of biological interest in comets, which may have some
relation to the existence of life on Earth, has interested biologists too, in
the study of comets.
1.2.
Discovery
Many comets are discovered by amateur astronomers who just scan the
sky with a low-power telescope. They are called comet seekers. The
comets are usually named after their discoverers. If two or even more
observers find the same comet nearly simultaneously, all the names are
attached to that comet. For example, the Comet Ikeya-Seki (1965 VIII)
which was visible to the naked eye in 1965, was discovered by two Japanese
amateurs, Ikeya and Seki. However, not all comets are found by amateurs.
Many are being discovered nowadays by astronomers in their photographic
plates taken from some other scientific study. A typical example of this class
is Comet Kohoutek (1973 XII) discovered in 1973. Comets discovered by
them are fainter as the professional astronomers have better instruments.
Several comets have also been discovered through satellites, such as Solar
Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO). In addition to the names of the discoverers, comets are also assigned temporary designations, indicating the
year of their discovery followed by a small letter denoting the order of their
discovery in that year. For example, the first two comets found in the
year say 1968, are designated as 1968a and 1968b respectively. Later on
when the orbits of all the comets discovered in that particular year are well
determined, permanent designations are given. This consists of the year
in which the comet passed nearest to the Sun i.e., perihelion, followed by
a Roman numeral which indicates the order of perihelion passage during
that year. Hence, the comets mentioned above will be given the permanent
designations 1968I and 1968II and so on. If the comet is periodic, one also
attaches P to the name of the comet. Thus the periodic Comet Encke is
written as P/Encke.
However, in this system of naming of comets, there is the difficulty
sometimes in deciding whether a particular object is a comet or a minor
planet. e.g. 2060 Chiron, 1990 UL3=1990P=1990XVI. In addition, confusion can creep in when the better orbit of the comet becomes available
comets
9:59
General Introduction
comets
1.3.
Appearance
Comets spend almost all their time at great distances from the Sun. The
cometary activity starts showing up only when it approaches the Sun. At
far-off distances from the Sun, it appears as a faint fuzzy patch of light. The
fuzzy patch of light is a cloud of gas and dust called coma. The coma grows
in size and brightens as it nears the Sun. In addition to the brightening
of the coma, the tail starts developing and reaches its maximum extent at
about the closest approach to the Sun. After its perihelion passage, the reverse process takes place in the sense that the comet starts fading away as it
recedes from the Sun. These effects can be seen clearly in the time sequence
photographs of Comet Halley Halley, as shown in Fig. 1.3. Cometary activity is therefore transient in nature. These observations clearly show that
the material composed of gas and dust must have come from a central compact solid source called the nucleus of comet. The diameter of the nucleus
is extremely small and is estimated to be about 1 to 10 km. This size is so
small that it appears as a point source and cannot be resolved even with
the largest telescope. On the other hand, the diameter of the coma is much
larger and lies in the range of about 104 to 105 km. The nucleus and the
coma forms the head of a comet. The most characteristic feature of a comet
is the tail which may extend up to about 107 to 108 km.
9:59
Physics of Comets
Fig. 1.3 Shows the time sequence photographs of Comet Halley in 1910 which brings
out the transient nature of comets (Report of the Science Working Group, loc. cit.).
1.4.
Statistics
The rate of discovery of comets has increased steadily since the beginning of the century. In recent times more and more fainter comets are also
being discovered due to vast improvement in the observational techniques
and also due to several systematic search programmes. On an average,
around 25 to 30 comets are seen every year. Of these, the newly discovered
comets are around 12 to 15 per year and the recoverable ones are around
13 to 15 per year. Comets are classified based on their orbital periods. The
general convention which has been followed is that short-period comets are
those which have periods (P) less than 200 years. Those which have periods greater than 200 years are called long-period comets. The short period
comets are further subdivided into two classes. Comets with periods < 20
years are called Jupiter-family comets (JFCs) and cluster around Jupiter
comets
9:59
General Introduction
comets
(semi major axis 7.4 AU). Those comets whose periods is in the range
20 < P < 200 years are called Halley- type comets (HTCs) with Comet
Halley as prototype. The semi major axis lies in the range of around 7.4 to
34.2 AU. Halley - type comets may be considered as short-period extension
of long-period comets. Among the newly discovered comets, about 810
are long period comets and 5 are short period ones. Most of these comets
are generally faint. The bright comets and, in particular, the sun-grazing
comets occur occasionally. Comets have been seen as close as 0.01 AU from
the Earth. Comets have also been classified as old and new based purely
on their orbital characteristics. Comets which have made several perihelion
passages around the Sun are generally termed old and those which are
entering for the first time are called new. If the direction of motion of the
comet is the same as that of the Earths motion, in its orbit, it is said to
have a direct orbit. If they are in opposite directions, the comet is said to
have a retrograde orbit.
More than 1000 Comets are known. The ratio of long-period to shortperiod comets is 5 : 1. For Jupiter-family comets, the peak in the orbital
period occurs around 7 to 8 years. The median orbital period of Halleytype comets is around 70.5 years. But in short-period comets, the period
of a few years has also been seen as in the case of Comet Encke which has a
period of 3.3 years. Among the long period comets, most of them seem to
have parabolic and osculating elliptical orbits. It is of interest to know how
far the comets reach away from the Sun in their orbit, which is called the
aphelion distance. Figure 1.4 shows a histogram of the number of comets
versus aphelion distance. A peak in the distribution occurs around 5 AU,
which corresponds roughly to the distance of Jupiter which are the Jupiterfamily comets. The general pattern of the histogram remain roughly the
same with the addition of more comets. On the other hand, the long-period
comets seem to peak around 4104 AU (Fig. 12.1). Those with a < 104 AU
are often called returning comets and those with a > 104 AU are called
dynamically new comets. It is also found that for most of the comets the
closest approach to the Sun, called the perihelion distance, is around 0.6 to
1.5 AU. The distribution of inclination to the ecliptic plane of short and long
period comets are striking. The short period comets have inclinations < 20
to 30 and the median inclination is around 11 . The median inclination
for Halley-type comets is around 64 . However, for long-period comets, the
inclinations are randomly distributed. They also approach the Sun more
or less isotropically. The short-period comets generally have direct orbits
while long-period comets have both direct and retrograde oribits.
9:59
Physics of Comets
Fig. 1.4 Shows the distribution of the number of comets as a function of the aphelion
distance for short period comets. The peak around Jupiters distance can clearly be
seen. Smaller peaks at the distances of other planets also appear to be present (Bailey,
M.E., Clube, S.V.M. and Napier, W.M. 1990. The Origin of Comets, Pergamon Press).
comets
9:59
General Introduction
comets
1.5.
Importance
9:59
10
comets
Physics of Comets
study of the ion tails of comets. After a large number of revolutions around
the Sun, the cometary activity may die out completely leading finally to
a residual solid nucleus, which possibly may lead to an asteroid. Comets
are also believed to be the sources of meteors and interplanetary dust. It
is generally believed that the origin of comets is intimately related to the
origin of the solar system, a problem of great current interest. Therefore,
the study of comets can provide clues which may help in understanding the
origin and evolution of the solar system. There is also generic relationship
between comets with the interplanetary dust particles, meteorites, asteroids
and interstellar matter. In addition to these possible interrelationships, the
comets themselves are interesting objects to study, as their nature and
origin are still not well understood.
1.6.
Brightness
One of the uncertain facts about a comet is its brightness. The comet
shines mostly due to the reflected sunlight at far-off distances from the Sun.
The brightness depends upon three factors: (i) the distance r from the Sun
to the comet: (ii) the nature of the comet and (iii) the distance from the
comet to the earth. The brightness depends upon the nature of the comet
as it is the one which is producing the observed radiation.
The expected brightness of a comet I, can be written as
Io
()
(1.1)
r2 2
where () is the appropriate phase function which is not important for
the total brightness, Io is the constant of proportionality, usually taken to
be the brightness of the comet at r = = 1 AU. It has been found that
the brightness of comets rarely follow a simple relation of the above type.
Figure 1.5 shows results for a few comets. Mostly the power of r is greater
than 2. One usually writes a modified form of Eq. (1.1) as
I=
Io
.
rn 2
The above equation can be written in terms of magnitudes as
I=
(1.2)
(1.3)
where m refers to the total apparent magnitude and m0 the absolute magnitude formally corresponding to r = = 1 AU. The study of a large number
of comets has given a pretty good idea as to the variation of brightness with
9:59
General Introduction
comets
11
Fig. 1.5 The magnitude of the comet reduced to a standard distance of 1 AU from the
Earth is plotted as a function of log of the solar distance in AU. Circles and dots refer
to observations made before and after perihelion respectively (Jacchia, L.G. 1974. Sky
and Telescope 47, 216; courtesy of Sky and Telescope).
Table 1.1
Comet
mo
Arend-Rigaux
Tuttle
Kobayashi-Berger-Milon
West
Machholz
Meier
Klemola
10.9
7.97
7.34
5.94
6.5
9.3
9.7
4
6
3.8
2.4
4
4
4
9:59
12
comets
Physics of Comets
Table 1.2
Orbit Class
II
III
IV
2.8 106
Pre-Perihelion Dominated
10
0.43
2.45
0.35
Post-Perihelion Dominated
15
1.20
3.16
0.26
2.8 106
104
104
103
103
25
5
0.90
3.11
0.71
5
1.17
3.32
0.52
6
0.71
3.83
0.49
16
1.54
3.87
0.58
9
0.88
4.48
0.53
17
0.80
4.94
0.79
Number of Comets
hqi(AU)
hni
(n)
Number of Comets
hqi(AU)
hni
(n)
(Whipple, F.L. 1991, In Comets in the Post-Halley Era, Eds. R.L. Newburn, Jr.
et al., Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 1259).
where P is the period. Table 1.2 give weighted mean perihelion distance
hqi, the weighted mean hni and (n) the mean error of hni. The mean value
of n shows a variation with the comet class and with the age of the comet
(i.e. inversely with the period). This is indicated for both pre-and post -q
data. The post -q observations give a considerably larger value of hni than
the pre -q observations. In general, the large value of n required for comets
arises due to the fact that the brightness is the sum total of the reflection
component and the emission of gases from the coma. For the case of pure
9:59
General Introduction
comets
13
(1.4)
where
m(r) = m0 + 2.5n log r.
From the observed light curve, the value of m(r) can be calculated from
Eq. (1.4) as a function of the time from the perihelion passage ( r).
Figure 1.6 shows the results of such calculations for Comet Crommelin
(1984 IV) based on the last four apparitions. Based on Eq. (1.4) and the
curve of Fig. 1.6, the expected brightness can be predicted.
1.7.
Main Characteristics
9:59
14
Physics of Comets
Fig. 1.6 A plot of the heliocentric magnitude of the Comet Crommelin as a function
of time (equivalent to perihelion distance) from perihelion for four different appearances
(Festou, M. 1983. International Halley Watch News Letter No. 3, p. 4).
Most of the comets seem to deviate from their predicted orbits. They are
known to arrive into the solar vicinity earlier or later than the predictions
based on Newtonian gravitation. The classic example for which the data
exist for the last two centuries is Comet Encke, which has a period of 3.3
years. It arrives earlier every time by about 2 21 hours. The splitting of
the nuclei of comets into two or more fragments has been seen in many
comets. The best example is Comet West (1975VI) in which the nuclei
split up into four components in a time span of a few days. This can be
seen from Fig. 1.7. There appears to be some correlation between the
time of fragmentation and the increase in brightness of the comet. This
might mean that a spurt of cometary activity leads to fragmentation. For
sun-grazing or planet grazing comets the splitting might also take place
because of the tidal forces. The classic example is the nucleus of Comet
Shoemaker-Levy 9 (D/1993 F2) which is believed to have fragmented into
several pieces primarily due to the tidal forces exerted by Jupiter during
its closest approach in July 1992. The spectacular feature of such an event
comets
9:59
General Introduction
comets
15
Fig. 1.7 Photograph shows the splitting of the nucleus of the Comet West 1975 VI into
four parts in a time period of 10 days. The separation of the various components with
time can easily be seen (Whipple, F.L. 1978. In Cosmic Dust, ed. J.A.M. McDonnell,
New York: John Wiley and Sons, p. 1).
is that as many as 21 nuclei all in a line, were discovered in mid July 1993.
(Fig. 1.8). The subsequent orbit of these fragments and their collision with
Jupiter in July 1994 is schematically shown in Fig. 1.9.
Comets which come very close to the Sun can be completely destroyed.
An example of this type is shown in Fig. 1.10 which was discovered accidentally in the satellite observation and shows the time sequence photograph
of a comet. After its closest approach to the Sun, the comet was not visible
at all, most probably due to complete evaporation or falling into Sun.
Many comets show a sudden increase in brightness of one to two magnitudes in a short time scale usually called outbursts or flares. These outbursts
are not periodic in character. An outburst may mean a sudden release of
9:59
16
Physics of Comets
Fig. 1.8 Image of Shoemaker-Levy 9 taken with the Hubble space Telescope on July 1,
1993. The comets heliocentric distance was 5.46 AU and the geocentric distance was 5.4
AU. The various fragments of the comet can clearly be seen. (Courtesy of H.A. Weaver
and collaborators).
material from the nucleus. A classic example in which the flares have been
seen very frequently is Comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 1. Figure 1.11
shows one such event for this comet. This comet has a period of 16.5 years
and has been seen to brighten as much as 8 magnitudes. The flaring activity appears to be a general property of comets and is not associated with
any particular type of comet. A strong outbursts was seen in Comet Halley
even at a heliocentric distance of around 14 AU.
In many comets successive halos coming out of the coma have also been
seen. Comet Donati (1858VI) is an example of this class where the successive halos can distinctly be seen (Fig. 1.12). In many comets a broad
fan-shaped coma coming out of the central condensation has also been seen.
The satellite observations in the Lyman line of hydrogen at 1216
A
led to the discovery of the enormous extent of the hydrogen envelope (
comets
9:59
General Introduction
comets
17
Fig. 1.9 The orbit of the Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 around Jupiter is shown schematically. The comet which appears to have come close to Jupiter around July 8, 1992 was
disintegrated due to Jupiters tidal force. This comet discovered in March 25, 1993 had
as much as 21 components. These components penetrated Jupiters atmosphere during
July 16 to 22, 1994 (Courtesy of Sekanina, Z., Chodas, P.W. and Yeomans, D.K.).
107 km) around the visible coma of about 104 to 105 km. The size of the
hydrogen halo was found to be larger than the size of the Sun at the same
distance. This can clearly be seen in the observations of Comet Kohoutek
which is shown in Fig. 1.13.
The most characteristic feature of a comet is, of course, the presence
of two tails. One is the dust tail which is curved, also called Type II tail.
The other is the plasma tail which is straight, also called Type I tail or ion
9:59
18
Physics of Comets
Fig. 1.10 Time sequence photographs taken between August 30, 18h 56m to August 31,
20h 36m by Solwind satellite show the disappearance of the comet. The comet enters
from the right. The photographs are taken by Howard, R.A., Koomen, M.J. and Michels
D.I. official US Navy photograph. (Courtesy of Howard, R.A. and collaborators).
tail. Figure 1.14 shows these two well-developed tails for the Comet Mrkos
(1957V). Both the tails point to the direction away from the Sun. The
nature of these two tails can be seen clearly in the colour photographs in
which the dust tail appears yellowish and the plasma tail bluish in colour.
Quite often a third short tail has also been seen in the direction towards
the Sun. This is called the anti-tail of the comet. Figure 1.15 shows an
example of this class for Comet Arend-Roland (1957 III).
The dust tail is generally very smooth and structureless. But this is not
so in the case of the plasma tail. Large scale structures of various kinds
comets
9:59
General Introduction
comets
19
have been seen in the plasma tail of comets. As the name indicates, this
tail is composed mainly of ions. Therefore many of the features seen in
the laboratory plasma arising out of various physical processes as well as
others, which cannot be seen in the laboratory plasma, have also been seen
in the plasma tail of comets. For example features like oscillations, kinks,
helices, knots, filaments, rays etc., have been seen in many comets. These
indicate clearly the presence of complex interactions of the magnetic field
with the tail plasma. Some typical large scale observed features in comets
are shown in Figs. 1.16 to 1.18.
1.8.
The general nature of comets has been revealed mainly through indirect
means from the studies of ground based observations, rockets, aeroplanes
and satellites. However space mission to comets will provide an opportunity
to make in situ measurements of a comet. Since this is almost like direct
access, it will provide more detailed information about the nucleus. With
this in view several space missions to comets have been undertaken. They
are given in Table 1.3. The main objective of space missions are, to image
the nucleus for its morphology; to determine the composition of gas and
dust; and to understand the interaction of the solar wind with the cometary
ionosphere.
9:59
20
Physics of Comets
Fig. 1.12 Successive halos around Comet Donati (1858 VI) as observed visually by
Bond on October 1858 (Whipple, F.L. 1981. In Comets and Origin of Life, ed. C.
Ponnamperuma, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, p. 1).
Comet Halley was the first comet to be studied in great detail from
several spacecrafts in 1986. Even prior to Comet Halley observations, in
situ measurements of particles, fields and waves were carried out by the ICE
satellite (International Cometary Explorer). It passed through the plasma
tail of Comet Giacobini-Zinner on September 11, 1985.
During March 1986, around the time of the closest approach of Comet
Halley to the Sun, six spacecrafts from various space agencies made detailed
and extensive in situ measurements of various kinds in the coma of Comet
Halley (Fig. 1.19). All the encounters took place on the Sunward side of
comets
9:59
General Introduction
comets
21
Fig. 1.13 Comet Kohoutek (1973 XII) as seen in visible (left) and in ultraviolet region
taken in Lyman line (right). Circle represents the apparent size of the Sun at the same
distance. The vast extent of the hydrogen halo can clearly be seen. (Whipple, F.L. 1981,
loc. cit.).
the comet. The closest approach to the nucleus was made by the European
Space Agencys (ESA) Spacecraft Giotto, which passed at a distance of
approximately 500 km from the nucleus. The Russian spacecrafts Vega
1 and 2 passed at distances of around 8000 km from the nucleus. The
distances of the closest approach of the Japanese spacecrafts Suisei and
Sakigake were around 1.5 105 km and 7.0 106 km respectively. The ICE
spacecraft also passed through at a distance of around 0.2 AU upstream
of Comet Halley later in March 1986. Another space encounter with a
comet took place on July 10, 1992 when the Giotto Spacecraft, which was
successfully redirected in July 1990, passed through the Comet P/GriggSkjellerup nucleus within 100 to 200 km.
The Comet Halley, with a period of about 76 yrs, moves in a retrograde
motion with respect to the planets. Due to the retrograde motion of Comet
Halley with respect to the Earth and the Spacecrafts, the relative encounter
velocity was very high, 68 km/sec. Since the gas and dust velocities in
the coma are 1 km/sec, the Giotto Spacecraft essentially saw the static
situation while it passed through the coma as particles hit the spacecraft
from the forward direction. The scientific payload on the spacecrafts, which
9:59
22
Physics of Comets
Fig. 1.14 Photograph of Comet Mrkos (1957V) taken on 27 August 1957 which shows
the characteristic feature of the two tails, ion tail (straight) and the dust tail (curved).
(Arpigny, C. 1977, Proceedings of the Robert A. Welch Foundation Conferences on
Chemical Research XXI, Cosmochemistry, Houston).
passed through Comet Halley, had experiments for the study of flux and
composition of neutrals, ions, electrons and dust, magnetic field and waves,
imaging the nucleus, infrared spectra and ultraviolet images among others.
The space missions, Deep Space 1, Stardust and Deep Impact also
made in situ measurements of various kinds in the Comets 19P/Borrelly,
81P/Wild 2 and 9P/Tempel 1 respectively. The cometary material from
Comet Wild 2 was successfully brought back to the earth by Stardust mission. This is the first time, laboratory studies are being carried out on the
real cometary dust particles.
The Deep Impact mission released a projectile which impacted on the
surface of the nucleus of Comet Tempel 1 resulting in a crater on the nucleus. As a result, the vapourized ejecta from the deeper layers came out.
This material was subjected to a thorough investigation, in addition to
studying the crater itself. This gave an opportunity for the first time to
study the material in the deeper layers of the nucleus of a comet. All these
missions have met with tremendous success. They provide new insights into
the nature of nucleus, coma, dust and the tails. These observations were
supplemented by extensive observations of various kinds carried out with
worldwide ground based telescopes, satellites, rockets and Kuiper Airborne
comets
9:59
General Introduction
comets
23
Fig. 1.15 Photograph of Comet Arend-Roland (1957III) which shows the anti-tail
(sharp ray towards the left). Taken on 24 April 1957 (Whipple, F.L. 1981, loc. cit.).
Observatory, with sophisticated instrumentation by professionals and amateur astronomers to obtain as much coverage as possible, over the orbit of
the comets. This co-ordinated effort of an unprecedented nature have not
only confirmed our knowledge about comets, theories and hypothesis that
existed before these measurements were made, but have also provided new
and unexpected insight into the cometary phenomena.
1.9.
An Overall View
The various aspects of cometary phenomena has come from studies carried out over the entire range of the electromagnetic spectrum from X-rays
to radio region, from in situ measurement of comets and from laboratory
studies of cometary dust particles brought back to earth. All these studies
had a tremendous impact on Cometary Science.
The three major parts of a comet are the nucleus, the coma and the
9:59
24
Physics of Comets
Fig. 1.16 Comet Kohoutek showing the helical structure. Photograph was taken on 13
January 1974. The oscillations in the tail at far off distances from the head can clearly
be seen. (Brandt, J.C. and Chapman, R.C. 1981. Introduction to Comets, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, illustrations credited to Joint Observatory for Cometary
Research (JOCR), NASA).
tail (Fig. 1.20). Most of the information about these three components has
come basically from the study of spectra. Almost all the observed activities
seen in a comet should be related directly or indirectly to the nucleus of
a comet. A reasonable working model for the nucleus which is the icyconglomerate model was first proposed by Whipple in the 1950s. In this
model the nucleus was believed to be a discrete rotating body consisting
of frozen water, complex molecules formed out of abundant elements H,
C, N and O, and dust. All the subsequent observations of comets for the
last four decades had supported this model by indirect means, basically
through the observation of the dissociated products of H2 O (i.e. OH, H
and O) and H2 O+ . The first actual detection of H2 O in a comet came from
the observation of Comet Halley in 1986, when well resolved rotational
lines of the 2.7 m band of H2 O were detected with observations carried
out with the Kuiper Airborne Observatory. The nucleus contains around
80% of H2 O-ice and the rest is made up of other constituents. The single
body nature of the nucleus, in contrast to that of loosely bound system,
comets
9:59
comets
General Introduction
May 12, 2010
15:37
25
comets
General Introduction
25
Fig. 1.17 Photograph showing a big knot in the tail of Comet Kohoutek. This is
generally called as Swan-like feature. The photograph was taken on 11 January 1974
(Brandt, J.C. and Chapman, R.C. 1981, loc. cit. JOCR photograph).
Fig. 1.17 Photograph showing a big knot in the tail of Comet Kohoutek. This is
generally called as Swan-like feature. The photograph was taken on 11 January 1974
(Brandt, J.C. and Chapman, R.C. 1981, loc. cit. JOCR photograph).
Table 1.3
Spacecrafts to Comets.
Table 1.3
Comet
Spacecraft
Halley
6 spacecrafts
Borrelly
Deep Space 1
Wild 2
Tempel 1
Launch
date
Spacecrafts to Comets.
Date of
closest
approach
Distance of
closest
approach
(Km)
Period of
Comet
(yr)
Remarks
March 1986
Giotto
500
76
Oct.25, 1998
Sept.22, 2001
2171
6.9
Stardust
Feb.7, 1999
Jan.2, 2004
100-150
6.4
Deep Impact
Jan.12, 2005
July 4, 2005
500
5.5
Out of 6 spacecrafts,
Giotto mission was
the closest
Extended mission
to comet after
asteroid flyby
Returned to Earth on
Jan.15, 2006 with
cometary dust
104 tons of material
was excavated from
the nucleus
All these results have been confirmed with further observations carried out
with Deep Space 1 on Comet Borrelly; Stardust on Comet Wild 2; and
Deep Impact on Comet Tempel 1. The shapes and sizes of the cometary
9:59
26
Physics of Comets
Fig. 1.18 Photograph of Comet Halley showing well developed streamers. Taken on 8
May 1910. (Report of the Science Working Group, loc.cit.).
nuclei have been determined from the images taken at different angles.
When the comet is far off from the Sun, the continuum spectrum seen
is simply that of the reflected sunlight by the nucleus. As it approaches the
Sun, the gas, mostly made up of complex molecules and the dust are released from the nucleus, due to solar heating. This then expands outwards
into the vacuum at about 0.5 km/sec giving rise to the observed coma. The
dimension of the visible coma is around 104 to 105 km, while the ultraviolet
coma extends up to about 106 to 107 km. As the gas expands, it is subjected to various physical processes like dissociation, ionization, gas-phase
comets
9:59
General Introduction
comets
27
Fig. 1.19 The geometry of the six spacecraft flybys to Comet Halley. The distances are
marked in logarithmic scale and the Sun is to the left of the Comet. The flyby dates for
each mission are given at the bottom, flyby phase angle in the centre and flyby speeds
at the top (Mendis, D.A. 1988. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 26, 11).
9:59
28
Physics of Comets
Fig. 1.20
comets
9:59
General Introduction
comets
29
9:59
30
Physics of Comets
beyond the orbit of Neptune, between 30 and 50 AU. This region is generally
called the Kuiper belt. The origin of comets therefore is related to the origin
of the Oort cloud and the Kuiper belt. Several hypotheses have been put
forward to explain the origin of these clouds.
In the succeeding chapters, we would like to elaborate on some of these
aspects. Before going into the actual subject matter, we would like to give
a brief account of the physical background required for the interpretation
of various observed phenomena.
Problems
1. What is the basis of the assumption that a comet possesses a nucleus
at its centre? Since it is hard to see the nucleus of a comet directly,
what is the best way to locate it?
2. Suppose a Comet A has n = 3 [Eq. (1.2)] in its 50th orbit around the
Sun while Comet B has n = 6 in its first orbit around the Sun. Does
one expect the same brightness variation of Comets A and B in their
next orbits? Give reasons. Explain why the two values of n could be
vastly different.
3. Is it possible for the comets to be in orbit around the Sun, but not seen
from the Earth?
4. Discuss with examples that impact of comets on solar system objects
is a natural phenomena.
5. Discuss the consequences of a comet hitting the Earth.
6. Compare the energy released by a 1 km size comet moving at 60 km/sec
and suddenly coming to a stop with that of two 3500 lb cars colliding
head-on at 50 km/hr.
References
Some of the references pertaining to cometary studies are the following:
1. Bailey, M.E., Clube, S.V.M. and Napier, W.M. 1990. The origin of
comets. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
2. Brandt, J.C. and Chapman, R.D. 2004. Introduction to comets. 2nd
Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Festou, M.C., Keller, H.U. and Weaver, H.A. (eds), 2005. Comets II,
Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson.
comets
9:59
General Introduction
comets
31
9:59
CHAPTER 2
Dynamics
2.1.
Orbital Elements
The objects in space are generally specified with respect to the ecliptic
or to the equatorial system of coordinates. In the former the Earths orbit
around the Sun, i.e., the ecliptic plane is the reference frame, while in the
latter it is the plane of the Earths equator. The position of an object is
specified by the longitude and the latitude in the ecliptic system and by the
right ascension () and the declination () in the equatorial system. The
right ascension is measured from the vernal equinox, which is the point
where the ecliptic plane cuts the Earths equator. The declination is the
angular distance from the north to the south of the celestial equator. The
two systems can be transformed from one to the other through trigonometric relations.
The orbit of a body around the Sun is generally a conic section. In
general, the conics are the ellipse, parabola and hyperbola. The major axis
refers to the maximum diameter of the ellipse and it determines the size of
the ellipse (Fig. 2.1). The eccentricity e of the ellipse is defined as the ratio
of the distance between the center and a focus to the length of the semi
major axis. An ellipse is completely defined by the eccentricity and the
major axis. The value of e varies between 0 and 1. A circle is a special case
of the ellipse when the eccentricity is zero. The parabola has an eccentricity
equal to unity while a hyperbola has an eccentricity greater than one. In
an elliptical orbit the closest and the farthest distance of the object from
the Sun which is stationed at one of the foci is known as the perihelion and
aphelion distances respectively.
The position of a comet in the sky is generally referred to the ecliptic
system of coordinates. To define completely an orbit in space, six quantities
33
comets
9:59
34
Physics of Comets
Fig. 2.1 Various parameters defined for an elliptical orbit. S denotes the position of
the Sun occupying one of the foci.
Fig. 2.2
usually termed as elements of the orbit are to be specified (Fig. 2.2). They
are the following:
a = length of the semi major axis;
e = eccentricity;
i = angle between the orbital plane and the plane of the ecliptic;
= longitude of the ascending node. This is the angle from the vernal
comets
9:59
Dynamics
comets
35
2.2.
2.2.1.
Orbit in Space
Relevant equations
The orbit of a comet is a conic section about the Sun and it can be
defined under the Newtonian Gravitation.
The equation of motion of a comet of mass m around the Sun can be
represented as
2
G(M + m)
r
d r
(2.1)
=
r 3
2
3
dt
r
r
where M is the mass of the Sun and G is the gravitational constant. Since
m<
M , = GM and r is the position vector of the comet relative to
the Sun, the use of plane polar coordinates r and in the orbital plane
of motion allows one to separate the Eq. (2.1) into r and components,
giving, for the r component
r r2 = 2
(2.2)
r
and for the component
r + 2r = 0
(2.3)
Equation (2.3) can be written as
1 d 2
(r ) = 0.
r dt
(2.4)
9:59
36
comets
Physics of Comets
The integration of the above equation gives the specific (means per unit
mass) angular momentum integral
r2 = constant = h.
(2.5)
E 0 = (r 2 + r2 2 ) .
(2.5a)
2
r
From the above system of equations, one can derive the polar equation for
the conic section for an angle as
p
(2.6)
r=
1 + e cos( )
q
0 2
where is constant, p = h2 / is the semi latus rectum and e = 1 + 2E2h
is the eccentricity of the orbit and therefore the length of the semi major
axis a = 2E
0 . is actually the angle that the major axis makes with the
axis = 0. At the perihelion point = = 0 and therefore the perihelion
distance is given by h2 /(1 + e). The perihelion distance is also equal to
a(1 e). Hence
h2 = a(1 e2 ).
(2.6a)
a(1 e2 )
a(1 e2 )
=
1 + e cos( )
1 + e cos f
(2.7)
where a is the semimajor axis and the angle f is known as the true anomaly
(Fig. 2.3).
The other quantity of interest is the velocity of the object in its orbit.
From Eqs. (2.1) and (2.4), the expression for the orbital speed of the particle
can be obtained and it is given by
2 1
.
(2.8)
v2 =
r
a
The quantity 1/a is +ve , zero or ve depending on whether the orbit is
an ellipse, a parabola or a hyperbola. The velocity at the perihelion point
for an ellipse is given by
1+e
vp2 =
;
(2.9)
a 1e
similarly at the aphelion point, the expression for the velocity is given by
1e
.
(2.10)
va2 =
a 1+e
9:59
Dynamics
Fig. 2.3
comets
37
From Eq. (2.7) it is clear that the value of r1 monotonically decreases from
perihelion to aphelion, Eq. (2.8) would then suggest that the velocity of
the object is maximum at perihelion and minimum at aphelion and varies
along its orbit in between these, two limits.
Another quantity of interest is the heliocentric radial velocity of the
object. For elliptical orbits, it can be shown from Eq. (2.7) by taking its
time derivative that
2 2
2 1/2
1/2 a e (a r)
r =
.
(2.11)
ar2
The minus and positive signs refer to preperihelion and postperihelion radial
velocities.
The mean angular motion n of the body in its orbit with the period P
is by definition
2
n=
.
(2.12)
P
Since Eq. (2.5) suggest that h = r2 = constant and 21 r2 is the areal
velocity, the orbital period
Area of the ellipse
P =
areal velocity
2a2 1 e2
(2.12a)
=
h
9:59
38
comets
Physics of Comets
s
P = 2
a3
.
(2.13)
Hence
n = 1/2 a3/2 .
(2.14)
(2.15)
p
x2 + y 2 = a(1 e cos E)
(2.16)
. Further
cos f = 1 2 sin2
f
2
(2.16a)
or
f
= r(1 cos f )
2
(2.16b)
a cos E ae
SF
=
r
a(1 e cos E)
(2.16c)
PF
a(1 e2 )1/2 sin E
=
r
a(1 e cos E)
(2.16d)
2r sin2
However
cos f =
and
sin f =
(2.16e)
9:59
Dynamics
comets
39
similarly
2r cos2 f /2 = a(1 e)(1 + cos E)
Therefore
tan f /2 =
1+e
1e
1/2
tan
E
2
(2.17)
This is the relation which connects the eccentric anomaly E with the true
anomaly f .
There is also a relation connecting the mean anomaly M and the eccentric anomaly E. This is generally referred to as Keplers equation which is
derived as follows:
The quantity (tT )/P represents the fractional area of the ellipse swept
by SP with respect to the point B, where P is the orbital period. This is
also equal to n(t T )/2. From the law of areas and the properties of the
auxiliary circle, it follows that
n(t T )
M
area BSP
area BST 0
=
=
=
2
2
area of ellipse
area of circle
But Area BST 0 = area of circular sector BOT0 - area SOT0
a
a2 E
ae sin E
=
2
2
Therefore
M
a2 (E e sin E)
=
2
2
a2
or
E e sin E = M
(2.18)
2q 3
2
r
1/2
(t T ) = tan
(2.19)
(2.20)
(2.21)
f
1
f
+ tan3
2
3
2
(2.22)
9:59
40
comets
Physics of Comets
a(e2 1)
1 + e cos f
(2.23)
r = a(e cosh F 1)
tanh
F
=
2
e1
e+1
v2 =
2 1
+
r a
e sinh F F = M =
2.2.2.
1/2
tan
(2.24)
f
2
(2.25)
1/2
(t T ).
a3
(2.26)
(2.27)
The position and the velocity of an object along its orbit can be obtained
from the solution of the above equations. The reverse problem which is
often of interest in cometary studies is to determine the elements of the
orbit from a given set of position, velocity and time.
Let the position of the body in the heliocentric coordinate system at a
time t be (x, y, z) and the velocity components (x,
y,
z).
Then
r 2 = x2 + y 2 + z 2
(2.28)
v 2 = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 .
(2.29)
and
Since r and v are known, the semimajor axis can be calculated from
Eq. (2.8).
The areal constant h may be regarded as the vector product of r and
the orbital velocity v of the comet relative to the Sun. If the components
of h along x, y and z directions are represented as hx , hy and hz then,
hx = y z z y
hy = z x xz
hz = xy y x
and
h2 = h2x + h2y + h2z = p.
(2.30)
9:59
Dynamics
comets
41
Therefore the value of p the length of the semilatus rectum can be calculated. From a knowledge of p and a, e can be obtained from the relation
p = a(1 e2 ).
(2.31)
The projection of h onto the three planes yz, zx and xy gives the following
expressions
h sin i sin = hx
h sin i cos = hy
h cos i = hz .
(2.32)
Hence, the above equations give i and . The upper sign and lower sign
refer to the cases when i is less than or greater than 90 .
The value of ( +f ) can be derived from the following relations whichrelate the position of the point (x, y, z) in terms of the angles of the orbit.
z
sin( + f ) = cosec i
(2.33)
r
and
1
cos( + f ) = (x cos + y sin ).
r
The value of f can be obtained from the relation
r=
(h2 /)
.
1 + e cos f
(2.34)
Since in general six elements are required to specify completely the orbit
in space, it follows that six independent quantities must be obtained by the
observations. A single observation gives only two quantities say, in terms
of the angular coordinates and of the body. Therefore in all, three
different sets of observations are required to define its orbit.
9:59
42
comets
Physics of Comets
(2.35)
GM x
r3
(2.36)
(2.38)
The direction cosines l, m and n are given in terms of the observed position
of the comet, right ascension and declination , as
l = cos cos
m = cos sin
and
n = sin .
(2.39)
(2.40)
GM
+ l = GX M M + me .
l
+
2
l
+
r3
r3
R3
(2.41)
l + 2 l + l = GM
or
9:59
Dynamics
Fig. 2.4
comets
43
(2.42)
(2.43)
r2 = R2 + 2 + a1
(2.44)
Therefore
where
a1 = 2(lX + mY + nZ).
Equations (2.41) and (2.44) can be solved for r and . Knowing the values
of r and , the comets heliocentric coordinates (x, y, z) and the velocity
components (x,
y,
z)
can then be obtained from the relations
x = X + l
+ l
x = X + l
(2.45)
9:59
44
comets
Physics of Comets
determined from the method already discussed. The method outlined above
is generally referred to as Laplaces method.
The actual computation involves a knowledge of the value l, m, n, X, Y, Z
and their derivatives. The values of X, Y, Z are given in the Ephemeris.
From this data the values of the first derivative can be found out. The
calculation of geocentric direction cosines, their first and second derivatives
can be deduced from three observations of the comet which are not too far
off from each other. Let the dates of observation be t1 , t2 and t3 . The right
ascension and declination for these three times are known. Here we will just
show an approximate method of getting the first and second derivatives. In
actual practice one can use various refined methods.
The average value of the first derivative of l for the time between t1 and
t2 is given by
l2 l1
.
l12 =
t2 t1
(2.46)
l3 l2
l23 =
.
t3 t2
(2.47)
Similarly
l2 = l23 l12 .
1
2 (t3 t1 )
(2.49)
Similar relations for the first and second derivatives and m and n can be
obtained.
The elements obtained from three sets of observations define the initial
orbit of the comet. For getting a better orbit it is necessary to have many
more observations. The initial orbit can be improved further as more and
more observations become available. In fact equations can be set up for
the difference between the predicted and the observed positions. These can
then be solved to get the corrections for the preliminary orbit elements.
This procedure will eventually lead to a more accurate orbit. Such an orbit
is called a definitive orbit. The orbit calculated based on the six elements
gives the position of the comet in space. In order to find the position of the
comet in the plane of the sky, it is necessary to know the position of earth
9:59
Dynamics
comets
45
in space. The geometrical position of the earth can be obtained from the
ephemeris which is used to find the position of the comet in the plane of
the sky.
In the discussion so far, it is assumed that the comet is only under the
influence of the Suns gravitational field. But in actual practice the orbit
gets perturbed due to the planets as comets enter the solar system. The
dominant effect arises mainly from the planets Jupiter and Saturn because
of their large masses. When the comet is far off, the perturbation produced
due to stars, has also to be considered. The calculations which include
many of these perturbations have been carried out numerically. Through
these efforts the dynamical evolution of comets has been studied.
Problems
1. The components of velocity of a body are (0, 1, 3) corresponding to the
position (4, 2, 1). Calculate a and e. What is the nature of the orbit?
Assume for simplicity = 1.
2. The ecliptic heliocentric coordinates of position and velocity of a comet
are (4, 2, 3) and (2, 2, 1) respectively on March 16, 1959. Find the
elements of the orbit of the comet. Here again assume = 1.
3. The time period of the Earth around the Sun is 1 year and its orbital
velocity is 30 km/sec. Compute the distance from the Earth to the
Sun.
4. Calculate the lifetime of comets which have aphelion distances of 5 AU
and 5 104 AU, are almost in parabolic orbits and can survive 1000
perihelion passages.
5. The comet moving in an elliptical orbit has an eccentricity of 0.985.
Compare its velocity at perihelion and aphelion.
6. Show that in elliptic motion about a focus under attraction /r2 , the
radial velocity is given by the equation
r2 r 2 =
7. Calculate roughly the distance from the Sun beyond which Comet Halley spends about half of its total time period of 76 yrs.
8. Estimate the average values of r, dr/dt, dv/dt and the kinetic energy
in an elliptical orbit taking time as an independent variable.
9. A satellite is orbiting in a circle at an altitude of 600 km. Knowing the
radius and surface gravity of the Earth, calculate its orbital velocity
9:59
46
Physics of Comets
References
The solutions of the equations of Sec. 2.2.3 are specially discussed in:
1. Moulton, F.R. 1970. An Introduction to Celestial Mechanics, New
York: Dover Publications Inc.
2. Roy. A.E. 1965. The Foundations of Astrodynamics, New York: The
Macmillan Company.
3. Danby, J.M.A. 1988. Foundations of Celestial Mechanics, Richmond:
Willmann-Bell, Inc.
Orbit calculation with personal computer
4. Boulet, D.L. 1991. Methods of Orbit determination with Micro Computer: Richmond: Willmann-Bell, Inc.
comets
9:59
comets
CHAPTER 3
Physical Aspects
(3.2)
known as Wiens displacement law. Figure 3.1 also shows that the total
amount of the radiation emitted shifts gradually from the ultraviolet to the
visible and to the infrared spectral regions as the temperature goes from a
higher value to a lower value.
If the photon energy h is very much less than the thermal energy i.e.
h kT , the Plancks formula simplifies to
47
9:59
48
comets
Physics of Comets
Fig. 3.1 The Planck function for various temperatures. The regions of ultraviolet,
visible and infrared are clearly marked.
2 2 kT
(3.2a)
c2
This is the well known Rayleigh - Jeans law which is valid for long wavelength region, such as radio wavelength region. This is extensively used in
the study molecules in the radio region.
The energy density u of the radiation field is related to B through the
relation
B (T ) =
4
B (T )
c
The total energy density is given by
u =
(3.3)
9:59
Physical Aspects
Z
u=
u dv = aT 4
comets
49
(3.4)
where a is the radiation constant. The relation (3.4) known as the StephanBoltmann law, shows that the energy density of the black body radiation
depends upon the fourth power of temperature.
3.2.
(3.5)
Dissociative Equilibrium
9:59
50
comets
Physics of Comets
(3.7)
where p(x), p(y) and p(xy) are partial pressures of x, y and xy respectively.
K(xy) is called the equilibrium constant or the dissociation constant of the
reaction. The equilibrium constant depends upon the temperature and on
various parameters of the molecule. An expression for the equilibrium constant can be obtained in an explicit form as
log10 Kxy (T ) = log10
5040.4D 5
px py
+ log10 T
=
pxy
T
2
3
Qx Qy
+ log10 M + log10
+ 4.41405.
2
Qxy
(3.8)
Here M is the reduced mass of the molecule equal to (mxy /(mx +my )) where
mx , my and mxy are the masses of x, y and xy respectively. The Qs are the
partition functions and D is the energy required to dissociate the molecule
called the dissociation energy. For many molecules of astrophysical interest
the equilibrium constant can be calculated from Eq. (3.8) as all the relevant
spectroscopic paramters are known. Since the equilibrium constant is a
function of the temperature, one usually fits the calculated data with a
polynomial expression of a suitable form.
3.4.
Doppler Shift
The frequency of the emitted radiation depends upon the relative velocity of the source and the observer. The effect is produced only by the
component of velocity in the direction towards or away from the observer
called the radial velocity. The shift of the lines produced as a result of the
above motion is termed as Doppler shift or Doppler effect. The expected
shift for a source moving with the velocity v is given by
( o )
v
=
=
(3.9)
o
o
c
where and o are the observed and the laboratory wavelength respectively.
The relative velocity of the source is denoted as positive if it is moving away
from the observer and negative if it is moving towards the observer. In the
9:59
Physical Aspects
comets
51
former case, the shift is towards longer wavelengths while in the latter case
it is towards shorter wavelengths. From the measurement of the shift of the
lines using Eq. (3.9), it is possible to determine the velocity of the source.
Doppler shift has been used extensively in astronomy to derive the relative
velocities of the various astronomical objects.
3.5.
3.5.1.
Spectroscopy
Atomic spectroscopy
hc
E2 E1
(3.10)
When the transition takes place from a lower level to a higher level, the
energy is lost from the incident radiation and it gives rise to an absorption
line. If the reverse process takes place it releases the energy and is kown as
the emission line.
The energy level diagram for the hydrogen atom, which has a single
orbital electron around a proton, is shown in Fig. 3.2. The energy levels
are defined by the principle quantum number n which can take values n =
1, 2, , . The Lyman series arises out of the transition from n = 2, 3,
to n = 1. The Lyman line corresponding to transition n = 2 to n = 1 has
a wavelength of 1216
A and is in the ultraviolet region. This line is very
strong in comets. Most of the lines of the Balmer series lie in the visible
spectral region. Similarly there are Paschen, Brackett and other series,
whose lines lie mostly in the infrared region.
As n increases, the energy levels come closer and closer together and
finally they coalesce. The transitions arising out of these highest levels
give rise to a continuum. The excitation potential of a line is the energy
required to excite the line. The excitation potential for the Lyman line
is 10.15 eV. The ionisation potential is the energy required to remove the
electron completely from the atom. For the hydrogen atom this energy is
13.54 eV. For atoms with more electrons, the spectra becomes complicated.
9:59
52
Physics of Comets
Fig. 3.2
However, the basic model on which they can be explained remains the same
except that one has to consider various types of transitions.
Since the electrons in an atom have orbital and spin angular momenta
around the nucleus, they are therefore characterised by three quantum numbers, n, l and j. They denote total quantum number, the orbital angular
momentum quantum number and the total angular momentum quantum
number. The quantum number j for the case of l and s coupling is given
by
j =l+s
comets
9:59
Physical Aspects
comets
53
where s is the spin quantum number representing the spin of the electron
and can take the values + 21 and 21 . For many electron systems, the vector sum of the above quantities has to be taken and is represented by the
capital letters L, S and J. Therefore
L=
li , S =
si , and J = L + S.
The J levels are in general degenerate with (2J + 1) levels. They split up
into (2J + 1) levels in the presence of an external magnetic field. L can
take values 0, 1, 2 up to (n 1) and they are represented as S, P, D, F,...
terms. The value with S = 0, 21 , 1, denotes the multiplicity of the levels
and refers to lines as singlets, doublets, triplets, etc. The level is generally
written as
n(2S+1) LJ
where n is the total quantum number, (2S + 1) gives the multiplicity, J the
total angular momentum and L is the term symbol.
In general, the transitions between various levels have to satisfy certain
selection rules. For electric dipole transitions the selection rules are the
following:
J = 0, 1 with J = 0 9 J = 0
L = 0, 1
S = 0.
In situations where dipole transitions are forbidden it is possible to
observe magnetic or quadrupole transitions. These are called forbidden
lines. The transition probabilities of these lines are much smaller than those
of allowed transitions. Many of the forbidden lines have been observed in
various astrophysical situations because of low density present in them.
Collisions are infrequent in such an environment and hence forbidden lines
can be seen. Many of these lines cannot usually be observed under normal
laboratory conditions. The forbidden lines are generally denoted with a
square bracket. For example the forbidden line = 6300
A of oxygen
arising out of 1 D level is denoted as O[1 D]. If the atom is neutral, it is
designated by putting I in front of the chemical symbol, like OI, NI, ... The
symbols II, III,... represent atoms in singly ionized, doubly ionized states
like NII, NIII,...
9:59
54
3.5.2.
comets
Physics of Comets
Molecular spectroscopy
(3.11)
(3.12)
9:59
Physical Aspects
comets
55
Fig. 3.3 Schematic representation of the vibrational and rotational levels of two electronic states A and B of a molecule. The left one shows the transitions involving P, Q
and R branches. The right one shows the transitions which define the band sequence
(see text).
h2
J(J + 1) = hcBJ(J + 1)
8 2 I
(3.13)
where B = [h/(8 2 cI)], J is the rotational quantum number and it can take
values, 0, 1, 2, I is the moment of inertia of the molecule. B is known as
the rotational constant of the molecule. All the quantum numbers of the
lower electronic level (T 00 ) are denoted as double prime (00 ) , like v 00 and J 00 ,
while that of the upper level (T 0 ) as prime (0 ) like v 0 and J 0 . Therefore, the
wave number (cm1 ) of the transition between the two electronic states is
given by
=
1
{[Eel (T 0 ) Eel (T 00 )] + [Evib (v 0 ) Evib (v 00 )]
hc
+[Erot (J 0 ) Erot (J 00 )]}.
(3.14)
9:59
56
Physics of Comets
similar to
(for molecules)
and
= 0, 1.
The transition between any two electronic states, is determined by the
vibration-rotation structure of the two states involved. There are no rigorous selection rules for the vibrational quantum number and so the transition can take place between any two vibrational levels of the two electronic
states. A pure vibrational transition between the two electronic states,
called a band is denoted as (v 0 , v 00 ), i.e., the quantum number of the upper
level is written first. Thus for example (2, 0) means a transition from the
upper vibrational level v 0 = 2 to the lower vibrational level v 00 = 0. Pure vibrational transitions in a given electronic state are allowed for heteronuclear
molecules but not for homonuclear molecules like C2 , N2 , etc.
Each of the vibrational bands is further split up into a large number of
rotational lines. The selection rule for the rotational quantum number J
is given by J = J 0 J 00 = 0, 1. However, if = 0, only J = 1 is
allowed. Therefore, the rotational transitions give rise to three series of lines
called P, Q and R branches corresponding to J = 1, 0, +1 (Fig. 3.3).
comets
9:59
Physical Aspects
comets
57
The rotational lines of a given vibrational band cannot in general be resolved in low resolution spectra and therefore it results in a blended feature.
It can be resolved with a higher spectral resolution. For some molecules
the bands arising for the same change in the vibrational quantum number
in going from the upper to the lower electronic state have wavelengths very
close to each other. Therefore these bands cannot be resolved and give rise
to blended features known as band-sequences (Fig. 3.3). For example, v =
0 of the Swan band sequence for the C2 molecule occurs around = 5165
A
(Fig. 4.1). To separate the bands from the band-sequences, it is necessary
to go in for even higher resolutions. To resolve rotational structure, still
higher resolutions are required (Fig. 5.17).
As in the atomic case, the molecular term can be written as
Z (2S+1)
where Z represents the designation of the electronic state, (2S + 1) the
multiplicity where S is the electron spin, the total angular momentum
and is the kind of term like , , etc. As a typical case, the designation
of some of the band systems are given below for illustrative purposes.
(B 2 X 2 ) of the CN system and (A2 X 2 ) of the CO+ system
and so on.
3.5.3.
Chemical subgroups
9:59
58
Physics of Comets
Fig. 3.4 The vibrational frequency ranges of various molecular groups (Allamandola,
L.J. 1984. In Galactic and Extragalactic Infrared Spectroscopy, Eds. M.F. Kessler and
J.P. Phillips, D. Reidel Publishing Company, p. 5: with kind permission of Springer
Science and Business Media).
Isotopic Effect
The diatomic molecules which have the same atomic number but have
slightly different masses can give rise to a separation of the lines. This
is known as isotopic shift. The difference in the emitted frequencies between the two isotopic molecules arises through the difference in the reduced
masses of the two molecules. The spectroscopic constants of the isotopic
molecules (i) and the ordinary molecule are related by the following rela-
comets
9:59
Physical Aspects
comets
59
tions.
we (i) = we
we xe (i) = 2 we xe
and
we ye (i) = 3 we ye
(3.15)
where
=
(i)
12
Here denotes the reduced mass of the molecule. The amount of the shift
depends upon the ratio of the masses and on the value of the vibrational
quantum number v. In the case when only the first term in the energy term
included, the isotopic shift is given by
1
1
0
0
00
shift = (1 ) v +
e v +
e00
(3.16)
2
2
Therefore, the isotopic shift is a function of the value of (1 ). The larger
the deviation from unity, the greater will be the shift of the lines. The sign
of (1 ) indicates the type of shift expected. The negative sign implies a
shift towards shorter wavelengths. For example, the (1,0) band of the blue
degraded Swan v = +1 sequence occurs around 4737
A while that of
12
C 13 C occurs around 4745
A.
The isotopic mass difference also has an effect on the rotational constant
B which in turn changes the rotational levels as
F i (J) = 2 BJ(J + 1).
(3.17)
Therefore, the isotopic effect could also be seen in the rotational spectra of
the molecules.
3.7.
Franck-Condon Factors
The electronic transitions in a molecule give rise to several types of intensity patterns depending on the type of the molecule. For example, for some
molecules (0, 0) transitions is the strongest, while for others the strongest
line may be for a different value (v 0 , v 00 ). The observed variations in the
intensity distributions can be understood in terms of the Franck-Condon
principle. The basic idea is the following. The electron jump takes place
9:59
60
Physics of Comets
the minimum of the potential curves is nearly one above the other, while in
the second case, one is shifted for higher values of r. Based on the FranckCondon principle the (0, 0) transition should be the strongest for case 1.
For case 2, the strongest lines will be arising from the higher values of v 0 .
For emission lines, there will be two values of v 00 , corresponding to points
B and D in Fig. 3.5 for which the intensity will be maximum. The locus of
the strongest bands is a parabola called the Condon parabola. The Condon
parabola can be calculated theoretically provided the potential curves are
known. The Franck-Condon factors give a measure of the relative band
intensities for an electronic transition.
comets
9:59
Physical Aspects
3.8.
comets
61
(3.18)
g2 A21 =
2 =
1
.
A21
(3.20)
(3.22)
In general the probability of a transition between two states of eigenfunctions 0 and 00 is given by the equation
Z
R = 0 00 dr
(3.23)
where is the dipole moment. R2 is proportional to the transition probability. Usually Sel and Svib are combined together as
2
Z
vib
(3.24)
(Se1 Svib ) Se1
= v0 Re v00 dr
9:59
62
comets
Physics of Comets
Here Re is called the electronic transition moment. v0 and v00 are the
eigenfunctions for the vibrational states v 0 and v 00 . Re itself is defined by
the expression
Z
Re = e0 e e00 de
(3.25)
where e s are the electronic wavefunctions and e refers to the electric
dipole moment for the electrons. In general the electron wavefunction e
also depends to some extent on the internuclear distance r. Hence Re
should also depend on r. However, since the variation of Re with r is slow,
this variation is often neglected and Re is replaced by an average value of
Re . Therefore Eq. (3.24) becomes
2
Z
vib
(3.26)
Sel
= Re2 (rv0 v00 ) v0 v00 dr
where rv0 v00 is called the r- centroid and it is a characteristic internuclear
separation which can be associated with a given band (v 0 , v 00 ) and is given
by
R
v0 rv00 dr
rvv00 = R
.
(3.27)
v0 v00 dr
The integral over the products of the vibrational wavefunctions of the two
states of Eq. (3.26) is known as the overlap integral and is generally called
the Franck-Condon factors of the (v 0 , v 00 ) band. Therefore, Eq. (3.26) can
be written as
vib
Sel
= Re2 (rv0 v00 )qv0 v00
(3.28)
where
2
Z
qv0 v00 = v0 v00 dr .
Hence Eq. (3.22) becomes
S21 = Re2 (rv0 v00 )qv0 v00 Srot .
(3.29)
Hence the electronic transition moment Re2 refers to r-centroid rv0 v00 and
Srot is usually known as H
oln-London factors. Equation (3.29) shows that
the total strength of a molecular line is essentially given by the product of
the three-strength factors, namely the electronic transition, Franck-Condon
factors and the H
oln-London factors.
The values of the electronic transition moment for any band basically
has to come from the laboratory measurements of the intensity of the lines,
as theoretical calculations are very difficult. Enormous amount of work has
9:59
Physical Aspects
comets
63
been carried out in various laboratories over the world to extract this basic
data from the line intensity measurements of various bands. But the data
is still very meagre. So for most of the cases, one ends up using either the
mean value or an approximate value for the electronic transition moment.
The Franck-Condon factors can be calculated from a knowledge of the
wavefunction of the vibrational levels, which comes out of the solution of
the Schr
odinger equation. For this, the potential function U (r) has to be
expressed in a convenient and mathematical form. There are various representations of the potential curve. The well-known function is that of Morse
and is generally called Morse function. This has been extensively used in
the literature as it is quite simple and convenient. However it does not
represent the potential curves for all the cases exactly. So other expressions for the potential have been suggested. The one that is commonly
used in recent years is known as the RKR potential referring to the authors
Rydberg, Klein and Rees, who proposed it. In this method, the potential
curve is constructed point by point from the laboratory measured values
of the vibrational and rotational levels. The potential curves obtained in
this way are much superior in many cases compared to Morse potential
representation. The advantage of this method is the fact that it uses experimentally determined values of the quantities. However, the disadvantage
is that the experimental values are often not of good quality and, in additon, this method is quite cumbersome. Many people have written computer
programs to evaluate qv0 v00 and r -centroids for given values of input parameters. For many molecules of astrophysical interest, the values of qv0 v00
have been published in the literature.
On the other hand, the rotational strength factors have to be calculated
from the theory. They depend upon the structure of the molecule, type
of coupling, type of transition involved, etc. Until recently there existed
a lot of confusion in the definition and normalization of Holn-London factors. This has been clarified by several workers. The expression for the
H
oln-London factors has been evaluated for various cases of interest and is
available in the literature. Computer programs have also been written to
compute these factors.
It is also possible to get an estimate of the Einstein A value or the
oscillator strength f , directly from the laboratory measurements of the
intensity of lines. Various techniques and methods have been employed to
measure these quantities. The measurements are however hard to make and
so there are not many measurements available at the present time. Even if
they are available, the values by different methods or by different observers
9:59
64
Physics of Comets
Boltzmann Distribution
-Doubling
comets
9:59
Physical Aspects
comets
65
with only a few vibrational levels is shown in Fig. 3.6. The strong (0,0) band
Fig. 3.6
3.11.
Frequency (MHz)
Relative Intensities
of lines
Transition
probability (sec1 )
1612.23
1665.40
1667.36
1720.53
1
5
9
1
4.50
2.47
2.66
3.24
(-12)
(-11)
(-11)
(-12)
Photochemistry of Water
Extensive studies pertaining to photochemistry of water has been carried out through laboratory and theoretical studies. All these studies have
shown that there are a large number of channels through which water can
go through depending upon the impinging energy of the photon. The resulting fragments can further divide in several ways. All these possible
9:59
66
Physics of Comets
Table 3.2
Reaction
Threshold
wavelength (
A)
(a)
H2 O + h
OH+ H
OH(A2 + ) + H
H2 + O(1 D)
H2 + O(1 S)
H + H + O(3 P)
H2 O+ + e
H + OH+ + e
H2 + O + + e
OH + H+ + e
2424.6
1357.1
1770
1450
1304
984
684.4
664.4
662.3
(b)
OH + h
O+H
OH+ + e
H+H
H+
2 + e
H + H+ + e
O+ + e
H+ + e
2823.0
928
844.79
803.67
685.8
910.44
911.75
H2 + h
O + h
H + h
comets
9:59
Physical Aspects
comets
67
3.12.
Silicate
There are various types of silicates. They differ in their chemical composition and mineral structure. The basic building block of silicate material
is SiO4 . They are tetrahedral in shape. In the tetrahedron, the four oxygen atoms of SiO4 are located one at each corner, while Si atom is at its
centre. The two main forms of silicate material of intererst are Olivine
and Pyroxene (Fig. 3.7). Olivines can be considered as solid solutions of
Fig. 3.7 Different forms of Olivines and Pyroxenes and their structure (Henning, Th.
1999, In Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars, Eds. T. Le Bertre, A. Lebre and C. Waelkens,
IAU Symposium 191, ASP Conference Publications, p. 221:By the kind permission of
the Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series).
9:59
68
Physics of Comets
Mg2 SiO4 and Fe2 SiO4 , while Pyroxenes of MgSiO3 and FeSiO3 . They can
be represented by a general formula as Mg2x Fe22x SiO4 for olivine and Mgx
Fe1x SiO3 for pyroxenes. The value of x can take values between 1 and 0.
The end members of olivine class are Forsterite (x = 1, Mg2 SiO4 ) and Fayalite (x = 0, Fe2 SiO4 ). The corresponding ones for pyroxene are Enstatite
(x = 1, MgSiO3 ) and Ferrosilite (x = 0, FeSiO3 ). Pyroxene has chain-like
structure while olivine has island-like structure. In the case of amorphous
silicate, long range order is absent due to blending of structures and only
short-range order exists. The two crystalline silicates exhibit both shortrange and long-range order. The degree of long-range order (amorphous
to crystalline) has a considerable effect on the spectroscopic properties of
the material. For example, amorphous silicate exhibit broad smooth spectral features, while crystalline silicates show sharp and distinct features.
Amorphous and crystalline silicates are present in cometary dust.
3.13.
Annealing
Amorphous silicate is the most common form present in astronomical objects. In fact the dominant component of silicate in the interstellar
medium is amorphous silicate. Since crystalline silicate is present in comets,
it is important to understand how amorphous silicate can be transformed
to crystalline silicate.
The transformation of amorphous to crystalline state is possible by the
process of annealing in which the ordered arrangement of silicate tetrahedra is brought about by atomic diffusion. In this process, thermal diffusion
brings about rearrangement of the structural units (tetrahedra) which results in long-range order. Diffusion in solids is a result of activation of
lattice defects. Therefore the poorly ordered state of the amorphous material slowly drifts towards more energetically favourable positions leading
to macro-crystalline structure.
Several experiments have been carried out to see the actual change over
from the amorphous state to crystalline state. Magnesium silicate which
showed a broad feature at 9.3 m to start with showed two features at 9.8
and 11.0 m after annealing at 1027 K. These features and the spectral
feature at 20 m showed the formation of olivine. The change over from
amorphous to crystalline can take anywhere between a few hours to a day
or so. In the change over process the band length or angle within the SiO4
tetrahedron is not altered but simply leads to ordered arrangement of the
comets
9:59
Physical Aspects
comets
69
Fig. 3.8 Annealing of CaMgSi2 O6 smoke at 1050K and for times from 1 to 40 hours.
The development of structures in the curve can clearly be seen. The curves for 1 to 40
hours are shifted vertically for clarity (Colangeli, L., Henning, Th., Brucato, J.R. et al.
2003. Astron. Astrophys, Rev., 11, 97).
3.14.
Carbon
Carbon can exist both in crystalline and amorphous form. Some of the
forms of carbon are graphite, diamond and amorphous carbon. Amorphous
carbon does not exhibit a long-range order in their arrangement. There are
serveral classes of materials of this category which depend mostly on their
appearance, for example, glassy carbon or soot. Aliphatic molecules have
open structures, while aromatic molecules have ring structures, like benzene, C6 H6 . Benzene is the building block for a wide range of hydrocarbon
molecules. Molecules with several aromatic rings are called Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). PAHs are the most thermodynamically stable
hydrocarbon compounds that exist in the gaseous form. PAHs can exist in
neutral and ionized states. The size of PAHs could be around 25 to 100
carbon atoms. Therefore wide variety of PAHs can exist under astrophysical conditions including comets. PAHs possesses rich spectra with specific
9:59
70
Physics of Comets
3.15.
Solar Radiation
The subject of the study of the total amount of energy as well as the
spectral distribution in the solar spectrum is an old one. It is of great
intererst in various fields. It has therefore been studied extensively in the
entire range of the electromagnetic spectrum. The detailed and extensive
measurements are carried out in the case of the Sun because of its proximity,
it being a typical main sequence star and also because of its effects on the
Earths environment. It also turns out that most of the phenomena that one
observes from a comet is associated directly or indirectly with the radiation
field of the Sun.
The surface temperature of the Sun is about 6000 K. According to
Plancks distribution law [Eq. (3.1)] most of the energy is concentrated
in the visible region of the spectrum. Therefore the amount of energy measured from the Earth corrected for the atmospheric transmission gives a
good estimate of the total energy of radiation. Of course, one should try
to allow for the UV and IR radiation which is cut off by the Earths atmosphere. The intensity of the solar radiation as seen from the Earths
atmosphere at the Earths mean distance from the Sun is called the solar
constant. To get the solar constant value, extensive ground based measurements have been carried out. The average value for the solar constant is
found to be 1.95 cal/cm2 /min.
The spectral energy distribution in the visible region is quite smooth
and can be represented well by a black body of temperataure 6000 K. Superposed on it are the absorption lines of the gases of the solar atmosphere.
For measuring the solar emission in the UV region, it is necessary to go
above the Earths atmosphere. Such observations have been carried out using rockets and satellites. The solar flux decreases very rapidly to shorter
wavelength. As one goes towards the UV spectral region, the number of
emission lines arising out of different ionization levels of the various ele-
comets
9:59
Physical Aspects
comets
71
Fig. 3.9 A representative spectral distribution of the quiet Sun between 1150 to 1400
A
(Dupree, A.K. and Reeves, E.M. 1971. Ap. J. 165, 599).
goes towards shorter and shorter wavelength, one is essentially seeing the
higher and higher temperature regions, namely the chromosphere and the
corona of the Sun, from where the emission lines arise. Therefore the shape
of the continuum radiation in the UV and far UV regions depend to certain
extent on the resolution of the instrument. The higher the resolution of
the instrument the more the number of weak lines can be resolved. The
intense lines in the UV region are the Lyman and Lyman occuring at
1215.7
A and 1025.7
A, respectively. They have fluxes of about 31011 and
9:59
72
Physics of Comets
3.16.
Solar Wind
The solar plasma from the corona that flows out continuously into the
interplanetary medium is called the solar wind. The possible existence of
such plasma flows came from the pioneering investigations of Biermann
based on the study of plasma tail of comets. The theoretical work of
Parker in the 1950s based on the hydrodynamic expansion of the solar
corona predicted the expected nature of the solar wind. The theory also
showed that the magnetic field originating in the photosphere and dragged
into the interplanetary medium takes the form of an Archimedean spiral
structure. The observations carried out with satellites later on confirmed
Parkers theory of the solar wind. The actual interplanetary magnetic field
measurements have established the Archimedean spiral structure for the
magentic field. The mean values obtained from observations for some of
the physical paramters of interest for the solar wind near the Earth are
the following: number density of electrons or protons, Ne Np 5/cm3 ;
velocity 450 km/sec; electron temperature 1.5 105 K; magnetic field
2.5 where = 105 gauss. However, it is well known that the Sun is not
quiet all the time and lot of activities of violent nature do take place on the
surface of the Sun, like flares, bursts, etc. These have a great effect on many
of the geomagnetic activities. In fact there is an almost one-to-one relation
between the disturbance occuring on the Sun and the effect observed on
the terrestrial atmosphere. The existence of such a correlation has been
known since early times. These effects arise basically due to the fact that a
comets
9:59
Physical Aspects
comets
73
Problems
1. Derive Eq. (3.1) in frequency units.
2. Calculate the wavelength of vibrational bands of the Swan system (d3
- a3 ) for the C2 molecule and (B X) transitions of the H2 molecule
for v 00 =0,1,2 and v 0 =0,1. This will help in understanding the meaning
of band sequence. What instrumental resolution is required to resolve
vibrational and rotational structure of the Swan bands.
3. Derive the expression for the isotopic shift for the vibrational and rotational transitions including second order terms.
4. Calculate the isotopic shift between 12 C12 C and 12 C13 C for the (1,0)
band of the Swan system.
5. Calculate the frequency and wavelength of the line arising out of the
transition between n = 109 to 108 in hydrogen and carbon atoms.
Discuss its significance.
6. Is there a Doppler effect when the observer or the source moves at
right angles to the line joining them? How can the Doppler effect be
determined when the motion has a component at right angles to the
line?
7. Make an estimate of the temperature of the Sun from the fact that it
can be seen.
9:59
74
Physics of Comets
8. Explain why the spectrum of the Sun at wavelengths less than 1500
A
consists entirely of emission lines.
9. What evidence do we have, direct and indirect, of the existence and
properties of solar wind?
10. What is the probable mechanism responsible for the generation of the
solar wind?
11. Suns radiation striking the Earth has an intensity of 1400
watts/meter2 . Assuming the Earth is a flat disk at right angles to
the Suns rays and that the incident energy is completely absorbed,
calculate the radiation force acting on the earth. Compare it with the
force due to the Suns gravitational attraction.
12. Calculate the Einstein A-value for the rotational transitions 2 to 1 in the
ground electronic state and compare it with the value for the electronic
transitions between A and X levels for the CO molecule.
References
1. Herzberg, G. 1950. Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure 1. Spectra of Diatomic Molecules, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
comets
9:59
CHAPTER 4
Spectra
The main goals of the study of spectra are to identify the species responsible for the observed lines and to obtain information about their
abundances and the physical conditions present in the source. It is no
exaggeration to say that our present understanding about various aspects
of cometary phenomena has come directly or indirectly from the study of
their spectra.
The first photographic observations in the visible region was carried
out in 1864. This was gradually superceded by photoelectric detectors of
various kinds followed by charged coupled devices (CCDs). Therefore it
is possible to make high spectral resolution observations with the existing
large size optical telescopes.
The observations in the UV spectral region below 3000
A was carried out
first with rockets and then by Orbiting Astronomical observatory (OAO-2)
in 1970. This was followed by the launching of International Ultraviolet
Explorer (IUE) in 1978, Hubble Space Telescope (HST) in 1990 and Far
Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE) in 1999. These satellites made
it possible to explore the spectral region from around 3000
A down to
about 900 A. The observations carried out with Rontgen Satellite (ROSAT),
Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer (EUVE) and Chandra X-ray observatory have
extended the wavelength limit to X-ray region of around 1
A.
In the near infrared region, observations have been carried out with
balloons and with the Keck telescope, Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF),
Subaru telescope etc. at Mauna Kea in Hawai with sensitive detectors.
Kuiper Airborne observatory (KAO) was very helpful in making observations in the infrared. Infrared Space Observatory (ISO) made it possible
to study farinfrared spectral region with high resolving power. This has
been followed by Spitzer Space Observatory (SSO) which has opened up
75
comets
9:59
76
Physics of Comets
4.1.
Main Characteristics
comets
9:59
Spectra
comets
77
studies had limitations due to photographic techniques and also most of the
spectroscopic observations could be made only on bright comets at small
heliocentric distances. Early observations were also limited to spectra taken
at low spectral resolution. In recent years many of these limitations have
been overcome. Based on the spectra in the visual region, it is possible to
arrive at some general pattern regarding the main characteristic features of
the spectra of comets.
At large heliocentric distances, the comet appears as a point source.
This is due to the reflection of the solar radiation by the nucleus. For
heliocentric distances, r >
3 AU, the spectrum is mainly the continuum
radiation arising mostly due to the scattered solar radiation by the dust
particles present in the cometary atmosphere. The emission lines of the
various molecules appear roughly in a sequence as the comet approaches
the Sun. The molecular bands first to appear are those of CN at r 3
AU followed by the emission from C3 and NH2 (r 2 AU). Thereafter at
r 1.5 AU the emission from C2 (Swan bands), CH, OH and NH appear
in the spectrum. They are often strong enough to reveal their structure.
+
At r< 1.5 AU emission from CO+ , OH+ , N+
2 and CH appear. Emission
from Na appear around 0.8 AU. The relative intensity of emission bands
and continuum varies from comet to comet. In sun-grazing comets, say for
r 0.1 AU, numerous metallic emission lines crowd the spectrum.
The spectrum of a plasma tail shows mostly the presence of ionized
species and generally at r< 2 AU. The notable exceptions include the Comet
Humason (1962 VIII) where CO+ was seen even at r> 6 AU. Among the
observed ions in the plasma tail of a comet, the emission from CO+ dominate.
As a typical case, Fig. 4.1 shows the spectra of Comet Encke in the
visual region taken at a resolution (full width at half maximum intensity)
of = 7
A. The Swan band sequences corresponding to v = 1, 0
and +1 of the C2 molecule (d3 II - a3 II), whose wavelengths lie around
5635, 5165 and 4737
A respectively, are the strongest in the spectra. The
vibrational structure could be resolved with better resolution spectra. The
resolution of the rotational structure requires still higher resolution. In fact
it has been possible to resolve completely the rotational structure.
The spectra of Comet Halley taken at a spectral resolution of 0.07
A
beautifully shows the rotational structure of the (0, 0) Swan band of the
C2 molecule(Fig. 5.17). The spectra taken in recent times by instruments
with very high resolving power, / 60,000, shows in great detail, the
rotational structure of individual bands. Since the Swan bands of the C2
9:59
78
Physics of Comets
Fig. 4.1 Typical scanner spectrum of Comet Encke using the 3m Lick Observatory
Telescope in the visual region. Courtesy of Spinrad.
molecule dominate the spectrum in the visual region, to a first approximation, it also determines the visual diameter of the head of the comet. It
may also be noted that the wavelength of v = +1 band sequence of the
isotopic molecule 12 C13 C (4745
A), is shifted by about 7
A with respect
12 12
comets
9:59
Spectra
comets
79
9:59
80
Physics of Comets
Fig. 4.3 Low resolution spectrum of Comet West taken from an Aerobee rocket in the
wavelength region 1300 to 1700
A which shows bands of CO molecule (Feldman, P.D.
and Brune, W.H. 1976. Ap. J, 209, L45).
CO was observed with HST for the first time in 1991 in Comet Hartley 2
(1991 XV). After its detection, it was also shown to be present in the earlier
data acquired with IUE in several others comets. Several other bands of
CO belonging to HopfieldBirge system (B1 + X1 + ), (C1 + X1 + )
comets
9:59
Spectra
comets
81
and (E1 X1 + ), have been seen in the spectral region 1075 and 1155
A
obtained with FUSE (See Fig. 4.6). The presence of CO+
ion
in
comets
2
2 ) system in the region
came from the detection of the bands of (A2 X
2 X
2 ) double band system whose wavelength
33003900
A. The (B
occurs around 2890
A has also been identified. In the region of 2000 to
2600
A the First Negative bands (B2 + X2 + ) of CO+ are generally very
strong. The Mulliken System of the C2 molecule corresponding to v = 0
has a wavelength around 2300
A. This feature is present in Fig. 4.2. The
relevant spectra of Comet Bradfield is shown in Fig. 4.4. Several strong
Fig. 4.4 The ultraviolet spectrum of Comet Bradfield 1979 X obtained from the International Ultraviolet Explorer (Weaver, H.A., Feldman, P.D., Festou, M.C. and AHearn,
M. F. 1981. Ap. J, 251, 809).
9:59
82
Physics of Comets
Fig. 4.5 The spectrum of Comet IRASArakiAlcock in the wavelength region 2500
to 3200 A obtained with the International Ultraviolet Explorer Spacecraft. The image
No. LWR 15908 was taken on May 11, 1983 with the nucleus centred, when the comet
was 0.032 AU from the Earth. The new features corresponding to (BX) system of S2
are identified (AHearn, M.F., Feldman, P.D. and Schleicher, D.G. 1983. Ap. J., 274,
L99).
features are also present. The lines of SI multiplet at 1807, 1820 and 1826
A
were detected for the first time in Comet West. (Figs. 4.2 and 4.4). Two
other multiplets of S are sometimes seen at 1429 and 1479
A.
Some of the molecules detected through their spectral characteristics
are given in Table 4.1.
The observations made with the orbiting astronomical observatory
(OAO2) satellite in 1970 on Comet Kohoutek and on other comets in
the light of the hydrogen Lyman line at 1216
A led to the discovery of a
hydrogen halo around the visible coma (Fig. 1.13). This important observation also led to the realization that the mass loss rates from comets are
much higher than previous estimates which were based on observations in
the visual spectral region.
The first Xray detection from a comet was from Comet Hyakutake in
1996 (Fig. 10.15). The Xray spectra obtained on Comet LINEAR from
Chandra Xray observatory in the energy range 0.2 to 0.8 KeV showed that
comets
9:59
Spectra
comets
83
Fig. 4.6 The lines of H2 seen in the FUSE spectrum of Comet C/2001 A2 (LINEAR)
on July 12, 2001. (Feldman, P.D., Weaver, H.A. and Burgh, E.B. 2002. AP.J., 576,
L91, Reproduced by Permission of the AAS).
the spectra was dominated by the emission arising out of highly charged
ions of C, N and O (Sec. 10.7).
The extension of observations into the infrared region is important as
this spectral region is characterized by vibrationrotation transitions of
many molecules. Some of the bands of the CN red system (A2 X2 )
occurring around 8000
A were first seen in the Comet Mrkos (1957 V)
based on photographic spectra. This has later been observed from many
comets. Several other bands of CN can also be seen. Many weak features
of NH2 and the Phillips bands of C2 are present. High resolution spectra
has resolved the rotational structure.
At wavelengths larger than 1 m, lines of several molecules have been
detected. In particular the first and direct detection of H2 O in Comet
Halley came from the high resolution observation of 3 vibrational band at
2.7 m with the Kuiper Airborne Observatory (Fig. 4.7). In the spectral
region around 2.9 m multiple nonresonant fluorescent lines of H2 O called
hot bands have been seen.
9:59
84
Physics of Comets
Table 4.1 Some of the observed spectroscopic
features of molecules.
Molecule
Transition
Wavelength
(
A) (0,0) band
OH
CN
A 2 + X 2 i
B 2 + X 2 +
A 2 X 2 +
d3 g a 3 u
A 1 u X 1 +
g
1 +
D1 +
u X g
A1 u X 1 +
g
A 2 X 2
B 2 X 2
A 1 X 1 +
A 1 u X1 +
a 3 r X 1 +
B 1 + X1 +
C 1 + X 1 +
E 1 X 1 +
A 3 i X3
A2 A1 X2 B1
B 1 1 X 1 +
g
B3 u X3 g
A1 X 1 +
A3 X 3
A2 X 2 +
B 2 + X 2 +
B2 + X2 +
A2 A1 X2 B1
A2 u X 2 g
B2 u X2 g
3085
3883
7873a
5165
7715b
2313
3950-4140
4314
3886
2576
1300-1800
1900-2200
1150.5
1087.9
1076.1
3360
4500-7350
1071.6,1166.8c
2800-3050
4230
3565
4273a
2190
3914
4270-7540
2800-5000
2890
C2
C3
CH
CS
CO
NH
NH2
H2
S2
CH+
OH+
CO+
N+
2
H2 O +
CO+
2
*Range of wavelength.
a. (2,0), b. (3,0), c. (6,1) and (6,3)
Feldman, P.D. et al. 2002, Ap. J., 576, L91.
Weaver, H. 1998, Comets, In The Scientific Impact of the Goddard High Resolution spectrograph, eds. J.C. Brandt et al. ASP Conf. series No. 143, p. 213.
Feldman et al. 2005, In Comets, eds. M.C.
Festou, H.U.Keller and H.A. Weaver, Univ.
Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 425.
comets
9:59
Spectra
comets
85
Fig. 4.7 High resolution infrared spectroscopic observations of the 3 band (2.7 m) of
H2 O in Comet Halley taken from NASAs Kuiper Airborne Observatory on December 24,
1985. The lines originating from Ortho (O) and Para (P) H2 O are resolved completely.
The spectra of the Moon is also shown for comparison (Mumma, M.J., Weaver, H.A.,
Larson, H.P., Davis, D.S. and Williams, M. 1986. Science 232, 1523).
9:59
86
Physics of Comets
Fig. 4.8 High dispersion spectra in the 3 m region of Comet C/1999 H1 (Lee) which
shows the lines of various hydrocarbons. The spectra was obtained on August 21, 1999.
(Adapted from Mumma, M.J. et al. 2001. Ap. J., 546, 1183, Reproduced by permission
of the AAS).
comets
9:59
Spectra
comets
87
Fig. 4.9 The infrared spectrum of Comet Halley taken on March 31, 1986 (r = 1.17 AU)
shows the presence of a broad emission feature around 3.4 m. The dashed line refers to
the continuum for a black body of 350 K and the scattered sunlight (Wickramasinghe,
D.T. and Allen, D.A. 1986. Nature 323, 44).
have a great implication with regard to the origin of comets. They could also
possibly be the parent molecules (Chap. 6) of cometary radicals. Therefore
searches for many of these molecules have been carried out on many comets
in the frequency range 80460 GHz from ground based radio telescopes.
Large number of molecules have been identified. A typical observed spectra
from Comet HaleBopp (C/1995O1) is shown in Fig. 4.10 which exhibit
lines of CH3 OH, SO and HC3 N.
Glycine (NH2 CH2 COOH), an amino acid has been detected for the first
time in the dust particles of Comet Wild 2.
With regard to the spectra of diatomic molecules, the doubling of
OH around 18 cm was first detected in Comet Kohoutek in 1974. Since
then these lines have been monitored regularly in almost all the comets.
The possible presence of noble gases (He, Ne, Ar, Kr and Xe) whose
lines lie in the far UV spectral region ( <
A) has been looked for, but
1200
not detected. The detection of noble gases which are highly volatile and
chemically inactive should provide clues with regard to the thermal history
of the nucleus of a comet.
9:59
88
Physics of Comets
Fig. 4.10 Radio spectrum of Comet Hale-Bopp Showing the lines of molecules CH3 OH
(twelve J3 - J2 A lines), SO (56 -45 line) and HC3 N(J(28-27)line) (Lis, D.C. et al. 1999.
Earth, Moon and Planets, 78, 13).
The studies carried out on several comets has shown the presence of various kinds of molecules of varying complexity ( 50), but smaller than those
detected from the interstellar medium (150). Many of these molecules are
likely to be parent molecules sublimated from the cometary ices. Many of
the molecules present in the interstellar medium but not seen from comets
does not mean that they are not present in comets. This could be due to
the fact that the detection of a line depend upon various factors, such as
column density of the specie, timing of the observation, possible destruction
etc.
There are large number of unindentified features that are present in
the spectra of comets in the UV, visible and radio regions. Many of these
unindentified features could be due to some already known species (atoms,
radicals, ions, simple molecules, complex molecules). Therefore the identification of these features require further laboratory studies as well as theoretical investigations.
The detection of continuum emission at 3.71 cm from Comet Kohoutek
in 1974 has not been detected in other comets even with more sensitive
instruments. However continuum at millimetre wavelengths have been detected from Comets Halley, Hyakutake and HaleBopp.
The in situ mass spectrometer studies of Comet Halley has given lot of
new information about the species present in the coma. They have given
rise to the identification of a large number of new species, which is difficult
to detect through traditional spectroscopic means.
A compilation of some of the observed atomic and molecular species
comets
9:59
Spectra
comets
89
Ions:
Dust:
Silicate
CHON
9:59
90
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Physics of Comets
4.2.
Forbidden Transitions
So far we have been discussing the spectra arising out of the allowed
dipole transitions which have a mean lifetime of 108 sec.
Many forbidden lines arising out of several atoms have been seen from
various types of astronomical objects, including comets. The mean lifetime
for magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole transitions are 103 and 1
sec respectively.
The wellknown auroral red lines of 6300.23
A and 6363.87
A, the green
comets
9:59
Spectra
comets
91
line of 5577.35
A of neutral oxygen atom have been seen in many comets.
The red lines originate from the 1 D upper level while the green lines arise
from the 1 S level as can be seen from the energy level diagram of neutral
oxygen atom (Fig. 4.11). In the beginning there was some confusion as to
Fig. 4.11
whether these lines were due to the Earths atmosphere or were intrinsic to
the comet. This was finally resolved based on high dispersion spectra. The
red lines observed in the spectra of a comet should be Doppler shifted in a
manner similar to other cometary molecular emissions, if they are intrinsic
to the comet, while that of atmospheric origin should not be shifted. Based
on such arguments it was conclusively shown that [OI] lines are of cometary
origin. In fact the observations carried out with FabryPerot instrument
can separate the lines arising out of the earths atmosphere and from the
comet quite well. The life time of the 1 D state is about 130 sec and that of
1
S is less than 1 sec. The red doubled at 6300.34 and 6363.77
A (1 D 3 P)
1
1
and the green line at 5577.34
A ( S D) arise out of prompt emission,
as the photodissociation of H2 O lead directly oxygen atoms in 1 D and 1 S
states (Sec. 3.11). Oxygen atoms that are excited to the 1 S state decays to
9:59
92
Physics of Comets
P state only 5% of the time and rest 95% to 1 D state. The line 2972
A has
also been detected. The intensity of the red doublet is quite strong as can
be seen from Fig. 4.1. The green line is weak compared to the red line. The
green line is also blended with the cometary C2 Swan band. Even so, the
green line has been detected. Since red doublet lines are strong in comets,
they have been observed regularly and studied extensively in comets.
As in the case of oxygen, the forbidden lines of carbon arising out of
1
D 3 P transition at 9823 and 9849
A has also been seen. The presence
1
of carbon atoms in the D state (lifetime of 4000 sec) comes from the
observation of the resonance scattered 1 P 1 D transitions at 1931
A.
3
4.3.
LinetoContinuum Ratio
Based on the spectra in the visual spectral region, one can classify the
observed spectra of comets into two categories: (1) strong continuum and
(2) strong molecular line emissions. Although at present a large number of
observations exist on comets taken since early times they are however not
homogeneous. This is due to the fact that the spectra have been taken with
different instruments as well as at different heliocentric distances. Also all
the available spectra are not of a very good quality. This is particularly
so for earlier spectral observations. Therefore, it is hard to make any real
meaningful ratio of continuum to line emission in comets. Nonetheless
several attempts have been made to use the available observations in order
to see any trend in the line to continuum ratios. One such study was based
on a homogeneous set of observations of about 85 comets. A statistical
study of these comets showed a wide variation in the line to continuum
ratios among these comets (Sec. 9.1.4).
It may be noted that the spectra of comets is entering a new era due
to the availability of sensitive instruments and detectors which can provide
high spatial, spectral and temporal observations. It is also possible to get
2dimensional images. In addition, the Earths atmosphere is no more a
hindrance for making observations in various spectral regions due to the
use of rockets and satellites.
As can be seen from the general discussion of cometary spectra presented
so far, comets are very rich in emissions arising out of various kinds of
molecules. The next logical step is to extract the physical conditions of the
gaseous material present in the coma from a study of these lines, which will
be discussed in the following chapter.
comets
9:59
Spectra
comets
93
Problems
1. Describe the spectra of a Comet at far of distance from the Sun and
very close to the Sun. Why is there a difference?
2. Cometary spectra show only the emission lines. Explain.
3. Suppose one were to observe an absorption line in the spectra and the
optical depth required is 0.1. Calculate the column density of sodium
atoms for the D1 line.
4. What are the various criteria that may be used for a firm identification
of an unknown line in a cometary spectrum.
5. What is meant by forbidden line? Describe the conditions under which
forbidden lines occur. Mention some specific examples and discuss what
we can learn from them.
References
A good account of the spectra of comets can be found in the following:
1. Arpigny, C. 1965. Ann. Rev. Astr. Ap. 3, 351.
2. Swings, P. and Haser. L., 1956. Atlas of Representative Cometary
Spectra Liege: The Institute of Astrophysique.
3. Arpigny, C., Rahe. J., Donn. B., Dossin, B. and Wyckoff, S. 1997.
Atlas of Cometary Spectra, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
4. Cochran, A.L. and Cochran, W.D. 2002. Icarus, 157, 297.
A discussion of the observations in the Ultraviolet (5), Visible (5,6), Infrared (7,8) and Radio (8,9) region can be found in
5. Feldman, P.D., Cochran, A. and Combi, M.R., 2005. In Comets II,
eds, M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and H.A. Weaver, University of Arizona
Press, Tucson, p.425.
6. AHearn, M.F. 1982. In Comets, ed. L.L. Wilkening, Univ. Arizona
Press, Tucson p. 433.
7. Hanner, M.S. and Tokunaga, A.T. 1991. In Comets in the Post Halley Era. eds. R.C. Newburn, M. Neugebauer and J. Rahe. Kluwer
Academic Publishers p. 93.
8. BockeleeMorvan, D., Crovisier, D., Mumma, M.J., and Weaver, H.A.
2005. In Comets II, eds, M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and H.A. Weaver,
Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, P.391.
9. Crovisier, J. and Schloerb, F.P. 1991. In Comets in the Post Halley
Era. eds. R.C. Newburn, M. Neugebauer and J. Rahe. Kluwer Aca-
9:59
94
Physics of Comets
comets
9:59
CHAPTER 5
Spectra of Coma
In the last chapter, we discussed the general characteristics of the spectra of comets. As was pointed out, the analysis of these spectral lines can
give information about the temperature, pressure and the physical processes responsible for producing the lines, in addition to the abundances
of the species. Here we would like to discuss in some detail a few of these
aspects, with special reference to the cometary spectra.
5.1.
Fluorescence Process
In order to analyse cometary spectra it is necessary to know the mechanism responsible for the excitation of cometary emissions. The absorption
of solar radiation in their resonance transitions which then trickle down to
give the radiation is called the resonance fluorescence process. Whether
the mechanism of excitation is due to the collision process with atoms,
molecules or ions, or due to the resonance fluorescence process is governed
by the relative time scales for the two processes. The collision time scale is
given by
1
coll
(5.1)
nv
where n, and v denote the number density, the collision crosssection and
the velocity of the species respectively. Using for the collision cross-section
with neutral atoms or ions, a typical value 1016 - 1017 cm2 and
v 1 km/sec, n 105 /cm3 , the characteristic collision time scale turns
out to be
coll 107 sec .
(5.2)
This time scale is much larger than the typical time scale for absorption of
solar radiation in the visible region of say C2 and CN at a distance of 1 AU,
95
comets
9:59
96
Physics of Comets
which is about 10 to 100 sec. Therefore for typical cometary conditions the
absorption of solar radiation is the main excitation process. Another observation which also supports the above conclusion is that the line emissions
seen in a cometary spectra arise mostly from the ground electronic state of
the molecule and this involves a lot of energy. It can therefore be brought
about only by the absorption of the solar radiation. However, the striking
success for the process came from the work of Swings. He noticed that
the relative intensity of rotational lines of the CN (0, 0) band seemed to
have peculiar minimum and maximum intensities at certain locations. The
pattern also changed with the Sun-Comet distance, as can be seen from
Fig. 5.1, which shows a marked difference between the two spectra taken
about 10 days apart. Comparing the position of the observed lines with the
solar spectrum, it was found that the position of minimum intensity corresponded to the regions of less flux in the solar radiation field as compared
to that of maximum intensity positions. This in turn was related to the
presence or absence of absorption lines called Fraunhofer lines. In other
words, there existed a definite correlation between the absorbed solar radiation by the molecule and the corresponding emission intensity. Since the
comet has a variable velocity around its orbit, the frequency of the radiation that the molecule in the comet absorbs depends upon this velocity due
to the Doppler shift effect. Therefore the observed intensity pattern should
change depending upon whether the Fraunhofer lines come in the way of
absorption or not. These are also consistent with the observed intensity
patterns. This effect is generally called the Swings effect.
Let us further examine the validity of the resonance fluorescence excitation process from a detailed analysis of the rotational and vibrational
spectra of molecules. The calculation of intensities of lines or a synthetic
spectrum requires the knowledge of the population distribution in different
energy levels of the molecule. This is a complicated problem as it is necessary to simultaneously consider the different electronic, vibrational and
rotational levels of the molecule in the level population calculation. The
nature of the energy levels depends upon the type and structure of the
molecule. Just as an example to show the complexity of the energy level
diagram of the molecules, Fig. 5.2 shows the various energy levels and the
transitions that have to be considered for the OH molecule. Therefore it
is rather difficult to give a general set of equations for the calculation of
the population distribution of molecules. Instead, one has to consider each
molecule on a more or less individual basis depending on its energy level
structure. However, there are some simple diatomic molecules for which the
comets
8:49
Spectra of Coma
comets
97
Fig. 5.1 The microdensitometer tracings in the spectral region of CN violet band of
Comet Ikeya 1963 1.(a) and (b) refer to the spectra taken on the 3rd and 13th of March
1963 respectively. The variations in the band structure between the two spectra can be
seen. (Taken from Whipple, F.L. 1978. In Cosmic Dust. ed. J.A.M. McDonnell, New
York; John Wiley and Sons. p. 1).
energy levels are such that it is a good approximation to consider vibrational and rotational transitions separately. Therefore it is appropriate to
outline the method for the cases of vibrational and rotational levels treated
separately. The formalism can easily be adapted to take into account the
complexities of the molecule of interest. Earlier studies indicated that the
C2 molecule appears to deviate from the general behaviour of all other
molecules. Therefore, the case of C2 molecule will be considered separately.
9:59
98
Physics of Comets
Fig. 5.2 The energy level diagram of OH molecule showing electronic, vibrational and
rotational structure and the various transitions between them (Schleicher, D.G. and
AHearn, M.F., 1988. Ap.J. 331, 1058).
5.1.1.
Rotational structure
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
99
P,Q,R
P,Q,R
A similar expression can be written for the transitions in the lower rotational state as
X
X
(5.5a)
Bij ij + Arot
Nj Aji + Ni+1 Arot
i
i+1 = Ni
P,Q,R
P,Q,R
where Arot represents the transition rate for pure rotational transitions
in the lower electronic state, which should be included for a heteronuclear
molecule. The total number of equations involved depends upon the number
of rotational levels in the upper and lower states. A simultaneous solution of
9:59
100
comets
Physics of Comets
these equations with the added condition that the sum total of populations
in all the levels is equal to unity, i.e.
i+j
X
Nt = 1
(5.6)
t=1
Fig. 5.3 The figure gives the relative population distribution of rotational levels for the
ground state of CN in comets for different heliocentric distances. (Arpigny, C. 1964.
Ann. dAp. 27, 393).
9:59
Spectra of Coma
5.1.2.
comets
101
Vibrational structure
p
X
Bik ik =
k=m
p
X
Nk (Bki ki + Aki ), i = 1, 2, (m 1)
(5.7)
k=m
m1
X
(Bjl jl + Ajl ) =
l=1
m1
X
Nl Blj lj , j = m, p.
(5.8)
l=1
64 4 3
|Rvv0 |2 .
3hc3
(5.9)
(5.10)
9:59
102
comets
Physics of Comets
where 1 is the coefficient of the linear term in the dipole moment expansion
and
0
Rv+p,v
(v + p)!
r2 B
= e xp1
e e
p2 v!
1/2
(5.11)
5.1.3.
The intensities or the synthetic profile of the bands can easily be calculated from the knowledge of the population distribution in different rotational or vibrational levels. The calculated profiles can then be convolved
with the Gaussian profile of instrumental resolution corresponding to the
observations. The results of such calculations for the rotational profile of
the (0, 0) band of B2 + X2 + transition of the CN molecule for various
cases is compared with the observed profile for Comet Mrkos in Fig. 5.4.
They clearly indicate that the observed profile agrees well with the expected
profile when the effects of Fraunhofer lines are taken into account.
A more detailed and sophisticated synthetic spectrum of the same band
has been calculated. The calculated profile agrees very well with the observed profile of several comets (Fig. 5.5). Such comparisons for the (0,
0) band or bands arising from A1 X1 + transitions for several other
molecules such as CO, CS and OH have also been carried out for various
comets. They also show good agreement.
In a similar way, the expected intensities of various vibrational bands
of the molecules CO, CO+ , CS, CN, CN+ etc. can be calculated based
on the resonance fluorescence process. As a typical case, Table 5.1 shows
a comparison of the expected and the observed intensities of lines for the
molecules CO+ and CS. The results for several other molecules also show
a similar agreement.
It is interesting to note that the total excitation rate to A1 state of
CO by the absorption of solar radiation in the 1500
A region leading to
resonance fluorescence in the CO(AX) system is around 1 to 2 106 s1
at 1 AU. This is much smaller than the excitation rate by solar radiation
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
103
Fig. 5.4 Comparison of the expected and the observed (solid curve) intensity distribution in the R-branch of the violet (0, 0) band of CN system for Comet Mrkos. The
continuous curve refers to results based on Boltzmann distribution for 500 K. The dotted
and dashed curves refer to results based on statistical equilibrium calculations without
and with Fraunhofer lines taken into account, (Arpigny, C 1964, loc. cit.).
9:59
104
comets
Physics of Comets
Fig. 5.5 Comparison of the observed R-branch lines of (0,0) band of (B2 + X2 + )
system of CN from Comet Austin with the calculated spectrum based on resonance
fluorescence process. The calculated spectrum is shifted by 0.25
A for easier comparison
(Wyckoff et al. 2000. Ap.J., 535, 991).
Table 5.1
Band (CO+ )
Computed
Observeda
Band (CS)
Computed+
Observed
(0,0)
(1,0)
(2,0)
(3,0)
(4,0)
(5,0)
0.11
0.63
1.00
1.20
0.67
0.28
0.12
0.60
1.00
1.16
0.64
0.40
(0,0)
(1,0)
(0,1)
(1,1)
(0,2)
(1,2)
1.0
0.03
0.13
0.07
0.01
0.03
1.0b 1.0c
0.05
0.12 0.11
0.08
0.01
0.012
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
105
9:59
106
Physics of Comets
Fig. 5.6 Top section shows the rotational lines of (0.0) band of the violet CN system
in Comet Seki-Lines. The lower portion represents the tracings of the spectra in the
regions a, b and c. (Arpigny, C. 1965. Mem. Acad. Roy. Belg. Cl 8 , Vol. 35, No. 5).
molecules with short lifetimes. It is possible that such molecules may decay
even before the fluorescence equilibrium is reached, which require several
cycles of excitation and de-excitation. These have to be treated based on
time dependent calculations.
In addition to the radiative process collisional excitation and de-
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
107
excitation could also be important. Since the density to a first approximation varies with distance from the nucleus as r2 , the collisions can be
an important excitation process close to the nucleus, a few thousand kilometers for molecules with production rates 1029 /sec. In the inner coma,
the molecules will be more in thermodynamic equilibrium rather than fluorescence equilibirum. As one moves outwards there will be a region where
both thermodynamic and fluorescence equilibria will be operating. Finally
at large distances, fluorescence equilibrium takes over. Since the observed
intensities or profile of emission lines are an average over the line of sight
in the coma, it is necessary to integrate over the whole volume, including
both collision and radiative processes. For collision effects, one generally
considers the collision of the molecule with H2 O as it is the most abundant
molecule in the coma. However, other species might have to be considered
if they turn out to be important. For example, the production rate of CO
is much larger than that of H2 O in comets at large heliocentric distances
and therefore collisional excitation is due to that of CO.
The collision de-excitation rate is given by
Ccoll = nH2 O coll v
(5.12)
where coll is the collision cross section for rotational transitions of the
molecules produced by collisions with H2 O, nH2 O is the number density of
H2 O molecules and v is the mean relative velocity between H2 O and the
molecule and is given by
1
1
8kT
.
(5.13)
+
v=
mH2 O
mmol
Here T is the temperature of the gas, mH2 O and mmol are the masses of
the two molecules. The excitation cross sections can be obtained from the
de-excitation crosssections from the detailed balance condition
gu
Eu El
(l u) = (u l) exp
(5.14)
gl
kTkin
where u and l refer to upper and lower levels and Tkin the temperature that
characterises the colliding particles.
The modelling of the collision process in the coma is rather uncertain
due to uncertainties in the collision cross sections between the molecular
species and the H2 O molecule and the temperature of the coma gas. However the best available data is generally made use of in such calculations.
The variation of the H2 O density with distance from the nucleus is also
required and is generally calculated based on Hasers model (Sec. 6.1.2).
9:59
108
Physics of Comets
The time evolution of the profiles, until it attains the equilibrium state, can
be investigated based on the time dependent population distribution. As
an example, the results for the case of AX(0, 0) band of CS is shown in
Fig. 5.7 for different initial population distributions. Such calculations are
important when comparing with observations made closer to the nucleus.
Fig. 5.7 Time evolution of the synthetic profile of P, Q and R branches of the (0, 0) band
of CS molecule for the case when the initial population (t = 0) is distributed over the
rotational levels in the lower level J 00 =10 to 19 (a) or upper levels J 0 = 10 to 19 (b) at 4000
km from the nucleus. The time for each curve is marked. The curves are for a spectral
resolution of 0.8 A corresponding to Halleys data (r=1.1 au, Q (H2 O)=3.01029 s1 ,
T = 300 K; Krishna Swamy, K.S. and Tarafdar, S.P. 1993. Astr. Ap. 271, 326).
5.1.4.
Case of C2 molecule
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
109
9:59
110
Physics of Comets
Fig. 5.8 Energy level diagram for the C2 molecule. The electronic structure is shown on
the left-hand side. The singlet electronic state is the ground state of the molecule. Various transitions are shown. BR indicates the BallikRamsay bands. The vibrational
levels of three lowest electronic states are shown on the right-hand side.
which the population from higher levels cascade radiatively to lower vibrational levels in the ground electronic state of the molecule. This increases
the concentration in the lower levels thereby simulating a lower excitation
temperature. Since the rate of spontaneous downward transitions would
be fixed, this process would become relatively more important in the lower
radiation field at greater heliocentric distances, so that the vibrational tem-
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
111
Fig. 5.9 The expected vibrational population distribution in the a3 u state is shown
for the cases when Fox-Herzberg, Ballik-Ramsay and Swan bands (referred as All bands)
or only Swan bands are included in the calculations. (Krishna Swamy, K.S. and ODell,
C.R. 1977. Ap. J., 216, 158). The deviation occurs due to new depopulation mechanism
discussed in the text.
9:59
112
comets
Physics of Comets
v = (v 0 v 00 ) can be written as
X
X
F (v)
nV 00
BV 00 v 0 V 00v0 Pv0v00 vv0,v00 .
V 00
(5.15)
Here nV 00 is the level population and Pv0 v00 is the probability that when an
absorption takes place from the state v 00 to v 0 state, it will come back to
state v 00 . The above expression can be written as
X
F (v)
nV 00 P R(V 00 , )
(5.16)
V 00
00
where P R(V , ) denotes the production rate. The production rates can
be calculated from a knowledge of the molecular parameters and are given
in Table 5.2.
Table 5.2
quences.
v00
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
v = 1
v = 0
v = +1
0.2745
0.3167
0.3255
0.3109
0.2813
0.2438
0.2030
0.1643
0.1299
0.1004
0.0747
0.0531
0.0383
0.0277
1.000
0.6333
0.4153
0.2450
0.1351
0.0700
0.0368
0.0249
0.0265
0.0371
0.0523
0.0669
0.0673
0.0564
0.0813
0.3484
0.5335
0.6509
0.7168
0.7449
0.7454
0.7328
0.7182
0.7108
0.7151
0.7180
0.6402
0.0517
This table shows that for the band sequence v = 0 the contribution
comes mostly from the lowest states, while for v = +1, higher states
also contribute appreciably. Figure 5.10 shows a comparison of the expected v = +1 Swan band sequence flux ratios for several values of the
electronic transition moment, |Re|2 for the ground state singlet-triplet transitions, with observations of Comet Halley. The expected variation from
the model for transition moment 2.5 106 gives a good fit to the observed variation. The calculated intensities can also explain the observed
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
113
Fig. 5.10 A comparison of the expected and the observed Swan band flux ratios plotted
as a function of the heliocentric distance. The continuous lines are the model based
dependence shown for several values of transition moment for the lowest singlet triplet
transitions. The filled circles show the observed dependence for Comet Halley (ODell,
C.R., Robinson, R.R., Krishna Swamy, K.S. MeCarthy, P.J. and Spinrad, H. 1988. Ap.
J. 334, 476).
flux ratios for the Mulliken system of the C2 molecule. The results of these
calculations also explain the observed result that the intensities of the Swan
bands are stronger compared to those of the Phillips bands. These investigations also show that the forbidden singlet-triplet transitions are quite
important. The wavelength of these transitions lies in the infrared spectral
region.
The molecule CO has a structure very similar to that of the C2 molecule
containing both singlet and triplet electronic states. The singlet electronic
state is the ground state of the molecule. However, the strong bands of
CO seen in a cometary spectra arise out of singlet states (A1 X1 + ) in
contrast to the case of the C2 molecule which arise from the triplet states
(d3 g - a3 u ). It is therefore of interest to know the physical reason for
the inversion in intensities of the singlet and triplet series for the case of
the C2 molecule. This arises basically due to the difference in the energy
level structures of the two molecules as can be seen below.
9:59
114
Physics of Comets
Consider the simple case of two levels with population n1 and n2 corresponding to the lowest singlet and triplet states of the molecule with energy
separation E. The resulting population in the upper and lower levels, n2
and n1 depend essentially on the rate of the absorption and emission processes and this can be written as
B
n2
.
(5.17)
n1
A
Here A and B are the Einstein coefficients and is the energy density of
the solar radiation. The ratio of the change in population for two values of
E is given by
5
F (1 )
Triplet
1
Triplet
/
=
.
(5.18)
Singlet E1
Singlet E2
2
F (2 )
Here F () represents the solar flux. The above equation shows a strong
dependence on the wavelength. Therefore the relative intensities of singletsinglet to triplet-triplet transitions of a molecule depend strongly on the
energy separation between the lowest singlet and triplet states which are
the 714cm1 for C2 and 49000 cm1 for CO.
Let us now consider the rotational structure of C2 molecule. The Swan
bands of the C2 system arise out of 30 , 31 and 32 states. The relative
population in different rotational levels of each of these substates for a
given vibrational transition can be obtained from the solution of statistical
equilibrium equations of lower and upper states. For vibrational population
distribution, the values based on statistical equilibrium equations can be
used. The synthetic profile resulting out of the superposition of many lines
arising out of the various bands and corrected for the instrumental effect is
compared with the observed profile in Fig. 5.11.
5.1.5.
Laboratory studies have demonstrated that the photodissociation of water creates a fraction of OH in the highly excited rotational levels (upto J0
22 of v0 = 0 and upto J0 17 of v0 = 1) of the electronic state A2 + (see
also Sec. 6.2.2). Since the lifetime of OH formed in the electronic state
A2 + is much shorter than the collision time, the OH formed in the electronic state A2 + quickly trickles down to ground electronic state X2 by
spontaneous emission giving rise to emission lines in the UV region, (AX)
bands. This type of transition lines are called prompt emission lines as the
dissociation fragment emit promptly after its production. The wavelength
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
115
Fig. 5.11 Comparison of the calculated (continuous) and observed (dashed) spectra of
v = +1 sequence of the C2 Swan system for Comet West. (Observations are from Lambert, D.L. and Danks, A.C. 1983. Ap. J. 268 428; spectral resolution (FWHM)=0.3
A).
9:59
116
Physics of Comets
Fig. 5.12 The Prompt Emission lines of P and Q doublet of OH arising from the highly
excited rotational levels of A2 state ((A X) transition) was observed for the first
time in Comet Hyakutake on 26 March 1996 (r = 1.02 AU and = 0.11 AU) in the
wavelength region 3100 to 3250
A. The above figures cover the wavelength region from
3100 to 3200
A. Many of the lines marked as A and B in the spectra are the prompt
emission lines of OH. These are compared with the computed spectra (lower panels)
which is summed over resonance fluorescence and prompt emission lines. (Meier, R. et
al. 1998. Icarus, 136, 268; AHearn, M.F., Krishna Swamy, K.S. and Wellnitz, D.D.
2007. Bull. Am. Astro. Soc., 39, 507).
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
117
Fig. 5.13 The Prompt Emission lines of P and Q doublet of OH arising from the highly
excited rotational levels of A2 state ((A X) transition) was observed for the first
time in Comet Hyakutake on 26 March 1996 (r = 1.02 AU and = 0.11 AU) in the
wavelength region 3100 to 3250
A. The above figures cover the wavelength region from
3200 to 3250
A. Many of the lines marked B in the spectra are the prompt emission lines
of OH. These are compared with the computed spectra (lower panels) which is summed
over resonance fluorescence and prompt emission lines. The expected intensities of P, Q
and R lines are also shown. (Meier, R. et al. 1998, Icarus, 136, 268; AHearn, M.F.,
Krishna Swamy, K.S. and Wellnitz, D.D. 2007. Bull. Am. Astro. Soc., 39, 507).
9:59
118
Physics of Comets
OH radio lines
The hydroxyl radical gives rise to lines in the radio region due to splitting of the levels (Table 3.1). The line at 1667 MHz which occurs at
a wavelength of 18 cm was first detected in Comet Kohoutek in 1974. The
most studied lines in comets are the 1665 and 1667 MHz lines. The intensity of the lines are found to be variable. Curiously, one finds that these
lines have been seen in the emission as well as in the absorption which
depend on the heliocentric distance of the comet. These observations can
be explained by the fluorescence excitation process. Since the transitions
between the -doublet levels are highly forbidden, in the absence of any
other excitation mechanism, the levels should be populated according to
their statistical weights at the coma temperature. The deviation from this
equilibrium value is generally referred to as inversion or anti-inversion. The
cosmic microwave background radiation of 2.7 K and the galactic sources
can induce transitions. The line may be seen in absorption if the population
is anti-inverted or in emission if the population is inverted due to stimulated
emission. The -doublet levels are actually populated through the process
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
119
Fig. 5.14 The g-factor or the Fluorescence efficiency factor for the (0,0) band of OH is
shown as a function of the heliocentric radial velocity. The variation in the value can
clearly be seen arising due to Swings effect (Schleicher, D.G. and AHearn, M.F., 1988.
Ap.J. 331, 1058).
9:59
120
Physics of Comets
Fig. 5.15 The radio OH data for Comet Kohoutek. The top portion denotes the observed peak antenna temperature of the 1667 MHz line as a function of time. The lower
portion denotes population inversion predicted by the ultraviolet pumping model as a
function of time (Adapted from Biraud, F. Bourgois, G., Crovisier, J. Fillif, R., Gerard,
E. and Kazes, I, 1974. Astr. Ap. 34, 163).
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
5.1.8.
comets
121
Oxygen lines
1025.72 A. Therefore excitation is produced mainly through chance coincidence with solar HI Lyman and hence absorption takes place. It then
goes through cascading process through intermediate levels leading finally
to the emission line at 1304
A. This mechanism is well known in planetary
nebulae as Bowen mechanism. The intensity of OI 1304
A multiplet produced by resonance scattering of the solar lines is much stronger than those
produced by the Lyman fluorescence. Therefore the intensity of the emission line 1304
A depends critically on the radial velocity (Swings effect),
the width of the solar emission line and the width of cometary absorption
line.
5.1.9.
Forbidden transitions
The identification of the red oxygen doublet lines at 6300 and 6364 A
in comets immediately raises the question of the excitation mechanism of
these lines as they are electric dipole forbidden transitions. First of all, it
is interesting to investigate whether the fluorescence process can or cannot
explain these lines. The direct method to test this hypothesis is to compare the fluorescence efficiency rate for the red oxygen lines with those of
ultraviolet resonance lines which is given in Table 5.3.
9:59
122
Physics of Comets
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
123
g-factor
(photons/sec/atom)
989
1027
1304
1.6
0.4
0.6
1.1
2972
5577
6300
6364
3.1 (-15)
6.21(-14)
4.2 (-10)
1.3 (-10)
(-8)
to 1.5 (-6)
to 1.5 (-5)a
to 3.9 (-7)b
* See Chap. 6.
Number in the bracket refers to
power of 10 (a) for solar absorption; (b) Lyman induced
fluorescence; (Festou, M.C. and
Feldman, P.D. 1981, Astr. Ap.
103, 154).
9:59
124
comets
Physics of Comets
P () =
Pmax sin2
1 + Pmax cos2
(5.19)
Pmax cos2 + 1
.
1
3 Pmax + 1
(5.20)
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
125
5.2.
Excitation Temperature
Rotational temperature
9:59
126
comets
Physics of Comets
(5.24)
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
127
time-dependent rotational population distribution with resonance fluorescence excitation process show that a reasonably good fit over the whole
wavelength region of the observed spectra, 51625132
A, can be obtained
for a time interval of around 2 103 sec as shown in Fig. 5.17. This time
Fig. 5.17 Comparison of the calculated time dependent spectra (Solid line) with the
observed spectra (dashed line) for the (0, 0) Swan band in the wavelength region 5166
lto 5154
A of Comet Halley. The calculated curves are for a time interval of 2 103
secs and FWHM=0.06
A. The short line with filled circles show the location of the NH2
features. Several of the P, Q and R lines are also marked (Krishna Swamy, K.S. 1991.
Ap. J, 373, 266).
9:59
128
comets
Physics of Comets
scale is consistent with the time 2.7 103 sec taken by the C2 molecules
with a velocity 1 km/sec, to cross the equivalent radius of the projected
area on to the sky. This indicates that the observations have picked up only
molecules with the time interval 2 103 sec from the time of formation
indicating that the level populations does not appear to have reached the
steady state values.
5.2.2.
Vibrational temperature
N G(v)hc/kT
e
Qvib
(5.25)
(5.26)
where qv0 v00 is the Franck-Condon factor for the band (v 0 , v 00 ) and C is a
constant. A plot of log (Iem /qv0 v00 ) versus G(v) gives a straight line from
which the vibrational temperature can be determined.
Several attempts have been made to get an estimate of the vibrational
temperature of molecules. However, one difficulty with this method is that
it is hard to get many bands where the contamination from other bands or
from other lines is negligible. So one usually uses the ratio of intensities
of two bands or more bands if available. For the case of C2 molecule, the
band sequence flux ratios corresponding to v = 0 and +1 is generally
used. The vibrational temperature vibrational temperature obtained for
C2 molecule is around 3000 to 5000 K. This is of the same order as the
rotational temperature.
5.3.
The emission lines of heavy elements are seen only for the heliocentric
distance ' 0.15AU. Comets passing through such small perihelion distances
are very rare. One such comet was the Sun grazing Comet Ikeya-Seki in
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
129
1965 which had a perihelion distance 0.005 AU. This comet provided the
opportunity for observing emission lines of various elements like Na, K, Ca,
Ca+ , Fe, Ni, Mn and so on in the visible region. This made it possible to
make an abundance analysis of these elements. These elements are believed
to come from the vapourization of the refractory grains.
In a steady state, the relative populations in the upper levels are governed by the Boltzmanns formula reduced by the dilution factor W , which
is a measure of the deviation of the energy density of radiation from the
equilibrium value i.e. u W 5 10 . Therefore the intensity of an
emission line is given by
2 2
8 e h N gf
I=
10
(5.26a)
m
u3
where is the excitation potential of the line and = (5040/T ). T is
the excitation temperature corresponding to the colour temperature of the
exciting solar radiation. The term represented by the power of 10 corresponds to the exponential factor in the Boltzmann distribution function. N
is the total number of atoms/cm2 in the line of sight and u is the partition
function of the line. The other quantities have their usual meanings. The
above equation can be written as
3
I
= + constant.
(5.27)
log
gf
Therefore, a plot of log (3 I/gf ) against the excitation potential for all
the observed lines will result in a straight line whose slope gives the value
of . Figure 5.18 shows one such typical plot for FeI lines. The straight
line drawn through the points is for = 1.0. Knowing the excitation
temperature, the total number of atoms can be calculated easily from
log N = constant + log(3 I) log(gf )
+ log u +
The procedure can be repeated for all the observed lines. The value of
= 1.0 also fitted the other lines. Therefore the number of atoms of
various kinds can be determined. The calculated relative abundances of
various elements relative to iron is similar to that of the solar value.
The in situ measurements of Comet Halley, made with impact ionization
mass spectrometer on board the Vega spacecraft, have given the elemental
compostion of dust. The contribution from the gaseous component has to
be added to the dust component, to get an estimate of the total elemental
abundances. Using a mean value for the dust to gas ratio of 0.8, the derived
9:59
130
Physics of Comets
Fig. 5.18 A plot of log (3 I/gf ) as a function of the excitation potential of the line.
The straight line drawn through the points is for ex = (5040/Tex ) = 1.0 (Adapted
from Arpigny, C. 1977, Proceedings of the Robert A. Welch Foundation Conferences on
Chemical Research XXI, Cosmochemistry. Houston, p. 9; see also Preston, G.W. 1966.
Ap.J. 147, 718).
total abundance of gas and dust for Comet Halley is compared with the
Sun in Fig. 5.19. It shows that the elemental abundances in Comet Halley
are very similar to the solar values except for hydrogen.
5.4.
Isotopic Abundances
The study of the isotopic abundances in comets has attracted considerable attention as it has significant amount of information in it as to the
conditions which prevailed at the time of formation of these objects. Fortunately, the most abundant elements, namely, H, C, N and O do have
many stable isotopes. Therefore a comparison of the isotopic ratios of
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
131
Fig. 5.19 A comparison of the elemented abundances in Comet Halley and in the Sun
showing that they are similar. The abundances refer to log N(H) = 12.0 (Delsemme,
A.H. 1991. In Comets in the Post-Halley Era, eds. R.L. Newburn, Jr. et al., Kluwer
Academic Publishers, p. 377).
these elements in different kinds of objects will reveal the history of the
whole evolutionary process. The detection of several complex molecules in
comets has given the general feeling that the cometary material and the
interstellar material could be very similar in nature. The isotopic ratios
could help in clarifying this problem as well.
For a diatomic molecule,
vibrational
and rotational isotopic shifts
q the
9:59
132
Physics of Comets
in the spectral and radio astronomical observations the studies have been
limited to only a few isotopic species. In principle, the isotopic ratios can
be determined better than the absolute abundances as they are not model
dependent.
The isotopic ratio 12 C/13 C has been determined for several comets based
on the analysis of the Swan band intensities of the C2 molecule. It is well
suited for the study as the (1, 0) band of the Swan system which occurs
at 4737
A is well separated from the 12 C/13 C band which occurs around
4745
A.
A typical medium resolution scan in the region of interest for the Comet
Kohoutek is shown in Fig. 5.20. From a comparison of the observed intensity ratios of these two bands, it is possible to get an estimate for the
isotopic ratio of 12 C/13 C. This method has been applied to many comets.
Unfortunately the isotopic line at 4745
A is strongly blended with the emission lines of NH2 molecule. The high resolution scan around 4745
A line
shows that the blending comes from 4 lines of NH2 . The blending problem
can be taken care with high spectral resolution observations and with better signal-to-noise ratio. To avoid the blending problem, the possibility of
using the (0, 0) band of the Swan system has been considered. With a high
resolution spectra of Comet West it was possible to resolve completely the
rotational structure of the (0, 0) band. However, the isotopic features are
rather weak, which makes the derived isotopic ratio uncertain.
The 3883
A (0, 0) band of B2 X2 system of CN has also been used for
the determination of carbon isotopic ratio in comets. However, the normal
lines of 12 C15 N, 13 C14 N, weak lines of (1, 1) band and P-branch lines of
the CN system also lie in this wavelength region (Fig. 5.21). All these lines
can be resolved in a high resolution spectra. Therefore the isotopic ratio
of carbon can be determined. The results of 12 C/13 C studies for various
comets are summarised in Table 5.4.
The deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio is of great interest as deuterium is
most likely to be synthesized in the early universe. The neutral mass spectrometer on board Giotto spacecraft made measurements of the compostion of neutral and ion species in Comet Halley with high mass resolution.
Therefore it is possible to get the isotopic ratio D/H. The derived ratio from
the study of HDO/H2 O is around 3 104 . Subsequently HDO was detected in Comets Hyakutake and Hale-Bopp from observations of 101 000
rotational line at 464.925 GHz. Following this, HDO was also detected from
211 212 transition at 241.562 GHz and 312 221 at 225.897 GHz in Comet
Hale Bopp.
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
133
The molecule DCN has been seen through their rotational transition
J(5-4) at 362.046 GHz. The derived D/H ratio is 2.3 103 . The rotational
transition of HC15 N, H13 CN and C 34 S has also been detected in Comet
Hale-Bopp leading to their isotopic ratios (Table 5.4). The line of J(3-2) of
H13 CN has been detected in Comet Hyakutake.
The fundamental ortho line of H18
2 O at 547.7 GHz has been seen in
16
Comet Ikeya-Zhang. The observed ratio of H18
2 O/H2 O is in agreement
with the ratio derived from mass spectroscopy from Comet Halley. The
results of the measured isotopic ratios are summarized in Table 5.4.
9:59
134
Physics of Comets
Fig. 5.21 The high resolution spectrum of Comet Halley in the wavelength region from
3866 to 3874 A. The R-branch lines of 12 CN and 13 CN overlap in this region. The
features marked a to g and i belong to the (0, 0) band of the 13 CN molecule while those
marked with h and j to m are P-branch lines from the (1, 1) band of the 12 CN molecule
(Jaworski, W.A. and Tatum, J.B. 1991. Ap. J., 377, 306).
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
Table 5.4
comets
135
Ratio
Molecule
Comet
Value
D/H
H2 O
3.08 104
2.9 104
3.3 104
2.3 103
HCN
Halley
Hyakutake
Hale-Bopp
Hale-Bopp
12 C/13 C
C2
CN
CN
CN
CN
HCN
HCN
93 10
95 12
90 10
165 40
115 20
111 12
90 15
14 N/15 N
CN
CN
HCN
HCN
Hale-Bopp
C/2000 WM1
Hale-Bopp
Hale-Bopp
140 35
140 30
323 46
330 98
16 O/18 O
H2 O
H2 O
Halley
153P/2002C1
470 40
450 50
32 S/34 S
S+
CS
H2 S
Halley
Hale-Bopp
Hale-Bopp
23 6
27 3
17 4
The results for 14 N/15 N is rather puzzling. The high spectral resolution
of CN observations for several comets give 14 N/15 N 150, while radio line
observation give 14 N/15 N 300 which is close to the terrestrial value of 270.
The lower ratio of 150 observed in Comets Hale-Bopp and WM1(LINEAR)
point to an additional source of CN other than HCN and heavily enriched
in 15 N which is still not identitifed.
The measured isotopic ratios given in Table 5.4 refer to the bulk compositions. However it is possible that departures from the mean value may be
present at the microscopic level. Such deviations to the extent of 12 C/13 C
ratios as high as 5000 has been found in the individual small grains in the
coma of Comet Halley. The variations in 12 C/13 C of around 2 to 7000 has
also been seen in primitive meteorites. The wide ranges in the observed
9:59
136
Physics of Comets
Fig. 5.22 The deuterikm to hydrogen ratio in comets is compared with the values
observed in planets and solar nebula (photosolar) (Attwegg, K. and Bockelee-Morvan,
D. 2003. Space Sci. Rev., 106 139: Hersant, F., Gautier, D. and Hure, J.M. 2001.
Ap.J., 554, 301).
value of 12 C/13 C ratios indicate that these particles are preserved presolar grains that have survived from physical and chemical processes in the
interstellar and early solar system environments.
The measured isotopic ratio 12 C/13 C from the interstellar medium at
the present time seems to vary from 20 to 80. The former and latter values
corresponding to the galactic centre region and around solar neighbourhood
respectively. This is smalller compared to the cometary value of around 90.
The equilibrium value of 12 C/13 C based on the hydrogen burning in stars
(i.e. CNO cycle) is around 4. The general reduction in the ratio of 12 C/13 C
in interstellar matter compared to the solar system value is more likely to
be produced as a result of the addition of 13 C. This could be brought about
by the processing of 13 C by the CNO cycle in stars. On the basis of the
present picture, the processed material of the stars find their way finally
into the interstellar medium and thus enrich the medium with 13 C isotopes.
The observed isotopic ratio of 12 C/13 C between the solar system and the
interstellar value appears to be consistent to a first approximation with the
scenario of chemical evolution which has taken place for the last 4.6 Gyr.
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
137
Lastly, mention may be made of the isotopic ratios of light elements like
Li, Be, B, etc., as these elements will be destroyed easily in stars even if
they were present in the original material. The detection in comets imply
that they ought to have been produced more recently by different physical
processes. However, the detection of light element isotopes in comets is a
difficult problem.
5.5.
Summary
The analysis of the spectra shows that the resonance fluorescence process is the excitation mechanism of the observed emission lines in comets.
The abundance of various elements obtained from the study of the spectra
of Comet Ikeya-Seki as well as in situ measurement of Comet Halley show
values very similar to those of solar abundances. In addition, the isotopic
ratio of 12 C/13 C in comets has a value of about 90, which is the same as
the solar system value. However 12 C/13 C as high as 5000 has been seen in
some of the individual dust grains in Comet Halley indicating that they are
presolar grains.
Other isotopic ratios such as 16 O/18 O and 32 S/34 S are found to be similar to the solar values except the D/H ratio. It appears that the abundance
of deuterium is enhanced compared to the solar values by a factor of 10 or
so. The likely mechanism of such an enhancement could be through the
ion-molecular reactions.
Problems
1. Consider the (BX) transitions of the molecular hydrogen. Write
down the equation between the upper and lower populations, N (v 0 )
and N (v 00 ), assuming only the absorption and spontaneous emission
terms are important. If the population in the lower vibrational levels is
determined by the Boltzmann distribution at temperature T = 2000 K,
calculate the population in the upper vibrational levels and the resulting emission.
2. Consider the ground electronic state (X 1 + ), the first singlet (A 1 II)
and the triplet (a 3 II) electronic states of the CO molecule. From the
statistical equilibrium equations, obtain an expression for the intensity
ratio of (a3 IIX1 + ) to (A1 IIX1 + ) transitions in terms of the
molecular parameters of the molecule and its numerical value. Assume
9:59
138
Physics of Comets
B21 < A21 and B31 < A31 . This problem will give an idea of the expected intensities of forbidden transitions compared to those of allowed
transitions.
3. Calculate the wavelength of a solar photon of =5000
A at the comet
which is at r = 0.52 AU. The comet is moving in an elliptical orbit
with e = 0.8 and has a period of 5 years.
4. The relative intensities of the rotational lines of molecular spectra in
a comet will vary irregularly with rotational quantum number and the
intensity of an individual line will vary irregularly with the distance of
the comet from the Sun. Explain why these effects occur and describe
how in principle, you could compute the line intensities.
5. In terms of the spectral features observed in the coma of a comet, is it
possible to infer the abundances of molecules in the primordial nebula?
Explain.
References
The effect of Fraunhofer lines on cometary spectra was first pointed out in
1. Swings, P. 1941. Lick Obs. Bull. 19, 131.
The application of Resonance Fluorescence Process to molecules can be
found in
2. Arpigny, C. 1965. Mem. Acad. Roy. Belg, Cl. 8 , 35, 5.
For some later work, the following papers may be referred.
3. Krishna Swamy, K.S. 1981. Astr. Ap. 97, 110.
4. Weaver, H.A. and Mumma, M.J. 1984. Ap.J. 276, 782.
5. Kleine, M., Wyckoff, S., Wehinger, P.A. and Peterson, B.A. 1994. Ap.
J. 436, 885.
6. Magnani, L. and AHearn. M.F. 1986. Ap.J. 302, 477.
7. Schleicher D.G. and AHearn. M.F. 1988. Ap.J. 331, 1058.
8. Reyle, C. and Boice, D.C. 2003. Ap. J., 587, 464.
For the calculation of vibrational transition probabilities, the following book
may be referred to:
9. Penner, S.S. 1959. Molecular Spectroscopy and Gas Emissivities, Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
The early work on C2 molecule is discussed in
10. Stockhausen, R.E. and Osterbrock, D.E. 1965. Ap.J., 141, 287.
For later work, the following papers may be referred:
11. Krishna Swamy K.S. and ODell. C.R. 1987. Ap. J. 317, 543.
comets
9:59
Spectra of Coma
comets
139
12. ODell, C.R., Robinson, R.R., Krishna Swamy, K.S., Spinrad, H. and
McCarthy, P.J. 1988. Ap.J. 334, 476.
13. Gredel, R., van Dishoeck, E.F. and Black, J.H. 1989. Ap. J. 338, 1047.
14. Combi, M.R. and Fink, U. 1997. Ap.J., 484, 879.
Papers pertaining to Prompt Emission lines.
The extensive Laboratory study carried out on H2 O is coverred in the following paper
15. Carrington, T. 1964. J. Chem. Phys., 41, 2012.
The following papers cover the application to Comets.
16. Bertaux, J.L. 1986. Astron. Astrophys., 160, L7.
17. Budzien, S.A. and Feldman, P.D. 1991. Icarus, 90, 308.
Comet Hyakutake spectral observations is in the following paper:
18. Meier, R. et al. 1998. Icarus, 136, 268.
The first detection of Prompt Emission lines in Comet Hyakutake is covered in the paper
19. AHearn, M.F., Krishna Swamy, K.S. and Wellnitz, D.D. 2007. Bull.
Am. Astro. Soc., 39, 507.
The following papers deal with polarization of molecular bands.
20. Ohman, Y. 1941. Stockholm Obs. Ann. 13, No. 11, p.1.
21. Le Borgne, J.F. and Crovisier, J. 1987. Proc. Symp. on Diversity and
Similarity of Comets. Brussels, Belgium.
22. Sen, A.K., Joshi, U.C. and Deshpande, M.R. 1989. Astr. Ap. 217,
307.
The following papers refers to isotopic studies:
23. Altwegg, K. and Bockelee-Morvan, D. 2003. Space Sci. Rev., 106, 139.
24. Bockelee-Morvan, D. 2005. In Comets II, Eds. M.C. Festou, H.U,.
Keller and H.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, P.391.
9:59
CHAPTER 6
The gaseous molecules vaporized from the nucleus are subjected to a variety of physical processes which could dissociate them step by step. Hence,
the species observed in the spectra of comets could comprise contributions
arising out of the dissociated products, as well as those released directly
by the nucleus or even by dust particles. Therefore, the physical quantity of interest is the production rate of the species and its variation with
the heliocentric distance. The production rate of a molecule can be determined either from the observation of the total luminosity or from the
surface brightness of a given spectral line, band or a band-sequence.
If the vapourization of H2 O is mainly due to the absorption of the solar
energy, then the production rate of H2 O should also have a r2 dependence with the heliocentric distance. Therefore, if the observations show
a deviation from the r2 dependence, it is of great significance and has
important information with regard to the mechanism of evaporation of the
material from the nucleus. It is also of interest to see whether the production rate of the molecules differs from comet to comet and whether it has
any correlation with the morphology, dust content, age, etc. of the comet.
From these results, one may be able to understand better the evaporation
of material from the nucleus as well as the source of the observed radicals
and molecules in comets and the structure of the nucleus. Some of these
aspects will be the subject of discussion in this chapter.
141
comets
9:59
142
6.1.
6.1.1.
comets
Physics of Comets
Theoretical Models
From the total luminosity
(6.1)
where Qi is the production rate of the species. Since the excitation of the
lines is due to the resonance fluorescence process, for an optically thin case,
the luminosity of any line or a band is proportional to the total number of
the species in the coma and to the fluorescence efficiency factor called the
g-factor. The g-factor actually represents the probability of scattering of
a solar photon per unit time per molecule. The luminosity at wavelength
i is therefore given by
Li = gi Ni = gi Qi i .
(6.2)
Since the observations include the whole extent of the coma, the flux received on the Earth Fi is given by
Li
.
(6.3)
Fi =
42
where is the geocentric distance. Therefore, the production rate is given
by
42 Fi
(6.4)
gi i
The production rate can therefore be calculated provided gi , i and Fi are
known. In general, the measurements covering only a given instrumental
field of view is available and not over the whole coma. For such cases the
total number of species in the field of view, Ni is given by the relation
Qi =
42 Fi
gi
and hence the column density can be calculated.
The g-factor represents the number of photons per second scattered by
a single atom or molecule exposed to the unattenuated sunlight. If the solar
photon flux is F per unit frequency in the neighbourhood of the line, the
g-factor for a strict resonance scattering is given by
Z
g = F d
(6.5)
Ni =
9:59
comets
143
(6.6)
(6.7)
where f is the absorption oscillator strength and F the solar flux per
unit wavelength. For molecules, the relative transition probabilities for
downward transitions must be taken into account. Therefore, Eq. (6.7)
can be written as
2
e
2 (F )f
(6.8)
g =
mc2
where
Av0 v00
.
v 00 Av 0 v 00
=P
Here the As are the Einstein coefficients. The g-factor depends upon the
oscillator strength and the solar flux. As pointed out in Chap. 3, the solar
radiation in the ultraviolet region is dominated by line emissions. Therefore,
the Doppler shift due to the comets heliocentric radial motion can produce
large changes in the g-factor as the comet moves in its orbit (see Fig. 5.14).
This has to be taken into account in the analysis of the observations. But
the average g-factor has been calculated for many molecules and is available
in the literature.
The calculation of the lifetime of the species involves a knowledge of the
photodissociation and photoionization rates, Jd and Ji respectively. These
can be calculated from the relation
Z 0
Ji,d =
()F ()d (sec/molecule)
(6.9)
c
(6.10)
9:59
144
comets
Physics of Comets
It should be noted that the dependence of the solar flux with heliocentric
distance (Eq. 6.9) also enters in the lifetime of the molecules. Usually,
the lifetime is referred to 1 AU. Since both gi and i depend directly on
the solar flux which varies as r2 , the product gi i [Eq. (6.4)] becomes
independent of r. Because of the presence of large uncertainties in the
value of cross-sections as well as the solar fluxes in the extreme ultraviolet
region, the calculated J values and in turn the lifetime of the species are
also uncertain. For example, the solar flux itself could vary by factors of 2 to
4 during the solar cycle. Therefore, the accurate calculation of the lifetime
of a species is one of the main problems at present. The uncertainty in the
lifetime of the molecules directly affects the calculated production rates.
6.1.2.
(6.11)
where N i () is the average column density of the molecule along the line
of sight. To get the total number of a species one has to integrate over the
model dependent variation of density as a function of the projected distance
from the nucleus. This is then to be convolved with the instrumental field
of view.
It is generally believed that the observed species are the dissociated or
the decayed products of the original complex molecules which were vapourized from the nucleus. Because of the finite lifetimes of these dissociated
products, they in turn break up further as they move out in the coma.
Therefore, the coma can be divided roughly into three zones: a productive
zone, an expansion zone and a destructive zone.
Let us start with the simplest model in which molecules are released by
the nucleus with a production rate
Q = 4R02 E
(6.12)
9:59
comets
145
Fig. 6.1 Theoretical surface brightness distributions based on Hasers model for different
ratios of the scale lengths of daughter and the parent molecule. (Adapted from DDell,
C.R. and Osterbrock, D.E. 1962. Ap. J., 136, 559).
9:59
146
comets
Physics of Comets
Q 1
.
4v
(6.14)
The column density, therefore, varies as (1/). The above formalism is very
simple and gives only rough estimates.
As the molecules move outwards, they are generally dissociated by the
solar radiation. They have a mean lifetime . This corresponds to a distance
Rd = v , where v is the average velocity of the molecule. The density
distribution is now given by
Q
e(R/Rd ) ,
4vR2
n(R) =
=
C (R/Rd )
e
R2
(6.15)
where
Q
.
4v
A slightly more complicated model is based on the parent-daughter hypothesis in which the parent molecules released by the nucleus decay with a mean
lifetime 1 corresponding to a distance (called scale length) of R1 = v1 1 .
The daughter products then in turn decay with a lifetime 0 corresponding
to R0 = v0 0 . For such a two-component model, the number density takes
the form
C
n(R) = 2 e0 R e1 R .
(6.16)
R
Here 0 ( (0 v0 )1 ) denotes the reciprocal of the mean distances travelled
by or scale lengths of the observed molecules, 1 denotes the same by the
parent molecule before they are dissociated. The Eq. (6.16) can be written
as
C
(6.17)
n(R) = 2 f (R)
R
where f (R) is the function representing the quantity in brackets of
Eq. (6.16). If n(R1 ) denotes the density at the distance R at which f (R)
has its maximum value, then
1
0 1 (RR1 )
R12
0 (RR1 )
e
n(R) = n(R1 ) 2
e
.
(6.18)
R 1 0
1
C=
The integration of the above equation along the line of sight at the projected
distance from the nucleus gives the column density and hence the surface
9:59
comets
147
brightness at that point for an optically thin case. The resulting expression
is of the form
0 1 +0 R1 1
e
[B(0 ) B(1 )]
(6.19)
N () = 2n(R1 )R12
1 0
0
where
Z z
B(z) =
K0 (y)dy.
(6.19a)
2
0
Here K0 (y) is the modified Bessel function of the second kind of order zero.
The Eq. (6.19) can be written as
1 x
(constant)
(6.20)
B(x) B
N () = (constant)s(x) =
x
0
where x = 0 . The equation shows that the shape of the surface brightness
distribution s(x), depends essentially upon the relative values 1 and 0 .
The Fig. 6.1 shows a plot of brightness profiles predicted for various values
of the ratio 1 /0 . The curves become rather flat in the central region for
small values of 1 /0 , and this means that the two scale lengths do not
differ from each other very much. One can also see the deviation from the
simple model (constant outflow velocity with no creation or destruction) in
which the dependence is given by 1/.
The total number of molecules M () within a cylinder of radius centred on the nucleus can be obtained by the integration of Eq. (6.19) over
, i.e.,
Z
M () =
2N ()d
0
= 4 n(R1 )R12
1
e0 R1 0 [G(0 ) G(1 )]
0 (1 0 )
(6.21)
where
G(z) =
K0 (y)dy +
0
1
K1 (z).
z
Here K0 and K1 are the modified Bessel functions of the second kind
of order 0 and 1 respectively. The above expression can also be expressed
more conveniently in terms of the production rate as
Z x
1
1
Q
1
+ K1 (x) K1 (x)
(6.21a)
K0 (y)dy +
M () =
v
x
x
where x = 0 and = 1 /0 . The quantity occurring in bracket depends
only on the parameters and x which could be tabulated for various values
of x and .
9:59
148
comets
Physics of Comets
Q1
exp(1 R)
4v1 R2
(6.22)
1
Q1
[exp(1 R) exp(2 R)]
4v2 R2 (2 1 )
(6.23)
Q1
[A exp(1 R) + B exp(3 R) + C exp(2 R)]
4v3 R2
(6.24)
n2 (R) =
and
n3 (R) =
where
A=
1 2
,
(1 2 )(1 3 )
B=
A(1 3 )
(2 3 )
C=
B(1 2 )
.
(1 3 )
and
The corresponding column density of the species over the field of view of
linear radius is given by
N1 () =
Q1 2
N2 () =
4v2
Q1 2
B(1 ),
4v1
1
2 1
(6.25)
[B(1 ) B(2 )]
(6.26)
and
N3 () =
Q1 2
[AB(1 ) + BB(2 ) + CB(3 )]
4v3
(6.27)
where B(Z) is given by Eq. (6.19a). The above procedure can easily be
extended to cascade processes involving more than three species.
9:59
6.1.3.
comets
149
The relation between the emission coefficient j and the number density
n of the species for the resonance fluorescence excitation process is given
by
j
e2 f
=
(r)nP.
(6.28)
hem
habs m
Here em and abs are the emission and absorption frequencies, (r) the
solar radiation density at the heliocentric distance r and P is the probability
that a particular transition takes place in comparison with other decays. All
other constants have their usual meanings. The integration of Eq. (6.28)
along the line of sight through the comet and up to a projected radius
gives the relation
e2 f
L()
(r) P M ()
(6.29)
=
hem
habs m
where L() is the observed luminosity in the emission line and M () is the
total number of the species in the field of view. The above equation can be
written as
mL()
abs
(6.30)
M () =
em
e2 f (r)P
or
log M () = log C + log L() + 2 log r
(6.31)
where
C=
abs
em
m
.
e2 f (r)P
00
v
9:59
150
Physics of Comets
Here v 00 represents the vibrational level in the lower electronic state and
v the various band sequences being considered. xv00 represents the weight
factors for the vibrational levels of the lower electronic state. Similarly the
transition probability P for the downward transition should also take into
account the population distribution in the upper vibrational levels. The
Eq. (6.31) gives the abundance of the species of interest within the field of
view of the comet as a function of r.
The comparison of the observed surface brightness distribution with the
expected distribution of Fig. 6.1, fixes the values of 0 and 1 as well as
R1 from its definition. These can then be used to compute M () from
Eq. (6.21) for comparing with the observed distribution [Eq. (6.31)]. This
fixes the value of n(R1 ) and hence the density distribution in the coma
through Eq. (6.18). The observed distribution of M () can also be used to
derive the production rate Q directly from Eq. (6.21a).
The radial outflow decay model has been used extensively in the literature with a high degree of success. Basically from a fit of the expected surface brightness distribution with the observed distribution, it is possible to
derive the production rates and the two scale lengths corresponding to the
parent and the dissociated product. From a knowledge of the scale lengths,
the lifetime of the species can be determined provided the velocity is known.
However, it is found that the scale lengths derived from the Hasers model
are generally smaller than the values calculated using the estimated outflow speed of the gas and the photodissociation lifetime computed from the
solar U V flux and the measured photoabsorption cross-sections. There are
some limitations of this model. First of all it is applicable only to photodestruction products. It does not allow for situations where they could
be produced through chemical reactions. Other effects like non-radial flow,
the effect of solar radiation pressure and the velocity distribution of the
species have to be taken into account in a more realistic model. Some attempts have been made in this direction. Mention may be made of the
method based on the vectorial formalism. In this method, the molecular
fragments of a dissociated parent molecule are ejected isotropically in a
reference frame attached to the parent molecule. Also, unlike in the case
of Hasers model, the effects of velocity and lifetimes are separated which
allow the study of velocity dependent phenomena. These are the two main
improvements over the Hasers model. Another formalism has been developed based on an average random walk model which is the Monte Carlo
approach. The calculations are done in 3-dimensions centred on the comet
nucleus. The results are then reduced to 2-dimensional maps for compar-
comets
9:59
comets
151
The gas production rate can, in principle, be determined from the knowledge of the observed light curve. The light curve of a comet basically gives
the variation of apparent brightness as a function of the heliocentric distance. In general, the observed brightness in the visual region is mainly due
to the continuum and the Swan bands of the C2 molecule. The continuum
is made up of scattering by the dust particles in the coma as well as the
reflection from the nucleus. Therefore, a simple photometric equation can
be written relating the observed light to the light contributed by the dust
grains and the nucleus in the same visual band pass. It can be written as
An () + Bf1 (r) + Cd ()f2 (r) = r2 100.4[m m1 (r)5 log ] .
(6.33)
The three terms on the left hand side of the above equation represent the
contribution from the nucleus, gas and dust respectively. Here m1 (r) is
the apparent visual magnitude of the comet, m the apparent magnitude
of the Sun, n () and d () are the phase functions of the nucleus and
the dust, at phase angle , f1 (r) and f2 (r) are the functional behavior of
the gas and dust production with r. The equation (6.33) can be simplified
with the assumption that the cometary activity is basically given by the
production rate of hydrogen QH . This is a reasonable assumption as H2 O
is the most abundant molecule in a comet and H is the dissociated product
of H2 O. If the gas and dust are well mixed and remain almost the same
with several apparitions, then one can write
Cf2 (r) ' C(r)QH (r).
(6.34)
(6.35)
9:59
152
comets
Physics of Comets
C(r)QH (r)d ()
.
B(r)Q2H (r)
(6.37)
The term B(r) should be proportional to the local lifetime of the molecule
and so it can be written as
B(r) = Rc2 (r/r0 )2
(6.38)
(6.39)
(6.40)
If the second term involving Pn Rn2 is smaller than the first term, which is
the case at shorter distances, it is easier to calculate QH from the observed
light curve.
6.2.
6.2.1.
Results
OH and H
9:59
comets
153
9:59
154
Physics of Comets
bution of hydrogen and oxygen atoms with two velocity distributions for H
atoms of 8 and 20 km/sec (Sec 6.3.1). Therefore, the observed brightness of
OH, H and O are consistent with a common source of all the three species,
which most probably is H2 O. The heliocentric variation of the production
rate of OH for Comet Stephan-Oterma is found to have a dependence, as
r4.80.6 for the pre-perihelion distance. The heliocentric variation of OH
production rate in Comet Hale-Bopp for pre-perihelion observations is initially steeper (r3.7 ), then flatter (r1.8 ) and finally much steeper (r6.8 ).
The typical number densities of H2 O and OH at a distance of 104 km from
the nucleus are of the order of 2 105 /cm3 and 4 104 /cm3 respectively.
Comet Halley was observed extensively from IUE satellite for Ly of
H emission (1216
A) and OH emission (3085
A). The observations of Ly
were analysed based on Monte Carlo models in combination with radiative
transfer models. The derived production rate of water from the nucleus
centred observations is compared with that derived from OH observations
in Table 6.1. The agreement in the production rate of H2 O derived from H
and OH observations is good.
(r AU)
Log Q(H2 O)
(from OH, 3085
A)
Log Q(H2 O)
(from Ly , H)
1.45
1.13
1.02
0.84
0.98
1.32
1.85
0.84a
28.987
29.582
29.555
29.818
29.642
29.367
29.340
29.36
28.978
29.509
29.452
29.734
29.691
29.343
29.406
29.45a
*IUE observations.
Adapted from Combi, M.R. and Feldman, P.D.
1993. Icarus, 105, 557.
a. For Comet Hyakutake: Combi, M.R. et al.
1998. AP.J., 494, 816.
comets
9:59
comets
155
of the lines in the ultraviolet region. A large amount of work has been
carried out on various comets based on the radio frequency lines of the OH
radical. Since the radio frequency lines are very narrow and since it is also
possible to make high resolution radio observations, it is possible to study
the velocity distribution of OH molecule in the coma. In fact, the precision
of the velocity field is limited only by the quality of the data. The observed
profile is generally asymmetric about the centre. In addition, there is an
asymmetry in the spatial brightness distribution in the East-West of the
comets centre. These asymmetries arise due to the fact that the velocities
of the OH molecules in the coma are not uniform throughout, i.e., the
differential velocity effect is present. The observed asymmetry implies that
the OH radicals are not isotropically distributed around the nucleus.
The calculation of the total number of OH molecules from the observed
emission is not so simple as the lines arise due to the excitation by ultraviolet radiation where Swings effect is very effective. The expression relating
the total flux density emitted by the entire comet to the total number of
OH molecules in the ground state is given by
Aul ikTBG 2Fu + 1
NOH
(6.41)
42
8
where TBG is the background emission, Fu is the total angular momentum
quantum number of the upper state of the transition, i is the inversion
of the lambda doublet (Fig. 5.14) and is the geocentric distance of the
comet.
The OH production rate can be calculated from the relation QP =
NOH /OH where OH is the lifetime of the OH molecules. In general, for a
better estimate it is necessary to take into account the collisional quenching
as well as the distribution of molecules and the molecular outflow velocities in the coma in the interpretation of the observed flux in terms of the
total number of molecules and hence the production rate. To specify the
distribution of OH in the coma requires a model for the production of OH
from H2 O and the destruction of OH due to photodissociation and photoionization. The Hasers model is most commonly used for the analysis of
OH observations, i.e.,
lOH
QP
r/lOH
r/lP
e
e
(6.42)
n(OH) =
4r2 vOH lOH lP
F =
where n(OH) is the density of the OH molecule. lOH and lP are the scale
lengths (same as 1 of Sec. 6.1.2) for OH and the parent molecule respectively. vOH is the radial velocity of the OH molecule. Figure 6.3 shows
9:59
156
comets
Physics of Comets
Fig. 6.3 Shows the production of OH as a function of the total visual brightness reduced
to r = = 1 AU for various comets. The dashed line drawn is for logQp =30.33 - 0.28
m1 (Despois, D., Gerard, E., Crovisier, J. and I. Kazes, I. 1981. Astr. Ap., 99, 320).
(6.43)
9:59
comets
157
example, the lifetime of OH used in the two cases are different. In addition, -doublet OH population is sensitive to collisions in the inner coma
and so it has to be taken into account. Therefore, the derived production
rate of OH from radio observations depends upon the beam width of the
radio telescope and so on. Basically, the physics of the problem is complicated and it involves the specification of too many parameters. So far
a comparison of the production rate of OH from UV and radio methods
were carried out for different dates of observations, radio telescopes and
so on. Therefore, in order to understand better this discrepancy, if it is
real, is to use simultaneous UV and radio observations so that the physical
characteristics of the coma are roughly the same. Through this procedure
it may be possible to put tight constraints on the model parameters. Such
an exercise was carried out for Comet Halley observations of 1985-86. The
OH observations from IUE satellite and 18 cm radio observations of Comet
Halley taken around the same time have been used for the study. The 18 cm
data has been analysed with sophisticated models. The derived production
rate of OH from OH observations and 18 cm radio observations are given in
Table 6.2. The agreement between the radio and UV OH production rates
is good.
Method
Q(OH)
(1029 /cm2 )
2.5 Dec
3.2 Dec
15.5 Dec
5.12 Dec
10-12 Dec
UV
UV
UV
Radio
Radio
1.4
1.0
1.7
1.4
1.2
9:59
158
Physics of Comets
6.2.2.
H2 O, H2
H2 O
2.7 m band
Before the direct detection of H2 O in Comet Halley, the presence of H2 O
in comets was inferred indirectly from observations such as the presence of
OH, H, O and H2 O+ in comets. The fundamental bands of vibration, especially the 3 near 2.7 m cannot be observed from ground due to strong
absorption by the Earths atmosphere. The first direct detection of 3 band
at 2.7 m of H2 O came from the observations carried out with KAO on
Comet Halley at r = 1.13 AU (Fig. 4.7). It was also detected by VEGA
spacecraft. This detection provided direct evidence that H2 O is the dominant volatile component of comets. The total column density of H2 O can be
estimated from the measured band brightness and with the use of Hasers
comets
9:59
comets
159
9:59
160
Physics of Comets
Fig. 6.4 High dispersion spectra of Comets Lee and LINEAR showing quodruplet lines
of OH near 3046 cm1 (Bonev, B.P., et al. 2004. Ap.J., 615, 1048, Reproduced by
permission of the AAS).
sity of its nonresonant fluorescence lines (hot bands) from the relation
F(H2 O)
(GF)
(6.43a)
Q(H2 O) = P
g(hc)
Where F(H2 O) is the line flux and g is the fluorescene emission factor. P is
a parameter which depends upon geocentric distance, the photodissociation
lifetime of H2 O and the fraction of H2 O molecules expected in the sample
region of the coma. The quantity (GF) represent the growth factor that
accounts for the loss of flux near the nucleus.
The equivalent g-factor geq for OH prompt emission lines which equal
the observed production rate of H2 O represented as Q can be calculated
from an expression similar to equation (6.43a) as
Q =
F(OH )
(GF)
geq (hc)
Here all the parameters are similar to those of equation (6.43a), but refer
to OH prompt emission lines. These geq factors can be used to derive the
production rate of H2 O in any other comet from the measured fluxes of
comets
9:59
comets
161
Fig. 6.5 Observed Spatial distribution of H2 O and OH in Comet Lee (Bonev, B.P. et
al. 2004. Ap. J., 615, 1048, Reproduced by permission of the AAS).
9:59
162
Physics of Comets
1.31011 kg. For Comet Borrelly, the estimated total amount of water sublimated from the nucleus obtained from integrating the water production
rate throughout an apparition is around 1.1 1010 kg.
H2
The strong lines of the hydrogen molecule should appear in the spectral
region around 1600
A. But its identification is not definite. Shorter than
around 1170
A, three H2 Lyman P1 lines of the (6, v 00 ) bands have been
detected in Comet LINEAR with FUSE (Fig. 4.6). These lines are normally
not excited but arises due to accidental coincidence of the wavelength of
1 +
solar Lyman line with the wavelength P1 line of (B 1 +
u X g ) (6,
13
0) band. The derived column density of H2 of (3.0 0.6) 10 /cm2 is
found to be consistent with the H2 O dissociation models. i.e. H2 O H2
+ O(1 D). It is possible that some of it could be produced directly from
the nucleus or by solar wind sputtering of dirty ice grains.
6.2.3.
CN, C2 , C3 , NH
It is easier to study the spectral lines of the molecules like C2 , CN, etc in
comets using the standard techniques as their lines lie in the visual region.
Generally filters are used which can isolate their emission bands. It is also
possible to get a homogeneous set of data on many comets covering a large
range of heliocentric distances which are of prime importance for investigating the possible physical correlations like the composition variations or
the similarities among the comets of various types.
The method based on Eq. (6.31) is particularly suitable for the study
of molecules like C2 , CN, etc., as the total flux of a band or a band sequence in a certain field of view can easily be measured using the standard
methods. The total number of the molecules can then be calculated from
Eq. (6.31) as the constant can be evaluated using the spectroscopic data
for the molecules of interest. The production rate can be calculated from
Eq. (6.21a) from molecular column densities knowing the scale length of
the two species and for an assumed outflow velocity, 1 km/sec. The
production rates can easily be scaled for any other value of the outflow velocity. The generally used scale lengths for some of the molecules are given
in Table 6.3. The results for the heliocentric variation of the production
rates of C2 , CN and C3 for Comet Bradfield show a dependence as r3.2
compared to r1.70.3 for CN observed for Comet West. For the dusty
comets
9:59
comets
163
Comet Steph
an-Oterma, the production rate of CN and C2 varied approximately as r4.20.3 and r5.60.4 respectively. Therefore the heliocentric
variation of the production rate of molecules vary among comets.
Table 6.3
Molecule
Parent(km)
OH(0,0)
NH(0,0)
CN(v = 0)
C3 (4050A)
C2 (v = 0)
2.4
5.0
1.3
2.8
2.2
104
104
104
103
104
Daughter(km)
1.6
1.5
2.1
2.7
6.6
105
105
105
105
104
Daughter
life time (sec)
1.6
1.5
2.1
2.7
6.6
105
105
105
104
104
9:59
164
Physics of Comets
Fig. 6.6 Observed production rates of molecules OH, NH, CN, C2 and C3 and A()f
plotted as a function of the heliocentric distance for Comet Halley. Filled symbols refer
to preperihelion observations while open symbols refer to postperihelion observations.
Solid lines and dotted curves are for linear and quadratic fit to the data. (Schleicher,
D.G, Millis, R.L. and Birch, P.V. 1998. Icarus, 132, 397).
comets
9:59
comets
165
Species
Wild2e
Halleyb
Borrellyd
Wirtenc
Meana
Rangea
NH/OH
CN/OH
C2 /OH
C3 /OH
UV Cont.
Blue Cont.
Green Cont.
C2 /CN
-2.35 .34
-2.60.14
-2.97.23
-3.40.20
-25.53.32
-25.40.13
-25.28.24
-1.86
-2.32
-2.21
-3.20
-2.28.34
-2.62.09
-2.91.12
-3.55.19
-25.53.31
-25.53.36
-25.40.31
-2.36.03
-2.50.12
-2.49.12
-3.49.12
-2.37.23
-2.50.18
-2.44.20
-3.59.27
-2.77
-2.83
-2.90
-4.26
+0.06.0
-0.09 to +.29
-25.0
+0.11
to
to
to
to
-1.80
-2.17
-2.10
-3.09
Continuum is in A()f/Q(OH).
(a) A Hearn, M.F. et al. 1995. Icarus, 118, 223.
(b) Schleicher, D.G., Millis, R.L. and Birch, P.V. 1998. Icarus, 132, 397.
(c) Farnam, T.L. and Schleicher, D.G. 1998. Astron. Astrophys., 335, L50.
(d) Schleicher, D.G., Woodney, L.M. and Mills, R.L. 2003. Icarus, 162, 415.
(e) Farnam, J.L. and Schleicher, D.G. 2005. Icarus, 173, 533.
9:59
166
Physics of Comets
6.2.4.
CH, NH2
comets
9:59
6.2.5.
comets
167
CO, CO2
CO
The ultraviolet observations made on the Comet West at the heliocentric
distance of 0.385 AU showed the strong bands of (A-X) transitions (near
1500
A) of the CO molecule. The deduced production rate of CO from this
observation based on Eq. (6.4) with (at 1 AU) = 1.4 106 sec comes out
to be
Q(CO) = 2.6 1029 / sec .
Since then the above bands of CO has been seen from all bright comets
observed with IUE, HST etc.
The derived production rate of CO relative to H2 O in Comet West was
around 0.3 and in Comet Bradfield the ratio was about 0.02. Comet Levy
gave a ratio of 0.11 0.02. Comet Halley gave a ratio of 0.17. For several
comets belonging to Oort cloud comets, the total abundance of CO varied
from 1% to 24% relative to water.
Extended source of CO
The presence of an extended source of CO in Comet Halley came from
the in situ observations carried out with Neutral Mass Spectrometer (NMS)
on board the Giotto spacecraft. This result came from a comparison of the
observed distribution of molecules of m/q = 28(CO) with m/q = 18(H2 O).
The observed radial density distribution of H2 O and CO derived from NMS
data is shown in Fig. 6.7. The two molecules show entirely different variations. The linear decrease of H2 O is due to the photo-destruction of H2 O.
For CO, the initial linear increase is due to the extended source of CO
which is likely to arise from CHON dust particles containing H2 CO which
photodissociates. The nearly constant variation at large distances is due to
the long life of CO against photodestruction.
CO2
The presence of CO+
2 ion in comets implied the presence of CO2 . But
CO2 was observed for the first time in Comet Halley from the infrared spectrometer on board the Vega spacecraft which detected 3 fundamental band
at 4.26 m. Although the band is strong, it cannot be observed from ground
due to the absorption of CO2 in the earths atmosphere. Subsequently it
has been observed in several other comets such as Hale-Bopp, Hartley etc.
9:59
168
Physics of Comets
Fig. 6.7 Radical density profiles for H2 O and CO derived from gas mass spectra with
NMS on Giotto spacecraft for Comet Halley. The solid line corresponds to a least square
fit to the data and corresponds to a photodestruction rate of kH2 O 1.7 105 s1 .
The dashed lines refer to photodestruction rate for 10%. (Eberhardt, P. 1999. Space
Sci. Rev., 90, 45).
by ISO. The presence of mass peak at 44 in the Giotto NMS mass spectra
also showed the presence of CO2 in Comet Halley. The derived abundance
ratio of CO2 /H2 O is around 34% for Comet Halley and 810% for Comet
Hartley 2. The derived production ratio of CO2 to water in comets varies
around 310%. However for Comet Hale-Bopp the estimated production
ratio of CO2 to water at r > 2.9 AU was > 20%. Therefore CO2 is also a
trace constituent of the nucleus.
comets
9:59
comets
169
Prompt emission
The Cameron band system of CO seen in comets arises between triplet
and singlet electronic states (a3 X 1 ). These transitions are forbidden
dipole ones. Therefore they cannot be excited by resonance fluorescence
process. They are most likely to arise from the formation of CO molecules
in the a 3 state during the photodissociation of CO2 . The molecules in the
a3 state then decay to the ground state in a time scale of 7 103 sec
producing prompt emission lines. Therefore the Cameron band emission
is directly proportional to the production rate of CO2 and can be used to
trace the abundance of CO2 .
Two dominant mechanisms for the observed Cameron emission are the
photodissociation of CO2 by solar radiation and the electron impact excitation of CO. The two processes can be distinguished observationally as
the rotational temperature of CO molecules produced in the photodissociation of CO2 is around five times larger than produced by electron impact
excitation.
6.2.6.
CS, S2
The other minor species whose production rates are of interest are the
sulphur containing molecules, CS and S2 . The (0, 0) band of CS at 2576
A
has been observed in many comets mainly with the IUE satellite. It has also
been observed in the radio wavelength region. If the observed CS comes
from CS2 , then CS2 /H2 O CS/H2 O 0.4%. Therefore, CS2 is also a
trace constituent of the nucleus.
The molecule S2 was discovered in IRAS-Araki-Alcock from the observations of several bands of (BX) system near 2900
A. The molecule S2 has
a short lifetime few hundred seconds at 1 AU. So it is present very close
to the nucleus. The derived production rate of S2 for the Comet IRASAraki-Alcock observed at =0.032 AU is about 2 1025 / sec. It has also
been seen in several other comets. The derived abundance ratio of S2 /H2 O
0.001.
6.2.7.
Ions
9:59
170
Physics of Comets
comets
9:59
comets
171
3910 A). Hence N2 has been used as a proxy for N2 . However, non detection of N+
2 in some of the recent comets as discussed earlier and with
5
4
an upper limit to the abundance ratio of N2 /CO <
10 10 has raised
several important issues. Some of them are whether comets have varying
amount of N2 or did the depletion took place at a later time or is it related
to the place of formation in the solar nebula. May be the general view that
neutral N2 and CO should have been present in the early solar nebula is
questionable.
6.2.8.
Complex molecules
TB = (1 e )
h
k
1
eh/kTex 1
1
eh/kTbg 1
.
(6.44)
hNJ i
c2 2J + 3
AJ+1J
[1 exp(h/kTex )]
8 2 2J + 1
(6.45)
where is the line width in frequency units and hNJ i is the mean volume
density within the observed field in the rotational state J. For most of the
molecules, the lines are optically thin and therefore (1 e ) in Eq.
(6.44). The average excitation temperature Tex can be calculated from the
9:59
172
Physics of Comets
relation
hNJ+1 i
2J + 3
h
.
(6.46)
=
exp
hNJ i
2J + 1
kTex
In order to proceed ahead, the excitation mechanism of the molecules
in a cometary atmosphere is required. To model the radio emission from a
molecule, it is necessary to consider the excitation scheme of the molecules
by taking into account the rotational, the vibrational and the electronic
states of the molecule. However, for most of the molecules in the coma,
the main excitation process is the pumping of the fundamental bands of
vibration by the solar infrared radiation field and the thermal excitation
by collisions in the inner coma. Such species do not have a significant
electronic excitation because they are generally predissociative and also
they lead to destruction rather than fluorescence. For the case of the stable
CO molecule the excitation rate of the ground state X1 + vibrational levels
by solar infrared radiation field at 1 AU is about 2.6 104 / sec for v 00 = 0
to 1 and 3 106 / sec for v 00 = 0 to 2. The rate is 106 to 109 / sec
for excitation from the ground level to higher electronic states. Hence,the
excitation rates are too low to populate electronic states as well as v 00 = 1
level. Therefore, it is a very good approximation to consider the excitation
starting from the v 00 = 0 ground vibrational state. Rotational excitation
by solar radiation is also negligible due to lesser fluxes at the wavelength
of rotational transitions.
To a very good approximation, the radiative excitation is dominated by
one or two vibrational bands. The balance between the infrared excitation
and spontaneous decay completely determines the rotational distribution
at fluorescence equilibrium. The fluorescence equilibrium can be evaluated
without much difficulty as it depends on the molecular constants and the
solar radiation field. However, the collisional excitation due to collisions
with H2 O molecules is more complicated. One assumes spherical symmetry and a reasonable value for collision cross-section between the molecule
and H2 O and the coma temperature and velocity distribution derived from
hydrodynamic models. The molecular mean column densities can then be
derived by volume integration within the instrument beam. The excitation temperature, Tex can therefore be estimated from Eq. (6.46). The
expected rotational line intensities can be calculated for reasonable values
of the relevant parameters in Eq. (6.44).
As an example the relative population distribution of linear molecules
CO and HCN is shown in Fig. 6.8. For such molecules, the rotational
comets
9:59
comets
173
Fig. 6.8 The rotational population distribution under resonance fluorescence equilibrium for CO and HCN is shown as a function of rotational quantum number and for
logarithmic ratio of the infrared excitation rate to the rate of rotational de-excitation
from the J = 1 level (Bockelee-Movan, D. and Crovisier, J. 1985. Astr. Ap., 151, 90).
population distribution is determined by the ratio of total infrared excitation rate to the spontaneous decay rate of the rotational levels. Therefore,
the molecules with large rotational Einstein A coefficients like that of HCN
molecule, will have population concentrated mostly in the lowest rotational
levels as compared to molecules like CO and HC3 N with small rotational
Einstein A values which have populations over a wider range of rotational
levels.
Observed molecules
As mentioned earlier, the line intensities in the radio region are generally
expressed in terms of equivalent brightness temperature TB . The brightness
temperature is related to the line flux Ful (upper level u, lower level l)
through RayleighJeans relation (i.e. h <
kT ) of the Planck function.
The integrated line area over the velocity is related to the column density
through the relation
Z
hc3 Aul
TB dv =
2 hNu i
8kul
where Nu is the column density in the upper level u and other symbols
have their usual meanings. In general, time-dependent excitation models
9:59
174
Physics of Comets
are required to derive the population distribution in the upper states for
calculating the total column density hN i. Alternately from the observed
intensities of several rotational lines, it is possible to estimate the rotational
temperature which can then be used for the calculation of population distribution in the upper states. Knowing the total column density of molecules
in the coma, the production rate of the molecule can be calculated. This
is then used for estimating the relative abundances of molecules in the
nucleus.
The number of known molecules in comets before Comet Halleys apparition in 1985-86 were limited in extent. However the concentrated effort
made on Comet Halley led to the detection of many new molecules. Subsequently, large number of molecules of various kinds and complexities has
been detected in comets. Several lines arising out of isotopes have also
been detected. A typical observed spectrum in the radio region is shown in
Fig. 4.10. From such observations the production rate of molecules can be
derived. A wide variation in the observed abundance of parent species in
the coma of comets have been seen. In addition to the detected molecules
upper limits have been determined for many other molecules.
Several molecules belonging to CHO group, such as Methanol
(CH3 OH), Formaldehyde (H2 CO), Formic acid (HCOOH), Methyl Formate
(HCOOCH3 ), Acetaldehyde(CH3 CHO) and Ethyl Glycol (HOCH2 CH2 OH)
have been seen. Surprisingly Ethyl Glycol is the most abundant organic
molecule in spite of its complexity and its identification is based on several
lines present in the millimetre spectra of Comet Hale-Bopp. The hydrocarbons such as, Methane (CH4 ), Acetylene(C2 H2 ) and Ethane (C2 H6 ) are
present. Several sulphur bearing molecules like S2 , H2 S, OCS, H2 CS etc
are present. Some of the complex molecules containing nitrogen are Methyl
Cyanide (HC3 N), Isocyanic acid (HNCO) and Formic acid (NH2 CHO).
Comet Tempel 1 showed the presence of PAHs.
The significant result that comes out of abundance studies of molecules
is the presence of chemical diversity among comets belonging to Oort cloud
and Jupiter-family of comets. For example, the abundance of CO varies
by a factor of around 40. The abundance of hydrocarbon CH4 varies by a
factor of about 10, while that of C2 H6 shows less variation 0.4 to 0.7%.
The HCN abundance seems to peak around 0.1%. HNC, the isomeric form
of HCN was first detected (J(4-3) line at 363 GHz) in Comet Hyakutake and
subsequently in other comets. It is an unstable molecule under laboratory
conditions. The ratio of HNC/HCN in Comet Hale-Bopp is found to lie
comets
9:59
comets
175
9:59
176
comets
Physics of Comets
variation initially is steeper and then flattens out. From the observed radial
distribution of molecules in the cometary coma of Comet Hale Bopp, the
extended source of H2 CO, OCS and CO has been inferred. In contrast,
the observed column density profiles for the molecules H2 O, C2 H6 , CH4
and HCN were found to be consistent with their release directly from the
nucleus.
6.2.9.
O, C, N, S
Oxygen
The abundances or the production rates of oxygen atoms can be calculated from the observation of red doublet lines of oxygen atom occurring
at 6300 and 6364
A. Since the line at 6300
A is quite strong in comets,
it has been studied extensively for deriving the production rate of oxygen
atoms. Since these lines arise due to photodissociation of H2 O, OH and CO
molecules which populate the 1 D state (Fig. 4.11), the column densities of
the parent oxygen atoms can be easily obtained. The observed intensity of
the line is therefore given by
N
(6.47)
I
P
where and are the yields for the particular state for dissociation and
branching ratio respectively. N is the column density of the parents and P
is the dissociation lifetime of the parent.The oxygen 1 D production rate of
the comet can be calculated using the observed fluxes of the oxygen line
that has been corrected for various blending and other effects (Fcorr ). The
photon rate is given by
P =
Fcorr 4 2
.
(h)6300
(6.48)
Fcorr 42
atoms.
(h)6300
(6.49)
9:59
comets
177
Fabry-Perot observations:
9:59
178
Physics of Comets
with respective branching ratios BR1, BR2 and BR3. O[1 D] can also be
produced from the reaction
CO + h C + O[1 D]
CO2 + h CO + O[1 D]
with branching ratios BR4 and BR5. However, as CO and CO2 are minor constituents of comets and their photodissociation lifetimes are much
larger than those of H2 O and OH, the contribution from these sources to
6300
A emission is relatively small within the field of view of observations.
Therefore, the contribution arising out of CO and CO2 is generally neglected. The intensity of 6300
A emission at the projected distance from
the nucleus is given by
NH2 O () NOH ()
+
.
(6.50)
41
43
Here 1 and 3 are the photodissociation lifetime of H2 O and OH leading
to O[1 D] channels. NH2 O and NOH are the column densities of H2 O and
OH respectively at . Using azimuthally symmetric parent-daughter Haser
model for representing NH2 O and NOH , the intensity I6300 () can be written
as
Z /2
sec
1
d
exp
I6300 ()
0
l1
I6300 () =
Z /2
BR2 .BR3
sec
l1
sec
exp
d.
exp
BR1 l1 l2 0
l1
l2
(6.51)
Here l1 and l2 are the Haser parent-daughter photodissociative scale length
for the (H2 O, H) and (OH, H) respectively. By integrating Eq. (6.51) with
respect to , it is possible to calculate the ratio of the total flux in the
6300
A line to the flux within the field of view of the observation. This
ratio is given by
R
I6300 ()d
AC = R 01
(6.52)
I6300 ()d
0
+
comets
9:59
comets
179
scale length can be derived from a comparison of Eq. (6.51) with several
high spectral resolution images of 6300
A emission. The production rate
Q(O1 D) can be derived from the relation
4
Q(O1 D) = ( )(42 I6300 )AC.
3
(6.53)
Here is the solid angle of the field of view, I6300 is the average intensity of
the 6300
A emission within the field of view (in photons /cm2 / sec /ster).
The factor (4/3) takes into account the fact that 1/4 of the O1 D atoms
radiate to the ground state via 6364
A channel.
To convert Q(O1 D) to Q(H2 O), the ratio of Q(H2 O)/Q(O1 D) has to
be known. This ratio can be determined from the photochemical branching
ratios. It can also be determined by comparing the production of Q(1 D)
with the results of Q(H2 O) derived from other observations. There is a
variation in the derived ratios of Q(1 D) to Q(H2 O). The estimated factor
for converting O[1 D] production rate to Q(H2 O) from the branching ratios
is given in Table 6.5.
Table 6.5
Branching ratios.
Reaction
Theoretical values
O(1 D)
H2 O + h H2 +
H2 O + h H + OH
OH + h H + O(1 D)
0.044, 0.054
0.840, 0.905
0.103
It is around 11.7 for pre-perihelion observations and 13.7 for postperihelion observations for Comet Halley. The conversion factor for pre-and
post-perihelion observations are different as the branching ratio BR3 depends upon the heliocentric velocity of OH. The resulting production rate
of H2 O is compared with those derived from H observations in Table 6.6,
which shows a general agreement between the two determinations.
The [OI] 6300
A emission line profile from the coma of Comet Halley
was observed with Fabry - Perot during 1986. The observed profile is in
good agreement with the calculated profile based on Monte Carlo Particle
Trajectory Model. The derived water production rate is (2.90 0.13)
9:59
180
comets
Physics of Comets
[OI] 6300
A
4.30.5
3.20.4
2.80.3
6.3 0.8
8.3 0.9
11.6 1.5
7.8 0.9
17.5 2.0
4.42 0.82
3.71 0.85
3.22 0.61
7.65 1.5
9.49 1.8
12.1 2.3
11.8 2.3
18.5 2.6
9:59
comets
181
Table 6.7
Comet
Date
r(au)
(au)
N(O)
(1013 /cm2 )
N(C)
(1012 /cm2 )
N(S)
(1012 /cm2 )
Bradfield
16 Jan 1980
31 Jan 1980
5 Nov 1980
24 Oct 1980
7 Dec 1980
0.80
1.03
0.81
1.01
1.02
0.40
0.29
0.32
0.29
0.50
2.5
0.8
0.40
1.2
1.7
0.68
0.27
1.0
1.7
1.4
0.59
1.3
Encke
Tuttle
(a) Weaver, H.A., Feldman, P.D., Festou, M.C., AHearn, M.F. and Keller, H.U. 1981.
Icarus 47, 449.
Carbon
The brightness of the carbon line at 1657
A arising out of the 3 P state
has been used to derive the column densities of carbon for several comets
and are given in Table 6.7. The CI line at 1657
A was strong in the spectra
of Comet West. It could be accounted for from the dissociation of the
CO molecule. However in Comet Bradfield carbon emission is quite strong
inspite of CO being less abundant. This could indicate the presence of other
sources.
The detection of the carbon line at 1931
A arising from the metastable
1
level D state is of particular interest. This is because the parent molecule
should be able to explain the presence of carbon both in the 3 P (1657
A
line) and 1 D states.
There are several molecules which can give rise to carbon atoms such
as CO and several other minor species such as CO2 and so on. The in
9:59
182
Physics of Comets
Ratios
Comets
Sun
CI chondrites
H/O
C/O
N/O
S/O
2.0
0.40
0.09
0.03
1175
0.43
0.13
0.02
0.17
0.10
0.007
0.07
The table shows that the observed ratio of C/O in comets is similar to
the solar value. However, the ratio H/O is very much smaller in comets
compared to the solar value. This implies that hydrogen is very much depleted in comets. This in turn means that either the hydrogen has escaped
from the system or it was not trapped at the time of formation. A plausible physical explanation could be that in the case of the sun it is the
gravitational binding while in comets it is the chemical binding which is
important. Hence, in the case of the Sun, gravity essentially prevents hy-
comets
9:59
comets
183
drogen from escaping, while in the case of comets only a small fraction of
hydrogen can be bound in molecules. Therefore, most of the hydrogen as
well as H2 disappear due to their high volatility. On the other hand, the
heavy elements like Na, Ca, Fe, Mn, etc are assumed to have sublimated
out of the refractory grains and have relative abundances similar to the
solar value (Fig. 5.19).
6.3.
6.3.1.
The presence of a huge halo of hydrogen gas around comets was predicted by Biermann in 1968 based on the dissociation of the H2 O molecule.
In general, the photon energy available for dissociation is much larger than
the dissociation energy. Therefore, this excess energy is usually carried
away by the dissociated products. For example, in the case of H2 O the
excess energy gives a velocity 17.8 km/ sec to the hydrogen atom, and
this is much larger than the gaseous outflow velocity which is of the order of 0.5 km/ sec. Since the lifetime for the ionization of the molecule is
106 sec, the observed extent of the size of the halo which is given by v
is about 106 to 107 km. Based on this simple physical argument and with a
hydrogen gas production rate of 1030 to 1031 molecule/sec, it was concluded
that the comets should be bright in the Lyman line. The ultraviolet observations made in Lyman with OAO-2 on Comets Tago-Sato-Kosaka
and Bennett confirmed the presence of the hydrogen halo extending up
to about 106 to 107 km around the nucleus. This result was further confirmed through a series of rocket and satellite observations made on various
other comets. In recent years, with the availability of better instruments
and spatial resolution, it has been possible to get good and high quality
isophotes of the Lyman region. These high quality isophotes and line
profile have shown that they extend farther in the direction away from the
Sun compared to that in the direction toward the Sun. The isophotes also
become more and more elongated in the antisolar direction as the comet
goes nearer the Sun. These observations clearly show the effect of intense
Lyman radiation pressure effects. The high quality isophotes also show
that the axis of the isophotes is not along the direction of the Sun-Comet
line, but is inclined at an angle to this line. The theoretical models have to
explain some of these observed effects.
In order to make a comparison with the observed isophotes, the emis-
9:59
184
comets
Physics of Comets
(6.54)
where g is the emission rate factor and N is the column density of hydrogen
atoms. Therefore, the calculation of emission intensities essentially depends
upon N , which is model dependent.
To start with, one can assume an isotropic radial outflow without collisions from a point source. The above assumption is reasonable since the
observed distribution of molecules is nearly spherically symmetric around
the nucleus. This is borne out by the shape of the isophotes in the visible
region. Therefore, the assumption of a point source with the radial outflow
of material usually termed as the Fountain model is reasonable for the interpretation of the hydrogen coma. In this steady state model the hydrogen
atoms are released at the rate of QH from the nucleus and are pushed away
due to solar radiation pressure in the direction away from the Sun with a
lifetime tH .
The lifetime tH for hydrogen atoms is the sum total of lifetimes due to
photoionization (tph ) and to charge exchange with protons (tpr ). The calculated photoionization lifetime at 1 AU is tph = 1.4 107 sec . The lifetime
for charge exchange with protons of flux Fw 2 108 proton/cm2 /sec at
1 AU and for an effective cross-section = 2 1015 cm2 is equal to
tpr =
1
= 2.5 106 sec .
Fw
(6.55)
(6.56)
(6.57)
9:59
comets
185
The most probable speed v0 is related to the mean speed vH by the relation
vH =
v0 .
(6.58)
The density of hydrogen atoms at a distance r from the nucleus and for a
time of travel t is given by
nH =
QH
et/tH .
4vH r2
(6.59)
The distance r has now to be expressed in terms of the orbit of the hydrogen
atoms after they are released from the nucleus. The co-ordinate system is
chosen such that the nucleus is the origin, the Sun is in the negative z
direction and the positive x-axis is in the direction of the Earth. The
hydrogen atoms leaving the nucleus follow the parabolic orbits and they can
reach any point (x, y, z) with a velocity v through two different trajectories.
The total density which is made up of these two components is given by
the relation
nH (x, y, z) =
QH
[(a
4v "
q
q
x20 x2 ) x20 x2 ]1
#
1/2 q
1 2
a (x20 x2 )1/2 .
exp
tH b
(6.60)
p
Here a = z + (v 2 /b) and x0 = x2 (z 2 + y 2 ). The parameter x0 is a
function of y and z and defines a surface of a rotational paraboloid about the
z-axis containing all the atoms within the maximum velocity v. The total
column density along the line of sight s, including the velocity distribution
of atoms, is given by
Z
N (s) =
0
v
f (v)2
vH
x0
(6.61)
9:59
186
Physics of Comets
Fig. 6.10 Calculated Lyman isophotes based on the Fountain and Syndyname models
for Comet Benett for April 1, 1970. The parameters used are: production rate QH =
1.2 1030 /sec, outflow velocity H = 7.9 km/sec, lifetime tH = 2.5 106 sec at 1AU,
solary Lyman flux = 3.2 1011 photons/cm2 /sec/
A (Adapted from Keller, H.U. 1976.
Space Sci. Rev., 18, 641).
comets
9:59
comets
187
At the observation time t0 , all the points are arranged along the Syndyname and correspond to the same emission time te . Let vP represent some
minimum velocity above which the contribution reaches the line-of-sight
integral. Then
s
vP =
(t0 te )
where s represents the minimum distance from the fictitious source point.
The total contribution to the column density at time t is the integral over
all the surface densities and is given by
Z
Pt (v) dv
1
(6.62)
Nt (s) =
2
2
2 vP v t [1 (vP /v)2 ]1/2
where Pt (v)dv represents the production rate of hydrogen atoms with velocities between v and v + dv. Here the subscript t is used to denote the
production rate as a function of time, which in turn depends on the heliocentric distance. The total column density arising out of all the fictitious
source points on the Syndyname is given by
Z
Z
Z
1
Pt (v)dv
.
(6.63)
N=
Nt (s)dt =
dt
2
2
2 1/2
2 0
vP v t [1 (vP /v) ]
If the hydrogen atoms decay with a lifetime
may be a function
R t tH which
0
0
of t, then the exponential factor exp [ 0 t1
(t
)
dt
]
has
to be included
H
in the expression for Nt (S). Therefore, the expression for the total column
density is given by
Z t
Z
Z
1
Pt (v)dv
1 0
0
N=
dt exp
tH (t )dt
. (6.64)
2
2
2 1/2
2 0
0
vP v t [1 (vP /v) ]
The velocity distribution is related to the production rate of hydrogen atoms
through the relation
QH
vf (v)dv.
(6.65)
Pt (v)dv =
vH
Figure 6.10 shows the calculated isophotes for Comet Bennett based on
the above model for the same parameters of vH , tH , QH and F used in
the Fountain model. The figure clearly shows that the isophotes are now
inclined at a certain angle to the Sun-Comet line and are symmetrical about
the Syndyname, and this is consistent with the observations.
The model described above can be improved further by assuming the
parent molecules to be released by the nucleus and allowing for the decay
of the molecules as they flow outwards. This eliminates the assumption of
9:59
188
Physics of Comets
the hydrogen atoms being emitted from a point source. In this model the
parent molecules are released isotropically from the nucleus. These parent
molecules could give rise to two or more decays along their paths with a
certain value for the scale length for each decay. This in turn is dependent
on the lifetime and the velocity of the molecules. The formalism developed
in Sec. 6.1.2 can easily be applied to the present situation.
The models described above has been applied to the Lyman observations of many comets with great success. A comparison of the observed
and the calculated isophotes allows one to determine quantitatively the
production rate, the lifetime and the outflow velocity of hydrogen atoms.
The detailed observations of Comet Bennett showed that two Maxwellian
velocity distributions in the model calculation corresponding to vH = 7 and
21 km/sec with 50:50 of each are required to fit the observations.
Monte-Carlo approach
In the formulation outlined above many details are still to be understood. This, therefore, led to the consideration of Monte-Carlo approach.
The model developed is a three-dimensional time dependent Monte-Carlo
particle trajectory model (MCPTM). It takes into account the physical
processes which are important in the inner and outer coma of comets.
In particular, it includes a physically realistic description of the detailed
production mechanism and trajectories of H atoms produced by the photodissociation of H2 O and OH. It takes into account the solar radiation
pressure acceleration. The gas dynamic model calculates the velocity and
temperature variation in the coma and includes the multiple collisions, photochemical heating, radiative transfer and so on. The model couples the
simple gas-dynamic flow of the gas with the MCPTM formalism. Therefore, the gas-dynamic model coupled with MCPTM formalism considers in
a consistent way and also in a realistic manner the actual trajectories of
as many as 105 radicals or atoms. The space and column densities and
hence the emission rates are then calculated. For comparing with the observation, the calculated results have to be referred to the projection on the
sky-plane which in turn depend upon the relative geometry of the Earth,
the Sun and the comet at the time of the observations. These are then
compared with observations.
The model simulated isophotes based on MCPTM formalism is in
agreement with the observed isophotes of Comet Hale-Bopp (Fig. 6.11).
Therefore MCPTM formalism which takes into account in detail the important physical processes in the inner and outer extended coma region, is
comets
9:59
comets
189
Fig. 6.11 (c) Comparison of the SOHO SWAN observations of Ly isophote contours
(solid lines) of Comet 1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) at r = 1.75 AU with the calculated isophotes
based on MCPTM models. (b) Shows the H-atom velocity distribution upon photochemical production (thin line) and after Monte Carlo model calculation (thick line) (Combi,
M.R. et al. 2000. Icarus, 144, 191).
Analysis of H observations
9:59
190
Physics of Comets
6562.8
A. However, the observations carried out with the Fabry-Perot spectrometer, the Doppler shift of the cometary H may be sufficient to avoid
the geocoronal H emission (Fig. 6.12). The contamination of galactic H
emission and H2 O+ emission can be minimized by taking proper precautions in making the observations. The commonly used Hasers model is
not adequate for the analysis of H emission as the hydrogen atoms have
large dispersion in velocities. These had limited the study of H emission
in comets.
As discussed earlier, the Monte-Carlo Particle Trajectory Model
(MCPTM) has been successfully applied to Lyman observations of
comets. This formalism can be modified and used for the analysis of observations of H emission in comets. The main quantity to be determined
in the application of MCPTM model is the g-factor for the H emission.
This has to be calculated taking into account the contributions from all the
transitions which can give rise to this emission. This involves the knowledge of the transition probabilities of all the relevant transitions which
comets
9:59
comets
191
contribute to this emission and the solar radiation which excites these levels i.e., through excitation and de-excitation. The principal source of H
emission is through the excitation of H atoms by solar Lyman photons. The actual profile of Lyman has to be used since H atoms are in
motion. For solar minimum conditions the total flux of Lyman line at
2
1AU is 3.5 109 photons/cm / sec while the corresponding Lyman flux is
2
3.1 1011 photons/cm / sec . For an accurate calculation of g-facotr for H
emission, in addition to principal contribution from the 3P to 3S transitions, several other secondary contributions have also been considered. The
derived g-factor is velocity dependent, as in the case of OH (see Fig. 5.14).
The MCPTM can be used to simulate observations of H emission.The calculated and the observed line profile for Comet Halley is shown in Fig. 6.12.
The derived velocities for such a fit require a broad velocity peak from 5 to
9 km/sec representing the bulk of ( 70%) of H atoms released and a velocity 8 km/sec due to the dissociation of OH. Additional smaller peaks also
appear at around 11 km/sec ( 7%) and 22 26 km/sec ( 20%) due to the
formation of H from OH and at 15 to 19 km/sec due to photodissociation of
H2 O. A comparison of the derived production rate of H2 O from H emission with those derived from 6300
A emission observations should help in
checking the photochemical processes which give rise to atomic oxygen and
hydrogen from the parent molecule H2 O. Fortunately such a comparison
can be made for Comet Halley, as measurements of H and 6300
A emissions were carried out on the same dates, with the same instrument, same
calibration procedure and so on. The results derived from such an analysis
are shown in Table 6.6. The agreement is reasonable in view of the various
uncertainties involved in the calculation of parameters such as, g-factor for
H emission and the branching ratios for the production of O[1 D] atoms
from photodissociation of H2 O and OH.
6.4.
6.4.1.
Related Studies
Gas-phase chemistry in the coma
9:59
192
Physics of Comets
ious physical processes that could modify this gas, the gas-phase chemical
reactions among various constituents (neutral and ions) in the inner coma
could also alter the original gas. The chemical reactions can take place
due to the fact that the timescales involved for many of the reactions are
much faster than the solar photodestruction rates at a heliocentric distance
of 1 AU. In fact, the early investigations did indicate that ion-molecule
could be quite important and various reaction sequences were considered.
They did produce substantial amounts of various types of species that have
been observed in comets. However, the reaction schemes considered were
quite simple so that the calculations could be carried out without much
difficulty. But in a real physical situation various networks of chemical reactions have to be considered between neutrals and ions of different atoms
and molecules.
The nucleus is assumed to be spherical in shape containing the volatile
material in certain proportions. The gases evaporate from the nucleus as a
result of the solar heating. The vapourization theory (Chap. 11) could be
used to calculate the gas production rate, outstream velocity, temperature,
etc., which is consistent with the assumed mixture. The total number
density present in the expanding coma gas at a distance r from the nucleus is
related to the density at the nucleus surface n(R0 ) through the conservation
of mass by
2
R0
n(r) = n(R0 )
.
(6.66)
r
Here R0 is the radius of the nucleus. To take into account the various
physical processes and the chemical reactions which modify the particular
species, it is necessary to have the particle conservation equation. The
equation for a general case for a species i can be written in the form
X
X
ni
Rji ni
+ ni vi =
Rik ,
(6.67)
t
i
k
where ni and vi denote the number density and the flow velocity respectively. The first and the second terms on the right-hand side of the equation
denote the rate of formation of species i, by processes involving species j
and the rate of destruction of species i through processes involving species
k. The whole set of equations given by Eq. (6.67) are coupled to each
other through sources and sinks which are on the right-hand side of the
equation. The assumption of spherical symmetry and a constant outflow
velocity for all the species will simplify the equations considerably. Photodissociation and photoionization processes as well as the opacity effects
comets
9:59
comets
193
for the incident solar radiation are taken into account. The various chemical reactions between ions, electrons, neutrals and free radicals have been
considered (Table 6.9).
Table 6.9
Photodissociation
Photoionization
Photodissociative ionization
Electron impact dissociation
Electron impact ionization
Electron impact dissociative ionization
Positive ion-atom interchange
Positive ion charge transfer
Electron dissociative recombination
Three-body positive ion-neutral association
Neutral rearrangement
Three-body neutral recombination
Radiative electronic state deexcitation
Radiative recombination
Radiation stabilized positive ion-neutral association
Radiation stabilized neutral recombination
Neutral-neutral associative ionization
Neutral impact electronic state quenching
Electron impact electronic state excitation
h + H2 O H + OH
h + CO CO+ + e
h + CO2 O + CO+ + e
e + N2 N + N + e
e + CO CO+ + e + e
e + CO2 O + CO+ + e + e
CO+ + H2 O HCO+ + OH
CO+ + H2 O H2 O+ + CO
C2 H+ + e C2 + H
+
C 2 H+
2 + H2 + M C2 H4 + M
N + CH CN + H
C2 H2 + H + M C2 H3 + M
O(1 D) O(3 P ) + h
e + H+ H + h
C+ + H CH+ + h
C + C C2 + h
CH + O HCO+ + e
O(1 D) + CO2 O(3 P ) + CO2
CO(1 ) + e CO(1 ) + e
(Huebner, W.F., Boice, D.C., Schmidt, H.U. and Wegmann, R. 1991. In Comets in the
Post-Halley Era, eds. R.L. Newburn, Jr. et al., Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 907).
A step-by-step solution of the coupled Eq. (6.67) gives the number density of the species and its variation with r. Figures 6.13 and 6.14 show
the typical results of such calculations for various neutrals and ions. The
column densities can be calculated by integrating the number density along
the line of sight.
It is interesting to note from the model calculations (Fig. 6.14) that
the most abundant ions in the inner coma should be H3 O+ , NH+
4 and
others. Therefore, in a comet, the most abundant ion in the inner coma
should be H3 O+ . The dominant H3 O+ in the inner coma arises as a result
of the production of H3 O+ through photoionization of H2 O followed by
9:59
194
Physics of Comets
Fig. 6.13 Typical variation of the number density of various species plotted as a function
of the distance from the centre of the nucleus. The radius of the nucleus = 1 km and
r = 1 AU (Huebner, W.F. and Giguere, P.T. 1980. Ap. J., 238, 753).
H2 O H2 O+ + e,
H2 O+ + H2 O H3 O+ + OH
and
H3 O+ + e H2 O + H.
Such calculations have been used to identify the species found by Giotto
Mass Spectrometer.
6.4.2.
comets
9:59
comets
195
Fig. 6.14 Typical variation of number density of ions plotted as a function of the distance from the centre of the nucleus. (Huebner, W.F. and Giguere, P.T., 1980. op.
cit).
9:59
196
Physics of Comets
Table 6.10 Dominant ion species contributing to mass range detected in
the ion mass spectrometer.
M/q
Ion Species
M/q
Ion Species
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
C+
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
34 S+ ,
CH+ , 13 C+
+
CH+
2 , N
+
,
NH
CH+
3
+
O+ , CH+
4 , NH2
+
+
OH , NH3 , CH+
5
H2 O+ , NH+
4
H 3 O+
+
H18
2 O
+
H18
3 O
C+
2
C 2 H+
+
C 2 H+
2 , CN
+
C 2 H+
,
HCN
3
+
H2 CN+ , CO+ , N+
2 , C2 H4
+
HCO+ , C2 H+
,
N
H
2
5
H2 CO+ , CH4 N+ , NO+ , C2 H+
6
CH2 OH+ , HNO+
+
S + , O2
HS+ , O2 H+
H2 S+
H3 S+
C+
3
C3 H+ , H3 O+ .H2 O
C 2 N+ , C3 H+
2
C 3 H+
3
+
C3 H4 , CH2 CN+
C 3 H+
5
CH3 CO+
+
+
CO+
2 , CS , C3 H8
+
+
HCS , HCO2
+
+
H2 CO+
2 , NS , H2 CS
H3 CS+ , HNS+
SO+
HSO+
C 4 H+
2
C 4 H+
3
C 3 H2 N+
C 4 H+
5
C3 H3 O+ , C4 H+
7
6.4.3.
+ (u) = ,
(6.68)
t
(u) + (u )u + u( u) + P = q,
(6.69)
t
comets
9:59
comets
197
Fig. 6.15 For illustrative purpose, this figure shows the network of major chemical reactions involving the formation and destructive processes that have to be considered in the
calculation of abundances of some of the species. The arrow indicates the direction of the
reaction represents photodissociation or photoionization and e indicates electron dissociative recombination (Huebner, W.F., Boice, D.C., Schmidt, H.U. and Wegmann, R.
1991. In Comets in the Post-Halley Era,eds R.L. Newburn, Jr. et al., Kluwer Academic
Publishers, p. 907).
u2
u2
( + ) + u( + h) = E.
t 2
2
(6.70)
Here and h are the specific internal energy and enthalpy respectively.
The quantities on the right hand side represent the sources and sinks for
the mass, momentum and energy respectively. These equations have to
be solved with the appropriate initial boundary conditions. The equations
are generally solved in a one-dimensional form with radial variation. Such
9:59
198
comets
Physics of Comets
Fig. 6.16 The ion mass spectrum of Comet Halley observed on March 14, 1986 with the
Giotto spacecraft at a distance 11 -12 103 km from the nucleus. The peaks at regular
intervals with alternate difference in mass number of 14 and 16 have been interpreted as
dissociation production of the molecule polyoxymethylene. (Huebner, W.F. et al. 1987.
Symposium on the diversity and similarity of comets, ESA-SP 278, p. 163; see also
Vanysek, V and Wickramasinghe, N.C. 1975. Astrophys. Space Sci., 33, L19).
solutions are sufficient in the inner coma, but in the outer coma where
the solar wind interactions occur, the description of the state of the ionic
gas may require two or three-dimensional solutions. The corresponding
equations for a spherically symmetric coma for the one dimensional case
are given by
1 d 2
(r u) = ,
r2 dr
u
du dP
+
= q
dr
dr
(6.71)
(6.72)
and
1 d
u2
2
u = Q L.
r u(h + ) +
r2 dr
2
1
(6.73)
Here is the specific heat ratio for the gas. Q and L are the energy input
and energy loss rates respectively. The above equations can easily be modified to include the dust component. The method is to write the analogous
9:59
comets
199
equations for the interaction of dust and the gas which are therefore treated
as separate fluids.
The results of the solution of the equations depend on the various physical processes that have been considered in the terms on the right hand side
of the equations. In particular, it depends on the source of energy input,
energy loss, chemistry and so on. Therefore, the emphasis on the solution
depends upon the problem of interest. For example, several studies have
been carried out which mainly emphasize certain aspects like nucleus-coma
interface, gas-dust interaction, detailed study of the chemistry or the solar wind interaction and so on. Here again initially simple models were
considered.
The inner part of the coma is the collision dominated region (LTE).
It decreases in importance moving away from the nucleus. The hydrodynamic flow which is a good approximation in the inner region becomes free
molecular flow in the outer region of the coma, with a transition region
in between. Therefore, the solutions of the hydrodynamic equations can
represent approximately the real solution provided proper quantities are
used referring either to LTE or NLTE situations and a suitable form for
in-between regions. The photolytic heating is given by the thermalisation
of the excess kinetic energy carried off by the photolytic products due to
photodissociation or exothermic chemical reactions. The dominant contribution to the heating process comes from the dissociation of H2 O through
the channel H2 O+h H + OH + Energy. In this process H atoms has
an excess of velocity 17.5 km/sec and OH radical 1.05 km/sec. This
means that collisions have to be important which imply that the time scale
for collision must be smaller than the time scale for the expansion of the
gas.
The cooling process of the coma gas comes mainly due to H2 O molecules
because of its large abundance. The cooling takes place mainly through
their strong rotational transitions.
In a real cometary situation, the calculation of photochemical heating
is not simple as the coma gas is not in LTE. Also the coma region where
the density is high for the local photochemical effect to be highly efficient,
depends upon the gas production rate and the expansion velocity in the
coma. Since the gas density varies as 1/r 2 , the photochemical heating
efficiency decreases slowly and hence it is rather difficult to define a collision
zone for heating caused by super-thermal H atoms.
Some of the complications in the calculation of cooling rates have also to
be considered. In particular, the water density in the coma is high enough
9:59
200
Physics of Comets
that some of the lines could be optically thick. The optical depth effect is
generally calculated based on escape probability method. The net result
being that rotational temperature basically comes out of equilibrium with
the gas kinetic temperature. Several of these effects and refinements have
been incorporated in the calculation of heating and cooling rates which
greatly influence the temperature and velocity of the gas in the coma.
The results of such model calculations provide the velocity and temperature variation in the coma. The resulting temperature distribution is
shown in Fig. 6.17. The temperature distribution falls steeply to a minimum temperature 20 K at a distance 102 km and then increases again.
The general shape of the temperature variation is the resultant effect of the
relative importance of heating and cooling rates of H2 O and the expansion
cooling.
Fig. 6.17 The calculated variation of gas temperature as a function of distance from
the nucleus for Comet Halley. (Combi, M.R. 1989. Icarus, 81, 41).
Refined models
All the discussion presented so far pertaining to chemistry, temperature
and velocity of the coma gas were based on certain simplifying assumptions
in the model calculations. In addition several processes that can occur
in the coma were considered individually or in combination with others.
But in a real situation, due to the nature of the physical conditions in the
coma, various processes operate simultaneously in a complex and intricate
manner.
comets
9:59
comets
201
The starting point for all the activities seen in the coma of a comet is
due the absorption of solar radiation by various molecules. This leads to
photodisssociation and ionization of the parent molecules. These in turn
fragment giving rise to newer species and the process continues. The energy
budget in this process is controlled by the heating and cooling mechanisms
which in turn has a great effect on the coma gas. The earlier assumption
of considering the gaseous coma as a fluid is reasonable in the inner parts
of the coma where the densities are high. But moving outwards from the
nucleus to the coma, the density gradually decreases and the flow of the gas
becomes more like a free molecular flow. In these regions the description
of the gas as a fluid is not applicable. Therefore it is necessary to consider
the flow of the gas in the coma in a consistent manner going from a region
of higher density to regions of decreasing densities. The presence of dust
can also have an effect on the structure of the coma. This comes through
the change in the temperature of the dust particles, which in turn can have
an effect on the vapourization of volatiles from the CHON dust particles.
Therefore the observed structure of the coma gas, is a resultant effect of
coma chemistry, physics and dynamics that are intimately connected with
each other. Therefore all these effects have to be considered simultaneously
in any realistic model.
Several types of such models have been developed. Some of them are,
Hydrodynamic model, Monte Carlo Model. Hydrodynamic model has been
used extensively for the study of the coma gas. For example, a chemical/dynamical model developed for the study of the coma includes in the
chemical reaction scheme involving around 180 species and more than 3500
reactions.
The Monte Carlo approach is the most general and most accurate description of the coma which can take care of all the complexities involved
within the coma. One such model is called Direct Simulation Monte Carlo
Method (DSMC). This is a time dependent in which the molecular motions
of a large number of molecules are followed and simultaneously their response to imposed field. This model has been used widely in the study of
the coma gas and has been highly successful. As an example, the observed
gas velocity variation in the coma of Comet Halley deduced from Giotto
observations is compared with the results based on time dependent DSMC
model in Fig. 6.18 for distances between 103 and 3 104 km. The observed
velocities are deduced from the energy shifts of peaks in the neutral mass
spectrometer energy spectra and show a variation from a value of about 0.8
to 1.05 km/sec. As can be seen the observed and the model based velocity
9:59
202
Physics of Comets
Fig. 6.18 The calculated variation of expansion velocity with distance from the nucleus
based on time-dependent DSMC model is compared with the observed variation for
Comet Halley deduced from the Giotto measurements (Combi., M.R. 1996. Icarus, 123,
207.
6.5.
Parent Molecules
Most of the observed species in comets cannot exist as such in the nucleus. Therefore, it is suggested that they could arise out of the photodissociation process of stable complex molecules. However, it is very difficult to
observe these parent molecules directly from the Earth-based observations
due to their short lifetime, as they are dissociated in most of the cases very
near the nucleus. Hence the information about the possible parent molecule
has to come from indirect means and, in particular, mainly from the study
of the decay products. However, the spacecrafts which passed by Comets
Halley, Tempel 1 and Wild 2 made in situ measurements of the inner coma
comets
9:59
comets
203
and have given important and direct information about the possible nature
of the parent molecules. In general, there are several ways to approach this
problem.
The straightforward approach is to look for the dissociated products
of simple parent molecules as in the case of H2 O molecules. There are
not many clear-cut cases of this type. The laboratory investigations of
the photochemistry of various types of molecules can help a great deal in
elucidating the problem of the parent molecules. The laboratory studies
have to give information with regard to the products of photodissociation,
the energy required to initiate the reaction and also the branching ratios
for various paths of the reactions. At present, the data is limited in extent.
Also such studies have to be performed for all molecules of astrophysical
interest. To start with, the various types of molecules identified in the
interstellar space could be used. The calculated photochemical lifetimes of
several molecules based on the laboratory data show that for most molecules
the lifetime is below 2 104 sec at 1 AU. The results based on laboratory
photochemical studies should be used only as a guideline when applying
the same to a cometary atmosphere. This is due to the fact that the
astrophysical situations are vastly different from laboratory conditions.
The surface brightness distribution as a function of the radial distance from the nucleus can give information about the parent molecule
(Sec. 6.1.2). The comparison of the observed brightness profiles with those
of calculated profiles gives the scale lengths of the species. The lifetime
of the species, can therefore, be obtained by dividing the scale length by
the expansion velocity. These lifetimes in turn can give information with
regard to the possible types of the parent molecule.
Another approach is through the study of gas-phase reactions in the
coma. If an agreement can be obtained between the observed and the
calculated abundances of various species, one can hopefully trace backwards
through the network of reactions and this could help in identifying the
plausible parent molecule of various species. However, the procedure may
not be very practical in most of the cases.
Another possible method is through the spectral study of the observed
lines and particularly from those molecules which give lines arising out of
singlet-singlet and triplet-triplet transitions. The idea is to see whether the
observed intensities of lines arise preferentially from the singlet-singlet or
the triplet-triplet states of the molecule. This could in turn be related to
the products arising out of the dissociation of the parent molecule.
The study of forbidden lines can also help in identifying the parent
9:59
204
Physics of Comets
molecule of the species which gives rise to these lines. By combining different types of studies it is possible to infer the possible nature of the parent
molecule of some of the observed species. We may illustrate them with a
few examples.
Until the direct detection of H2 O from Comet Halley in 1986, all the
earlier observations had built up a strong case for the H2 O as the dominant
volatile component of the nuclei of comets. This is basically related to the
fact that all the dissociated products of H2 O are seen and they dominate
the ultraviolet spectra of comets. But the direct detection of H2 O came
from the observation made from the Kuiper Airborne Observatory of the 3
band near 2.65 m in Comet Halley. The same band was also observed
by the infrared spectrometer on the Vega spacecraft. The results based on
Neutral Mass Spectrometer (NMS) measurements on the Giotto spacecraft
showed that H2 O comprised around 80% of the volatile of Comet Halley.
The presence of CO in comets was indicated by the detection of fourth
positive bands at 1500
A. Its abundance relative to water varies from
a few percent to around 30%. For Comet Halley, the value derived from
various observations is 17%, while NMS data gave a value 7%. The
lower value is attributed to CO coming from the nucleus and the rest is
believed to arise from an extended source. CO is the second most abundant
molecule in comets.
The observation of the 3 band of CH4 around 3.3 m has yielded an
estimate for the production rate of CH4 which is 1%.
Although CO2 was believed to exist due to the presence of CO+
2 ion in
comets, it was first detected in Comet Halley from the observation of 3
band at 4.3 m from the IKS instrument in the Vega spacecraft and the
NMS instrument on Giotto which gave a value 3% relative to water. The
observed distribution of the column density of CO2 is in good agreement
with the 1 law. This is consistent with the distribution of R2 expected
for parent molecules in the vicinity of the nucleus.
NH3 ,NH2 and NH have been seen in comets. The photodisssociation of
NH3 appears to produce mostly NH2 ( 95%) and very little NH( 5%).
Therefore the parent of NH2 is NH3 and the dominant parent of N H is
NH2 .
The photodissociation of HCN, namely
HCN + h CN + H
can explain the CN radical both from the point of view of production rates
as well as from the kinematic considerations. The molecule C2 N2 has also
been proposed as the parent of CN.
comets
9:59
comets
205
The parent of CH is most like CH4 . Since CH3 is highly unstable, CH4
first decays to CH2 which in turn decays to CH.
i.e.,
CH4 CH2 + H2 ,
CH2 CH + H
The source of S2 (lifetime 350 sec) has been the subject of considerable
debate as the presence of S2 in the cometary nuclei has great significance
for the origin of cometary material. CS2 hardly photodissociates into S2 .
It is highly unlikely that solid S2 has formed from gas phase condensation,
which primarily produces other compounds. So is also with the irradiation
of the nucleus by cosmic rays or ultraviolet radiation and so on.
The long-slit spectroscopic observations has been carried out with HST
to get the spatial brightness profile of S2 in Comet Ikeya-Zhang. These observations seems to indicate that most likely S2 originate from the nucleus.
Therefore, S2 could be a parent molecule.
The most plausible parent of CS is the short-lived (life time at 1 AU
500 sec) CS2 molecule,
i.e.,
CS2 + h CS + S(3 P ),
CS2 + h CS + S(1 D).
Another possible source of CS is OCS. However the main dissociation process of OCS is CO and S. Hence the contribution of OCS to S is minor.
The S produced from CS2 and S2 does not appear to account for the
observed amount of sulphur. The molecule H2 S which has been detected
in comets may contribute to the observed sulphur.
The analysis of the C2 brightness profile seems to suggest that it could be
formed in a three-step photodissociation process of some parent molecule.
The laboratory studies indicate that C2 can be produced in a two-step
process as follows:
C2 H2 + h C2 H + H
followed by
C2 H + h C2 + H.
The C3 molecule is a difficult case for which there are some suggestions.
Laboratory studies have shown that C3 molecule can be formed from C3 H4 .
This molecule photodecomposes to give C3 H3 and C3 H2 as intermediate
products, which can then absorb a photon to give C3 molecule. C3 H8 has
also been suggested.
9:59
206
Physics of Comets
H2 O, H2
OH, H, O
+
CO+
2 , CO , CO
CO, CO+ , C
CH
CN
HCN
NH, NH2
NH
C2
C3
CS
S2
S
6.6.
Chemical Diversity
The surprising result that comes out of the study of the abundances of
a large number of molecular species in comets, is the presence of chemical
diversity among them. This could help in the understanding of the possible
sites of formation of these objects as well as the physical processes that
could have taken place leading to such an observed effect.
The other problem of great interest is the bulk composition inside the
nucleus of a comet. The only available information for the study is the production rate of volatiles and its variation with heliocentric distance. The
natural question that arises is, to what extent the observed ratio of volatiles
reflects the bulk chemical composition inside the nucleus. The relation betwen the two is not simple. It has been realized over the years that the
observed ratio of volatiles in the coma which vary with the heliocentric distance and also among comets, may be vastly different from those present
in the nucleus even before they were processed by solar radiation. Conclusions on the bulk composition of the nucleus can only be made if the coma
composition is integrated over the entire orbit of the comet.
comets
9:59
6.7.
comets
207
Summary
Problems
1. Calculate the surface brightenss profiles for a few values of 1 /0 as
shown in Fig. 6.1.
2. Deduce the values of 1 and 0 for the following observed surface brightness distribution: at = 103 , 4 104 and 7 104 km, the observed
values of surface brightness are 350, 35 and 12 kilo Rayleighs respectively. What is the lifetime of the species for an assumed velocity of 1
km/sec?
3. Assume that the diatomic molecule NH is formed due to the collision process of N and H with as the rate constant for the reaction.
What is the resulting concentration of NH for nH = 10/cm3 , =
1010 cm3 / sec and for a time scale of 4 109 years?
9:59
208
Physics of Comets
References
The calculations of surface brightness distribution for the two component
models are discussed in these two papers.
1. Haser, L. 1957. Bull. Acad. Belg.cl. Sc., 5e Ser. 43 740.
2. ODell, C. R. and Osterbrock, D. E. 1962. Ap. J. 136 559.
The values required for the calculation of surface brightness distribution
are given in
3. AHearn, M. F. and Cowan, J. J. 1975. Ap. J., 80 852.
The three component model is given in the paper
4. ODell, C. R., Robinson, R. R., Krishna Swamy, K. S., Spinrad, H. and
McCarthy, P. J. 1988. Ap. J., 334, 476.
For later work refer to
5. Combi, M.R. and Fink, U. 1997, Ap. J., 484, 879.
6. Manfroid, J.M., Hutsemekers, D., Jehin, E. et al. 2007, Icarus, 187,
144.
The vectorial formalism model is presented in
7. Festou, M C. 1981. Astr. Ap., 95, 69.
The Monte Carlo approach and others are discussed in
8. Combi, M. R. and Delsemme, A. H. 1980. Ap. J. 237, 633.
9. Hodges, Jr. R. R. 1990. Icarus, 83, 410.
10. Xie, X. and Mumma, M.J., 1996. Ap.J., 464, 442.
11. Combi, M.R. 1996, Icarus, 123, 207.
12. Crifo, J.-F., et al. 2005. Comets II, eds. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and
H.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 471.
13. Combi, M.R. et al. 2005. Comets II, eds. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller
and H.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 523.
14. Crifo, J.-F. 1990. Icarus, 84, 414.
For some basic parameters, refer to
15. Crovisier, J. 1992. Infrared Astronomy with ISO, eds. Th. Encrenaz
and M.F. Kessler, Nova Science Publishers, p. 221.
16. Huebner, W.F. et al. 1992. Astrophys. Space Sci., 195, 1.
comets
9:59
comets
209
9:59
210
Physics of Comets
36. Disanti, M.A., Villanueva, G.L., Bonev, B.P. et al. 2007. Icarus, 187,
240.
The following paper pertains to Sec. 6.2.9 of oxygen
37. Schultz, D., Li, G.S.H., Scherb, F. and Roesler, F. L. 1992. Icarus, 96,
190; 101, 95, 1993.
For later work
38. Smyth, W.H. et al. 1995. Ap. J., 440, 349.
39. Morgenthaler, J.P. et al. 2001. Ap. J., 563, 451.
40. Oliversen, R.J. et al. 2002. Ap.J., 581, 770.
The following paper refers to discussion of Ly observations.
41. Keller, H.U. 1976. Space Sci. Rev., 18 641.
Monte-Carlo approach is presented in
42. Combi, M. R. and Smyth, W. H. 1988. Ap. J., 327, 1044.
43. Combi, M. R., Bos, B. J. and Smyth, W. H. 1993. Ap. J., 404, 668.
Some papers pertaining to H observations.
44. Smyth, W.H., Marconi, M.L., Scherb, F. and Roesler, F. 1993. Ap. J.,
413, 756.
45. Morgenthaler, J.P. et al. 2002. Earth Moon and Planets, (90), 77.
The basic formulation of gas phase chemistry in the coma can be found in
46. Huebner, W. F. and Giguere, P. T. 1980. Ap. J.,238 753.
For later work
47. Rodgers, S.D. and Charnley, S.B. 2002. MNRAS, 330, 660.
48. Rodgers, S.D. et al. 2005. Comets II, eds. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller
and W.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona, Tucson, p. 505.
The following papers give some results based on in situ measurements.
49. Balsiger, H. et al. 1986. Nature, 321, 330.
50. Eberhardt, P. Meier, R., Krankowsky, D. and Hodges, R. 1994. Astr.
Ap., 288, 315.
51. Meier, R., Eberhardt, P., Krankowsky, D. and Hodges, A.R. 1994. Astr.
Ap., 287, 268.
52. Krankowsky, D. 1991. In Comets in the Post-Halley Era, eds. R. L.
Newburn, Jr., et al. Kluwer Academic Publishers p. 855.
53. Keller, H.U. et al. 2005. Comets II, eds. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and
W.A. Weaver, University Arizona, Tueson, p. 211.
54. Kissel, J., Krueger, F.R., Silen, J. et al. 2004. Science, 304, 1774.
55. Tuzzolino, A.J., Economou, J.E., Clark, B.C. et al. 2004. Science,
304, 1776.
The following papers may be referred for parent molecules.
56. Krasnopoesky, V. A. 1991. Astr. Ap., 245, 310.
comets
9:59
comets
211
57. Feldman, P.D., Cochran, A. and Combi, M.R., 2005. In Comets II,
eds. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and H.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press,
Tucson, p. 433.
9:59
comets
CHAPTER 7
Dust Tails
The gaseous material released by the nucleus was studied in the previous
chapter. This material also carries with it a large amount of dust. The idea
that the dust particles are dragged into the tail by the effect of radiation
pressure was first suggested by Bessel in the 1830s. This concept was
refined by Bredichin around 1900. These ideas were put on a firm basis by
Finson and Probstein in the 1950s. These authors have worked out in great
detail the dynamics of grains based on fluid and kinetic concepts and the
resulting intensity distributions. Some of these aspects will be considered
in this chapter.
7.1.
Dynamics
Consider the case of only pure dust tails. The dust emitted by the
nucleus is subjected to two opposite forces. The solar radiation pressure
acting on the dust particles tries to push it away from the Sun while the
force of solar gravity tries to pull it towards the Sun. Since the two forces
vary as (1/r2 ), one usually defines an effective gravity, essentially given by
the difference of the two forces. The Keplerian orbit mechanics is then used
for the study of the dynamics of the dust particles. The ratio of radiation
pressure to gravitational force is denoted by (1 ) where
(1 ) =
Frad
.
Fgrav
(7.1)
The expressions for Frad and Fgrav for a spherical particle can be written
as
F
d2 Qpr
(7.2)
Frad =
4 c
4r2
213
9:59
214
comets
Physics of Comets
and
Fgrav
GM
=
r2
d d3
6
.
(7.3)
Here F is the mean solar radiation field impinging on the grain of diameter d and density d . Qpr is the efficiency factor for radiation pressure
(Chap. 8). Therefore Eq. (7.1) becomes
(1 ) = C(d d)1
where C =
(7.4)
3Qpr F
= 1.2 104 Qpr .
8cGM
9:59
Dust Tails
Fig. 7.1
comets
215
the particle size as can be seen from Eq. (7.4). The smaller size particles
would have moved farther compared to those of larger size particles. All
these effects have been incorporated in the dynamic model. Some of the
calculated Syndynes and Synchrones are shown in Fig. 7.2.
As mentioned already, in a real situation the dust particles are emitted
continuously as well as with varying sizes from the nucleus for which
(1 ) (d d)1 .
(7.5)
Let N d (t) represent the dust production rate of all sizes in particles per
second. For simplicity it is assumed that the distribution of particle sizes
remains constant along the orbit of the comet. The particle distribution
function g is given by
Z
g(d d)d(d d) such that
g(d d)d(d d) = 1.
(7.6)
0
9:59
216
Physics of Comets
Fig. 7.2 Syndynes and Synchrones for Comet Arend-Roland on April 27, 1957. Time
= 1.71 106 sec at perihelion on April 8. The position of the observed tail of the
comet is also shown. (This figure as well as the other figures of this chapter are taken
from Finson, M.L. and Probstein, R.F. 1968. Ap. J. 154, 327 and 353).
The quantities N d (t) and g(d d) are usually obtained from the fitting of
the model with the observations.
For the calculation of the orbit of the particle, it is necessary to know the
initial velocities of the dust particles coming out of the nucleus. The model
for the calculation of the velocity of the dust particles is based on the steady
state fluid approach. The flow is assumed to be spherically symmetric with
the same temperature for the gas and dust at the nucleus and dust particles
having a uniform size. The gas and the dust coming out of the nucleus are
coupled through drag forces, computation of which is based on molecular
drag coefficient. With no relative velocity to start with, the particles are
accelerated outwards. The solution of the conservation equations gives the
velocity of the dust particles. These calculations which are quite involved
show that the dust particles reach their terminal speed within about 20
radii of the nucleus. This is indeed a very short distance and hence one
generally uses terminal speed for the dust particles in the tail calculations.
The terminal speed denoted as vi can be expressed in the functional form
as
vi
= g(M, )
(7.7)
(Cp T )1/2
m
d
16
M=
and =
d dR0 (Cp T )1/2 /m
g
m
g
3
comets
9:59
Dust Tails
comets
217
where m
d is the mass flow rate for the dust and m
g that of the gas. Therefore M represents the dust-to-gas mass ratio. Here R0 is the radius of the
nucleus of the comet, T is the initial temperature of the gas and Cp the
specific heat at constant pressure. Figure 7.3 shows a plot of the velocity of
the dust particles as a function of . Therefore the velocity can be written
Fig. 7.3
Speed of the dust particles emitted from the inner head region (see text).
in the form
vi = vi (d d, N d , m
g)
(7.8)
9:59
218
comets
Physics of Comets
(7.9)
where increases along the Syndyne curve with zero value at the Syndyne
origin. The number of particles emitted in the time and + d and in
the size range (d d) and (d d) + d(d d) is given by
N d (t)d g(d d)d(d d).
(7.10)
This has to be multiplied by the light scattering function to get the total
scattered intensity. The scattered intensity is proportional to the crosssectional area of the particle and hence varies as (d d)2 . Working in terms
of (1 ) rather than (d d), the new weighted distribution function can be
written as
f (1 )d(1 ) g(d d)(d d)2 d(d d)
(7.11)
(7.12)
These particles then follow well-defined orbits in the plane of the orbit of
the comet. However what is actually seen is the projection of these orbits
in the plane of the sky. Therefore, the expected intensities in the plane of
the sky has to be calculated. The total modified surface density is obtained
by integrating over various Syndyne tails for all values of (1 ). The final
expression is of the form
1
Z (1)b
dx
D=
Nd f (1 ) 2vi ( ; 1 ; tc )
d(1 )
(7.13)
d
(1)a
9:59
Dust Tails
comets
219
Here dx/d represents the rate of change of length along the given Syndyne
axis with respect to . Physically it represents the effect on the surface density due to dispersion in the longitudinal direction with respect to the tail
axis. On the other hand the other term vi arises due to the dispersion
in the lateral direction. The Eq. (7.13) involves the functional parameters N d (t), f (1 ) and vi ( ; 1 ; tc ). These can be determined from a
comparison of the expected and the observed intensity distributions. From
a knowledge of these three parameters, all other quantities of interest can
then be determined.
The above formalism has been applied very successfully to Comet
Arend-Roland as can be seen from Fig. 7.4. Near perihelion, the gas and
Fig. 7.4 Measured and calculated isophotes for Comet Arend-Roland for May 1, 1957.
D is the density level.
the dust emission rates are about 7.5107 gm/sec and 6107 gm/sec. This
gas emission rate corresponds to a value of about 1.5 1030 molecule/sec.
The dust to gas ratio for Comet Arend-Roland is about 0.8 and the average
size of the particles in the tail is 1 m. The particles in the observed dust
9:59
220
Physics of Comets
7.2.
Anti-tail
Many comets generally show a short tail in the solar direction which
is called the anti-tail (see Fig. 1.15). The anti-tail really do not point
towards the sun. It is related to the geometry of the system. The theory
developed for the dynamics of the grains of dust tails can also explain the
presence of anti-tail in comets. The calculated Synchrones and Syndynes
for Comet Arend-Roland are shown in Fig. 7.5 which shows the presence of
Synchrones in the direction of the Sun. The size of the particles giving rise
to these synchrons is >
10 m, which is much larger than those present in
the dust tails which is <
1 m. The appearance of the anti-tail of Comet
Arend-Roland changed with time within an interval of a few days. This
comets
9:59
Dust Tails
Fig. 7.5
Roland.
comets
221
Calculated Syndynes and Synchrones for tail and anti-tail for Comet Arend-
9:59
222
Physics of Comets
It is evident from the dynamical theory of grains that the size of the
particles along the tail should vary and it depends upon the nature of
Synchrone and Syndyne curves. Since the polarization measurements are
sensitive to particle sizes, they could effectively be used for determining the
sizes of the particles. The polarization measurements on comets do seem
to indicate the variation of the particle size along the tail of the comet.
7.3.
Dust Trails
Dust trails were first seen on Comet Tempel 2 from the observations
carried out with the Infrared Astronomical Satellite. They are very narrow
with length to width ratio of around 200 to 1. Many of the trails are found
to coincide with the orbit of comets. Dynamical calculations show that
the observed dust trails are coincident with large size particle trajectories
indicating the presence of particles in the size range of about millimetre to
centimetre. These particles are ejected out at low velocities a few m/s
from the nucleus. The narrowness of the trail indicate that the velocity
dispersion is quite low and are therefore stable against perturbing forces
over periods of atleast a few orbital revolutions. Therefore the observed
dust trails is the resultant effect of the build up of large particle emissions
over several orbits. The observations carried out with ISO could spatially
resolve the dust trail in Comet Encke. Because of very large particles
present in dust trails, it may be too faint to be seen in the visible region.
However it has been detected along the orbit of Comet Kopff in the visible
region when the comet was at r = 3.01 AU. Therefore study of dust trails
in comets in the visible region should help in a better understanding of the
nature of very large size particles.
7.4.
A narrow, straight and long tail along with a diffuse tail superposed over
the dust tail composed of sodium atoms has been seen in the bright Comets
Hale-Bopp and Hyakutake. These were seen in the images taken with filters
centred on the sodium D lines at 5890
A. These are similar to plasma tail
and dust tail that are generally seen in comets. The straight sodium tail
extending upto 107 km is located between the ion tail and the prolonged
radius vector. The straight tail could arise from the dissociation of some
molecule containing sodium which is then dragged out due to radiation
comets
9:59
Dust Tails
comets
223
pressure. The diffuse sodium tail could arise by the release of sodium
from dust grains due to some physical processes, such as evaporation and
sputtering. It is possible that sodium tails could be a common feature of
comets.
7.5.
Dust features
The high quality photographs near the nuclear region show highly complicated structure of various kinds as can be seen from Fig. 7.6. This arises
Fig. 7.6 The top rows show the various types of features observed in six comets in the
vicinity of the nucleus. The bottom rows show the computer simulated images. There is
a good similarity between the two. The Sun is at the top. (Sekanina, Z. 1991. In Comets
in the Post-Halley Era, eds. R.L. Newburn, Jr., et al. Kluwer Academic Publishers, p.
769).
9:59
224
Physics of Comets
due to the complicated flow pattern of the grains after they are released
from the nucleus. To a first approximation it can be described in terms
of the resulting force between the gravitational, Fgrav and radiation Frad ,
forces acting on the grains (Sec. 7.1). The trajectories of the grains under
such a force in a cometocentric system are approximately parabolic in nature. Different patterns could be produced depending on the parameters
of the grains like radius, density and the material property (Fig. 7.7). In a
Fig. 7.7 Dust particle trajectories for Comet Halley released from the nucleus at the
time of perihelion passage. (a) and (b) correspond to particle sizes of 10m and 0.8 mm
respectively. The dotted curve shows the resulting envelope (Fertig, J. and Schwehm, G.
1984. Adv. Space Res. 4, 213).
real situation the spin of the nucleus, its associated precession and nutation
and the cometary activity has to be considered. These will give rise to complex behaviour of the flow patterns of the dust particles in the near nucleus
region. For example, arising from a single active area on the nucleus, the
spiral jets unwind and develop into expanding parabolic envelopes and so
on. It is rather difficult to take into account all these effects in the model
calculations. Therefore several attempts have been made to understand the
observed features in terms of simple hydrodynamic models. Another approach that has been attempted is to understand the flow patterns through
computer generated synthetic images by varying the parameters. As can
be seen from Fig. 7.6, the computer simulation technique can in principle
reproduce the diverse patterns of the observed dust structures of comets.
However the disadvantage of this method is that there are many parameters
involved which have to be adjusted by trial and error method to match the
observations, such as the angles associated with spin axis positions and its
relation to Earth and Sun, rotation period, position of active regions, dust
comets
9:59
Dust Tails
comets
225
Problems
1. A grain of size a and density is moving in a medium of hydrogen density NH due to the effect of radiation pressure of a star of temperature
T and radius R. The grain is being slowed down by the drag force due
to the hitting of the grain and sticking to it. Show that the terminal
speed of the grain is given by
vt =
R2 T 4
mH c
1/2
1
1/2
NH r
9:59
226
Physics of Comets
References
The theory of dynamics of dust tails is worked out in detail in these papers
1. Finson, M.L. and Probstein, R.F. 1968. Ap. J. 154, p. 327. (Paper
I), p. 353 (Paper II).
Other relevant papers are the following
2. Crifo, J.F. 1991. In Comets in Post-Halley Era, eds. R.L. Newburn,
Jr. et al., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Vol. 2, p. 937.
3. Fulle, M. 1989. Astr. Ap. 217, 283.
4. Fulle, M. 2005. In Comets II, eds. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and W.A.
Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 565.
5. Gr
un, E. and Jessberger, E.K. 1990. In physics and chemistry of
comets. ed. W.F. Huebner. Springer-Verlag. p. 113.
6. Richer, K. and Keller, H.U. 1987. Astr. Ap. 171, 317.
7. Sekanina, Z. and Farrell. J.A. 1978. A.J 87, 1836.
Dust Trail
8. Eaton, N., Davis, J.K. and Green, S.F. 1984. MNRAS, 211, 15.
9. Sykes, M.V., Lebofsky, L.A., Hunten, D.M. et al. Science, 1986. 232,
1115.
Detection in the visible for the first time
10. Ishiguro, M., Watanabe, J., Usui, F. et al. 2002. Ap. J., 572, L117.
Cometary dust features can be seen in
11. Rahe, J., Donn, B. and Wurm, K. 1969. Atlas of Cometary Forms,
NASA SP-198 U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington D.C.
The following papers discuss model calculation of features
12. Vasundhara, R., Chakraborty, P., Muneer, S. et al. 2007. A.J., 133,
612.
13. Sekanina, Z., Brownlee, D.E., Economou, T.E. et al. 2004. Science,
304, 1769.
comets
9:59
CHAPTER 8
The dust particles present in comets scatter and absorb the incident
solar radiation. In fact, it is the scattered solar radiation which makes the
dust tail of comets visible. The infrared radiation that has been seen from
comets is also directly related to the amount of incident radiation absorbed
by the dust particles. Therefore the theory of scattering of light by small
particles is basic to the study of cometary grains. The aim is to determine,
from theory, the distribution of intensity of the scattered radiation and the
polarization as a function of the scattering angle. It is also of interest to
know the cross sections for the absorption and scattering processes, which
determine the albedo of the particles. The efficiency factor for the radiation pressure is also of interest, as was discussed in the last chapter. All
these quantities depend upon the shape, structure and composition of the
grain. The theories of scattering have been developed for well-defined particle shapes like spheres, concentric spheres, cylinders, spheroids and so on.
However, grains in general are likely to be irregular in shape, inhomogeneous and fluffy in nature. The theory of scattering from such grains is
highly complex. Hence, at the present time attempts are being made to
study the scattering from such grains from the theoretical points of view
with certain approximations. The study is also being pursued through experimental means. We will briefly discuss some of these aspects in this
chapter.
227
comets
9:59
228
8.1.
8.1.1.
comets
Physics of Comets
The theory of scattering by spherical particles of homogeneous composition involves the solution of Maxwells equations with appropriate boundary
conditions on the sphere. This was worked out by Mie in 1908 and independently by Debye in 1909. Since an excellent account of the solution of this
scattering problem, generally known as Mie Theory, is discussed in many
books, we will summarize here only the results with particular reference to
the case of cometary dust.
The scattering properties of a particle depend upon the following quantities: (1) the property of the medium, usually specified by the complex
refractive index, m = n ik. where n and k are the refractive and absorptive indices respectively. (2) the wavelength of the incident radiation ()
and (3) the size of the particle (a). As a result of radiation interacting with
the particle, part of the radiation is absorbed and part of it is scattered.
Therefore, the total amount of radiation lost from the incident beam (extinction) is the sum total of the absorbed and the scattered components.
These are generally expressed in terms of the dimensionless efficiency factors, Qsca and Qabs for the scattering and absorption components. The
efficiency factor for the total extinction is given by
Qext = Qsca + Qabs .
(8.1)
If Csca , Cabs and Cext denote the corresponding cross sections, then
Csca = a2 Qsca
(8.2)
Cabs = a2 Qabs
(8.3)
Cext = a2 Qext .
(8.4)
and
The main aim is to determine the efficiency factors Qsca and Qabs from
the scattering theory. They are given by
Qsca =
2 X
(2n + 1) |an |2 + |bn |2
2
x n=1
(8.5)
Qext =
2 X
(2n + 1){Re(an + bn )}
x2 n=1
(8.6)
9:59
comets
229
(8.7)
bn =
(8.8)
(8.12)
(8.13)
where
cos Qsca
x
4 X n(n + 2)
[Re(an )Re(an+1 )
= 2
x n=1
n+1
9:59
230
comets
Physics of Comets
where Re and Im represent the real and imaginary quantities. The efficiency for radiation pressure is of interest in the study of dynamics of
grains. The value of cos is also sometimes known as the asymmetry factor.
i.e. g = cos .
(8.14a)
Albedo
Qsca
.
Qext
(8.16)
If the diffraction component is not taken into account, it is called the bond
albedo. Therefore the bond albedo is defined as the ratio of the energy
refracted and reflected by the particle in all directions to the energy incident
on the geometric cross section.
Z
1
i.e. AB =
r (, )d
(8.16a)
G
Here r (, ) is the differential scattering cross-section. For the case
when there is symmetry with respect to the direction of incident radiation,
then
r (, ) = r ().
The geometric albedo Ap is defined as the energy scattered by the particle at = 180 (backward scattering) to that scattered by a white disk
9:59
comets
231
i.e. Ap = r (180 ).
(8.16b)
G
The bond albedo AB is related to the geometrical albedo Ap by the relation
AB = Ap .q
(8.16c)
where
Z
j() sin d.
q=2
0
Here j() = r ()/r (180 ) F ()/F (180 ), the ratio of the phase functions and q is known as the phase integral. For isotropic scattering, AB = 1
and Ap = 0.25 and therefore q = 4.
8.1.3.
Scattered intensity
Fig. 8.1 Schematic diagram of a scattering process. is the scattering angle and
Io ()F () is the intensity of the scattered radiation from the original incident radiation of Io .
9:59
232
comets
Physics of Comets
X
2n + 1
{an n (cos ) + bn n (cos )}
n(n
+ 1)
n=1
(8.18)
s2 () =
X
2n + 1
{bn n (cos ) + an n (cos )}
n(n
+ 1)
n=1
(8.19)
where
n (cos ) =
1
P 1 (cos )
sin n
(8.20)
n (cos ) =
d 1
P (cos ).
d n
(8.21)
and
Polarization
i1 i2
.
i1 + i2
(8.22)
9:59
8.2.
comets
233
Approximate Expressions
So far we have been considering the exact expressions for the efficiency
factors for the scattering and the extinction by the spherical particles. In
many practical situations, like in the infrared and far infrared regions, where
the condition that the size of the particle is very much less than the wavelength of the radiation, i.e., x <
1 is satisfied, the approximate analytical
expressions of Eqs. (8.5) and (8.6) may be used. Under the above condition,
the Eqs. (8.5) and (8.6) reduce to
2
2
8 4
m 1
Qsca = x Re
(8.23)
3
m2 + 2
and
Qabs = 4xIm
m2 1
m2 + 2
.
(8.24)
8 4 m2 1 2
x | 2
|
3
m +2
(8.25)
and Qabs = 0.
8.3.
The actual evaluation of the efficiency factors has been considered in detail by various investigators. Various methods have been proposed for the
calculation of efficiency factors starting from the simple expansion techniques. The main problem is to calculate the coefficients an and bn and
this is quite tedious. The calculation of an and bn involves a knowledge
of the quantities n , n0 and others which in turn depend upon the Bessel
functions with complex arguments. The computation of these quantities becomes complicated when the refractive index is complex. However they can
be calculated easily using recurrence relations with the help of a computer.
The following recurrence relations can be used to derive the Riccati-Bessel
functions.
2n 1
n1 (y) n2 (y)
(8.26)
n (y) =
y
n0 (y) =
n
y
n (y) + n1 (y)
(8.27)
9:59
234
comets
Physics of Comets
n (y) =
2n 1
y
n1 (y) n2 (y)
(8.28)
(8.29)
and
0n (y) =
n+1
y
with
0 (y) = sin y
1 (y) =
sin y
cos y
y
0 (y) = cos y
(8.30)
(8.31)
(8.32)
and
1 (y) =
cos y
+ sin y.
y
(8.33)
Results
For astrophysical situations, one seems to deal with the real part of
the refractive index of the particles, which is of the order of 1.3 to 1.6
(Chap. 9). Therefore, for illustrative purposes, the extinction cross-section
is plotted as a function of x for constant indices of refraction of 1.3 and
1.6 in Fig. 8.2. Since the indices of refraction are assumed to be constant,
the nature of the curves remains the same when the size or wavelength is
changed. But in a real situation, the refractive index of the material is a
function of the wavelength which has to be incorporated. The results of such
calculations give a better physical picture and show more structures in the
curves arising due to the material property. The curves in Fig. 8.2 display
several interesting features. A series of broad maxima and minima can be
9:59
comets
235
Fig. 8.2 The efficiency factors for extinction and scattering for spheres calculated from
the Mie Theory are plotted as a function of the dimensionless parameter X. The results
are shown for three sample cases. (Adapted from Wickramasinghe, N.C. 1973. Light
scattering functions for small particles. London: Adam Hilger).
seen easily. Superposed on these band features are the small irregular fine
structures generally called the ripple structure. The curve for small values
of x refers to Rayleigh scattering region, where it varies as (1/4 ). For
intermediate values of x, the variation is given by (1/). For large values of
x, the value of Qext approaches a value of 2. It is interesting to note that the
limiting value 2 is twice as large as the cross section given by the geometrical
optics. This is essentially related to the fact that the geometrical optics is
strictly not valid in the neighbourhood of the edges of the object. So one
has to use the diffraction theory. The additional factor of a2 comes due to
this reason. The effect of absorption in the Qext is to reduce the strength
of the resonances and the curve becomes smooth (Fig. 8.2). For very large
values of x, the absorption and scattering contribute almost equally while
for small values of x, the total extinction is mainly contributed by the
absorption process. The effect of increase in the absorption coefficient is to
reduce the albedo of the particle.
The scattering intensity for various angles is shown in Fig. 8.3. The
9:59
236
Physics of Comets
Fig. 8.3 The intensities I1 (dashed curve) and I2 (solid curve) are plotted as a function
of the scattering angle for two representative values of the refractive index. Each curve
is labeled by the parameter X. (Adapted from Wickramasinghe. N.C. 1973. op. cit.).
values of the intensity at 0 and 180 are marked in the margin of the curve.
The most important point to note from the curve is that the scattering is
mostly in the forward direction ( = 0 ) and it oscillates with the scattering
angle. The scattering diagrams for a few cases are shown schematically in
Fig. 8.4. For isotropic scattering the intensity is the same in all directions.
For Rayleigh scattering i.e., particle size <
wavelength of the incident
radiation, the phase function (1 + cos2 ) where is the scattering angle.
This dependence shows that the resultant diagram shown by the solid line
is a superposition of two different components. One component which is
isotropic, is shown by dashed lines and the second component is shown by
two lobes. The Mie scattering diagram for m = 1.3, x 1 and x > 1 is
also shown in Fig. 8.4. Here as x increases, the scattering becomes more
comets
9:59
comets
237
Fig. 8.4
(8.34)
where a = reff and b = veff . Here reff and veff represent a mean radius
for scattering and a measure of the width of the size distribution function
respectively, b = 0 refers to the case of single particles. The effect of the size
distribution function is to average out the ripple structure which smoothens
it out. It also dampens the resonance effects. Therefore the curve becomes
smooth. The results for phase function and linear polarization are shown
in Fig. 8.6. Although the results refer to a particular size distribution
function, the general trend and nature of the results are similar for any
other size distribution function.
9:59
238
Physics of Comets
Fig. 8.5 A plot of the efficiency factor for scattering as a function of the dimensionless
parameter X = (2a/). The curves represent the averaged value summed over the
size distribution of the form n(r) = const. r(13b)/b er/ab . The refractive index is
n = 1.33, k ni = 0. (Hansen, J. E. and Travis, L.D. 1974. Space Sci. Rev. 16 527).
8.5.
So far, the discussion has been limited to the case of spherical particles
with homogeneous and isotropic internal structure. Even in this case the
mathematical solution is highly complex in nature. However in a real situation, the particles are far from being spherical in shape. Therefore considerable effort has been spent in the study of particles of other shapes through
theoretical and numerical means. Several classical methods of solving scattering problems have been used. To name a few, separation of variables,
perturbation methods, fields expanded in vector spherical harmonics among
others have been used. The exact solutions for scattering from spheroids,
comets
9:59
comets
239
Fig. 8.6 Phase function and polarization for single scattering are plotted as a function
of the scattering angle for wavelength of 5500
A and n = 1.33, k ni = 0 (Adapted
from Hansen, J. E. and Travis, L. D. 1974. op. cit.).
infinite cylinders, concentric spheres have been worked out and are available in many books. The cases of cylinders with oblique incident, as well
as concentric cylinders have also been investigated mathematically. The
approximate formulae for the limiting cases are also available for concentric spheres, cylinders etc. However, even the well defined shape for the
particles introduces many more additional parameters due to their shape,
orientation etc. compared to that of spheres.
Two possibilities exist for the case of spheroids. They could be prolate
or oblate. For infinite cylinders, the exact solution has been derived for
the case when the particle diameter is much smaller than its length. In the
case of concentric spheres there are various possibilities depending on the
inner and outer radii and their relative refractive indices. Even from such
well-defined shape of particles the computation of cross sections is quite
complicated and lengthy. In addition, the computation time could be quite
large and particularly so for larger size particles. Therefore efforts are being
made to develop efficient methods for the calculation of cross sections from
such well-defined particles.
The general results for nonspherical cases are qualitatively very similar
to those for spheres, with a Rayleigh like increase, broad scale interference
structure with finer ripples superposed over it. As a typical case, the results
for the extinction efficiencies in the case of infinite cylinders for n = 1.33
and m = 1.33 0.05i are shown in Fig. 8.7. Here QE and QH denote
9:59
240
Physics of Comets
Fig. 8.7 A plot of the efficiency factors for extinction of cylinders oriented normal to
the incident radiation for two values of refractive index. QE is for the electric vector
E of the incident radiation parallel to the axis and QH is for the magnetic vector H of
the incident radiation parallel to the axis. The polarization is also shown as QE QH .
(Adapted from Greenberg, J. M. 1978. In Cosmic Dust. ed. McDonnel, J. A. M. New
York: John Wiley and Sons, p. 187).
the value of Q for the case of electric vector and the magnetic vector of
the incident radiation parallel to the axis of the cylinder. The radius of
the cylinder is a. The polarization (QE QH ) is also shown in the same
figure. The effect of absorption as pointed out before, is to dampen the
polarization oscillations.
The discussion so far was limited to the ideal situations wherein the
particles are assumed to have definite and regular shapes. However, in general, the dust particles in a real case are far from the above situations. It is
more likely that they will be irregular in shape. They could also be fluffy,
porous and could have surface roughness. Therefore several attempts have
been made to consider the general case of scattering by an arbitrary parti-
comets
9:59
comets
241
cle. The general solutions involve the calculation of the effect on individual
atoms by the incident field and also the combined fields of all other atoms.
As the general case is almost impossible to solve, it necessarily involves
making certain approximations and finally the cross sections have to be derived from numerical methods. Several studies have been carried out based
on perturbation approach, T-matrix method also known as the extended
boundary condition method, study of statistical description of roughness in
the frame work of the potential theory and so on.
However a method which has been successfully used is to subdivide the
particle into several smaller identical elements, which itself is a collection of
large number of atoms, and can be represented as a dipole oscillator. The
average field due to the combined effect of all these individual oscillations
is then calculated. This is the well known Discrete Dipole Approximation
(DDA) method. Another approach that has been investigated is to make
use of the integral representation of the macroscopic Maxwells equations.
In this method, the particles are assumed to be an aggregate of small cubic
volumes at the lattice site of which are located sub volumes, of identical
and homogeneous character. This is mathematically equivalent to that of
DDA except that the computation is based on the calculation of volume
element polarizations. The advantage of DDA method is that it can be
applied to particles of arbitrary shape, structure and composition. A sample
representation of a fluffy particle in terms of subparticles which is considered
in the computation of cross sections is shown in Fig. 8.8. The nature of
fluffiness i.e. creating porosity in the grain, depends upon the number of
dipoles, their sizes and the separation between them. The number of dipoles
used in the calculation could be as large as 105 . Each of the dipoles in the
grain could be small enough to be thought of as Rayleigh-limit inclusions.
Extensive calculations have been carried out for the study of scattering
properties of such a grain under the DDA formalism for examining the
effects of porosity, size of the dipoles, topology of the grain and so on,
on the derived results. A sample result for the extinction from a prolate
spheroid is shown in Fig. 8.9. The validity of DDA results has to be tested
by comparing the results with those derived from well-defined shapes.
In the past, the scattering from regular particles like spheres, spheroids
etc., but with inhomogeneous composition, has been studied by replacing
the inhomogeneous grain with a homogeneous grain by using an effective
dielectric constant. The idea being that the effective dielectric constant of
the material provides the correct light scattering characteristics of the heterogeneous medium. It can be calculated either from the Maxwell-Garnett
9:59
242
Physics of Comets
Fig. 8.8 The model of the dust particle (a prolate pseudospheriod with 2a = 60, 2b =
2c = 30 in units of the lattice spacing d) used in the calculation of cross-section under
Discrete-Dipole approximation. In this grain model 60% of the original 28256 dipoles
have been removed (Wolff, M. J., Clayton, G. C., Martin, A. G. and Schulte-Ladbeck,
R. E. 1994. Ap. J. Letters, 423, 51).
theory or the Bruggeman theory (Sec. 8.6). It is therefore of interest to compare the results obtained from such calculations with those derived from
DDA formalism, for the same grain parameters. Figure 8.9 shows such a
comparison. The agreement in general is found to be better, as the number
of dipoles in the DDA formalism is increased. Ultimately, how good are
the calculations has to be tested by comparing with the observations. In
general, the results based on these theories seem to represent astronomical
observations better compared to the case of spherical particles. However
the results based on spherical dust particles can be used to limit the range
of cometary grain parameters.
It is easier to carry out laboratory measurements on larger size particles
rather than on micron size particles. Therefore several studies have been
carried out using the microwave techniques. If the optical constants of the
material in the microwave and optical wavelength regions are the same, then
comets
9:59
comets
243
Fig. 8.9 The calculated efficiency factors for extinction with 40% porosity. The results
are for two orientations of the incident electric vector E and H which are parallel and
perpendicular to the major axis of a 2:1 prolate spheroid. The DDA results for both
Rayleigh and non-Rayleigh vacuum inclusions are compared to the various mixing rules
(continuous curves). The base grains have 3558, 8320 and 14440 dipoles for the ranges
x 2, 3 x 4 and x 5 respectively (Wolff, M. J. et al. 1994. loc. cit.).
the results based on the microwave studies carried on larger size particles
are also valid for smaller size particles in the visible wavelength region,
as the characteristic parameter x is the same. Therefore, various kinds
of measurements like extinction, angular scattering and so on have been
carried out in the microwave region on particles of various shapes such as
cylinders, spheroids, spheres and irregular particles. The results of such
studies agree reasonably well with those of calculated values, thus giving
some credibility for the theories.
8.6.
Optical Constants
(8.35)
9:59
244
Physics of Comets
comets
9:59
comets
245
The optical constants for several terrestrial rock samples and moon samples
have also been measured. The measured refractive indices of silicates for
different Mg/Fe ratio show wide variation. This will have great effect on
grain temperature and hence on the infrared emission from such grains.
Since these materials are not strictly homogeneous, the measurements in
principle, should provide some sort of average dielectric constants of these
materials. The cometary grains are inhomogeneous in character. Therefore
the best way to get the refractive index of the material of interest is through
laboratory studies. Since it is almost impossible to study all the cases of
interest in the laboratory, a theoretical treatment of the problem becomes
a necessity.
The dust grains present in the astrophysical environments are highly inhomogeneous in character. In general, it is not easy to calculate the average
optical properties of inhomogeneous medium even if the property of the individual constituents are known. So one has to use various approximations.
This has given rise to the concept of an effective dielectric constant for the
material. This has given rise to several theories. The two theories that are
most commonly used are the Maxwell-Garnett theory dating back to 1904
and the Bruggeman theory proposed in 1935. In the Maxwell-Garnett theory, the composite grain consists of matrix material in which small spherical
inclusions are embedded having dielectric constants m and i respectively
with f as the volume fraction of inclusions. The inclusions are assumed to
be spherical in shape with sizes smaller than or nearly equal to the wavelength under consideration. The problem is to calculate the average electric
field of the medium from the knowledge of the individual electric fields Ei
and Em of the two components arising out of the interactions, which are by
themselves are averages over a smaller volume. With the assumption that
the relations for the electric fields, polarization vector and the relations
between Ei and Em as well as between i and m also hold for the average
fields, the following relation for the average dielectric constant is derived.
av = m [(2m + i 2f (m i ))/(2m + i + f (m i ))] .
(8.38)
9:59
246
Physics of Comets
volume fraction (fi ). The effective dielectric constant for such a case is
given by the expression
X fi (i eff )
= 0.
(8.39)
(i + 2eff )
i
The value of eff is derived from the solution of the above equations. However there may be some convergence problem if there is a wide variation in
optical constants. Maxwell-Garnett theory is more popular and is generally being used. The applicability and accuracy of the above relations has
to be tested based on the comparison between the computed values and
those of laboratory measurements of two component mixtures. The laboratory measured dielectric constants of several two component mixtures
are in agreement with the effective dielectric constant values derived from
Eq. (8.38). Therefore the M-G rule can be used to derive the average optical
constants of a two component medium. It is possible to extend the method
for a multicomponent mixture as well as for the shape distribution for the
inclusions, which of course introduces several additional parameters.
The dust in comets are more complicated than the simple models considered in the theoretical treatments as summarized so far. For a real situation
it is necessary to specify several parameters for the aggregate like the size,
shape and the refractive index of the material and for the inclusions, the
degree of porosity, size, shape, location and their orientation. To consider
so many parameters in the actual calculation of cross-section becomes difficult from the practical point of view as well as computing time required.
In spite of this, in recent times DDA and other methods have been used
extensively in cometary studies. The codes for some of these methods are
available.
Problems
1. Show that for the condition (2a/) <
1 and with refractive index m =
n ik, Qabs is given by
Qabs =
a
48nk
.
2
2
(n k + 2) + 4n2 k 2
2. Express the above relation for Qabs in terms of the dielectric function
1 and 2 .
3. Calculate Qsca and Qabs for ice particles of m = 1.30.05i, a = 2105
cm and = 5 m.
comets
9:59
comets
247
4. For a particle size distribution of the form n(a)a3 for a1 < a < a2 ,
calculate the constant of proportionality such that the total number is
unity.
5. Assuming m=1, a and the size distribution of Problem 3, get an
expression for the total Qabs .
6. Discuss the physical reason for the occurrence of Kinks in the extinction curve. Why does it smooth out when integrated over the size
distribution function?
References
The theory of scattering from spheres can be found in these classic works:
1. Debye, P. 1909. Ann. Physik, 30, 59.
2. Hulst, Van de 1957. Light Scattering by Small Particles. New York:
John Wiley and Sons.
3. Mie, G. 1908. Ann. Physik, 25, 377.
A discussion of albedos can be found in
4. Hanner, M.S., Giese, R.H., Weiss, K. and Zerull, R. 1981. Astr. Ap.,
104, 42.
The theory of core-mantle particles is worked out in
5. Guttler, A. 1952. Ann. Phys., Lpz. 6 Folge, Bd. 11,5.
The case of core-mantle and cylindrical particles is included in
6. Wickramasinghe, N.C. 1973. Light Scattering Functions for Small particles, London: Adam Hilger Limited.
A good account is also given in the book
7. Bohren, C.F. and Huffman, D.R. 1983. Absorption and Scattering of
Light by Small particles. John Wiley, New York.
The idea of Discrete-Dipole approximation was proposed in the following
paper.
8. Purcell, E.M. and Pennypacker, C.R. 1973. Ap. J. 186, 705.
More recent work can be found in the following papers.
9. Draine, B.T. and Goodman, J.J. 1993. Ap. J. 405, 685.
10. Hage, J.I. and Greenberg, J.M. 1990. Ap. J. 361, 251.
11. Wolff, M.J., Clayton, G.C., Martin, P.G. and Schulte-Ladbuck, R.E.
1994. Ap. J. (Letters), 423, 51.
12. Wolff, M.J., Clayton, G.C. and Gibson, S.J. 1998. Ap.J., 503, 815.
13. Kimura, H. Kolokolova, L. and Mann, I. 2006. Astron. Astrophys.,
449, 1243.
9:59
248
Physics of Comets
14. Kolokolova, L., Hanner, M.S. and Levasseur - Regourd, A. -Ch. 2005.
Comets II, eds. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and M.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 577.
Maxwell-Garnett and Bruggeman rules are discussed in
15. Bohren and Huffman 1983. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small
particles, John Wiley, New York.
comets
9:59
CHAPTER 9
Visible Continuum
Comets in general posses a continuum in the visible region of the spectrum. The strength of the continuum varies from comet to comet and with
the heliocentric distance. The observed continuum is attributed to the
scattering of the solar radiation by the dust particles. Therefore, the dusty
comets should have a strong continuum. What is of interest, of course,
is the dependence of the continuum as a function of the wavelength. The
usual method adopted for getting the variation of continuum with wave249
comets
9:59
250
Physics of Comets
comets
8:49
comets
251
Fig. 9.1 Superposed plot of relative observed fluxes of eight comets as a function
of wavelength for heliocentric distances r grouped around 0.3 AU(), 0.7 AU(4),
1.0 AU(0), 2.5 AU(X) and 3.75 AU(). They cover the scattering angles from around 30
to 177 . The continuous curve shows the shape of the observed solar flux and the dashed
curve is for Mie calculations with m = 1.38 0.039i and N (a) a3.5 . Observational
data: Bradfield (1974 III) and Kohoutek (1973 XII) (Ney E.P. 1974 Icarus 23, 551);
Bradfield (1980 XV) (Ney, E.P. 1982. In Comets, ed. L.L. Wilkening, Univ. Arizona
Press, Tucson, p 323); P/Crommelin (1984 IV) (Hanner, et al. 1985. Astr Ap 152, 177);
P/Giacobini-Zinner (1985 XIII) (Hanner, M.S. et al. 1992. AJ, 104, 386); Halley (1986
III) (Bouchet, P. et al. 1987. Astr. Ap. 174, 288; Tokunaga et al. 1988, AJ, 96, 1971);
West (1976 VI) (Ney, E.P. and Merrill, K.M. 1976. Science 194, 1051); Wilson (1987
VII) (Hanner, M.S. and Newburn, R.L. 1989. AJ, 97, 254).
from the extensive studies of near infrared colour like J-H and H-K, which
show that they cannot be used as a distinguishing feature for the study
of the properties of cometary grains. It also indicates that in general, the
results expected from the scattering effects of grains are not drastic.
There have been several refined studies of the continuum measurements
9:59
252
comets
Physics of Comets
of comets in the visible region. However, the results are somewhat confusing. In some comets, the observed wavelength distribution of the scattered
radiation has almost the same dependence as that of the solar radiation,
while for others, it produces a large reddening. This arises due to several
factors. As mentioned earlier, the wavelength dependence of the scattered
radiation is derived from observations by comparing the observed continuum with the energy distribution of the Sun. In this procedure, it is very
essential to take into account properly the contribution of the molecular
emissions, before the dust scattered component can be extracted. This is a
difficult and a major problem in scattering studies, as the molecular bands
are quite strong and dominate in the visual spectral region. This leaves
very few clear windows or spectral regions where the observations could
be carried out. However, the situation improves moving towards the red
region. It may also be noted that the continuum becomes stronger as the
dust to gas ratio increases and the emission bands become weaker as the
heliocentric distance of the comet increases. The other difficulty associated with the early observations is connected with poor spectral resolution.
A combination of these difficulties and the poor response of the detectors
could have been responsible for the differing results of earlier studies. In
recent years it has been possible to overcome some of these difficulties and
it is now possible to get somewhat reliable and consistent results.
From the observational point of view, it is convenient to describe the
scattered radiation or colour from the observed spectra in terms of a quantity called reflectivity, which is merely the ratio of the flux F () to the
solar flux F ()at the same wavelength, i.e.,
F ()
.
(9.2)
S() =
F ()
To be consistent with the cometary spectra, the solar spectrum has to be
made smooth to the instrumental resolution of the cometary spectra before
the ratio is determined. The normalized reflectivity gradient is defined as
ds
S 0 (1 , 2 ) =
/S.
(9.3)
d
Here (ds/d) represents the reflectivity gradient in the wavelength interval
between 1 and 2 , and S is the mean reflectivity in the same wavelength
region defined as
X
S = N 1
Si ().
(9.4)
The reflectivity gradient S 0 (1 , 2 ) gives a measure of the colour.
S 0 (1 , 2 ) > 0, it indicates grain reddening.
If
9:59
comets
253
9:59
254
Physics of Comets
agreement between the observed and the expected variation shows that the
fountain model is reasonable. However, with an increase in distance from
the nucleus, the effect of radiation pressure on the grains will start becoming important causing distortion in the observed surface brightness curve.
This is evident from the observed isophotes of comets which show spherical
symmetry close to the nucleus, but distorted at larger distances. Also, the
asymmetry in the coma due to sunward ejection of the dust particles becomes prominent. In these situations, the surface brightness in the coma is
also a function of the phase angle. Therefore, the surface brightness profile
of comets can be described reasonably well with the geometrical dilution of
the expanding gas for distances not too far from the nucleus. But, with the
increase in distance, the radiation pressure effect becomes important and
it dominates at large distances causing deviations from the 1 index law.
The interpretation of reddening results in terms of the physical characteristics of the dust grains is complicated, as it involves several parameters,
comets
9:59
comets
255
including the variation in scattering angle, and is also generally based on the
Mie theory of scattering for spheres. Also, in general, it is rather difficult
to entangle the influence of size and the composition of the dust grains.
The early reddening observations of the tails of Comets Arend-Roland
and Mrkos were found to give a fit with model grains with the refractive
index of iron and sizes 0.3. The scattered radiation from the head regions of Comets Arend-Roland and Mrkos could also be fitted with particles
with the refractive indices between 1.25 and 1.50 (dielectric) and the size
distribution proportional to a4 for the sizes of the particles. The interpretation of later observations of Comets Kohoutek, Bradfield, West and
others seems to indicate the particle sizes to be submicron or micron and
slightly absorbing. The expected intensity distributions have been carried
out for various types of silicate materials as well as for various values for
the constant refractive index (n) with a small absorption part (k). These
comparisons indicate that n 1.5 to 1.6, k 0.05 and the particle size
0.2. The observed colour trend of Fig. 9.2 is consistent with dust grain
sizes, a 1 m and slightly absorbing.
9.1.1.
Albedo
The average value for the albedo of cometary particles can be obtained
from a combination of very simple physical arguments and observations.
The observation required for such a study is the scattered radiation at the
visible wavelength and the total integrated infrared flux from a comet.These
are readily available for many comets. The basic physical idea behind such
a simple method is that the continuum in the visual region arises due to
the scattering process which depends on the scattering efficiency of the
grain. On the other hand the observed infrared radiation is dependent on
the amount of impinging energy absorbed by the grain, which depends on
the absorption efficiency of the grain. For small optical depths and also
neglecting phase dependence effects, the optical surface brightness can be
written as
F ()
F ()Nd la2 Qsca (a, )
=
.
(9.5)
4
4
Here Nd is the column density of the dust particles and l is the representative path length. The infrared surface brightness can be approximated
as
Sopt () =
Sir =
hQabs ia2 F Nd l
.
4
(9.6)
9:59
256
comets
Physics of Comets
Here hQ
R abs i represents a mean absorption efficiency for the grain and
F = F ()d, the integrated solar radiation. It is possible to derive
an expression for the average albedo of the particles from the above
equations. This is given by
F Sopt ()
=
.
1
Sir F ()
(9.7)
The estimated values of albedo for several comets is 0.1. In the above
method, the phase dependent scattering is neglected. The derived albedo
for Comet Giacobini-Zinner to around 0.07 to 0.15.
9.1.2.
Phase function
8:49
comets
257
Fig. 9.3 (a) A composite phase diagram of the observed ratio of the reflected to the
infrared flux as a function of the scattering angle derived for several comets. For comparison with the data, the curve 3 from (b) is also shown. (b) shows the laboratory data
from spherical (curves 1 and 2) and nonspherical particles (curve 3) (Gehrz, R. D. and
Ney, E. P. 1992. Icarus, 100, 162).
The phase function for Comet Halley has been determined for phase
angles between 1.5 and 66 . This in combination with other results should
give the phase curve over the entire range of phase angles.
The observed phase function is consistent with the expected distribution
of micron size particles with an index of refraction in the ranges 1.3 n
2.0 and k 0.05.
With regard to albedo, the estimated albedos for different comets have
to be compared at the same scattering angle. The geometric albedo Ap at
1.2 m is roughly around 0.025 for scattering angles in the region of
around 150 .
9.1.3.
9:59
258
comets
Physics of Comets
expression
Qopt
D (r)
42 Fearth M
=
V
(9.8)
where
Z
amax
E=
amin
2
I0 () R
[i1 (, ) + i2 (, )] n(a)da
2k 2 r2
(9.9)
and
R amax
M=
4 3
a n(a)da
amin 3
R amax
.
n(a)da
amin
(9.10)
Here is the linear radius of the projected field of view, is the density of
the grain material and is the geocentric distance. The mean velocity of
grains is defined by
R amax 3
a V (a)n(a)da
R amax
.
(9.11)
V = amin
a3 n(a)da
amin
In the above expression, n(a)da represents the number of grains of size a in
the size range between a and a+da and V (a) is the velocity of grains of size
a. The summation has to be carried over minimum, amin and maximum,
amax size ranges of the size distribution function. The other symbols have
their usual meanings.
The calculation of dust production rate from the nucleus requires the
knowledge of the density of the grains, the dust particle velocities and the
size distribution of grains. However the density of grains in comets is quite
uncertain. Although the instruments on board the spacecrafts to Comet
Halley were not designed or calibrated to measure the density accurately,
some estimates have been made which are around 0.3 to 1.0 gm/cm3 . The
compositional measurements from Giotto and Vega spacecrafts indicate an
average value of 1 gm/cm3 for the carbon type of particles and a value
2.5 gm/cm3 for the silicate type particles. The density measurements of
the actual interplanetary dust particles indicate a value 1 gm/cm3 . In
view of the uncertainties, a canonical value of 1 gm/cm3 is generally used
as the production rate roughly scales with the density.
The velocity of the grains has to be obtained from the study of the
dust-gas dynamics in the coma. Either the dust velocities calculated based
on a simplified expression for the dust or by the results based on detailed
dust-gas dynamics may be used.
The size distribution function for cometary dust is generally taken as
n(a)da a da
(9.12)
9:59
comets
259
Comet
Date
r(au)
(AU)
From IR
emission
From
scattered
radiation
Halley
25 Aug 85 (Pre)
26 Sept 85 (Pre)
8 Jan 86 (Pre)
2 May 86(Post)
30 May 86 (Post)
2.81
2.40
0.90
1.65
2.05
3.16
2.18
1.29
0.85
1.75
2.4(4)
5.8(4)
2.9(6)
5.3(5)
2.5(5)
3.4(4)
5.0(4)
2.2(6)
3.8(5)
2.4(5)
Kohoutek
10 Dec 73 (Pre)
16 Dec 73 (Pre)
1 Jan 74 (Post)
4 Jan 74 (Post)
0.65
0.48
0.23
0.33
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
2.0(6)
2.0(6)
5.0(6)
3.3(6)
2.5(6)
3.4(6)
8.0(6)
3.8(6)
9.1.4.
9:59
260
comets
Physics of Comets
F
Here A(), f and represent the average grain albedo for the phase angle
of observation , filling factor of the grains in the field of view and the
linear radius of aperture projected on the comet respectively. Fcom is the
observed cometary flux. The filling factor f is given by
f=
N ()
2
(9.14)
where N () is the number of grains in the field of view and is the average
grain cross-section. If the column density N () 1 , as in the case of the
radial outflow model, the quantity A()f becomes independent of the field
of view or the geocentric distance. The advantage of the quantity A()f
is that it can be directly determined from the measurable quantities. Since
A()f depend upon the phase angle, some correction may be needed on
the measurements. The resulting values of A()f which has been corrected
to zero phase angle represents the intrinic production of dust of the comet.
In addition there could be some deviation in the projected density from
1 variation, which could have some effect on the measurements made
with different aperatures. The quantity Af allows comparison of dust
production rates of comets.
The calculated dust production rate A()f from observations for
Comet Halley is shown in Fig. 6.6. The resulting variation of Af corrected to zero phase angle is quite similar to Fig. 6.6. The power law
constant which are for the pre- and post-perihelion observations give values
of 2.96 and 2.25 respectively. The interesting feature is the pre- and
post perihelion data do not converge near perihelion in contrast to those of
other gas species.
In contrast of Comet Halley, Comet Borrelly has heliocentric distance
dependence for OH of 8.9 which is very steep. Other observed molecules
have also similar steep slopes. These variations are vastly different from
that of A()f which has a power law slope of around 3. In addition it
does not show any asymmetry about perihelion.
The dust-to-gas ratio is just the ratio A()f /Q(OH). Since the heliocentric variation of gas and dust is vastly different in Comet Borrelly, the
derived gas-to-dust ratio varies during each apparition. There is a strong
9:59
comets
261
asymmetry for the dust between pre- and post-perihelion data in the case of
Comet Wild 2. The dust-to-gas ratio was found to have a variation of two
orders of magnitude between different comets in the study of a sample of
85 comets. The variation that have been seen among different apparitions
in the same comet could be due to evolutionary effect.
As can be seen from the above discussion, there appears to be a wide
variation in the dust-to-gas ratio in comets and its variation with heliocentric distance. These could be the consequence of strong seasonal effect
which is also present in the gas species as pointed out earlier.
9.2.
9.2.1.
Polarization
Linear polarization
9:59
262
Physics of Comets
Fig. 9.4 The observed dust polarization in several comets denoted by various symbols
is plotted as a function of the scattering angle. The existence of negative polarization
for scattering angles around 170 can be seen. The observations clearly delineate a well
defined polarization curve as a function of the scattering angles. The dark vertical bars
are the calculated values (Krishna Swamy, K. S. and Shah, G. A. 1988. Monthly Notices,
233, 573).
comets
9:59
comets
263
9:59
264
Physics of Comets
Fig. 9.5 The observed polarization of comets for phase angles 0.3 to 120 . They seem to
divide comets into classes depending on the maximum polarization (Levasseur-Regourd,
A.-Ch, Hadamcik, E. and Renard, J.B. 1996. Astron. Astrophys., 313, 327).
in Comet Halley based on Giotto measurements. This has also been seen
in Comet Tempel 1. The reason for the increase or decrease in polarization
with wavelength is basically related to the sizes of the dust particles in
relation to the wavelength of the observation. This is due to the fact that
the dust particles are efficient scatters when the size of the dust particles
is of the order of wavelength of the incident radiation. Therefore the polarization dependence depend upon the size of the dust particles at a given
wavelength.
An extensive polarimetric measurements of the tail of Comet IkeyaSeki carried out in 1965 when the comet was at r 0.3 AU showed the
surprising result that the polarization value changed from +0.20 to 0.42%
with scattering angles from 116 to 136 respectively, for = 0.53 m.
The neutral point (zero polarization) was found to be around a scattering
angle of 125 . The linear polarization measurements carried out along the
tail of Comet Halley in April 1986, at r = 1.3 AU showed that they are
very similar at 1000 km, 3000 km from the nucleus and for the envelope
around the nucleus, for the scattering angles between 125 to 160 . These
comets
9:59
comets
265
observations showed that there was no change in the crossover angle of linear
polarization and there was also no drastic modification of the grains as they
were transported from the nucleus out to distances of around 1.6 106 km.
The expected polarization calculated as a function of the particle size
shows that it is possible to produce positive and negative polarizations
for grain composition of silicate type and not for that of dirty ice (ice
with a small complex part), graphite or iron. Figure 9.6 shows the typical
result obtained for grain composition of olivine. As the polarization is very
9:59
266
Physics of Comets
Circular polarization
So far, the discussion pertained to linear polarization. It is also of interest to see whether circular polarization can be detected in comets as it
can give additional information about the grains. The expected circular
polarization is of the order of 0.5% for certain values of scattering angles
which is quite small compared to the linear polarization. Circular polarization was first detected in Comet Halley with an average value of around
1.7 103 . This was followed by Comet Hale-Bopp which had a circular
polarization of 0.26% in 1997. Since then circular polarization has been
measured in Comets D/1999 S4(LINEAR), C/2001 Q4(NEAT) etc. The
circular polarization seen from comets show left circularly polarized light.
This can be seen from Fig. 9.7 where the phase dependence of circular
polarization is shown for several comets. The figure also show the increase
in circular polarization (absolute value) with phase angle.
The circular polarization is produced only in the case when an incident unpolarized light after scattering by an ensemble of particles violating
mirror symmetry. This can arise due to the intrinsic property of the particles itself or it could be due to an external cause. The external processes
could due to multiple scattering in an anisotropic medium or scattering
by aligned non-spherical particles. Scattering by optically active (Chiral)
particles belongs to the other class where the property is intrinsic to the
particle.
For multiple scattering to be the cause of the observed circular polarization, the optical depth must be appreciable. The estimated optical depth in
a cometary atmosphere appears to be reasonable and therefore in principle
this mechanism can account for the observed circular polarization.
comets
9:59
comets
267
Fig. 9.7 The variation of circular polarization with phase angle for Comets Halley,
Hale-Bopp, LINEAR and NEAT (Rosenbush, V., Kiselev, N. and Kolokolova, L. 2008.
Organic Matter in Space, eds, Kwok S. and Sandford S., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, p. 311).
9:59
268
Physics of Comets
9.3.
Grain Sizes
Dust particle detectors were used on Giotto and Vega missions to Comet
Halley to record dust impact rate and thus to measure the mass distribution
of particles. The instrument from both the missions covered together the
mass range of around 106 to 1016 gm. The size distribution of particles
can therefore be inferred from these mass measurements. The cumulative
mass distribution function for the observed data is consistent with =
3.7(n(a) a ). The measured mass distribution of dust particles for
particles masses > 106 gm is found to be much flatter compared to smaller
masses. This indicated that the total mass is mostly contributed by large
size particles. The in situ mass distribution of dust particles in the coma of
Comet Wild 2 was also carried out by the stardust misssion. The results of
these measurements was found to be similar to that of Comet Halley. The
in situ measurements also showed the dominance of small size particles,
a 0.1 m, which cannot generally be detected through observations made
in the visible region.
It is possible to deduce the size distribution function of the dust particles
from the model fitting to the observed dust tail of comets. These studies
indicate the size distribution function is characterized by the power law
index of 3.5. The analysis of the nucleus of Comet Tempel 1 acquired
with camera aboard Rosetta spacecraft in the orange filter 6450
A with
the Monte Carlo approach gave an index of 3.0 for the power law size
distribution function.
Large size particles are also present in comets. This comes from several
observations. The absence of 10m silicate emission feature in the antitail of Comet Kohoutek puts a lower limit to the particle size, a 5 m
(Sec. 9.4.2). This conclusion is also consistent with the results based on
comets
9:59
comets
269
dynamical considerations of the anti-tail which gives for the particle sizes,
a 15 m. Supportive evidence for the presence of large size dust particles
comes from the study of meteor showers which are associated with comets.
In addition dust trails seen in comets require millimetre to centimetre size
dust particles.
The dust particles emitted from comets span a wide range in sizes, from
submillimetre to millimetre to centimetre. The derived size distribution
of dust particles based on various studies is a representative value for all
comets, but it could vary from comet to comet and can also vary within
the coma. The variation in the size distribution of dust particles with
distance in the coma can arise as a resultant effect of sorting of particles
due to radiation pressure effect and sublimation of volatiles. The power
law index, 3.5 of the size distribution function, is also characteristic
of intersteller grains and is typical of collisionally evolved bodies.
9.4.
Infrared Measurements
There are very few windows in the infrared region that are available for
ground based observations, as most of the infrared radiation is absorbed
by the Earths atmosphere (Fig. 9.8). Therefore, most of the observations
are carried out with broad band passes. Several such systems exist which
have been used by different observers with slight variations in their mean
wavelengths and band widths. (Table 9.2).
Table 9.2
Band pass
Arizona System
Wavelength
(m)
(m)
IRTF System
Wavelength
(m)
(m)
J
H
K
L
L0
M
N
Q
1.26
1.60
2.22
3.54
4.80
10.6
21.0
0.20
0.36
0.52
0.97
0.60
5.0
11.0
1.20
1.60
2.2
3.55
3.78
4.7
10.50
20.6
0.3
0.3
0.4
1.05
0.57
0.57
5.0
9.0
9:59
270
Physics of Comets
Fig. 9.8 The atmospheric transmission is plotted as a function of wavelength for the
region of 1 to 20 m. The spectral band passes corresponding to J to Q are also shown
(Courtesy Charlie Lindsey).
comets
9:59
comets
271
which in turn depends on the nature and composition of the dust. From a
detailed comparison of the cometary infrared radiation with the expected
infrared fluxes based on grain models, it is possible to infer the physical
and the chemical nature of cometary grains. The grains are considered to
be in radiative equilibrium with the incident solar energy. The equilibrium
temperature of the grain is, therefore, determined by a balance between
the absorbed radiation which is mostly in the ultraviolet and visible regions
and the emitted radiation which is in the far infrared region. This can be
expressed by the condition
Fabs (a) = Fem (a, Tg )
(9.15)
where
Fabs (a) =
R
r
2 Z
(9.16)
and
Z
Fem (a, Tg ) =
(9.17)
Ftotal (, r) =
j
X
i=1
Fem (, r)i xi
(9.19)
9:59
272
comets
Physics of Comets
where xi is the fraction of the grain population of type i. The corresponding mass of grains of type i is given by
Z
Mi =
o
th
4 3
a i n(a)da
3
(9.20)
The production of dust can also be determined from the observed infrared radiation of comets. The observed infrared radiation at the Earth,
9:59
comets
273
Fig. 9.9 Observed infrared fluxes plotted as a function of wavelength for Comet Kohoutek. The fitted black body temperataure for each of the curves along with the factor
by which the temperature exceeds the black body temperature is also shown. (Ney, E.
P. 1974. Icarus, 23 551).
Fearth is related to the total number of grains in the coma, N (r) through
the relation
Fearth =
E
42
(9.21)
(9.22)
9:59
274
comets
Physics of Comets
Here is the geocentric distance. A rough estimate for the production rate
can be obtained from the relation
N (r)
(9.23)
QD (r) '
where is the lifetime of the grain. This gives an average dust mass rate of
about 4 106 gm/sec for the assumed lifetime of the grain ' 4 104 sec .
However, in general, it is necessary to take into account the effect of the size
distribution of grains. Therefore, the production rate of grains in gm/sec,
as in the case of continuum can be calculated from the relation
QiR
D (r) =
42 Fearth M
V
(9.24)
where
Z
amax
E =
(9.25)
amin
The expressions for M and V are given by Eqs. (9.10) and (9.11). All the
symbols which occur in these equations are described in Sec. 9.1.3 or have
their usual meanings. The calculation of the production rate of grains from
Eq. (9.24) involves the knowledge of density, velocity and size distribution
function for the grains. A discussion regarding these quantities is also
outlined in Sec. 9.1.3. The production rate of grains has been calculated
for various comets. The results for Comet Halley for heliocentric distances
between 2.8 and 0.6 AU show a close relation with an r4 dependence,
while the results for Comet Kohoutek show a close relation for heliocentric
distances between 0.15 and 1.5 AU with an r2 dependence. It is interesting
to see whether there exists a general behaviour of the production rate of
dust with the heliocentric distance in comets. This could be carried out
by the superposition of the shape of the derived dust production rate with
the heliocentric distance of various comets and the results are shown in
Fig. 9.10.
The gas (composed of H2 O) and the dust coming out of the nucleus of
a comet flow outwards in such a way that the gas carries the dust with it.
Therefore, to a first approximation, the heliocentric variation of the dust
production rate and the water production rate should be very similar as can
be seen from Fig. 9.10. The dependence of r2 for r 1 AU arises due to
the solar flux falling of as r2 and it then deviates from this dependence due
to the effect of temperature dependence of the vapour pressure. The ratio
of gas to dust for a representative sample of comets is given in Table 9.3.
9:59
comets
275
Fig. 9.10 A composite diagram showing the general shape of the variation of the dust
production rate with heliocentric distance is derived from several comets, denoted by
various symbols. There is a tight relation with heliocentric distance r showing r2
variation up to r 1 AU and r4 for r 1 AU. The dashed curve shows the shape of
the derived water production for r0 = 2.4 and 2.6 respectively (Krishna Swamy, K. S.
1991. Astron. Astrophys., 241, 260).
9:59
276
comets
Physics of Comets
Table 9.3
Comets
Q(H2 O)
(Kg/sec)
Q(dust)
(Kg/sec)
H2 O/dust
1.5(4)
1.1(2)
1.8(2)
2.1(2)
1.2(3)
9.0(1)
1.5(3)
5.4(1)
1.2(3)
2.8(1)
3.8(2)
2.0(1)
10
2
0.1
7
3
5
1.5(4)
2.2(2)
5.4(3)
2.0(2)a
3
< 11.1
6.0(2)
9.2(3)
8.1(1)
1.5(4)
1.1(4)
1.0(2)
4.6(2)
2.0
3.5(3)
1.8(3)
6
20
40
4
6
9.4.2.
Anti-tail
9:59
comets
277
Fig. 9.11 Measured energy distributions in the coma, tail and anti-tail of Comet Kohoutek are plotted as a function of wavelength. Observations refer to January 1.7, 1974.
The absence of 10 micron feature in the anti-tail observations can be seen. (Ney, E. P.
1974. op. cit.).
21.9, 1974 (r = 0.51 AU and = 0.73 AU), but was clearly absent in the
observations of April 5.8, 1974 (r = 0.67 AU and = 0.69 AU). These observations show that the sizes of the emitted grains (Fig. 9.12) could vary
from comet to comet, as well as with the heliocentric distance for the same
comet. The supporting evidence for the large size particles in the anti-tail
also comes from the colour temperature measurements of Comet Kohoutek.
It showed that the colour temperature for the anti-tail was much cooler and
therefore closer to the black body temperature than that of the coma and
the tail temperature.
9:59
278
Physics of Comets
Fig. 9.12 Shape of emission curves for different sizes, grain temperatures and for material of moon samples are shown. (a) For moon sample 12009, Tg = 550 K and sizes of
0.2, 1.0 and 5.0 microns. (b) For moon sample 14321, Tg = 400 and 700 K. Long-dashed,
continuous and dashed curves refer to particle sizes of 2, 5 and 10 microns respectively.
(Krishna Swamy, K. S. and Donn, B. 1979. A.J., 84, 692).
9.5.
Spectral Feature
The most direct way of getting information about the composition of the
grain is through the detection and identification of characteristic spectral
features such as the vibration-rotation bands of molecules. It is important
to note that such bands retain their identity even when the molecules are
in the solid state.
comets
9:59
9.5.1.
comets
279
Silicate signature
9:59
280
Physics of Comets
Fig. 9.13 Absorption spectra of Orthopyroxene ionosilicates. Sample curves shown (in
cm1 ) are for the enstatite-hypersthene series of En62 , En75 and En84 . (Adapted from
Lyon. R. J. P. 1963. NASA Technical Note, NASA TN D-1871).
comets
9:59
comets
281
Fig. 9.14 Shows the shape of the emission feature around 10 m in Comets Halley (r
= 0.79 AU, line) and Hale-Bopp (r = 0.92 AU, dots) with various spectral signatures.
(Hanner, M.S. et. al. 1999. Earth, Moon and Planets, 79, 247).
Comet Halley
The mineralogical composition of dust particles was first obtained for
Comet Halley based on in situ measurements. This came from the studies
of mass spectra of around 5000 particles made with instrument on board
Giotto and Vega Spacecrafts. The mass spectra basically provide the elemental composition of the dust particles. The mass spectra clearly indicated the presence of dust particles with rock-forming elements Mg, Si, Ca,
and Fe. It also showed the presence of dust particles containing both rock
and CHON elements (Sec. 9.6).
The next step is to get some information on the mineralogical composition of the dust particles. From a knowledge of the abundances of various
elements, it is possible to make a systematic analysis of the variation among
9:59
282
Physics of Comets
the observed grains and make some broad classification of its composition.
For this purpose the cluster analysis method can be used. Cluster analysis
is a stistical method of grouping a set of data points to look for correlations
among them. This method has been applied to classify Comet Halleys dust
particles. In this study, the abundant inorganic elements Na, Mg, Al, Si, S,
Ca and Fe have been considered. The result of these studies and with the
observed distribution of Fe/(Fe+Mg), Mg-Fe-Si, Mg-Fe-O and Mg-Fe-S, it
has been possible to characterise the particles into a few major mineral
groups. The resulting major mineralogical composition of dust particles
in Comet Halley is given in Table 9.4. As can be seen from the table,
the dominant component is the Mg-Si-O rich particles (olivine, pyroxene
etc.). The other group comprising around 10% are the particles of Fe, Ni
and sulphides. These particles could consist of Pyrrhotite (Fe1x S) and
Pentlendite(Fe Ni)9 S8 . All these results indicate that the cometary dust is
an unequilibrated heterogeneous mixture of minerals containing both high
and low temperature condensates.
Table 9.4
Mineral
proportion
chemistry
possible minerals
Mg silicates
> 20%
Fe-poor, Ca-poor
Fe sulfides 10%
some Ni-rich
pyrrhotite, pentlandite
Fe metal
1-2%
Ni-poor
Mineral group
Fe oxide < 1%
kamacite
magnetite
Schulze, H., Kissel, J. and Jessberger, E.K. 1997, From Star Dust to Planetesimals, ASP
Conference Series, Vol. 122, p. 397, eds. Y. Pendleton and A.G.G.M. Tielens, By the kind
permission of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series.
Comet Hale-Bopp
comets
9:59
comets
283
Fig. 9.15 The upper curve shows the silicate emission features in Comet Hale-Bopp
observed with ISO, in the wavelength region 5 to 45 m. The lower curve shows the
modeled spectrum of forsterite from the laboratory data (Crovisier, J. et al. 1997.
Science, 275, 1904).
9:59
284
Physics of Comets
seen from Fig. 9.16. This shows the similarity in the mineralogy of the
grain material.
Fig. 9.16 Comparison between the ISO-SWS spectrum of Ae/Be star. HD 100546 (top
curve) with the corresponding spectrum from Comet Hale-Bopp (bottom curve). The
striking resemblance between the two curves can clearly be seen (Malfait, K., Waelkens,
C., Waters, L.B.F.M. et al. 1998. Astron. Astrophys., 332, L25).
Comet Tempel 1
Deep Impact mission gave the first opportunity to look at the deeper
layer material ejected from Comet Tempel 1. The spectral characteristics
of this material was observed by the Spitzer Space Telescope in the spectral region from 535 m. The emission from the normal coma and the
nucleus, which is representative of the pre-impact spectrum was subtracted
out from the observed spectrum. The resulting emission spectrum represent basically the emission from the ejected material. This is shown in the
Fig. 9.17. The conspicuous features in the spectrum are carbonates in the
region 6.5 to 7.2 m, pyroxenes in the region 8 to 10 m, olivines at 11 m
and sulphides in the region 27 to 29 m. The calculated spectral emission
model is based on measured thermal emission spectra of micrometer size
comets
9:59
comets
285
Fig. 9.17 (a) Comparison of the observed spectrum of Comet Tempel 1 ejecta obtained
from Spitzers Space Telescope at r = 1.51 AU with the best fit model using various kinds
of materials for the dust particles. (b) The residual spectrum after subtracting the best
fit model (a). The best fit with non-silicate species are overlaid in the figure (Lisse, C.M.
et al. 2007. Icarus, 187, 69).
particles of over 80 mineral species. The particle composition, size distribution and temperatures were determined through search in phase space.
Several checks were applied for the correctness of the model such as, minerals detected are the major species seen IDPs, the derived abundances
are consistent with solar system abundances as well as the deduced particle distribution and temperature agrees with the findings of instruments
on Deep Impact etc. The phase space search eliminated large number of
mineral species from the Comet Tempel 1 ejecta. The best model fit to the
9:59
286
comets
Physics of Comets
Molecular
Weight
Nmoles
(rel.)
172
140
204
0.35
0.70
0.18
232
264
216
200
0.06
0.50
0.18
0.16
496
0.07
84
116
0.11
0.17
84
0.92
18
18
0.27
23.7
12
(178)
1.45
0.022
9:59
comets
287
The results of Comet Tempel 1 are consistent with the Comet Halley
flyby results which showed the presence of silicates, water, sulphides and
carbonates.
The same model has been used for the re-analysis of ISO Spectrum in
the region 2.4 to 4.5 m of Comet Hale-Bopp (r = 2.8 AU) and the young
stellar object HD 100546. The results are qualitatively similar in showing
emission signatures due to silicates, cabonaters, Phyllosilicates, water ice,
amorphous carbon and sulphides. But there are some differences as well.
Comet Wild 2
The Stardust misssion which collected samples of dust particles from
Comet Wild 2 has given interesting results with regard to their mineralogy.
It showed the importance of sulphur and nitrogen chemistry in the dust
particles. It is likely that sulphur atom which is generally associated with
mineral phase result have came from mineral such as troilite.
Infrared studies of these particles has shown the presence of amorphous
silicate. Among crystalline silicates, forsterite, enstatite, olivine and diopside with pyroxene has been seen. FeNi metal grains and FeNi sulphides
have been seen. The range of Fe/Mg ratios seen in the particles indicate that
Comet Wild 2 is unequilibrated. The presence of particles with nitrogenrich chemistry and lower abundance of O implies that nitriles or polycyanides may have been present. The interesting finding is that dust particles which are mineralogically similar to meteoritic Calcium-Aluminiumrich inclusions have been found. Ca-Al-rich dust particles are the oldest
samples in the solar system and contain minerals in abundance.
Deep Impact mission of Comet Tempel 1 provided detailed mineralogical
composition of this comet. Among the various minerals, only forsterite was
seen in both the Comets Tempel 1 and Wild 2. Iron sulphide has been seen
in Comet Wild 2, but not FeMg sulphides. The major difference between
the two comets is the presence of carbonatess and hydrated silicates in
Comet Tempel 1 but not in Wild 2 samples. These species have been
seen from meteorites. Its formation is generally believed to arise from
hydrothermal alteration inside a wet parent body.
The vast difference in the observed mineralogy betwen the two Jupiter
family of Comets Tempel 1 and Wild 2 could be due to several reasons. It is
possible that the two comets themselves are different or it could have been
formed in different regions. In addition the synthesis of observed infrared
9:59
288
Physics of Comets
spectra of Comet Tempel 1 was carried out with laboratory minerals which
may be different from those present in comets that have gone through
various processes. Since comets were formed from aggregates of materials, it
is quite possible that some comets possess hydrated silicates due to melting
of ice. Lastly Comet Tempel 1 site of impact appeared to show the presence
of impact craters. Therefore it is possible that the hydrated silicates could
have been formed inside Comet Tempel 1 due to the impact. However this
appears not the case for Comet Wild 2.
9.5.3.
A new emission feature near 3.4 m was first detected by Vega 1 spacecraft in the spectra of Comet Halley. This was confirmed by several groundbased observations. The laboratory absorption spectra of organic materials
both in gaseous and solid phase generally show a strong feature around
3.4 m. Most of the C-H stretching vibrations fall in the wavelength regions around 3.1 to 3.7 m (see Fig. 3.4). Therefore, the observed feature
in Comet Halley is attributed to C-H stretching of some organic material.
The 3.4 m feature has subsequently been seen from several other comets
indicating the common nature of cometary organics. This feature is also
seen from some IDPs collected in the stratosphere. The intensity of the
3.4 m feature as observed by Vega spacecraft seemed to vary inversely
with the projected distance from the nucleus in a manner similar to the
parent molecule indicating the possible detection of a new parent molecule.
The apparent profile of 3.4 m feature in several comets is around
3.36 m (Fig. 9.18). In addition, there is evidence for the presence of
two weaker features at 3.28 and 3.52 m. The vibrational frequencies of
CH3 group occur at 3.37 m and 3.48 m and that of CH2 group at 3.42 m
and 3.50 m. Therefore, the observed features in comets appear to indicate
the presence of spectral signatures of CH3 and CH2 functional groups.
The structure, width and the intensity of the observed 3.4 m emission
feature suggest that several of these species may be present.
The feature at 3.52 m is attributed to 3 band of Methanol (CH3 OH).
Other rotational-vibrational lines of methanol occurring at 3.33 m(2 ) and
3.37 m(9 ) contribute to the broad 3.36 m emission. Detailed modelling
with methanol indicate a residual feature. This could come either from
other weaker lines of methanol, for which the required data is not available
or it could come from some other species.
The other feature present at 3.28 m is characteristic of aromatic com-
comets
9:59
comets
289
Fig. 9.18 The spectral feature around 3.4 m region observed from Comet 109P/SwiftTuttle at r = 1.0 AU (Disanti, M.A. et al. 1995. Icarus, 116, 1).
pounds(PAHs). The feature seen at 3.29 m from interstellar matter is generally associated with other features occurring at 6.2, 7.7, 8.6 and 11.3 m.
Some of these features have also been seen in the infrared observations of
Comet Tempel 1.
The spectra of the Comet Tempel 1 showed an increase in the ratio of
organics to water after the impact. The organic feature was also found to
be broader and contained more structures after the impact. This indicates
the presence of many new species that were below the detectable limit prior
to the impact.
The 3.4 m cometary feature has also been seen from interstellar clouds,
molecular clouds, HII regions and so on. But the characteristic feature
is different indicating the variation of carbonaceous material present in
different environments.
9.5.4.
Ice signature
9:59
290
Physics of Comets
9.6.
Comet Halley
The important information about the chemical composition of dust particles in Comet Halley has been obtained from the dust impact mass analyzer PUMA 1 and 2 on Vega and PIA on Giotto spacecrafts. Dust particles
striking a silver target placed in front of the mass spectrometer generate a
cloud of ions and the positive charge are mass analyzed, which indicates its
chemical composition. Several thousand mass spectra of dust particles were
recorded by the instruments. These studies indicated broadly three classes
of particles (Fig. 9.20): (1) mostly made up of light elements such as H, C,
N and O indicative of organic composition of grain called CHON particles
(2) similar to CI Chondrites but enriched in carbon and (3) primarily O,
Mg, Si and Fe suggestive of silicate grains. Therefore, the Comet Halley
comets
9:59
comets
291
Fig. 9.19 Comparison of the observed broad feature in the region of 3 m from the
ejecta of Comet Tempel 1 with the model spectra of 0.5 m diameter water ice particles.
There is a good fit (Sunshine, J.M. et al. 2007. Icarus, 190, 284).
The possibility of the presence of core-mantle structure of dust particles comes from the fact that on the average CHON ions appear to have a
higher initial energy than the silicate ions. The observed ion abundances
have been transformed to atoms based on laboratory calibration from the
knowledge of the ion yields with different projectiles. The resulting composition of Comet Halleys dust indicate that the abundances of rock forming
elements in Halleys dust are within a factor of two relative to the solar
system abundances. The abundances of H, C and O are more than that
of CI-chondrite believed to be the unaltered meteorites from the early solar system. This can be interpreted to mean that the Halley dust is more
primitive than CI-chondrites. The puzzle of carbon depletion in comets also
seems to have been resolved as they are tied up in the refractory organics.
Due to uncertainties in converting the ion intensities to atomic abundances,
there could be a factor of two uncertainties in the final derived abundances.
The derived gas to dust ratio is 1.1 to 1.7. The estimated density of
silicate dominated grain indicates a value 2.5 gm/cm3 , while CHON
dominated grain indicates a value 1 gm/cm3 . Several refractory grains
show 12 C/13 C 5000 which is drastically different from the normal value
89. This indicate that the carbon coming out of different nucleosynthesis
sites has been incorporated in the Comet Halley dust particles.
9:59
292
Physics of Comets
Fig. 9.20 Composition of dust particles seen by dust impact mass analyzer by Vega
spacecraft from Comet Halley (Kissel, J. et al. 1986. Nature, 321, 336).
comets
9:59
comets
293
a distance of 234 km on 2 Jan 2004. The particles ejected from the nucleus
of Comet Wild 2 were collected when they hit silica aerogel with a speed
of 6.12 km/sec. Stardust collected more than 1000 dust particles of sizes
in the range of about 5300 m. Stardust mission was meant for collecting
dust samples from Comet Wild 2 and bring back to earth for laboratory
investigation. The stardust spacecraft also contained a time-of-flight spectrometer called CIDA (cometary and interstellar dust analysis) which was
used for the study of the composition of dust particles in the coma. These
two studies have given detailed information about the composition of dust
particles of Comet Wild 2.
The CIDA instrument was similar to that in PUMA 1 and 2 on the
Vega spacecraft and PIA instrument on Giotto of Comet Halley. The CIDA
instrument is a time-of-flight mass spectrometer and is based on the fact
that the dust particles with enough velocity striking a silver target produce
either positive ions or negative ions depending on the voltage applied. The
flight time of these ions from the time of impact to the time of detection
give a direct measure of the mass of these ions.
The dominant ion detected from CIDA instrument was CN . This
indicates the dominance of nitrogen-rich chemistry. It was found that O
and OH ions were minor in abundance which show that oxygen chemistry
play a minor role in these dust particles. Hence water-ice cannot be a major
constituent of these dust particles.
The importance of sulphur chemistry in the dust particles came out of
the detection of the two isotopic lines of SH (mass-to-charge ratio m/z =
33 and 35). it is possible that sulphur atom which is generally attributed to
mineral phases of cometary dust could have come out of minerals such as
troilite to organic phase by some radiative process during the time (several
billion years) the dust particles spent in interstellar space and later in the
nuclei of comets.
In the positive ion mass spectra, three types of species have been detected. They are CH+ ion(m/z = 13+ ), traces of N+ , NH+ ,O+ , OH+ and
unsaturated organic species containing some nitrogen.
Therefore studies based on CIDA instrument of Comet Wild 2 indicate
that H2 O and CO were absent in the dust particles, nitrogen chemistry
appears to be dominant and sulphur must have come out of mineral phase
of the cometary dust.
The stardust samples collected from Comet Wild 2 have been subjected
to multiple experimental techniques. They show the presence of organic
aromatic matter(PAHs). As shown in Fig. 9.21 it contains benzene(78 amu,
9:59
294
Physics of Comets
9.7.
The dust particles released from the nucleus are subjected to radiation
pressure forces which push them to different distances from the nucleus and
comets
9:59
comets
295
Fig. 9.21 Mass spectra of stardust sample C2115, Track 22 of Comet Wild 2. The
complex distribution of aromatic species covering molecular weights upto 500 can be
seen in (B). The expanded portion of mass range is shown in (C) and (D). The complex
nature of organics present can be seen (Clemett, S.J. et al. 2007. Lunar and Planetary
Science, 38, 2091.
this ultimately gives rise to the observed dust tail as discussed in Chap. 7.
The dust tail is composed of various Syndynes and each curve is defined
in terms of a parameter (1 ), which is the ratio of solar radiation
pressure to gravity. These Syndynes when projected on to the photographs
of the tail give a range of values which encompass the observed tail. The
maximum value of fixes the minimum size of the particles that can exist in
the tail. Others will essentially be pushed away from the system. From such
9:59
296
Physics of Comets
max
Comet
max
1957
1957
1962
1965
1965
0.55
2
2.5
1.1-1.4
0.8 (farthest
part)
2.5 (near the
head)
1970 II
1970 II
1973 XII
1976 VI
1976 VI
Several
Comets
1.9
3.8a
0.8b
2
2.5
2.5
III
V
III
VIII
VIII
1965 VIII
a.
from IR photometry; b.
from
Colorimetry( Saito, K., Isobe, S., Nishioka, K.
and Ishii, T. 1981. Icarus 47, 351.)
are subjected to radiation pressure forces beyond about max ' 2.5. This
apparent cut-off in the value of can be used to infer the properties of
the dust particles. However, the interpretation is not straightforward as it
involves various parameters of the grains, which means one has to invoke
various grain models. As an example, Fig. 9.22 shows a plot of the variation
of as a function of the radius of the particle for different types of particles.
It can be seen that for small size particles most of the curves are flat except
for the silicate type (Basalt) of materials. The observed maximum value of
max ' 2.5 seems to lie in between these two general shapes of the curves.
9.8.
Summary
comets
9:59
comets
297
Fig. 9.22 The variation of radiation pressure force (1 ) with the radius of
the particle for three types of material is shown. (Adapted from Saito, K., Isobe, S.,
Nishioka, K. and Ishii, T. 1981. Icarus, 47, 351.)
9:59
298
Physics of Comets
Problems
1. Derive an expression for the variation of the temperature of a black
body as a function of distance from the Sun. Assume that the energy
distribution of the Sun can be represented by a black body of temperature 6000 K. What will happen if the body is a planet with no
atmosphere or if there is an atmosphere?
2. Calculate the grain temperature for graphite grains of a = 0.2 m at
1 AU from the Sun. How much does this value differ from that of black
body temperature at the same distance?
3. Suppose in the above problem, the grain has some impurity which gives
Qabs = 1 at 1 mm. What will happen to the temperature of the grain?
4. Calculate the number of electrons and atoms or molecules required to
explain the observed scattered radiation in comets at r = 1 AU and for
= 5000
A. Take the value of the scattered intensity to be 50% of the
solar intensity at that wavelength. What is the expected wavelength
dependence of these?
5. Suppose the heavy elements like O, C, N hit the grain and stick to it
with a probability . If the temperature of the gas is T and assuming
the mean velocity to be given by the Maxwellian distribution, deduce
comets
9:59
comets
299
the expression for the rate of growth of the grain. What is the time
required for an ice grain of initial radius of 0.01 m to grow to 1 m,
if = 1, T = 100 K and nH = 10/cm3
6. A grain releases a molecule and reduces in size due to protons hitting
the surface of the grain. Deduce an expression for the rate of decrease
of grain size with time, if is the probability for the release of a lattice
molecule when the proton hits the surface. What is the time required
to destroy completely an ice grain of size 1 m with NH = ne = 10/cm3 ,
T = 104 K and = 0.1?
2
7. Assuming solar constant of 1.4 106 ergs/cm sec and spherical completely absorbing particles of density 3.0, calculate the limiting radii of
particles to be retained in the solar system released from Comet Encke
at aphelion distance of 4.10 AU and perihelion distance of 0.34 AU.
8. Compare the importance of radiation pressure on the motion of the dust
compared with the force of gravity at the orbit of Venus. Calculate the
time required for the dust to be driven out to the distance of the Earth
by radiation pressure alone.
References
The following paper gives a good account on dust
1. Kolokolova, L, Hanner, M.S., Levasseur-Regourd, A.-Ch et al. 2005.
In Comets II, eds., M.S. Festou, H.U. Keller and H.A. Weaver, Univ.
Arizona Press, Tucson, P.577.
The early work on continuum studies can be found in these two references:
2. Liller, W. 1960. Ap. J. 132 867.
3. Remy-Battiau, L. 1964. Acad. r. Belg. Bull. el. Sci. 5eme Ser. 50
74.
The following papers may be referred for later work:
4. Jewitt, D. C. and Meech, K. J. 1986. Ap. J. 310, 937
5. Hanner, M.S. 2003. JQSRT, 79-80, 695.
6. Wolf, M.J., Clayton, G.C. and Gibson, S.J. 1998. Ap.J., 503, 815.
7. Mann, I., Kimura, H. and Kolokolova, L. 2004. JQSRT, 89, 291.
8. Mason, C.G., Gehrz, R.D., Jones, T.J. et al. 2001. Ap.J., 549, 635.
The determination of grain albedo can be found in the following papers
9. ODell, C.R. 1971. Ap. J., 166, 675.
10. Hanner, M.S. and Newburn, R.L. 1989. Astron, J., 97, 254.
A()f was introduced in the following paper
9:59
300
Physics of Comets
11. AHearn, M.F., Schleicher, D.G., Feldman, P.D., et al. 1984. Ap.J.,
89, 579.
The early measurement of polarization was done by
12. Bappu, M.K.V. and Sinvhal, S.D. 1960. M N 120 152.
The existence of negative polarization in comets was shown in the following
two papers:
13. Kiselev, N.N. and Chernova, G.P. 1978. Soviet Astron. 22 607.
14. Weinberg, J.L. and Beeson. D.E. 1976. Astron. Astrophys. 48 151.
For later work the following may be consulted
15. Dollfus, A. 1989. Astr. Ap. 213, 469.
16. Mukai, T., Mukai, S. and Kikuchi, S. 1987. Astr. Ap. 187, 650.
17. Harrington, D.M., Meech, K. Kolokolova, L., et al. 2007. Icarus, 187,
177.
The possible division of comets based on observed linear polarization is in
the following papers
18. Levasseur-Regourd, A. -Ch., Hadanicik E. and Rehard, J.B. 1996. Astron. Astrophys., 313, 327.
19. Levasseur-Regourd, A. -Ch., Zolensky, M. and Lasue, J. 2008. Planetary and Space Science, 56, 1719.
20. Jockers, K., Kiselev, N., Bonev, T. et al. 2005. Astron. Astrophys.,
441, 773.
Circular polarization could be due to organics is discussed in the following
paper
21. Rosenbush, V. Kolokolova, A., Lozarian, A. et al. 2007. Icarus, 186,
317.
In situ studies are discussed in the following papers
22. Mazets, E.P., Aptekar R.L., Golenetskii, S.V. et al. 1986. Nature, 321,
276.
23. McDonnell, J.A.M., Lamy, P.L. and Pankiewicz, G.S. 1991. In Comets
in the Post-Halley Era, eds. R.L. Newburn, M.Neugebauer and J. Rahe,
Kluwer Academic Publishers, P. 1043.
24. Nordholt, J.E., Reisenfeld, D.B., Wiens, R.C. et al. 2003. Geophys.
Res. Lett., 30, 18.
25. Tuzzolino, A.J., Economou, T.E., Clark, B.C. et al. 2004. Science,
304, 1776.
The first infrared measurements made on Comet Ikeya-Seki is reported by
26. Becklin, E E and Westphal, J A. 1966. Ap. J., 145 445.
The following paper reports the first detection of 10 m emission feature
in Comet Bennett.
comets
9:59
comets
301
27. Maas, R., Ney, E.P. and Woolf, N.J. 1970. Ap. J.,160, L101.
Interpretation of infrared observations and mineralogy of grains can be
found in the following papers
28. Krishna Swamy, K.S. and Donn, B 1968. Ap J 153, 291.
29. Krishna Swamy, K.S., Sandford, S., Allamandola, L.J. et al. 1988.
Icarus, 75, 351.
30. Oishi, M., Okuda, H. and Wickramasinghe, N C 1978. Publ. Astro.
Soc. Japan, 30, 161.
31. Crovisier, J., Brooke, T.Y., Leech, K. et al. 2000. Thermal Emission
Spectroscopy and Analysis of Dust Disks and Regoliths, eds. M.L. Sitko,
A.L. sprague and D.K. Lynch, ASP Conference Ser. Vol. 196, P.109.
32. Wooden, D.H., Harker, D.C., Woodward, C.E., et al. 1999. Ap.J.,
517, 1034.
Study of complex mineralogy of dust is in the following papers
33. Crovisier, J., Leech, K., Bockelee-Morvan, D. et al. 1997. Science, 275,
1904.
34. Lisse, C.M., Kraemer, K.E., Nuth III, J.A. et al. 2007. Icarus, 187,
69.
35. Hanner, M.S. and Bradley, J.P. 2005. In Comets II, eds. M.C. Festou,
H.U. Keller and H.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 555.
The following papers discusses the complex nature of organics
36. Sandford, S.A. 2008. In Organic Matter in Space, Eds. S. Kwok and
S.A. Sandford, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, P.299.
37. Brownlee, D., Tsou, P., Aleon, J. et al. 2006. Science, 314, 1711.
38. Kissel, J. Krueger, F.R., Silen, J. et al. 2004. Science, 304, 1774.
39. Kissel, J. and Krueger, F.R. 1987. Nature, 326, No. 6115, 755.
40. Disanti, M.A., Villanueva, G.L., Bonev, B.P. et al. 2007. Icarus, 187,
240.
41. Biver, N., Bockelee-Morvan, D., Boissier, J., et al. 2007. Icarus, 187,
253.
42. Clemett, S.J., Nakamura-Messenger, K., Mckay, D.S. et al. 2007. Lunar and Planetary Science, 38, 2091.
The first detection of Glycine in Comet Wild 2 is reported in the following
paper
43. Elsila, J.E., Glavin, D.P. and Dworkin, J.P. 2009. Meteorites and Planetary Science, 44, 1323.
The observed C-H(3.4 m) feature in Comet Tempel 1
44. AHearn, M.F. 2005.
In Asteroids, Comets and Meteors, eds.
D.Lazzaro, S. Ferraz-Mello and J.A. Fernandez, Cambridge Univ.
9:59
302
Physics of Comets
Press, p. 33.
The first definite detection of strong 3.1 m ice dust feature in Comet Tempel 1 is reported in the following paper
45. Sunshine, J.M., Groussin, O., Schultz, P.H. et al. 2007. Icarus, 190,
284.
comets
9:59
CHAPTER 10
Ion Tails
The ion tails of comets provide a unique and natural place for the study
of various plasma processes. Many of the features seen in the ion tails
of comets change on a short-time scale as well as on a long-time scale.
The formation of ion tails is basically due to the interaction of the solar
wind plasma with the cometary plasma. The detailed dynamical model
calculations for such an interaction process had indicated the presence of
Large Scale Structures like bow shock, ionosphere and so on. The in situ
measurements of Comets Giacobini-Zinner, Halley Borrelly, etc. showed
not only the presence of these features but also indicated the plasma to be
highly complex, containing instabilities, waves, turbulence and so on. Some
of these aspects will be discussed here. In addition, some of the large scale
features that have been seen in the ion tail of comets will also be discussed.
10.1.
The existence of the solar wind was first postulated based on the study
of the ion tail of comets. The model was put on a firm footing with the
work of Parker based on the hydrodynamic expansion model of the solar
corona. The model predicted in detail the expected nature of the solar wind
as well as the resulting shape of the interplanetary magnetic field. These
were confirmed later on with observations made through satellites.
The idea of the solar wind came from the photographic observations of
comets which showed that certain features like knots in the ion tails were
moving away along the tail. The velocity and the acceleration of the features
obtained from successive photographs showed clearly that these features
were moving in the anti-solar direction with high velocities. The typical
velocity is about 100 km/sec. A measure of the deceleration is generally
303
comets
9:59
304
comets
Physics of Comets
.
dt
mi
(10.2)
Here the quantities with the subscript e refer to electrons and i to ions, Ne
is the electron density and ve is the velocity of electrons, is the electrical
conductivity. In order to explain the observed accelerations, the above
equation requires the solar wind velocity to be of the order of a few hundred
kilometers per second and the density of about 600 electrons/cm3 . These
values may be compared with the present day velocity of about 400 to
500 km/sec and the density of about 5/cm3 .
10.2.
Dynamical Aberration
More support for the solar wind hypothesis came from the study of the
orientation of ion tails of comets. The tail axes of ion tails are found to lag
behind by a few degrees with respect to the radius vector. The lag arises
due to the resultant effect of the solar wind velocity and the velocity of the
comet. This is known as the dynamical aberration. Figure 10.1 shows the
geometry of the comet tail on the plane of the sky. Here r, t and v denote
the radius vector, the tail vector and the negative velocity vector of the
comet. For the interpretation of ion tail orientation, it is convenient to use
the plane of the comets orbit as the reference frame. The observational
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
305
Fig. 10.1 The geometry of the comet tail (dashed lines) projected on to the plane of the
sky. The position angles , and denote the prolonged radius vector, the comet tail
and the direction of comets velocity back along the orbit respectively. (Belton, M.J.S.
and Brandt, J.C. 1966. Ap. J. Suppl. 13, 125).
data is the position angle of the tail axis on the plane of the sky. From a
knowledge of the various quantities as shown in Fig. 10.1, the orientation
of the tail in the comets orbital plane can be calculated (Fig. 10.2) with
the assumption that it also lies in the same plane. The aberration angle
is then the angle of the tail with respect to the radius vector. The basic
equation used for the interpretation of dynamical aberration observation is
given by
t=wv
(10.3)
where t is the tail vector which lies in the orbital plane of the comet, w is
the solar wind velocity and v is the comets orbital velocity. Physically the
above equation means that the direction of the tail is the direction of the
9:59
306
Physics of Comets
Fig. 10.2 The geometry of the comet tail projected on to the plane of the comets orbit.
The aberration angle and the angle are shown. (Belton, M.J.S. and Brandt. J.C.
1966. op. cit.).
solar wind as seen by an observer riding on the comet. If the solar wind
velocity is resolved into radial (wr ) and azimuthal (w ) components, the
aberration angle for a comet near the solar equator is given by
v sin w cos i
tan =
(10.4)
wr v cos
where i is the inclination of the comets orbit to the plane of the solar
equator and is the angle between the radius vector and the direction of
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
307
v. All the quantities in the above equation are known except for wr and
w . Since the value of w is small, the value of wr can easily be calculated
from Eq. (10.4). Since the observations on comets cover a wide variety of
situations, it is possible in principle to get not only wr and w but also
their variations. If w has an appreciable value, it should show up in the
aberration angle between the direct (D) and retrograde (R) comets. The
above method has been applied to about 60 comets covering approximately
1600 observations. The resulting averages for the aberration angles for
direct and retrograde comets are
hiD = 3.7
and
hiR = 5.5 .
Assuming wr and w are the same for the two cases and using the average
values for other parameters, the resulting mean values for wr and w are
hwr i = 450 11 km/sec
and
hw i = 8.4 1.3 km/sec.
In the above discussion, it was assumed that the tail of the comet lies
in the orbital plane of the comet. This assumption can be relaxed and
the velocity field of the solar wind can also be taken into account. The
following variations for w and w which are found to be consistent with
the observational and theoretical evidences have been used in the comet
tail orientation problem
wr = constant, w = w,o
(cos b)2.315
r
(10.5)
and
W = wm sin 2b
(10.6)
where b is the solar latitude, w,o and wm denote the azimuthal speed
in the plane of the solar equator at 1AU and the maximum value of w .
The results of analysis are given in Table 10.1. It is also possible to get
the minimum solar wind speed which actually refers to the larger values
of . The minimum value obtained for the solar wind speed is around
225 50 km/sec. All these results are in good agreement with the direct
space probe measurements. The presence of the azimuthal component of the
9:59
308
Physics of Comets
Table 10.1
Parameter
Published sample
r (km/sec)
,o (km/sec)
m (km/sec)
Number of
observations
402 12
7.01.8
2.61.2
400 11
6.71.7
2.3 1.1
678
809
(Brandt, J.C. and Mendis, D.A. 1979. In Solar System Plasma Physics, Vol. II,
eds. C.F. Kennel, L.J. Lanzerotti and E.N. Parker. Amsterdam: North Holland
Publishing Company.)
solar wind was also first deduced based on the study of ion tails which was
later confirmed through the direct space probe measurements, vindicating
the simple aberration picture of the ion tails of comets. It is also remarkable
that it can give so much of information without a detailed knowledge of the
interaction between the solar wind and the tail plasma.
From the above discussion, it is apparent that the derived results based
on the use of Eq. (10.3) are in good agreement with the gross observed properties of plasma tail of comets. Having established the validity of Eq. (10.3),
it is now possible to reverse the problem and calculate approximately the
expected general shape of the plasma tail from the same equation. This
formalism is known as the Wind Sock Theory. Therefore the existence of
solar wind was well established from the cometary studies before its detection by spacecraft at a much later time. The above studies indicate the
importance of knowing the nature, structure and composition of solar wind
for a full understanding of the comet and solar wind interaction.
10.3.
Theoretical Considerations
The comet acts as an obstacle to the free flow of the solar wind. Therefore one can approach the problem of the interaction of the solar wind with
the cometary atmosphere purely from the theoretical considerations. The
presence of fine structures in the plasma tail of comets indicates the existence of magnetic field in comets for its confinement. Otherwise the fine
structure will be washed out due to thermal motions.
Therefore the theoretical study of the interaction between the solar wind
and cometary ions is a complicated problem as the interaction is coupled
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
309
through the interplanetary magnetic fields. The basic idea of the cometsolar wind interacation was provided by Alfven in 1957 and is shown in
Fig. 10.3. When the solar wind with its frozen-in-magnetic field encounters
Fig. 10.3 A schematic representation of the piling up and curling up of interplanetary magnetic field by the coma of the comet. The gradual formation of the ion tail is
shown in (a), (b), (c) and (d). (Adapted from Alfven, H. 1957. Tellus 9, 92).
9:59
310
Physics of Comets
in transfer of momentum betwen solar wind plasma and the cometary ions
and this formalism can explain in a natural way the presence of narrow
and straight streamers in the ion tail of comets. This is the basis of all the
plasma models.
In a simple model, the plasma can be assumed to act as a fluid in the
sense of fluid dynamics, allowing the use of simple hydrodynamic methods
to predict the flow pattern of the plasma. Even without detailed modelling,
it was suggested around 1964 that the expansion of the ionized coma gas
should act as an obstacle to the supersonic solar wind flow which should
result in a bow shock at a distance of around 104 to 105 km from the nucleus. The particle distribution functions can usually be determined from
the conservation laws, namely, continuity, momentum and energy equations
including the effect of electric and magnetic fields. These are to be supplemented with the equations for the magnetic field and the electric field.
These equations constitute the magnetohydrodynamic equations (MHD) for
the plasma and provide a good description of most of the plasma processes
in the coma. The results of accurate one-and-two-dimensional models with
spherical gas flow showed that a weak bow shock is expected with a Mach
number 2. In recent years, more realistic and sophisticated models have
been constructed, which takes into account various physical processes including chemistry in the neutral and ionized coma and its interaction with
the solar wind. The interaction of the ionized coma with the solar wind
lead to deviations from spherical symmetry. The assumption of axial symmetry is also destroyed due to the embedded magnetic field. Therefore a
detailed description of the region would require a 3-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic model. These MHD models describe the macroscopic flow
patterns and the characteristic boundaries expected from such interactions.
The result of one such detailed 3-dimensional MHD calculation is shown in
Fig. 10.4. The model takes into account momentum exchange from ionneutral collisions, photoionization, mass-loading through ion pick up and
the Lorentz forces of the transverse magnetic field. The simulation also
takes into account the detailed physics and chemistry of the coma together,
as they are intimately connected.
The results show that a bow shock occurs around 5 105 km from the
nucleus for Comet Halley parameters. The ions are heated by the shock
to around 2.2 106 K. However they cool down very fast due to collisions
and charge exchange. The temperature of electrons is not affected by the
shock and they lose their energy due to electron impact reaction. A sharp
boundary exists at a distance of around 4800 km where the flow velocity
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
311
Fig. 10.4 Variation of physical quantities as a function of distance from the nucleus (R
in km) for axisymmetric model (dashed lines) and the three dimensional model (solid
lines). Ti=ion temperature (K), Te=electron temperature (K), v=velocity (km/sec),
N=Number density (/cm3 ), B=magnetic field strength (nT) and =mean molecular
weight (Wegmann, R., Schmidt, H.U., Huebner, W.F. and Boice, D.C. 1987. Astr. Ap.
187, 339).
falls steeply. This is the contact surface which separates the contaminated
solar wind from the pure cometary plasma inside. Therefore at this surface
two plasmas of different origin converge. The magnetic field is compressed
by the shock and it reaches a value of about 53 nT in the stagnation zone.
The value drops suddenly at the contact surface. The variation of physical
parameters as shown in Fig. 10.4 arise as a result of balance of different
effects.
The overall morphology of the flow of plasma near a comet is schematically shown in Fig. 10.5. They can be understood as follows. At large
distances from the comet the interaction of the solar wind is collisionless
9:59
312
Physics of Comets
Fig. 10.5 Schematic representation of the global morphology produced by the interaction of the solar wind with the cometary atmosphere shows the flow pattern and the
presence of various discontinuities arising from such an interaction (Mendis, D.A. 1988.
Ann. Rev. Astr. Ap. 26, 11).
as the cometary material is neutral. Once the ions are created, they are
accelerated due to the interplanetary magnetic field (B) and the motional
electric field of the solar wind, E=-Vsw B where Vsw is the solar wind
velocity. The most important source of ionization of the gas is the photoionization by the extreme ultraviolet radiation. The charge exchange
transfer of solar wind protons with cometary neutral also contribute to the
ionization process. The ions formed move with a typical speed of around
1 km/sec in the cometary frame of reference, while the solar wind velocity
is 400 km/sec. The newly formed ions which are initially at rest are accelerated by the motional electric field of the solar wind leading to a cycloidal
motion with both gyration and EB drift motion. The gyration speed
depends upon the angle between the solar wind velocity and the magnetic
field. This assimilation of the cometary ions into the magnetized solar wind
is called mass loading of the inflowing solar wind. The dynamics of the
solar wind containing cometary ions depend upon the overall pressure and
density associated with these ions. The thermal speed of ions, picked up by
the solar wind, is of the order of solar wind speed. The picked up energy of
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
313
the ions in the upstream in the solar wind reference frame is typically about
1020 keV for O+ , whereas the solar wind protons have thermal energies
10 eV. Therefore the picked up ions are quite hot and the pressure due
to these ions dominate the total pressure even at large cometocentric distances. With the decrease in cometocentric distance, more and more ions
are added to the solar wind and hence the total pressure increases. As solar
wind progressively gets mass loaded, due to momentum conservation, the
solar wind slows down. As the solution of the fluid equation cannot go
continuously from supersonic to subsonic state, this results in a weak bow
shock at a critical level of mass-loading. This depends crucially on the mean
molecular weight. Therefore the cometary bow shock arises purely as a result of mass-loading process and is unique among the solar system objects.
Many of the energetic ions like O+ , C+ and H+ are generated upstream
of the comet. Moving inwards from the shock, the solar wind continues to
interact with the cometary material of increasing neutral density. These
outflowing neutrals play an important role in slowing down the incoming
solar wind through collisions. Therefore cometary ions which are produced
down-stream of the shock are less energetic (E 1 keV) compared to those
produced upstream of the shock. In a real situation there is a slow gradation in the energy of the picked up ions and hence in the solar wind
reference frame, energy of the pick-up ions decreases with decreasing cometocentric distance. Therefore the plasma found in the inner regions of coma
contains ions of different populations made up of energetic ions picked up
far upstream, and relatively cold ions picked up locally Finally, the velocity
decreases rapidly, giving rise to a sharp boundary called cometopause,In
this transition region, collisions dominate. Near cometopause, the hot and
warm cometary ions disappear from the plasma through charge exchange
collisions with the neutrals. Inside the cometopause, the speed is very low,
the ions are abundant and are modified by collisions and chemistry. This
also leads to compression of the magnetic field giving rise to the magnetic
barrier. The boundary of the field free cavity is called diamagnetic cavity
boundary surface. It is also called contact surface, the ionopause or the tangential discontinuity. This boundary separates the purely cometary plasma
and the mass-loaded solar wind plasma. The basic physical mechanism of
its formation is due to the balance between the outward ion-neutral frictional force (due to the flow of neutrals past stagnated ions) and an inward
directed electromagnetic (J B) force. Here the mass loading term is less
important. The presence of another shock inside the cometary ionopause
has been suggested in order to decelerate the supersonic outward flowing
9:59
314
Physics of Comets
The in situ measurements of Comets Giacobini-Zinner, Halley and Borrelly which provided detailed data, confirmed the large scale picture of the
solar wind interaction with comets at close heliocentric distances. Out of
the three comets, extensive and detailed in situ data exists for Comet Halley
due to six spacecrafts passing close to the nucleus of this comet.
The ICE spacecraft passed by Comet Giacobini-Zinner on Sept.11, 1985.
The observations indicated the prersence of a bow shock around 130,000 km
from the nucleus. The detection of the high energy particles and plasma
waves was an important result that came out of these studies. These high
energy ions are basically the ions that were picked up by the solar wind
magnetic field and accelerated as they are dragged by the solar wind. This
process generates plasma waves. The curling of the magnetic field was
also seen in the observations. The reversal of the magnetic polarity was
also seen from spacecraft measurements. Far from the nucleus, plasma had
typical solar wind speed of about 500 km/s. The density was around 5
ions/cm3 and an electron temperature of around 250,000 K. Around the
closest distance of the spacecraft to the nucleus of 7800 km, the flow speed
was about 30 km/sec, electron density of 600/cm3 and electron temperature
of 15000 K. The measured ions were mostly water-group ions, such as H2 O+
and H3 O+ .
While the bow shock of Comet Giacobini-Zinner was not well defined,
the presence of a bow shock at a distance 1 106 km from the nucleus
in Comet Halley was clearly identified by instruments aboard spacecrafts,
measuring plasma, magnetic field and plasma wave. The detection of bow
shock in Comet Halley has resolved the controversy about its existence. The
spacecraft measurements, has also given detailed information on the structure of the bow-shock. For example, the water group ions O+ , OH+ , H2 O+
and H3 O+ showed a sudden enhancement following the bow shock. Inside
the bow-shock, in the cometo-sheath region the flow speed was found to decrease continuously due to ion pick up and the plasma becomes more dominated by cometary ions. The phase space density distribution of cometary
H+ ions showed a shell-like structure at a distance of around 8 106 km
upstream of the bow-shock in Comet Halley. This pattern arises due to the
fact that the velocity distribution of pick up ions which should be in the
form of a ring with velocity component v = Vsw sin perpendicular to
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
315
the interplanetary magnetic field and a drift velocity v11 = Vsw cos along
B and relative to the solar wind is unstable and leads to various plasma
instabilities. As a result of wave-particle scattering, the H+ ions diffuse
along the sphere transforming the ring-like structure to shell-like structure.
Many of these features have also been seen from Comet Borrelly from
measurements carried out with Deep Space 1.
The existence of cometopause at a distance of around 105 km came
from the observation that the density of the solar wind protons was found
to decrease rapidly approaching this distance, while the comet ion density
increased rapidly with 1/R2 radial dependence for R < 105 km (Fig. 10.6).
At a cometodistance 1.4 105 km there was also a sudden decrease of
Fig. 10.6 Number density profiles of water group ions and solar wind protons as measured by Giotto ion mass spectrometer (see Ip, W.-H. 1989. Ap. J. 343, 946).
9:59
316
Physics of Comets
Fig. 10.7 The variation of abundances of several species as measured by ion mass spectrometer on Giotto from Comet Halley. R is the distance of Giotto from the nucleus and
the time refers to UT at the ground station (Balsiger, H. et al. 1986. Nature 321, 330).
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
317
Fig. 10.8 The Giotto measurements of variation of magnetic field is compared with
modeled results (Gombosi, J.I., De Zeeuw, D.L. and Haberte, R.M. 1996. J. Geophys.
Res., 101: 15, 233).
3800 km. The region bound by these two distances is devoid of magnetic
field. The upper limit for the magnetic field strength in the stagnent plasma
region can be estimated from balance between the magnetic pressure and
the solar wind ram pressure
i.e.,
Bs2
2
= nsw msw Vsw
2o
(10.7)
Using for solar wind number density nsw 5/cm3 and Vsw 400 km/sec,
the calculated value of Bmax 60 nT. This is what is observed.
The width of the field-free cavity is about 8500 km. The boundary of
the cavity separate the two regions of the plasma wherein the inner side
containing mainly pure cometary plasma while the outer region containing a mixture of cometary plasma and solar wind plasma. In essence the
outflowing cometary plasma hinders the flow of solar wind with its magnetic field inside this surface. The location at which the inner edge of the
ionopause occurs can also be estimated from the balance between the magnetic force and the ion-neutral drag force. This gives a distance 4335 km
for inbound and 3470 km for the outbound for the Giotto encounter.
These are in reasonable accord with the observed values mentioned above.
The general results of plasma measurements carried out in Comet Borrelly are quite similar to those of Comet Halley. The approximate composition as determined from the closest approach data is as follows: 63% OH+ ,
9:59
318
Physics of Comets
Fig. 10.9 The Giotto measurements of variation of speed and temperature of ions are
compared with modeled results (Gombosi, J.I., De Zeeuw, D.L. and Haberte R.M. 1996.
J. Geophys. Res., 101:15, 233).
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
319
Vsw B motional electric field makes the newly created ions gyrate around
the magnetic field. In this case the anisotropy in their gyro velocities (as
they can have both the zero velocity and twice the solar wind velocity),
can give rise to three types of low frequency instabilities, namely the ioncyclotron instability, a parallel propagating nonoscillatory mode and a fluid
mirror instability. In the other extreme case, when the IMF is parallel to
the solar wind velocity vector i.e. Bk Vsw , there is no Vsw B solar wind
force acting on the cometary ions. For such a situation the ions form a beam
in the solar wind plasma frame moving at a velocity V sw relative to the
ambient plasma. This can lead to two types of instabilities, a right handed
resonant helical beam instability and a nonresonant instability. However
the coupling between the solar wind and the cometary ions becomes complicated if the solar wind flows obliquely to the magnetic field at an angle
. Therefore, in principle, various kinds of plasma instabilities and waves
could be generated due to the ion pick up by the solar wind, depending
upon the complex local conditions of the plasma. The in situ plasma and
magnetic field measurements of Comets Giacobini-Zinner and Halley by the
spacecrafts have shown the presence of a large number of waves of various
kinds. They are highly complex and difficult to interpret. Only a few of
these results will be mentioned here.
One of the main results that came out of the study of the Comet
Giacobini-Zinner by the ICE spacecraft is the detection of the water group
(16 to 19 amu) ion cyclotron frequency from spectral power analysis. This
has also been detected in Comet Halley observations. Several peaks with
cyclotron fundamental at 7 mHz and its harmonics at 14, 21, 29 and 39 mHz
has been seen in the cross-spectral densities of the solar wind proton velocity
and magnetic field. The fundamental mode at 7 mHz is linearly polarized
and the higher harmonics are either linearly or highly elliptically polarized.
The cometary influence extends to a distance of around 2 106 km.
Waves have been detected upstream of the bow shock for Comets
Giacobini-Zinner and Halley. A variety of polarizations have been detected
from circularly polarized waves propagating at large angles relating to the
ambient field to highly elliptical polarized waves. The detection of short
duration magnetic pulses during = 90 intervals was rather an unexpected result. The field variations have a duration of around 6 to 7 sec and
is comparable to the proton cyclotron frequency in the spacecraft frame.
These pulses are mostly transverse oscillations.
At distances 3 104 to 18 104 km from the comet the magnetic
field experiment detected mirror mode waves which are characterized by
9:59
320
Physics of Comets
irregular dips in the magnetic field. Similar structures have been seen
from Giotto Spacecraft in Comet Halley and ICE on Comet GiacobiniZinner. Higher frequency whistlers have been seen near the bow shock of
Comet Giacobini-Zinner and it is an integral part of the magnetosonic wave.
Several mechanisms for the formation of whistlers have been proposed such
as through generation of dispersive whistlers derived from hybrid simulation
results, generation of pick up of heavy ions and protons at the distorted
steepened fronts of the magnetosonic waves and so on.
The waves of extremely low frequency (ELF) in the region 10 to 1500 Hz
and of very low frequency (VLF) in the region 103 to 106 Hz generated by
cometary pick up ions and photoelectrons are present in Comets GiacobiniZinner and Halley upto distances of about 2106 km from the nucleus. The
Comet Halley emission was about an order of magnitude more intense than
as seen from Comet Giacobini-Zinner. Some of the wave modes that has
been seen in comets are shown in Fig. 10.10. They show the electron plasma
oscillations (EPO), the ion acoustic waves, electromagnetic whistlers and
lower hybrid resonance (LHR) waves.
An indication of the presence of strong turbulence even upto distances
2 106 km from the nucleus came from the detection of strong wave
activity. In addition to high level plasma activity, large-amplitude magnetic
field variation were observed. The turbulence measured by Vega and Giotto
Spacecrafts of Comet Halley showed that the magnetic field fluctuations
were smaller compared to that observed in Comet Giacobini-Zinner. There
is a clear correlation between the magnetic field variations and solar wind
plasma measurements which suggest the waves are fast-mode magnetosonic
waves. The observed magnetic field turbulence spectrum follows a power
law spectrum with an index of about 2, which is sufficiently different from
the fully developed Kolmogorov spectrum with a spectral index of 5/3. This
indicates that the cascade has not progressed far enough.
The detection of strong turbulence has led to several theoretical investigations. Both analytical treatments and numerical simulations have been
applied to interpret these results. They could arise due to the presence of
cyclotron harmonic emission, which would add power at the higher frequencies; or if ions have a finite temperature, it will shift the wave frequencies to
higher values or due to non-linear effect of the waves and so on. It is quite
possible that several processes could lead to a smooth power law spectrum.
It is found that resonant wave-particle interactions and ion-shell formation
can lead to a wave power law spectrum with an index of around 2.0.
Though a large number of substructures have been identified in the in
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
321
Fig. 10.10 Several wave modes seen in Comet Giacobini-Zinner in the upstream and
down stream are shown. This includes electron plasma oscillations (EPO), ion acoustic
waves, electromagnetic whistler modes and lower hybrid resonance (LHR) waves (Scarf
F.L. et al. 1987. Astr. Ap. 187, 109).
The possibility that cometary ions could be accelerated to high energies in the coma due to the turbulent plasma environment came from the
analogy with the diffuse shock acceleration at the Earths bow shock. The
existence of such accelerated ions in Comet Giacobini-Zinner came from
the observations carried out with the ICE spacecraft. The measurement
showed large flux of cometary ions of about 100 keV even upto distances
106 km from the nucleus. Large anisotropy in their distribution was
also detected. The in situ measurements of Comet Halley confirmed the
presence of appreciable fluxes of energetic cometary ions in the coma, but
9:59
322
Physics of Comets
it extended even beyond 100 keV and upto about 0.5 MeV.
The maximum energy that a newly formed ion can have in the rest
frame of the spacecraft is given by
1
2
Emax = mi (2V )2 = 2mi Vsw
sin2
(10.8)
2
where 2V is the total velocity comprising of the drift speed V and roughly
an equal amount of gyration speed. VSW is the solar wind speed and is
the angle between the solar wind velocity and the interplanetary magnetic
field. For Vsw ' 400 km/sec, the maximum energy Emax that water ions
can have 60 keV corresponding to = 90 . There should be a sharp cut
off in the energy distribution beyond this value. However the observations
indicating that the energy spectra extended upto 0.5 MeV clearly showed
that significant ion acceleration must have occurred. The value of = 90
or 0 correspond to the extreme cases of velocity vector of the ions in the
direction of the solar wind (Emax ) or in the opposite direction (Emin ) and
should therefore lead to anisotropies in the energy distribution.
The possible mechanisms for the acceleration of ions has led to several
studies of wave-particle interactions. The cometary ions could be accelerated through diffuse shock acceleration process near the bow shock. This
process is basically related to random multiple scattering of charged particles across the shock front, separating the supersonic and subsonic sides, a
form of first order Fermi acceleration. Another mechanism is the stochastic acceleration process, a form of second order Fermi acceleration process.
Here the mechanism is the scattering of the particles by the waves in the
turbulent cometary plasma. In the diffuse acceleration process, the accelerated ion population builds up ahead of the bow shock with a characteristic
length scale given by K/Vsw where K is the diffusion coefficient of the
medium normal to the shock. For the case of ion acceleration at the bow
shock of Comet Halley, the estimated distance is 106 km. The diffuse
shock acceleration process is more important in this region and for energies 100 keV. For energies > 100 keV and for distance > 5 106 km
far from the bow shock, the acceleration through stochastic process or the
second-order Fermi acceleration process is of major importance. Support
for the stochastic acceleration process also seems to come from the observations that can be fitted well with an exponential velocity distribution of
cometary ions. Other mechanisms that have been considered for ion acceleration process include the lower hybrid turbulence that could be generated
by the comet ion pick up process as well as by the bow shock formation
and ion cyclotron wave absorption.
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
323
10.6.
Physical process
Development of
instabilities
Enhancement of ionization,
flares, condensations, filaments,
rays, helices, waves, etc.
Disconnected tails
9:59
324
10.6.1.
Physics of Comets
The filametary structure in the ion tails of comets is quite common and
is also very conspicuous (Fig. 1.18). The shape of these streamers appears
to show the importance of magnetic fields. Since the CO+ ions present
in the ion tail follow the direction of the magnetic field, the streamers are
made visible through CO+ emission. These rays going in the anti-solar
direction grow with time and can extend from smaller lengths of about 103
km to longer lengths of about 106 km. The rays are distributed almost
symmetrically around the comet tail axis. They also seem to turn towards
the main tail axis. The time scale for coalescing process is around 10 to
15 hours. Since the time of formation of a new streamer is about one hour,
usually streamers as many as 20 to 25 can be seen at any given time. These
streamers do not interact with each other. They appear to originate from
a small volume very close to the nucleus, at a distance of the order of
103 km from the nucleus. In addition to seeing the streamers originating
from the coma, streamers starting from the tail have also been noticed.
Since these rays do not originate from the ionized region, the mechanism
of formation of these rays has to be different. Two possibilities have been
suggested either they are produced by nonlinear compressional waves or
the cometary ions trace the magnetic field lines. Observations appear to
show the first explanation to be unlikely although there are problems with
the second explanation. The ion stream could also arise due to the effect
of magnetic sector boundaries in the IMF (Sec. 10.6.6) The IMF following
the sector boundary reconnects at the front side of the ionosphere. This
can lead to ion streamers. In the coma, in addition to magnetic lines
of force, neutral sheets or surfaces also curl around and their behaviour
will be similar to the observed reversal of directions in the interplanetary
medium. It has been suggested that the streamers represent the enhanced
plasma which is confined to these neutral tubes or surfaces. These ions are
concentrated in the neutral zones as a result of the field gradients on either
side of the neutral regions. Also these neutral regions prevent the field lines
of opposite polarity merging with each other leading to annihilation. These
neutral tubes are nearly cylindrical, centred on the tail axis and when seen
edge-on, they appear as rays. They appear symmetrical about the tail
axis and this is consistent with the observations. It is quite possible that
strong shock waves in the sunward direction can generate keV electrons
and energetic protons. These high energy electrons streaming along the
magnetic field lines can result in high ionization in a short time scale which
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
325
Knots or condensations
The plasma tails are filled with structures such as bright knots or condensations which are basically ion concentrations. With the use of time
sequence photographs, it is possible to follow these knots as a function of
time for a period of a few hours to a day. From such measurements, the velocity and acceleration can be determined. Their velocities lie in the region
of around 20 km/sec near the head to around 250 km/sec at distances far
from the head. This corresponds to a value of (1 - ) of around 100 with
wide variation. Several attempts have been carried out for an understanding of these results. In particular whether the observed motions are the
mass motions or some form of disturbance traveling down the tail. Even
though the collision mean free path for the particles is large, it is still a
reasonable approximation to treat the interaction between the solar wind
and the cometary plasma as a fluid-like interaction. Based on such a hypothesis, several other mechanisms for the observed acceleration have been
suggested. One suggested process is that the acceleration will result when
the plasma is squeezed out of the flux tubes by the magnetic pressure gradients. Another point of view is that the enhancement of the momentum
transfer takes place due to some form of instability setting in the plasma. It
is not clear at the present time whether the observed motions are the mass
motions or some form of disturbance propagating down the tail. Doppler
measurements carried out in the near-nucleus region of plasma tail indicate
speeds of around 30 km/sec and extend to distances of around 3 105 km.
The derived acceleration is found to increase with distance. Therefore it is
likely both mass motion and waves are present in the plasma tail of comets.
10.6.3.
Oscillatory structure
9:59
326
comets
Physics of Comets
the studies of the Earths geomagnetic tail. The theoretical work developed
for the Earths geomagnetic tail has been successfully applied to the comet
tails. In brief, an azimuthal component of the magnetic field is produced, in
a cylinder of plasma when a current flows through the longitudinal magnetic
field. This finally gives rise to a helical field. The phase speed of the helical
kink turns out to be simply the Alfven speed of the tail plasma, which is
given by
C
B
(4)1/2
(10.9)
where B is the magnetic field and is the mass density. For a number
density of CO+ ions of 10 to 103 /cm3 , the magnetic field lies in the range
of
100 B 1000.
10.6.4.
Swan-like feature
The changes in the solar wind conditions can reflect directly in the
observations of ion tails. This was established for the first time, based on
the photographic observations of Comet Bennett. It was shown that the
kinks observed in the tail of this comet were correlated with the solar wind
events as observed from the satellite measurements.
A striking example of this type can be seen from the photograph of
Comet Kohoutek taken on 20 January 1974, where a large bend can be
seen. This is shown in Fig. 10.11. It is interesting to investigate whether
this bend is correlated with the solar wind properties for that date. The
properties of the solar wind are obtained by the observations made by
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
327
Fig. 10.11 Photograph of Comet Kohoutex taken on January 20, 1974 which shows the
large scale bending of the tail. (Brandt, J.C. and Chapman, R.C. 1981. Introduction to
Comets. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press). Illustration credited to Joint Observatory
of Cometary Research, NSA.
the Earth orbiting Satellite IMP-8. These observations have been used in
conjunction with the theory to predict the nature and structure of the ion
tail projected on to the sky for the day of the observation. There was a good
agreement between the expected and the observed comet tail configurations.
These results clearly showed that the observed large-scale tail curvature
coincided with the compression region of a high speed solar wind stream.
Generally a high speed solar wind stream causes enhanced geomagnetic
activity which usually shows up in the geomagnetic records. A geomagnetic
storm was actually detected on January 24 to 27, corresponding to the
Comet Kohoutek observations. Figure 10.12 shows schematically the tail
configuration and the bend. The direction of the solar wind is shown by
the arrows. It can be seen that in region A, the tail has the same direction
as the direction of the solar wind. This means that the tail has taken the
equilibrium position. In region B, the flow of the solar wind is across the
tail and has not yet adjusted to the direction of the solar wind. On the
other hand the segment C is well aligned with the head of the comet, as the
tail has not yet been affected by the solar wind. This is a striking example
9:59
328
Physics of Comets
Fig. 10.12 Schematic representation of Fig. 10.11. The left portion shows overall kink
and the right portion shows some details. The inferred solar wind direction is shown by
arrows. (Adapted from Jockers, K. 1981. Icarus, 47, 397).
which clearly shows that the comet tails are very effective for monitoring
the changing conditions of the interplanetary plasma.
10.6.6.
Disconnection events
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
329
Fig. 10.13 Photograph of Comet Morehouse showing a tail disconnection event. Left
and right photographs refer to September 30, 1908 and October 1, 1908 respectively.
(Niedner, M.B. and Brandt, J.C. 1979. Ap. J. 223, 671).
9:59
330
Physics of Comets
Fig. 10.14 Process of formation of disconnected plasma tail of a comet due to the passage of an interplanetary sector boundary. Tail ways are shown by the shaded portions.
(Niedner, M.B. and Brandt, J.C. 1979. op. cit.).
1996. This was also in agreement with the calculated position of the magnetic sector boundary. Therefore all the observations are in agreement with
the magnetic sector boundary reconnection model.
10.7.
X-rays
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
331
Fig. 10.15 Shows the images of Comet Hyakutake taken on 2628 March 1996. The
first two are the X-ray images taken with ROSAT. The third image is in the visible
light with X-ray emission contours superimposed. The mark + denotes the location
of the nucleus and the direction of the Sun is towards the right (Lisse, C.M. et al. 1996.
Science, 274, 205).
9:59
332
Physics of Comets
with solar wind proton flux and oxygen ion flux, but no correlation with
solar X-ray flux. Longtime monitoring of rapid changes in gas production
and the observed X-ray flux in comets (such as an outburst) has shown a
direct link betwen the two. Earlier X-ray observations carried out at low
energy resolution could not resolve the possible presence of emission lines.
However with the availability of higher resolution instruments, the spectrum was found to be dominated by emission lines from highly charged C,
N and O and not by continuum (Fig. 10.16).
Fig. 10.16 X-ray spectrum of Comet C/1999S4 (LINEAR) observed with Chandra Xray Observatory (crosses). The six-line best-fit model spectrum is shown as solid line
(Lisse, C.M. et al. 2001. Science 292, 1343).
Any physical mechanism proposed to explain the observed X-ray emission in comets has to be consistent with all the observed characteristics of
this emission. These include thermal bremsstrahlang associated with collision of solar wind electrons with neutral gas or dust, scattering of solar
X-rays by cometary small dust particles, charge exchange of solar wind
heavy ions with cometary neutrals, K-shell ionization of cometary neutrals
by electron collision etc.
In the Thermal bremsstrahlang mechanism, the electrons of solar wind
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
333
are deflected from the nuclei of atoms on collison and give rise to continuum
radiation. For such a process the electron energies have to be larger than
100 eV (i.e. T>106 K). In the K-shell mechanism the collision between
a fast solar wind electron and an atom can remove the orbital electron
from the inner shell of the atom. However in these mechanisms the expected luminosity are smaller by a factor of around 100 to 1000 compared
to observations. This is due to the fact that flux of high-energy solar wind
electrons near comets are not enough. Also X-ray emission has been observed upto larger distance from the nucleus ( 105 to 106 km) beyond the
bow shock and the energies of solar wind electrons at these distances is only
around 10 eV. In addition the presence of multiple emission lines indicate
non-viability of continuum or K-shell line models.
There are also difficulties associated with mechanisms involving dust
models. The scattering of solar X-ray radiation by cometary dust particles
of sizes 1 m in size cannot produce the observed X-ray luminosities.
This problem can be overcome by involving the presence of small dust particles of size of the order of the wavelength of observed X-ray emission,
10100
A, which can scatter the solar X-ray radiation efficiently. The
abundance of such dust particles in comets is not known. However there
was some indication of the presence of such dust particles in Comet Halley
from Vega flyby spacecraft. Other problems associated with dust particles
are X-ray emission correlates with gas production rate, time variation of
X-ray emission correlate with solar wind ion flux etc. In view of these considerations the charge exchange collisions of highly charged solar wind ions
with cometary neutral species and the collison of high energy solar wind
electrons with cometary neutrals are plausible processes. Charge exchange
mechanism produce lines while electron neutral collision produce a continuum. In both of these mechanisms, neutral species in the cometary coma
is the target.
The heavier minor species in the solar wind exist in highly charged
states such as O7+ , O6+ , N6+ , C5+ , Ne8+ , Si9+ etc. In the charge exchange
mechanism, these highly charged ions charge exchange with cometary neutral species and produce ions in an highly excited state. A typical example
of such a process is,
O6+ + H2 O O5+
+ H2 O+
9:59
334
comets
Physics of Comets
ion O5+ decay spontaneously giving rise to photons in the X-ray region.
It is possible to make an estimate of the X-ray power density for the case
of a single collision with the solar wind ion in the coma from a simple
expression,
Px = nsw usw nn .
(10.10)
where nsw , usw and nn represent solar wind proton density, solar wind speed
and density of the neutral species respectively. The parameter includes all
other quantities partaining to solar wind, atomic and molecular details. The
variation of neutral density of the species with r in the coma for a spherical
symmetric case is given by nn = Q/(4r2 un ) where Q is the production
rate of the specie. Integration of equation (10.10) over the observed volume
of the neutral species result in the X-ray luminosity which is roughly within
a factor of 2 to 3 of the observed X-ray luminosity. The X-ray luminosity
is also proportional to the gas production rate which is in agreement with
the observations.
The cometary gas density is high close to the nucleus and hence collisions are frequent. This results in solar wind ions being converted to a
low charged state ion and therefore X-rays cannot be excited. This could
explain the observed crescent - shaped X-ray emission. The model spectra
based on charge exchange mechanism were in good agreement with the low
resolution cometary X-ray emission.
For a better understanding of the X-ray emission including the observed
X-ray line emissions, it is necessary to invoke detailed Magneto Hydrodynamic models (MHD) for the interaction of the solar wind with the
cometary gas which allows variation in plasma density, temperature, velocity etc. The variation in the neutral density of species such as H2 O,
CO2 , CO, OH etc. can be included through Hasers model. The details of
the charge-exchange mechanism such as, the abundance of various ions and
its variation and the cascading process leading finally to X-ray emission
should be an integral part of this study. Such sophisticated models have
been carried out to calcuate the expected X-ray emision around a comet.
The simulated X-ray emission are found to be in good agreement with the
observed images (i.e. isophotes). The X-ray line emission spectra can also
be calculated. These are in good agreement with the observed spectra
(Fig. 10.16). Therefore the observed characteristics of X-ray emission from
various comets can be explained based on charge-exchange model.
9:59
Ion Tails
10.8.
comets
335
Summary
The existence of solar wind came from the studies of the orientation
of ion tail of comets, long before its detection by spacecrafts. The whole
problem of comet-solar wind interaction is a highly complex one. The exact nature and the location of the different discontinuities depend upon the
various physical processes that can take place during the interaction. What
happens in a particular situation depends upon the complex interaction of
the plasma, turbulence, solar activity and so on. However the large scale
structure as predicted by the MHD calculations like bow shock, ionopause,
magnetic cavity and so on have been confirmed from the in situ measurements of Comets Giacobini-Zinner, Halley and Borrelly. This shows that
the mechanism of interaction between the solar wind and cometary plasma
giving rise to various structures is fairly understood at the present time.
The measurements also showed the plasma to be highly complex in showing
the presence of strong turbulence, various instabilities, waves, high energy
particles and so on. Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain
the origin of these observed features. Strong X-ray emission a is common
feature of all comets.
All the properties of the ion tail that have been discussed so far can be
classified as belonging to the typical comets. In these comets the iontails are more or less similar and behave in a certain manner except for the
presence of certain characteristic features in the tail in some cases. The
major aim has been to understand the gross behaviour of such typical
comets.
Problems
1. Take for the velocity of the solar wind v = 450 km/sec and the proton
density n = 5/cm3 . Calculate the magnetic field required to counteract
the solar wind pressure.
2. Does the magnetic field exist in comets? Can you suggest some method
to probe the magnetic field associated with a comet?
3. Calculate the Alfven speed in the tail of comets.
4. Discuss the relative importance between cometary plasma and laboratory plasma
9:59
336
Physics of Comets
References
The evidence for the existence of solar wind is discussed in this paper
1. Biermann, L. 1951. Zs. f. Astrophysik 29, 274.
For a complete theoretical discussion of the solar wind, refer to
2. Parker, E.N. 1963. Interplanetary Dynamical Processes. New York:
Interscience Publishers.
The phenomena of dynamical aberration is discussed in the following papers.
3. Belton, M.J.S. and Brandt, J.C. 1966. Ap. J. Suppl. 13, 125.
4. Brandt, J.C. and Mendis, D.A. 1979. In Solar System Plasma Physics,
Vol. II. eds. C. F. Kennel, L.J. Lanzerotti and E.N. Parker. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company p. 253.
5. Hoffmeister, C. 1943. Zs. f. Astrophysik 23, 265.
The Wind-Sock theory for the ion tail is discussed here.
6. Brandt, J.C. and Rothe, E.D. 1976. In The Study of Comets, eds. B.
Donn. M. Mumma, W. Jackson, M.F. AHearn and R. Harrington,
NASA SP 393, Washington D.C. p. 878.
The basic idea of the solar wind interaction is given in this paper.
7. Alfven, H. 1957. Tellus 9, 92.
The theoretical model of the Comet-Solar Wind interaction is from
8. Wegmann, R. et al. 1987. Astr. Ap., 187, 339.
Later work
9. Gombosi, T.I., De Zeeuw, D.L. and Haberli, A.M. 1996. J. Geophys.
Res., 101, 15, 233.
10. Ip, W. -H. 2005. In Comets II, eds. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and H.A.
Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 605.
The confinement of ions very close to the nucleus was discussed by
11. Wurm, K. 1963. In The Moon, Meteorites and Comets, eds. B.M. Middlehurst and G.P. Kuiper, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
p. 575.
The following atlas gives cometary plasma tails of various forms.
12. Rahe, J. Donn, B and Wurm, K. 1969. Atlas of Cometary Forms,
NASA SP-198, Washington D.C. GPO.
A good discussion of the in situ plasma measurements can be found in the
following papers:
13. Flammer, K.R. 1991. In Comets in the Post-Halley Era. eds. R.L.
Newburn, Jr. et al. Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 1125.
comets
9:59
Ion Tails
comets
337
14. Tsurutani, B.T. 1991. In Comets in the Post-Halley Era. eds. R.L.
Newburn, Jr. et al. Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 1171.
15. Ip,-W.H. and Axford, W.I. 1990. In Physics and Chemistry of Comets,
Springer Verlag, p. 172.
The electron temperature is discussed in the paper
16. Eberhardt, P. and Krankowsky, D. 1995. Astron. Astrophys., 295,
795.
Model for Disconnection event was proposed in the following paper
17. Niedner, M.A. and Brandt, J.C. 1978. Ap. J., 123, 655.
18. Brandt, J.C., Caputo, F.M., Hoeksema, J.J. et al. 1999. Icarus, 137,
69.
Possibility of detection of X-ray from comets is discussed in the paper
19. Ibadov, S. 1996. Adv. Space Res., 17:(12), 93.
Discovery of X-rays from Comet Hyakutake is in the following paper
20. Lisse, C.M. et al. 1996. Science, 274, 205.
For later work, refer to the following papers
21. Cravens, J.E. 2002. Science, 296, 1042.
22. Lisse, C.M., Cravens, T.E. and Dennerl, K. 2005. In Comets, eds. M.C.
Festou, H.U. Keller and H.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson,
p. 631.
23. Wickramsinghe, N.C. and Hoyle, F. 1996. Astrophys. Space Sci., 239,
121.
8:49
CHAPTER 11
Nucleus
Morphology
comets
9:59
340
Physics of Comets
11.2.
Theory of Vapourization
When the solar radiation impinges on the surface of the nucleus, part
of the energy is absorbed and part of it is reflected. The reflected part
depends upon the albedo of the nucleus. The absorbed energy gives rise to
the surface temperature which sublimates the material and also gives rise
to the thermal emission. The absorbed energy also depends upon the angle
between the incident radiation and the normal to the surface.
The amount of energy radiated from the surface is dependent upon the
temperature, which in turn is related to the chemical composition and the
structural properties of the nucleus. The sublimation of the gases depends
upon the latent heat and its variation with temperature. The penetration of
the heat flow inside the nucleus also depends upon the conducting properties
of the material. The presence of dust in the coma can also have an effect
on the vapourization of the volatile components. Therefore the amount of
volatile constituents that come out of the surface of the nucleus is a very
complicated function involving many unknown factors. Hence, until we
have better ideas with regard to the above processes, one has to resort to
simplifying assumptions in writing down the equation for the energy flow.
The temperature of the nucleus is determined by the balance between
the amount of absorbed and the emitted energy. The energy balance equation for the simple model of a spherical nucleus which takes into account
the thermal re-radiation and the heat used to transform the vapourizing
comets
9:59
comets
Nucleus
341
Fig. 11.1 Comparison of the images of nucleus of Comets Tempel 1 (upper right), Wild 2
(upper left) and Borrelly (bottom) taken from spacecrafts. The morphological structure
of each of these comets is entirely different (Thomas, P.C. et al. 2007. Icarus, 187, 4).
ice into gas for the steady state condition can therefore be written as
F (1 Av )
cos z = (1 AIR )T 4 + Z(T )L(T ).
r2
(11.1)
Here F is the solar radiation at 1AU. Av and AIR are the bond albedo
of the nucleus in the visible and infrared region and r is the heliocentric
distance. Z(T ) and L(T ) represent the vapourization rate of the gas in
molecule/cm2 /sec and the latent heat for sublimation in ergs/molecule. T
9:59
342
comets
Physics of Comets
is the surface temperature and z is the solar zenith distance. The vapourization rate Z(T ) can be deduced by relating it to the equilibrium vapour
pressure of ice. Under the equilibrium conditions the number of molecules
coming out of the nuclear surface will be balanced by the number hitting the
surface. The number of molecules hitting the surface for such a situation
is equal to 41 N v. Therefore
1
Nv
(11.2)
4
where N is the gas density and v is the mean speed for the Maxwellian
distribution of velocities which is given by
1/2
8kT )
v=
(11.3)
m
Z(T ) =
Here m is the average molecular weight of the gas. Using the above relation
for v and with the use of the relation P = N kT, Z(T ) can be written as
Z(T or r) =
P
.
(2mkT )1/2
(11.4)
9:59
Nucleus
comets
343
L(T )
RT
1
1
Tr
T
where Tr and Pr are the reference point. The vapour pressure in general
is very sensitive to temperature. Therefore, the general variation of the
production rate of H2 O and OH as a function of the heliocentric distance
should reveal something about the vapourization of ice from the nucleus
of a comet and should in turn give information about the overall nature
of the nucleus of a comet. A simultaneous solution of Eqs. (11.1) and
(11.4) iteratively will give the unknown Z(T ) and T , for assumed values of
the parameters that enter in the above two equations. The results for the
variation of Z as a function of the heliocentric distance for different cases are
shown in Fig. 11.2. The curves depend upon the values of Av and AIR . The
Fig. 11.2 The vapourization rate Z, for various snows as a function of the heliocentric
distance. The distance after which the vapourization becomes negligible is denoted as
r0 . (Delsemme, A.H. 1982. In Comets, ed. Wilkening, L.L. Tucson: Univ. Arizona
Press, p. 85).
curves are almost the same if Av = AIR . For unequal values of Av and AIR
the maximum difference in the results arises in the shift of the curves in log
r by about 0.2. Figure 11.2 shows r2 dependence in the beginning and
then shows a rapid fall in the sublimation rate of water for distances between
9:59
344
Physics of Comets
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
345
in their formation. These experimental studies showed that clathrate hydrates is produced under high pressure conditions and hence not applicable
to comets, which are produced at low pressure and temperature. Besides,
the abundances of the observed species are quite high and is not possible
to trap so much in the clathrate hydrate icy matrix. This has led to a
new model where water-ice is most likely to be present in amorphous form.
Amorphous ice exists at lower temperatures of around 77 K or less. The
study of solar nebular models have shown that these conditions exist at
distances > 7 AU. Hence interior of comets is most likely to have amorphous ice, as comets were formed under low temperature and low pressure
conditions.
Amorphous H2 O - ice can trap large amount of volatiles and when
heated, their trapped volatiles are released. For temperature starting
around 90 K, amorphous form of ice changes over to crystalline form with
the release of energy. This corresponds to distances of around 8 to 20 AU
where large amount of traped gases may be released. In this connection
it is interersting to note that volatile species of various kinds were seen in
abundance from Comet Hale-Bopp beginning at distances of around 7 AU.
These are most likely to be produced by amorphous to crystalline H2 O - ice
phase transitions rather than produced by sublimation due to solar heating.
The early results of the vapourization of H2 O from the nucleus had
met with reasonable success in explaining the gross observed nature of
the light curves of various comets. However observations have shown that
the light curve for pre-and post-perihelion passages are not symmetrical
in shape and gas comes out in jet form at some discrete active regions
on the nucleus. The active areas are hardly a few percent of the surface
area of the comets. The use of constant values of Av , AIR , L and P in
modelling means that the material property of the nucleus is the same for
all comets. Several attempts have been made to refine the models that take
into account factors like, thermal properties of the surface layers, rotation
period of nucleus, the effect of diurnal heating and cooling individually or
in combination. Though these studies have met with partial success, these
simple models have been quite useful for an understanding of the general
trend as well as qualitative study of Comets.
Refined Models
The striking feature of a comet is their varied features along the orbit
of a comet. Hence complicated models have to be considered which take
into account several processes simultaneously. Some of the processes con-
9:59
346
Physics of Comets
sidered are, diurnal temperature variation over the surface of the nucleus,
heat conduction to the interior through the entire nucleus, possibility of
the outer dust mantle enveloping the icy nucleus, cometary ice being in
amorphous state which can lead to crystallization, poracity, radioactive
heating from the short lived isotope 26 Al. Since half life of 26 Al is less
than about 0.7 million years, it would have decayed during the early stages
of the solar system, within few million years and thus providing a heat
source. The initial mass fraction of 26 Al in the solar nebula 7 107 .
In comets it could be smaller on the average by an order of magnitude, as
the time of cometary formation did not exceed a few million years. The
change over from amorphous to crystalline state could provide additional
source of energy. Therefore there are three sources of energy available to
comets; namely solar radiation, radioactivity and process of crystallization.
When the comets are near the sun, solar radiation dominates the other
two sources. On the other hand, the energy source through radiactive decay is important that are far from the sun. However crystallization from
amorphous ice can occur at any stage in the cometary evolution once the
threshold temperature is reached.
Heat could flow inwards or outwards from any region of the nucleus.
The effect of heat and gas diffusion in the nucleus results in chemically
differentiated layers. In particular the top layers of the nucleus should
contain mostly least volatile material followed by layers of water ice and
dust and the deeper layers should contain dust, ices and most volatiles such
as CO and CH4 .
The built up pressure from the gases released from the interior of the icy
nucleus, forces the gas to flow towards the surface. The flow of the gas drags
the dust particles from the icy solid matrix. It is possible that the built in
pressure could be high enough to make cracks in the porous matrix leading
to out-gassing. Large size particles reaching near the surface may lead
to formation of a dust mantle resulting in diminishing cometary activity.
Therefore the observed activity of a comet is a resultant effect of several
physical processes involving the structure of the nucleus, heat conduction
and energy sources. Several attempts have been made to study the nuclei
of comets taking into account all these details. The model considered is
a porous agglomerates made up of amorphous ice, dust and volatiles such
as CO, CO2 , HCN, N2 etc. Such a model results in explaining the overall
observed activities of comets. The thermal evolution and the resulting
pattern in the activities from the nucleus of a fragile and porous comet
leads to the structured nature of the nucleus of comet as shown in Fig. 11.3.
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
347
This is quite different from that of a solid body of a nucleus made up of ice
sublimating from the surface due to solar heating as in the earlier models.
Fig. 11.3 Schematic representation of the layered structure of a cometary nucleus with
pristine composition deep inside and the modified layers arising as a result of various
physical processes taking place (Prialnik, D. 1999. Earth, Moon and Planets, 77, 223).
r
ro
(11.5)
9:59
348
11.3.
Physics of Comets
Outbursts
Outbursts have been seen quite frequently in comets. It is basically related to a sudden increase in the production of volatiles from the nucleus.
Comet Schwassmann-Wachmann is well known for its large outbursts and
flares up frequently. These outbursts can brighten the comet by a factor
of 100 or more compared to the quiescent brightness. Initially, the comet
looks star-like in appearance. After the outbursts, a halo forms and eventually it fades away leaving behind the original nucleus. The whole process
might take around 3 to 4 weeks. The outbursts from Comet SchwassmannWachmann have been seen regularly from heliocentric distances of around
5 to 7 AU. Comet Halley showed an outburst when it was at r = 14 AU.
It is rather difficult to understand such a phenomena based on the sublimation of H2 O from the nucleus, as the production rate of H2 O falls down
steeply for r >
3 AU. A number of suggestions and ideas have been proposed to explain the origin of these outbursts. It has been suggested that
exothermic chemical reactions involving free radicals or pockets of volatile
gas stored beneath the surface takes place until the pressure would build
up which leads finally to explosions. The phase change from amorphous
to crystalline ice at temperatures above 140 K is an exothermic process
giving about 24 cal/gm, which is a substantial amount of energy and could
trigger the outbursts. Since the phase change is critically dependent upon
the temperature, the outburst should depend on the heliocentric distance.
Therefore crystallization of amorphous ice appears to be the best mechanism for explaining the appearance of outbursts in comets. The three
physical processes of interest are crystallization, conduction and sublimation and their relative time scales. For understanding the resultant effect
of these processes inside a porous nucleus, which are complicated in nature,
it becomes necessary to resort to numerical methods.
When the surface of the nucleus is heated due to solar heating, the heat
wave moves inwards. This results in amorphous ice to crystallize liberating
trapped gases. Part of the released gas move inwards into the colder regions
and eventually condense at different location inside the nucleus depending
upon the temperature in that region. The recondensation process results
in the release of heat which in turn affects the chemical composition of its
surroundings. During the next perihelion passage the heat wave generated
reaches these regions and is used to sublimate condensed gases rather than
the crystallization of amorphous ice. This is the process by which alternative layers of crystallization and amorphous ice are created. Such layers
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
349
extend from about 10 metres to about a few hundred metres below the surface of the nucleus. When the heat wave from the surface reaches to some
of these layers the trapped volatile species are suddenly released leading to
pressure build-up. These gases move to the surface through pores, cracks
etc. This gives rise to an outburst. The resulting production rate of different volatiles could be vastly different. This could explain the observed
activities in comets (Fig. 11.4).
Fig. 11.4 The production rate of volatiles based on model calculations for Comet
9P/Tempel 1 is plotted as a function of time measured from the perihelion point (Prialnik, D. 2005. In Asteroids, Comets and Meteors, IAU Symposium No. 229, eds, Lazzaro,
D.Ferraz-Mello, S. and Fernandez, J.A., Univ. of Cambridge Press, Cambridge, p. 153).
Model calculations have also been carried out to long time scales to understand the outburst seen in comets at large heliocentric distances. These
results indicate that such bursts are related to fine-tuning of time scales
of re-condensation of volatiles and crystallization of amorphous ice. It is
possible to attain a temperature 200 K in a narrow region and for a brief
period of time which can lead to sudden release of trapped gases which is
seen as an outburst. It is also possible to get repetitive outbursts if phase
transition time scale is comparable to diffusion time scale of moderately
volatile gases.
9:59
350
11.4.
comets
Physics of Comets
(11.6)
4SZLr2
QLr2
=
F
F
(11.8)
where Q = 4SZ represents the production rate of water which can be obtained from the observed production rates of OH or H in comets (Chap. 6).
9:59
Nucleus
comets
351
The value of L, the latent heat for vapourization of water is 11500 calorie/molecule for T = 200 K. From a knowledge of AS and (1 Av )S it is
then possible to get the albedo and radius from the following equations:
S = (1 Av )S + AS
(11.9)
and
Av =
Av S
.
Av S + (1 Av )S
The method is valid if the effective area is roughly the same for the
reflected light and for the vapourization equilibrium. However, there could
be a difference in the areas in a real situation. In addition, there is some
difficulty in separating the contributions to brightness from the nucleus and
coma. The quantity (1-A)S can also in principle be determined from the
infrared observations of the nuclei of comets. To a first approximation,
(1-A)S is directly proportional to the thermal emission in the 1020 m
region provided the vapourization process from the nucleus does not take
a significant fraction of the absorbed energy.
Even at large heliocentric distances a faint coma is still present. Therefore direct photometric observations have the problem of separating the
light from the nucleus from the surrounding coma radiation. The coma
contribution can be minimized with the use of high spatial resolution observations of the nuclei of comets. In this approach the brightness of the
nucleus is observed as a delta function over a slowly varying coma contribution. Therefore the brightness distribution of a comet can be represented
as
B() = a[1/ + b()]
(11.10)
Where is the projected distance from the nucleus. The first term in equation (11.10) represents the variation of the coma brightness for a constant
source with inverse square dependence of space density. The delta function
() represent the contribution arising from the nucleus, while a and b are
constants. A fit to the observed brightness variation will give the contribution from the nucleus which can be used to get the radius of the comet for
an assumed value for the albedo. If the rotational light curve is available it
is possible to get the semi axes for the nucleus.
The direct determination of the size of the nucleus of a comet was made
possible by the study of Comet Halley. The images taken by the spacecrafts
9:59
352
Physics of Comets
Sizes of cometary
Comet
abc
(km km km)
Halley
Tempel 2
Borrelly
Tempel 1
Wild 2
Table 11.2
Comet
Geometric albedo
Radius(km)
Eucke
Tempel 1
Borrelly
Neujmin 1
Halley
Hale-Bopp
Swift Tuttle
IRAS-Araki-Alcock
Arend-Rigaux
0.046
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.04
2.3
3.1
10.6
30
11.8
3.5
4.6
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
353
Fig. 11.5 Composite image of the nucleus of Comet Halley made from several images
obtained from Halley Multicolour Camera on board Giotto Spacecraft (Courtesy Keller,
H.U., Copyright Max-Planck - Institut f
ur Aeronomie, Lindau, Germany).
11.5.
Mass
It is rather difficult to make an estimate of the mass of the nuclei of
9:59
354
Physics of Comets
comets. A rough estimate can be made from a knowledge of their sizes and
densities.
Another method that has been generally used for getting the mass of the
nucleus is through change in the orbital period caused by non-gravitational
force arising from the sublimation of water ice from a rotating nucleus. This
force arising from the outflow of the material is related to the mass of the
nucleus of the comet through Newtons second law of motion, F=ma. This
method has been applied to several comets. The derived masses lie in the
range of around 1 to 5 1013 kg. The derived mass for Comet Tempel 1
from the same method is (5.8 3.0) 1013 kg.
The study of the ejecta plume created by the impactor in Comet Tempel
1 by the Deep Impact mission has been used to make an estimate of the local
gravity at the impact site. This is used for making an estimate of the bulk
density for an assumed shape and a uniform mass distribution inside the
nucleus. The derived mass is 4.5 1013 kg. This value based on direct observations is consistent with the mass derived above from non-gravitational
force modelling. This therefore gives credibility to the indirect method
of estimating the mass of the nucleus of comets through non-gravitational
force modelling technique.
The perturbation produced by a close encounter of flyby spacecraft with
a comet could in principle be used to extract the nuclear mass. However
the expected perturbation is below the detectable limit of the present day
instruments.
The discovery of satellites around asteroids has raised the prospect of the
likely presence of satellites around cometary nuclei. The main advantage
of a binary system is that it is possible to derive the mass of the system
using Keplers laws from the observed orbits. However the detection of a
satellite companion to cometary nucleus is difficult because of its small size
and also due to the presence of coma even at large heliocentric distances.
If and when cometary binaries are detected, it will give a direct method of
estimating the mass of the nuclei of comets.
Density
The determination of bulk density of the nucleus of a comet is important
as it can give information about the structure of the nucleus. It can be
estimated provided the mass and the total volume (including voids and
pore spaces) of the nucleus are known.
Volume can be estimated from direct spacecraft imaging or from telescopic observations that can yield the appropriate radius and axial ratios
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
355
of individual nuclei. Spacecraft imaging has been carried out for several
comets such as Halley, Tempel 1, Wild 2, Borrelly etc.
The charge-coupled device (CCD) photometry of nuclei when they are
far from the sun (and presumably inactive) provide an estimate of their
brightness. It is possible to make an estimate of the radius of the nucleus
and hence volume for a typical cometary albedo of 0.03 - 0.04.
The estimated bulk density lies in the region of around 0.2-0.8 gm/cm3 .
The density of the fully compacted comet material consisting water-ice,
organics and dust is expected to be in the range 1.2 < compact < 1.65
gm/cm3 . Therefore the results appear to indicate a somewhat lower value
for the bulk density of the nucleus of comets. This indicates that the nucleus
could be fluffy. The estimated bulk poracity of the nucleus is about 0.3 to
0.6.
Surface Gravity
The impactor from the Deep Impact spacecraft that collided with Comet
Tempel 1 made a crater and ejected the material giving rise to an ejecta
plume. The ejecta plume was imaged continuously from the flyby spacecraft at a distance of around 700 km. These images show clearly that the
ejecta cone remained attached to the surface throughout the encounter.
This interesting observation indicates that the formation of the crater was
controlled by gravity.
The images of the ejecta plume taken by the spacecraft showed the
expansion of the base of the conical solid ejecta with time. The particles
forming the solid ejecta follow paths in the gravitational field of Comet
Tempel 1 at any given time. Making few assumptions such as, the cone is
nearly axially symmetric, scaling relations derived from laboratory studies
for gravity dominating cratering is valid and the properties of ejecta flow
could be extrapolated to this observed impact, it was possible to make an
estimate of the strength of gravity from the observed expansion of the base
of the conical ejecta. The estimated local gravity at the impact site of
Comet Tempel 1 is about gnuc =3.4 104 m/sec2 .
11.6.
Rotation
The rotational state of the nucleus of a comet is important for an understanding of the physical properties of the nucleus of a comet and its
surface. The evolution of the spin state and the nucleus gives information
9:59
356
Physics of Comets
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
357
Fig. 11.6 The densitometer tracings of the photograph of June 25, 1927 in the inner
part of the fan of Comet Pons-Winnecke are shown here. The jet near the nucleus in the
sunward direction and the curvature effect as one goes outwards can be seen. The circled
dot denotes the direction of the Sun. (Sekanina, Z. 1981. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet Sci.,
9, 113). Reproduced with permission from Annual Reviews Inc.
9:59
358
Physics of Comets
For Comet Encke, the zero age method gave a value of 6.5 hrs. The periodic variation in the photometric magnitude gave a value of 22.4 hrs. The
photometric data obtained near aphelion could be satisfied with periods of
22.6 hrs, 15.1 hrs,11.1 hrs or 7.5 hrs. Later studies have put some doubt
on 15.1 hrs period. It is possible that the observed periods may represent
harmonically related periods. If this is the case, then the observed periodicities could relate to the basic period of 7.4 h. However it is not clear
whether this is the case.
For Comet Halley several values have been derived. The zero age
method gave a period of about 10 hrs. The most direct evidence came from
the morphology of sun ward jets. A rotational period of around 52 hours
was estimated from the processing of spiral jets seen in the photographs
taken during the 1910 apparition. The comparison of Vega 1 and Vega 2
camera observations gave a rotational period of 5254 hours. However the
images of features like jets near-nucleus show a period 2.2 days. A time
period of about 7.4 days was obtained from the time series studies of the
narrow-band photometric observations of the coma. The same time period
was also indicated by the morphology of jets of free radicals, Lyman
emission and the 18 cm OH line, but nothing around a period of 2.2 days.
Therefore there is conflicting results derived from various methods. Images
taken from Vega 1, Vega 2 and Giotto spacecrafts could refer to different
viewing geometries and timings of the nucleus of Comet Halley that might
complicate the interpretation of the observed images. But on the whole
there appears to be two rotational periods corresponding to 2.2 and 7.4
days.
For a non-spherical nucleus there could be several possible rotation
states. It can rotate around the long or short axis. It can also have nutation motion. The rotation could be in its lowest rotational state energy
or in an excited state. Depending on the state of the nucleus, it can have
one or two time periods and their harmonics. Several attempts have been
made to understand the observed periodicities of Comet Halley in terms
of rotational, precessional or nutational motion of the nucleus. From a detailed model study of the nucleus of Comet Halley, it has been possible to
understand the observed time periods. In this model the nucleus is considered to be a prolate spheroid with dimensions of 17 8.5 8.5 km.
It takes into account five active areas on the surface of the nucleus that
are active only when they are exposed to the sun and provide torques to
the nucleus. The model can explain reasonably well the ground based data
as well as the interpretation of visible data from spacecraft. The resulting
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
359
model indicate that long axis of the nucleus precess around the rotational
angular momentum vector in 3.69d at an angle of 66 . In addition the long
axis rotates around its own axis with a period of 7.1d.
A rotation period of 26 h has been deduced for Comet Borrelly based
on ground based and HST observations. A linear jet emanating from the
nucleus was seen from the Deep Space 1. Several observations about this
feature indicate that the jet is along the rotation axis of the nucleus and
also spinning close to its lowest energy spin state.
Based on the above brief discussion, it is evident that the periodicities
depend upon the state of the nuclei. In particular, on the shape, activity
and their location, jets, how the gas comes out and so on. This leads to the
complex nature of the periodicities in the observed spectra than indicated
by the assumed simple models. Hence the interpretation of the observed
periodicities is a difficult matter and is comet dependent.
11.7.
Nucleus Composition
The major goal of cometary studies is to determine the chemical composition of the nuclei of comets. Therefore the evolution of the activity of a
comet along its orbit is important for an understanding of the chemical nature of the nucleus. In view of this, extensive studies have been carried out
with regard to the variation of gas production ratio of species as a function
of the heliocentric distance for various comets. The observed production
rates of various species are found to vary with heliocentric distance and
from comet to comet. Therefore the coma abundances of species cannot
directly reflect the composition of the nucleus of a comet. This problem
has been investigated based on the model for the nucleus.
As discussed earlier the structure of the nucleus of a comet is a complicated function of various physical processes that could take place inside
the rotating porous nucleus containing amorphous ice and volatiles. These
result in structured layers with different composition. The top layers containing the least volatile material and the deepest layers containing the
most volatile species. This structured layer nucleus can be used to calculate the production rate of the species and the integration over the entire
orbit will give the total amount of material ejected during one orbit of the
comet. The deduced abundance ratios for each specie can then the compared with the abundance ratios for the same specie in the nucleus. The
results of such studies have shown that the abundance ratios of the ob-
9:59
360
Physics of Comets
served species in the coma integrated over the entire orbit of the comet is
a better representation of the composition of the nucleus of a comet. This
implies that one has to take into account the change in coma composition
with heliocentric distance.
Comet Hale-Bopp was a bright and active comet which made it possible
to study this problem in greater detail. The comet was observed over a large
range of heliocentric distances of 1 to 7 AU. The expected abundances in
the coma from the structured layer chemical model that takes into account
the gases arising from, the surface of the nucleus (sublimation), the interior
of the porous nuclei and the distributed source, can be calculated. These
results can be compared with the observed ratios to deduce the composition
of the nucleus. A mixture composed of 35% amorphous H2 O, 7%CO2 ,
13%CO (50% trapped in the amorphous ice) and 45% dust give a good fit
to the observed data as can be seen from Fig. 11.7. The fit to the observed
data will be much better if the distributed source of CO were subtracted.
The deduced abundance ratio for the nucleus is similar to the expected
abundance ratios from a condensable component of molecules at a lower
temperature from a mixture of solar abundance elements.
11.8.
Mass Loss
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
361
Fig. 11.7 Mixing ratio Q(CO)/Q(H2 O) is plotted as a function of the heliocentric distance for Comet Hale-Bopp. The dashed line is the model fit. The model fit will be much
better if the distributed source is subtracted from the observations (Huebner, W.F. and
Benkhoff, J. 1999. Space Sci. Rev., 90, 117).
11.9.
Structure
There is no direct method of knowing the internal structure of the nucleus. Therefore one has to infer the possible nature of the structure of the
nucleus from the observed characteristics of comets. The observational fact
that the splitting of the nuclei is quite commonly seen in comets implies
that the nuclei should be quite brittle. Otherwise it will not break that
easily. The important point is that the splitting process does not totally
destroy the nucleus. Comets split into several components when it passes
within the Roche limit of the planet. The Roche limit is defined as the distance from the planet at which a smaller body like a comet which is porous
9:59
362
Physics of Comets
and with weak tensile strength will be torn apart due to tidal forces. The
classic example is the Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 which came with in 0.001
AU of Jupiter in 1992 and disintegrated into 21 pieces due to tidal forces
(Figs. 1.8, 1.9). The splitting phenomenon also gives a chance to compare
the different split components with the original nucleus and through this
one may be able to get some information about the changes with depth.
The splitting of Comet West into four components (Fig. 1.7) has been analyzed in some detail. The components are observed to separate out with
extremely small velocities of the order of one meter per second. After their
initial velocity they are all subjected to non-gravitational separation forces
produced as a result of the jet action resulting out of vapourization of ice
(Sec. 11.10). The observations can be fitted very well with such a physical model. Comet LINEAR (1999S4) split up into several pieces during
its passage around the sun in 2000. The observations of several other split
comets, which have different time-period can also be explained in a similar
manner. These results show that the different pieces coming out of comets
of extreme ages show the same behaviour with regard to the vapourization
process. The splitting of the nuclei of comets appear not to depend upon
whether the comet is of short period or long period or on their orbits or
happens before or after perihelion etc. The splitting of comets also appears to be more or less random in character. The outburst seen in many
comets indicate the nucleus could be fragile as well as porous. In general
the new comets appear to exhibit more activity than short-period comets
at large heliocentric distances. This may indicate that the outer layers of
new comets may be extremely loose with more volatile material contained
in it or there could be a halo of volatile material around the nucleus.
The erosion of the nuclear surface can take place during its long exposure
at far off distances from the Sun due to the bombardment of cosmic rays,
the solar wind etc.
The gross material strength of comets can be obtained from the estimates of the tidal forces acting on the Sun grazing comets, split comets
5
and from other considerations. The gravitational compression force ( <
10
2
dynes/cm ) is quite small and cannot compress the icy material of the
nucleus. The tensile strength against the tidal disruption of Sun grazing
comets indicates a value in the range of 103 to 105 dynes/cm2 . Similar order of strength of the material in the nucleus is estimated from the period
of rotation of the nucleus. These values are small and they indicate the
material to be weak. The strength of the material can also be estimated
based on the study of meteor trajectories as they plunge into the Earths
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
363
atmosphere since they are believed to be cometary debris (Chap. 13). They
also give value of about 103 to 105 dynes/cm2 . The estimated values for
the tensile strength for cometary material in the nucleus may be compared
with the values for solid water-ice and rocky material which is 4 106
dynes/cm2 . It shows the cometary material to be of low material strength.
In addition to this, the particles collected at high altitudes appear to be
fluffy. The estimated low bulk density for the nuclei of comets indicate the
material to be fulffy and loosely packed in the nucleus.
There are also other types of observations which can give some clue to
the structure of the nucleus. It is well known that comets go around in
their orbits many times. These observations show that only a thin layer
of the material comes out of the nucleus keeping the core of the nucleus
intact. More support for this comes from the Sun grazing comets which
survive even after such an encounter. Also the jet force arising out of the
vapourization of the gases modifies only the trajectory of the comet and it
does not destroy the nucleus as a whole.
All these observations appear to show that the nucleus cannot be composed of a cluster of small particles termed as the sand-bank model. In
the sand-bank model the particles are independent of each other but they
follow similar orbits around the Sun. In this case there is no real body at
the centre although there is a high concentration of particles at the centre. The images of the nucleus of Comet Halley, Tempel 1, Wild 2 and
Borrelly taken from spacecrafts have clearly shown the nucleus to be a one
solid chunk. The images have also given enormous information about the
surface morphology and topology of the nucleus of comets.
Modelling cometary nuclei which can reproduce the observed characteristic behaviour of comets can also provide internal properties of a comet.
The earlier model based on the assumption that the solar radiation is the
only source of energy responsible for the observed cometary behaviour has
been superseded by more sophisticated models. This is due to the fact that
the cometary nucleus likely to contain amorphous ice and its subsequent
crystallization could provide an additional source of energy. In addition,
there could be another source of energy arising from short-lived radionucleide 26 Al. Models which take into account these three sources of energy,
namely solar radiation, through crystallization process and radioactive decay and the high poracity of the nucleus have been considered. These
studies indicate the stratified structure of the nucleus (Fig. 11.3).
Comets are formed as a natural product in a contracting solar nebula.
The resulting nuclear structure could be aggregates of smaller icy planetes-
9:59
364
Physics of Comets
imals. This concept has led to models such as fluffy aggregaate, primordial
rubble pile and icy-glue. The collisional evolution appears to have played
a role as well for the cometary nuclei. Infact all the evidences seems to
indicate that the structure of nuclei of comets is processed rubble pile of
smaller ice planetesimals of previous generation. Therefore the general feeling at the present is that the processed models such as fluffy aggregates or
the collisionally evolved rubble pile models are the best representation of
the interior structure of a cometary nucleus.
Fig. 11.8 Schematic diagram showing the persisting layers that have been seen on the
surface and deeper layers of Comet Tempel 1 based on the images taken by Deep Impact
spacecraft. Such features has also been seen in Comets Wild 2 and Borrelly (Belton,
M.J.S. et al. 2007. Icarus, 187, 332).
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
365
11.10.
Non-gravitational Forces
9:59
366
comets
Physics of Comets
(11.13)
and to see what form of f (r) can remove the observed discrepancy. The
component of the force F3 is generally present for active comets, but it
is difficult to determine a meaningful solution due to its periodic nature
and also the average non-gravitational acceleration is determined from the
solution over three or more apparitions. Therefore for most of the comets
the value of A3 is put equal to zero. The change in the semi major axis introduced due to the radial and transverse perturbing acceleration (RP , TP )
is given by the equation
da
2
P
=
(e sin )RP + TP
dt
r
n(1 e2 )1/2
where n, e, and r represent the orbital mean motion, eccentricity, true
anomaly and the heliocentri distance respectively. P presents the orbital
semi-latus rectum, a(1e2 ). The derived empirical function f (r) was found
to agree well with the form g(r) given by the Eq. (11.5). Knowing the
function f (r), the constants Ai can be calculated. These nongravitational
parameters are actually obtained from the least square fit to the definitive
orbit of the comet. Therefore the empirical work on the nongravitational
force has been put on a firm basis based on a physical model. In recent
years the expression (11.5) has been used in all the orbit calculations.
9:59
Nucleus
comets
367
These ideas fit in well with the matter ejected from a rotating icy model
of the nucleus which can be understood from Fig. 11.9. When the solar
radiation impinges on the nucleus, the material evaporates from the surface
and moves out in the direction of the incident radiation. This results in a
jet action, a force pushing the comet away from the Sun. If the nucleus
is rotating then there will be a time delay between the heating and the
ejection of the gas from any point on the surface. If the rotation is in the
same direction as its motion around the Sun, the delayed jet action will
have a forward component which will increase the orbital period of the com
et (Fig. 11.9(b)). As a result it will go into a higher orbit and so it will show
up later than the predicted time. On the other hand, if the nucleus rotates
in the opposite direction to the motion around the Sun (Fig. 11.9(c)) the
jet action will have a backward component. This will reduce the period
of the comet and hence it will show up earlier than the predicted time.
Therefore, depending on the direction of rotation of the nucleus, some of
them will be accelerated and some will be retarded, which is consistent with
the observation.
Fig. 11.9 The result of outguessing on the cometary nucleus: (a) the nucleus does not
rotate; (b) the nucleus rotates along the direction of motion around the Sun. The jet
force is also along the direction of motion increasing thereby the period of the comet;
(c) the nucleus rotates in the opposite direction to the direction of motion around the
Sun. The jet force is now in the opposite direction to its motion resulting in a decrease
in the period of the comet.
It is now possible to make a meaningful comparison of the nongravitational parameters A1 and A2 for different comets as they represent the
relative mass loss rates. However, there was still a major problem requiring the outguessing to be much higher than what was known at that time
based on the line emission of C2 and CN in the visual region of the spectrum
(Chap. 6). Otherwise the jet force was not enough to exert an adequate
force on the comet. This problem was resolved with the discovery of the
9:59
368
Physics of Comets
presence of a huge halo of hydrogen gas around Comet Bennett in the 1970s
through the detection of the Lyman line radiation (Chap. 6). The observed decrease of nongravitational effect with an increasing distance from
the Sun can also be explained based on the vapourization model. The
nongravitational parameter indicates that about 1% of the material is lost
from each comet in one revolution which is consistent with other estimates
(Sec. 11.8). To take care of the active emission areas from the surface of
the nucleus, an effective sublimation rate Z(z, r) (molecules/cm2 /s) at a
heliocentric distance r and the Suns local zenith angle z is defined as
Z(z, r) = Z0 (r)G(z, r)
where Z0 is the sublimation rate at the subsolar point and G(z, r) ( 1) is
the relative sublimation rate at the Suns Zenith angle z. If there are several
sources then it has to be averaged to get the rotation-averaged acceleration.
The transverse component given by the parameter A2 is quite sensitive
to the effects of episodial events in the orbital motions of comets. The
determination of non-gravitational parameters require at least three consecutive apparition and in addition at least three independent values of the
parameters A2 is required for the study of temporal variations. This limits
the study to short period comets for which astrometric observations have
been made for 5 or more apparitions. Such observations have been used to
determine the values of A1 and A2 for a large number of comets. These have
been used to understand the diurnal effects and seasonal effects in comets.
Diurnal effect refers to the short term variations arising due to outgassing
from uneven exposure of individual sources to sunlight caused by the rotation of the nuclei. Seasonal effects are the long term variations associated
with producing the asymmetric curve in the production rate with respect
to perihelion.
The non-gravitational parameter for the Comet Kopff which was positive before 1930 changed over to negative value around 1940. On the other
hand for Comet Halley the value of A2 has not changed over a long time
period. This indicate that Comet Halley has been out-gassing at almost
the same rate over this long period of time.
In the discussion so far, it has been generally assumed that the parameter representing the component of the force normal to the orbital plane, A3
is equal to zero. This is due to fact that the introduction of the parameter
A3 did not seem to improve the orbital solutions implying that it is hard
to extract the value of A3 i.e. essentially indeterminate. Therefore A3 is
the least understood parameter and it requires further study. With this
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
369
in view, several attempts have been carried out, in recent years, to detect
the contribution from the normal component of the transferred momentum. Using various mathematical techniques, the three non-gravitational
parameters A1 , A2 and A3 have been derived for a number of comets. The
results are rather consistent in showing that the value of A3 is not large.
Therefore with the availability of accurate values for the parameters A1 ,
A2 and A3 representing the component of non gravitational perturbation
in the radial, transverse and normal directions it may be possible to study
the time evolution of the orbits, precession of the spin axis, wobbling and
so on.
All the studies carried out so far for the last two decades or so, were
based on the symmetric models for the non-gravitational effects in the equation of cometary motion. The implicit assumption in the symmetric model
is that the non-gravitational effects are the same on either side of the perihelion position. However, in a real situation the non-gravitational effects
are more of perihelion asymmetrical in nature. The evidence for such an
effect comes from the non-random distribution of the active regions on the
surface of the nucleus and the observed asymmetrical nature of the light
curve of comets, which basically reflect their out gassing histories. Therefore the results based on symmetrical non-gravitational acceleration model
is being questioned. However, it should be noted that the symmetric models have been very successful in providing accurate ephemerides but the
derived physical properties of comets should be taken with caution. Therefore attempts are being made to take into account the asymmetrical nature
of the non-gravitational force in comets by considering the out gassing as
accurately as possible.
An approach that has been attempted is a slight modification of the
symmetrical non-gravitational acceleration model. In this procedure the
possible asymmetry in the out-gassing is taken into account by shifting the
time (DT) for a few days before or after perihelion passage so that it coincides with the maximum value of the water vapourization curve. DT=0
corresponds to the symmetric case. Therefore the expression for the asymmetric non-gravitational acceleration model at any time t is given by g(r0 ),
where r0 = r(t0 ) = r(t DT ). The new calculations are similar to the
symmetric model case except that the function g(r0 ) is evaluated for the
heliocentric distance corresponding to the time t DT , rather than for t
itself. The time shift DT is varied till a best fit to the anisotropic observations is found and this in general agrees with the shift seen in the maximum
of the light curve from the perihelion. It is found that the asymmetric
9:59
370
Physics of Comets
11.11.
The nuclear spin of two similar atoms in a molecule such as H2 , give rise
to segregation of rotational levels of the molecule depending upon the total
nuclear spin angular momentum (I). Therefore it was postulated based on
Quantum Theory the existence of two forms of molecular hydrogen called
Ortho - H2 and Para -H2 and got experimental confirmation of this prediction, a great success story. Later work found that in ortho - H2 , the two
hydrogen atoms spin in the same direction (I=1,) and have rotational
levels with odd J values. In para - H2 , the nuclei of two hydrogen atoms
spin in the opposite direction (I=0,) and have rotational levels with even
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
371
Fig. 11.10 A composite figure showing the light curves of Comet SchwassmannWachmann 2 for the period from 19291987. The negative times correspond to the
inbound orbit and positive times to outgoing orbit. The long-term variations as well as
erratic behaviour can be seen (Sekanina, Z. 1993. Astron. Astrophys. 271, 630).
i.e.,
P
(2J + 1) exp Eo
kT i
h
OP R =
.
P
(2Ip + 1) (2J + 1) exp Ep
kT
(2Io + 1)
Here o and p refer to ortho and para rotational levels. J and E refer
to rotational quantum number and energy of the levels respectively. The
above equation can be evaluated as a function of temperature using energy
9:59
372
Physics of Comets
level diagram of H2 O molecule. The results are shown in Fig. 11.11. For
high temperatures the population ratio of ortho-to para H2 O approach the
statistical weight 2I+1 which is 3 for H2 O. As can be seen from the figure,
the statistical equilibrium value of OPR=3.0 is achieved for temperatures
greater than around 60K. For lower temperatures the OPR is less than the
statistical equilibrium value.
Fig. 11.11 The time dependent Ortho to Para ratio is shown by the solid curve. The
observed ratio for H2 O in various comets is also shown (Bonev, B.P. et al. 2007. Ap.
J., 661, L97).
Since the nuclear spin conversion in H2 O is forbidden during radiative transitions or non-destructive collisions, the OPR formed at a particular temperature is essentially frozen-in and OPR is believed to remain
the same throughout the coma. Therefore the observed OPR should give
an indication of the spin temperature that existed when water molecule
was formed and hence the location in the solar system where comets were
formed. Therefore ortho-to-para abundance ratio of cometary H2 O could
give information about the region of formation of comets in the solar system about 4.6 Gyr ago. In view of this, the determination of ortho-to-para
ratio of H2 O in comets is of particular interest.
The first determination of ortho-to-para ratio of H2 O was for Comet
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
373
Halley in 1985-86 based on the observed lines of ortho and para in the
2.9 m spectral region. Since then OPR ratio of water has been determined
for a large number of comets. This is determined from a comparison of the
observed spectra with the synthetic spectra based on fluorescence model.
The molecules NH3 and CH4 which exhibit ortho and para states and
whose lines lie in the radio and infrared spectral regions have also been
used to determine the OPR in comets. Although OPR ratio of NH3 can be
determined directly from their observed spectral lines, it is more advantageous to get this ratio from the study of NH2 molecule whose lines are quite
strong and lie in the visible spectral region. As a typical case, a comparison
betwen the observed spectra and the best fit synthetic spectra for NH2 is
shown in Fig. 11.12 for Comet Ikeya-Zhang.
Fig. 11.12 Comparison between the observed and modeled spectra of NH2 A (0, 9, 0) X (0, 0, 0) band in Comet Ikeya-Zhang for April 19, 2002. The best fit for OPR of NH2
is 3.22 for the model spectrum indicating spin temperature of 32 K for NH3 (Kawakita,
H. et al. 2004. Ap.J., 601, 1152, Reproduced by permission of the AAS).
The observed OPR of NH2 is used to get the OPR of NH3 with the
assumption that NH2 is the major photodissociation product of NH3 and
the application of nuclear spin selection rule to photodissociation reaction
of NH3 into NH2 and H is valid. The spin temperature determined from
the study of H2 O, NH3 and CH4 for several comets are given in Table 11.3
and shown in Fig. 11.11 for H2 O. The striking feature of Table 11.3 is the
9:59
374
Physics of Comets
comets
9:59
comets
Nucleus
Table 11.3
375
Comet
H2 O
Halley
Wilson
Hale-Bopp
Hartley 2
Lee
S4 LINEAR
A2 LINEAR
WM1 LINEAR
Ikeya-Zhang
NEAT
MACHHOLZ
Tempel 1
Enake
292
> 50
282
363
30+15
6
30
23+4
3
31+11
5
>34
NH3
26+10
4
27+3
2
25+1
2
30+5
3
32+5
4
31+4
2
24 2
33
CH4
33+2
1
Orbit
OC
OC
OC
JF
OC
OC
OC
OC
OC
OC
OC
JF
JF
11.12.
Binary Systems
9:59
376
Physics of Comets
stable binary configuration. Even if a satellite can form, its motion around
a non-spherical rotating and an active cometary nucleus could be highly
complex. Therefore the detection of a satellite around a cometary nuclei is
a real challenge from the observational point of view.
11.13.
Summary
The vapourization theory of water from the nucleus could explain reasonably well the visibility of comets at around the heliocentric distances
of 3 AU. However, it had difficulty in explaining comets seen at distances
much beyond 3 AU. This led to clathrate model. Such a configuration is not
practicable as it can be produced only at high pressure conditions, which
is not the case in the case of comets. The working model at the present
time is that the nucleus contains amorphous ice, and release energy when
it crystalizes. Consequently, the repetition of heating and cooling processes
inside the nucleus creates a layered structure with different compositions.
The most volatiles lie in the near central regions and less volatiles near
the surface layers of the nucleus. This model can reasonably explain all
the observed activities of a comet such as bursts, random or repetitive,
outbursts at large heliocentric distances etc. The flybys to several comets
have given surprising results with regard to the morphological structure of
the nucleus. The tensile strength of the nucleus is quite low and hence it
is fragile. Therefore the nucleus can break up easily, which has been seen
in several comets. The ortho-to-para ratio of several molecules indicate a
formation temperature 30 K which implies that comets are formed in the
low temperature region of the solar nebula. The surface gravity of Comet
Tempel 1 has been determined for the first time from the observation of
ejecta plume. The non-gravitational force which arise due to the net transfer of momentum to the nucleus, is a complicated function which depends
upon the shape, active areas and their location, rotation, jets, outbursts
etc. of the nucleus. Similarly all these effects has influence on the nuclear
rotation giving rise to one or several time periods for the rotation of the
nucleus of a comet.
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
377
Problems
1. Do you expect the vapourization rate of gases from the nucleus to be
constant at every revolution around the Sun?
2. Consider a nucleus made up of ice 1 km in radius, with mass loss rate
of 108 gm/sec and a period of 5 years. If the comet is assumed to be
active for about a year at every revolution, how much does the nucleus
shrink per revolution? What is the lifetime of the nucleus?
3. A comet of radius 1 km is moving with an orbital velocity of 60 km/sec
at 1 AU. Calculate the amount of out-gassing required if the gas comes
out at 1 km/sec from the sun-lit hemisphere of icy nucleus so that the
non-gravitational forace is about 1% of the orbital force.
4. How do you reconcile the fact that the nucleus contain mostly water
but the observed geometrical albedo for Comet Halley is 0.04.
5. If the nucleus of a comet was made up of 80% CO2 and rest is made up
of other molecules like H2 O, CO and others, what will be the scenario
of such a comet?
6. What are the consequence if the nucleus is a hard solid body instead
of fragile and fluffy in nature?
References
The following papers cover morphology of comets
1. Brownlee, D.E. et al. 2004. Science, 304, 1764.
2. Britt, D.T., Boice, D.C., Buratti, B.J. et al. 2004. Icarus, 167, 45.
3. Thomas, P.C., Viverka, J., Belton, M.J.S. et al. 2007. Icarus, 187, 4).
The following paper gives a good account of the vapourization theory
4. Delsemme, A.H. 1982. In Comets ed. Wilkening, L.L. Univ. Arizona
Press, Tucson, p. 85.
A good account for later work is given in the following papers:
5. Meech, K.J. and Svoren, J. 2005. In Comets, Eds. M.C. Festou, H.U.
Keller and W.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 317.
6. Prialnik, D., Benkhoff, J. and Podolak, M. 2005. In Comets, Eds, M.C.
Festou, H.U. Keller and W.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson,
p. 359.
A good summary of albedo and radius of comets is given in the following
paper:
9:59
378
Physics of Comets
7. Lamy, P.L., Toth, I., Fernandez, Y.R. et al. 2005. In Comets, eds.
M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and W.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 223.
The mass and density is covered in the following papers.
8. Davidson, B.J.R. and Gutierrez, P.J. 2006. Icarus, 180, 224.
9. Richardson, J.E., Melosh, H.J., Lisse, C.M. et al. 2007. Icarus, 190,
357.
10. Weissman, P.R., Asphang, E. and Lowry, S.C. 2005. In Comets II,
eds. F.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and W.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press,
Tucson, p. 337.
First direct determination of the surface gravity of Comet Tempel 1, is in
the following paper.
11. AHearn, M.F., Belton, M.J.S., Delamere, W.A., et al. 2005. Science,
310, 258.
The rotation of the nuclei of comets is covered in the following paper
12. Samarasinha, N.H., Mueller, B.E.A., Belton, M.J.S. et al. 2005. In
Comets, eds, M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and W.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 281.
The following papers refer to nucleus composition
13. Huebner, W.F. and Benkhoff, J. 1999. Space Sci. Rev., 90, 117.
14. Huebner, W.F. and Benkhoff, J. 1999. Earth, Moon and Planets, 77,
217.
For structure, outburst etc. of cometary nuclei, see papers
15. Belton, M.J.S., Thomas, P, Veverka, J., et al. 2007. Icarus, 187, 332.
16. Prialnik, D., Benkhoff, J. and Podolak, M. 2005. In Comets, eds. M.C.
Festou, H.U. Keller and W.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson,
p. 359.
The existence of non-gravitational force in comets was proposed for the first
time in a classic paper by
17. Whipple, F.L. 1950. Ap.J. 111, 375.
For a good summary of non-gravitational forces in Comets, refer to:
18. Yeomans, D.K., Chodas, P.W., Sitarski, G. et al. 2005. In Comets,
eds. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and W.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press,
Tucson, p. 137.
The first determination of Ortho-to-Para ratio is in the following papers:
19. Mumma, M.J., Weaver, H.A. Larson, H.P. 1986. Science, 232, 1523;
Astron. Astrophys., 187, 419.
For later work, refer to the following papers:
comets
9:59
Nucleus
comets
379
20. Bonev, B.P., Mumma, M.J., Villanueva, L. et al. 2007. Ap.J., 661,
L97.
21. Kawakita, H., Russo, N.D., Furusho, R. et al. 2006. Ap.J., 643, 1337.
22. Kawakita, H., Jehin, E., Manfroid, J. et al. 2007. Icarus, 187, 272.
A good account of binary systems is in the following paper
23. Noll, K.S. 2006. In Asteroids, Comets and Meteors, eds. D. Lazzaro, S.
Ferraz-Mello and J.A. Fernandez, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 301.
9:59
CHAPTER 12
Origin
There are many ideas and hypothesis with regard to the origin of comets.
Some of these date back to Laplace and Lagrange. Dynamical simulations
in conjunction with available observations, although scarce, have given new
insights into this area of study. Some of these aspects will briefly be discussed in this chapter.
12.1.
During early times, the emphasis in the study of comets was mainly
on the determination of their orbits. This resulted in the accumulation of
a lot of data with regard to the orbital characteristics of comets, which
gave an insight into some of the physical problems. One such fundamental
aspect, which came out of these studies - namely, nongravitational force has
already been discussed in the previous chapter. Another significant result
refers to the problem of the origin of comets themselves. Several general
characteristic properties can be noted just from the stability of comets.
The long-period comets, mostly in parabolic orbits, appear to come from
all directions in the sky. The short period comets, have low inclination to
the ecliptic plane and have a strong association with the planetary system.
Any reasonable theory of the origin of comets has to explain these features.
Various concepts, ideas, hypothesis and theories, have been put forward
over the years discussing the merits and demerits of interstellar vs solar
system origin of comets. Therefore the whole subject was in a confused
state. In a classic paper, Oort in 1950 proposed the unification of the
origin of comets within a reasonable and consistent framework. This has
given rise to a rapid development of the subject and a better understanding
of the whole phenomena.
381
comets
9:59
382
Physics of Comets
Table 12.1 Distribution of original values of
semimajor axes, a(AU).
1/a
0.00005
0.00015
0.00020
0.00025
0.00050
>
Number of comets
0.00005
0.00010
0.00015
0.00020
0.00050
0.00075
0.00075
10
4
1
1
1
1
0
Even with limited observational material available on about 19 longperiod comets at that time, Oort showed that a simple plot of the number
of comets versus the inverse of semi major axis, 1/a (equivalent to orbital
energies) of the original orbit gave a conspicuous peak near value zero (i.e.
nearly parabolic orbits) (Table 12.1). The original orbit refers to the orbit
of the comet before it enters the planetary system.
The peak observed in the 1/a distribution cannot be due to chance but
represents the real characteristic property. This is based on the fact that
the observed dispersion in 1/a is much smaller than it would have been
if it had passed through perihelion passage once. Even one passage can
bring in a dispersion in 1/a which is much larger than the observed values.
Therefore most of the comets must have come into the solar system for
the first time, generally called new comets. Most of these comets appear
to come from the region of say 30,000 to 50,000 AU. This led Oort to
recognize the existence of a spherical cloud of comets around the Sun at
this distance but still gravitationally bound to it. This is generally called
the Oort cloud. It should be pointed out that as far back as 1932, Opik
had suggested the possibility of the presence of such a cloud surrounding
the solar system. With more accurate and high precision data available
in recent years on a large number of comets the idea proposed by Oort
has been confirmed and all the results deduced earlier based on the limited
data remain more or less the same. It is remarkable that such an important
work came out, based just on 19 cometary orbits. Figure 12.1 shows the
histogram of the number of comets versus the original 1/a values based on
comets with well-determined orbits. The observed distribution has a sharp
comets
9:59
Origin
comets
383
peak of comets at near zero. The figure also shows a continuous distribution
of tightly bound orbits. Most new comets have aphelion distance of around
50,000 to 100,000 AU. The corresponding major axis is around 25,000 to
75,000 AU. More recent determination give a value for the semi major axis
of about 36,000 AU. These distances are almost comparable to the distances
of nearby stars. Oort recognized the fact that the peak in Fig. 12.1 should
be the source of long period comets, a gravitationally bound spherical cloud
of comets at distances greater than 104 AU from the sun. Recent simulation
studies have shown that the inner part of the Oort cloud at distances of
around 300010,000 AU may also be the source of long period coments.
Fig. 12.1 A histogram of the number of comets plotted as a function of the original
inverse semi major axes for the observed long-period comets. The sharp peak of comets
near zero value of original 1/a represent the new comets from the Oort cloud. (Marsden,
B.G., Sekanina, Z. and Everhart, E. 1978. A.J., 83, 64).
Oort made an estimate of the total number of comets in the Oort cloud
to be about 1.9 1011 based on the observed flux of dynamically new
comets for an influx rate of about 1 comet per year within 1.5 AU from the
sun. More recent dynamical models gave a value for the number of comets
in the Oort cloud to be in the range of (0.4 to 1.3) 1012 . The present day
mass for comets with a > 20,000 AU and H (absolute magnitude) < 11 is
around 7M and the total present day mass of the Oort cloud is estimated
9:59
384
Physics of Comets
to be around 38M .
Cometary fading
It is observed that the number of returning comets after the Oort cloud
spike decreases more steeply compared to the expected rate based on models which takes into account planetary and stellar perturbations. This is
generally known as Cometary Fading. Dynamical model calculations have
shown that this effect cannot be attributed to modelling effect, but must
be due to the intrinsic property of the comet. Three possibilities have been
suggested. They are disruption or splitting process due to low tensile
strength of the nucleus, loss of volatiles called Extinct State or formation of non-volatile mantle on the surface of the nucleus called Dormant
State of the comet. Dynamical calculations once again seems to rule out
the extinct and dormant state of the comet for the observed cometary fading. Therefore more likely that the catastrophic splitting of comets is the
dominant physical loss process for the observed cometary fading. Therefore comets after few passes through the solar system are split up into a
large number of smaller bodies which then move independent of each other.
Such a process might have resulted in well known Kreutz group of comets
containing more than few hundred comets.
12.2.
comets
9:59
Origin
comets
385
9:59
386
Physics of Comets
Table 12.2 Influx rate of comets from
the Oort clouds.
Perturber
Relative
number
Random stars
1.0
Intermediate size
molecular cloud
124
1.72
62.1
This approach tries to simulate the actual physical system, wherein the
interaction of all the bodies is taken into account. It is possible to study
physical processes through this approach, such as the exchange of energy
and angular momentum between the cloud and the stars and so on. A
comparison of the mean square velocity of the cloud with the escape velocity
at any particular layer would show whether it can escape from the system.
The results show that the inner regions are stable, while the outer layers
can escape from the system.
The dynamical half-life of comets in the Oort cloud due to the effect of
passing star is estimated to be about 3 Gyr at 25,000 AU. It is around 1
Gyr at 50,000 AU. The effect of Giant molecular cloud on the Oort cloud is
comparable that of passing star. The resultant effect of stellar perturbation
is that, around 5% of comets should survive at 50,000 AU for 4.5 Gyr.
Similar is the case at 30,000 AU. This indicates that the comets in the
outer region of the Oort cloud decrease with time. One way to replenish
is by capture of comets from interstellar space. This is a highly unlikely
process as it involves a three body gravitational interaction for dissipating
the excess hyperbolic energy. The other possibility being that the supply
of comets is provided by the inner regions of the Oort cloud. However it
is not at all clear at the present time whether the comets are depleted at
such a rate from the outer regions of the Oort cloud that it requires to be
replenished in view of several simplifying assumptions made in the model
calculations.
comets
9:59
Origin
comets
387
Fig. 12.2 The results of Monte Carlo simulation showing the number of new long-period
comets entering the terrestrial planets region q < 2 AU from the Oort cloud. The spikes
represent the comet showers arising due to random stars penetrating the Oort cloud
(Courtesy Heisler, J).
Cometary Showers
The studies based on Monte Carlo calculations have indicated that influx of cometary flux from the outer regions of the Oort cloud could vary
roughly by a factor of 2 to 3. These are a sort of common phenomena.
Sometimes it is possible that the passing stars happen to penetrate the
Oort cloud, or the stars could be of relatively high mass, or pass the cloud
with small impact parameter. In these situations the orbit of comets could
be changed by a larger amount. The net effect will be to scatter more
long-period comets into the solar system, which will increase drastically
the observable comets giving rise to cometary shower (Fig. 12.2). Monte
Carlo simulations have been carried out for such situations to get an idea of
the expected results. The impact rate increases by a factor of around 300
for the case of star passing at a distance of to 3 104 AU from the Sun
and seems to last for around 2 to 3 106 years. The increase in flux rate
arises due to the fact that comets coming from the inner part of the Oort
9:59
388
Physics of Comets
cloud have relatively shorter time periods compared to those coming from
outer regions and hence perturbed more due to planetary perturbations
and in turn make more revolutions. However such close stellar encounters
are quite rare and the frequency of occurrence could be perhaps once in 3
to 5 108 years or so. In a similar way, a sudden increase in the influx of
comets from the Oort cloud can increase by a factor as high as 103 for a
close encounter with a Giant molecular cloud (M 5 105 M ) or even
higher rate of influx for the penetrating Giant molecular cloud. But such
occurreness may occur at intervals of several times 107 years.
The distribution of comets is a complicated function of the various physical mechanisms which could operate on the Oort cloud. Therefore the
enhancement of ejection of comets could vary in a periodic fashion, random or in some complicated way, depending on the manner in which the
disturbances act on the Oort cloud. This could have catastrophic or moderate effects on the geophysical, biological or climatic changes on the earth.
They could possibly appear in terrestrial records. In view of these considerations, it has been suggested that the random cometary showers could
contribute substantially for the formation of craters on planets and the
Moon and also the biological extinction events on the Earth. Also the statistical study of the fossil records has been interpreted in terms of biological
extinction events that may be taking place with a time scale of approximately 26 106 years (Fig. 12.3). An interesting measurement was carried
out at the sea floor looking for iridium concentration for the period from
33 to 67 Myr ago. The results showed an increase by a factor of around 13
near the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary (referring to 66 Myr). This can be
explained in terms of a strong comet shower which enhanced the iridium
concentration. The expected value from such a process agrees within a factor of two of the observed value seen at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary.
At present these may be considered as possibilities rather than evidence in
support of them, as more work needs to be done from both observational
and dynamical points of view.
The Oort cloud has been considered to be a cold storage place for longperiod comets without much happening until it is perturbed by a perturbing
force. In recent years, it has been suggested that during the life time of
the Oort cloud the outer layers of the cometary nuclei could be modified
due to various physical processes such as, bombardment by galactic cosmic
rays, solar wind, heating due to nearby supernova explosions, luminous
stars passing by, impact due to various debris and so on.
comets
9:59
Origin
comets
389
Fig. 12.3 A statistically significant mean periodicity of ground 26 million years is indicated by the extinction records for the past 250 million years. (Raup, D.M. and Sepkoshi,
J.J. 1984. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 81, 801).
12.2.1.
The long-period comets, after random-walk through the planetary system, which reduces the semi-major axis of the orbit, could finally give rise
to short period comets. The important work of Everhart in 1972 showed
clearly that such a dynamical mechanism can be an efficient process. The
question to ask is whether such a mechanism can produce the number of
observed short-period comets.
Estimates of the expected number of short period comets from long
period comets by diffusion process has been made and it varies considerably. The dynamical calculations have shown that the ratio of the initial
population of near parabolic orbits to the number of long period comets
gravitationally bound to the system after N perihelion passages varies as
N1/2 . The ratio of the observed long period comets to short period comets
is 5 and hence N 25. This indicates that after around 25 passages or
so, around 90% of the original comets are lost from the system. It is quite
possible that some of the long period comets can be transformed into short
period comets after an unusually long number of revolutions. It is estimated
that around 2 103 revolutions are required for transforming a long period
comet to short period comet with P < 20 years. The transformation can
9:59
390
Physics of Comets
also take place only over a restricted region, 4 < q < 6 AU and 0 < i < 9 ,
with an efficiency factor of one captured comet for about 102 long period
comets. In addition, other physical processes such as sublimation, breaking
of the nucleus and so on could also prevent the long-period comet turning into a short-period one. Therefore the existing dynamical calculations
show that roughly one comet out of a total of 103 comets can end up as a
short-period comet. Hence the major difficulty in the process of producing
long-period comets to short-period comets through diffusion process in the
solar system is that the resulting number of short-period comets are too
small compared to the observed number. Also the long-period comets tend
to preserve their inclination as they evolve into short-period comets, in contrast to those of observed short-period comets, whose orbits are confined
to inclinations <
30 or so. In addition, the original population of long
period comets with random inclinations would lead to a certain fraction of
short period comets with retrograde orbits, which is not seen. These are
some of the major difficulties and therefore it is necessary to consider other
mechanisms for the production of short period comets.
In order to produce low inclination, short period comets, the source
has also to be confined to a flattened disk of comets. This has led to the
hypothesis that the Trans-Neptunian population of comets could be the
source of short period comets. The possibility of the existence of such a
source of comets had been suggested by Kuiper in 1951. He postulated a
remnant of the accretion disk of planetesimals in the solar nebula, which
never managed to accrete into planets. This is now termed as Kuiper Belt.
The Kuiper Belt is also called Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt as Edgeworth had
shown the possible presence of comets beyond pluto in 1949. This idea
has been elaborated later on by several investigators and showed that such
a residual population of planetesimals could have remained bound to the
solar system. The short period comets produced from such a comet belt
are far more efficient than produced through long period comets from the
Oort cloud.
Detailed simulation studies have shown that Oort cloud is composed of
two parts, namely the spherical outer cloud and the inner cloud which is
flattened. The boundary between the two regions is around 20,000 AU.
Long period comets come from the the spherical distribution of the Oort
cloud, Halley type comets come from the inner flattened disk of the Oort
cloud and Jupiter family of comets come from the Kuiper belt. It now appears likely that most Jupiter family comets arise from the related structure
called the scattered disk.
comets
9:59
Origin
comets
391
12.3.
The reservoir of comets generally called the Oort cloud is quite well
established. The observable long-period comets can be understood reasonably well, based on the time evolution of new comets coming out of the
Oort cloud. Therefore the origin of long-period comets essentially reduces
to the problem of the origin of the Oort cloud. Various hypothesis have
been proposed to explain the origin of the Oort cloud. They can all be divided roughly into two groups, interstellar and the solar system. The other
possibility of comets forming at the present location of the Oort cloud itself
is not feasible due to the extremely low densities, which make it difficult
for the growth of the particles.
If interstellar comets do exist and enter the solar system at times then
they should be seen with hyperbolic orbits. However, no such comet has
been observed for the last 200 years or so. This observation can be used to
put a limit on the number of interstellar comets in the solar neighborhood
9:59
392
Physics of Comets
evaporating. This led to the other possibility that the comets were formed
in the outer parts of the nebula that formed the planets. The chemical
composition of the solar system bodies can roughly be divided into three
classes depending upon the characteristics of the elements present in them.
For example, gases such as hydrogen, helium and noble gases stay as gas
even at low temperatures, ice melts at moderate temperature and lastly
the terrestrial materials like silicon, magnesium, and iron melt at higher
temperatures. Table 12.3 shows the relative abundances of various elements in the solar system bodies. It is clear that Jupiter and Saturn were
formed mostly of the original solar material like the Sun, while Uranus,
Neptune and Comets were formed in the colder regions which account for
the icy material. Therefore, probably comets were formed beyond Saturn.
Additional evidence for the low formation temperature of T 35 K,
comes from the observation of S2 in comets. Additional support comes
from the study of ortho and para ratio of H2 O, NH3 and CH4 in comets
which indicate the temperature of formation of ice 35 K. Thus there are
several observational results which seem to show that comets are formed
comets
9:59
comets
Origin
Table 12.3
Elements
Gaseous
Icy
Earthy
H
He
C
N
O
Mg
Si
Fe
etc.
393
Terrestrial
planets and
meteorites
Jupiter
Saturn
Uranus, Neptune
and comets
1.0
Trace
0.9
0.7
Trace
0.015
Trace
0.1
0.3
0.85
0.0025
1.0
Trace
Trace
0.15
Whipple, F.L. 1972. In Motion, Evolution of Oribits and Origin of Comets eds.
Chebotarev, G.A. Kazimirchaka-Polonskaya, E.I. and Marsden, B.G. Dordrecht:
D. Reidel Publishing Company, p. 401.
far from the Sun and in the cooler regions of the solar nebula, placing them
beyond Uranus-Neptune zone, possibly the Kuiper belt.
In this connection it is interesting to note that Oort had proposed early
on that asteroid belt could be the source region for the long-period comets.
It was Kuiper who was the first to propose that due to the icy nature of
the comet, they are more likely to be formed in the region of orbits of giant
planets, a concept that has withstood over time.
The ejection of minor bodies appears to be a natural consequence of the
accumulation process of giant planets. Due to gravitational perturbations
of various planets, the orbit of some of these bodies can detach themselves
from the bound system. Monte Carlo simulations have demonstrated clearly
that such mechanisms can be present in the system. The results of such
calculations have shown that the planets tend to eject icy planetesimals
from their present zones to eccentric long period orbits with semi-major axis
103 AU. At these distances the perturbations due to stellar and galactic
sources tend to be important to push the orbits further into the region of
the Oort cloud and thus detaching them away from the zone of influence
of planetary perturbations. This can finally lead to a cloud with more
comets at its centre compared to its outer region, similar to the Oort cloud.
A typical result of the Monte Carlo calculations for the assumed initial
hypothetical comet distribution confined to the ecliptic plane is shown in
Fig. 12.4. They show the expected distribution in the plane perpendicular
to the plane of the Galaxy for different times. The comets are more or less
9:59
394
Physics of Comets
Fig. 12.4 The results of dynamical evolution of a cloud of comets ejected from UranusNeptune zone are shown projected onto a plane perpendicular to the galactic plane for
several time intervals. The dotted circle with a radius of 2 104 AU separates the inner
and outer Oort clouds (Duncan, M., Quinn, T. and Tremaine, S. 1987. AJ, 94, 1330).
The best way to study the structure of the Oort cloud is to directly
image the comets and make a statistical analysis. This is still a long dream
as the object would have a magnitude 42 in the inner region 3000 AU
and 60 magnitudes at around 20,000 AU in the Oort cloud that it will not
comets
9:59
Origin
comets
395
9:59
396
12.4.
Physics of Comets
Taxonomy
The general scenario that emerges from the study of origin of comets
is that, icy planetesimals (comet nuclei) reside mostly in the two regions
of the solar system, namely Kuiper - Edgeworth Belt and Oort cloud(OC).
The OC comets are the ones ejected from the giant - planet region of the
solar nebula (530 AU). OC comets include long period comets and dynamically new comets. The Jupiter-family of comets (short period and
Halley-type, JFCs) originate from Kuiper-Edgeworth Belt (>30 AU). Dynamical studies indicate that comets present in the Oort cloud originated
roughly in equal proportion from each giant planet and the Kuiper belt.
These studies have also shown the possibility of radial transport of material
inward and outward of giant - planet region during the formation period of
comets. During this time the nebular temperature was around 200 K near
Jupiter (5 AU) and around 30 K near Neptune (30 AU). These studies
indicate that JFCs should have been formed at lower temperature environment compared to those of long period comets. Therefore there would be
variation in chemical composition among these classes of comets as well as
differences in the same group. Therefore the study of the chemical composition of comets should give information on the proto-solar nebula chemistry
and in turn on the processes that could have taken place in the early solar
nebula.
The study of the molecular composition of volatiles in comets has helped
a great deal in this regard. The molecular composition of a large number
of comets derived from observations in the radio region has clearly shown a
wide variation in the observed chemical composition among comets. Table
12.4 give the average volatile composition of five OC comets which differ substantially from that of OC Comet 1999S4(LINEAR). The Comet
C/1999S4(LINEAR) is really an unusual comet. It is possible that the five
comets which have similar composition, except CO and CH4 , were formed
in the low temperature region, probably formed beyond 30AU from the sun,
while Comet S4(LINEAR) could have formed around 510 AU.
Extensive compositional surveys have been carried out on a large number of comets. One such survey relates to the study of the production rates
of C2 , C3 , OH, NH and CN in a homogeneous data set of 85 comets. It contained 39 Jupiter-family comets 8 Halley-type comets 8 dynamically new
comets and 27 long-period comets. Although the overall chemical com-
comets
9:59
comets
Origin
Table 12.4
397
Comets
CO
CH4
C2 H2
C2 H6
HCN
CH3 OH
Average of
5 cometsa
1.8-17
0.5-1.5
0.2-0.3
0.6
0.2-0.3
LINEAR
0.9 0.3
0.18 0.06
<0.12
0.110.02
0.100.03
<0.15
9:59
398
Physics of Comets
The enhancement of D,12 C13 C and 15 N13 C seen in the dust particles
from comets indicate that cometary material contain presolar material.
Therefore there is also mix of solar system material with that of interstellar and proto-stellar material. All these studies could provide clues to
the place of origin of comets in the solar system. They could also help in
the understanding of the physical processes that led to larger scale mixing in the solar nebula. These studies could in turn provide important
information with regard to the origin and evolution of the solar system.
12.5.
Summary
Oort showed from the study of 19 comets, the existence of gravitationally bound spherical cloud of comets at distances larger than 104 AU,
called the Oort cloud. The comets in the Oort cloud are perturbed by
various forces which make them leave the system. Some of them are captured by the solar system and it can account for the observed long period
comets. The formation of Oort cloud is by the accumulation of icy planetesimals ejected from the giant-planet region ( 530 AU). This is a natural
outcome of the various processes that could have taken place in the solar
system during its life time.
The diffusion process of long period comets in the solar system cannot
explain the observed number of short period comets. Therefore short period
comets is believed to come from a different source (>30 AU) called Kuiper
Belt. Large number of objects in this region, called Kuiper Belt objects
(KBOs) have been seen whose characteristics are similar to those of Juipter
family of comets. Therefore the general picture at the present time is that,
long period comets comes from the spherical distribution of the Oort cloud,
Halley type comets comes from the inner flattened region of the Oort cloud
and Jupiter family of comets comes from the Kuiper Belt. Therefore comets
are formed in the colder regions of the solar system which account for the
icy material. There is also evidence for the large scale mixing of the material
between inner and outer regions of the solar nebula.
Problems
1. How can one say from the appearance of a comet in the sky whether it
is a new comet coming from the first time or whether it is one which
has already been seen?
comets
9:59
Origin
comets
399
References
The basic idea of the cloud of comets is from the classic paper
1. Oort, J. 1950. Bull. Astr. Inst. Netherlands 11, 91.
Other relevant paper
2. Kaib, N.A. and Quinn, T. 2009. Science, 325, 1234.
Earlier references to the cometary clouds can be found in
3. Opik, E. 1932. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts and Sciences, 67, 169.
The best book on the origin of Comets is the following:
4. Bailey, M.E., Clube, S.V.M. and Napier, W.M. 1990. The origin of
Comets. Pergaman Press.
A good account of several aspects are given in the following papers:
5. Dones, L., Weissman, P.R., Levison, H.F. et al. 2005. In Comets,
Eds. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and H.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press,
Tucson, p. 153.
6. Morbidelli, A. and Brown, M.E. 2005. In Comets, eds. M.C. Festou,
H.U. Keller and H.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, p. 175.
Papers pertaining to KBOs: First Detection
7. Jewitt and Luu, J. 1993. Nature, 362, 730.
The following paper may be referred for a good summary
8. Barucci, M.A., Doressoundiram and Cruikshank, D.P. 2005. In Comets,
Eds. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller and H.A. Weaver, Univ. Arizona Press,
Tucson, p. 647.
For a discussion pertaining to Taxonomy see also Section 6.6
9:59
CHAPTER 13
Asteroids
The minor planets of the solar system were classified as objects having
dimensions less than Pluto. The Ceres which was discovered in 1801 was
classified as a minor planet. This was followed by the discoveries of other
minor planets called Pallas in 1802, Juno in 1804 and Vesta in 1807 and so
on. However, these objects turned out to be far fainter than expected as
their orbits are closer than Jupiters distance. It was realized that these are
of different kind of objects. Hence, minor planets are also called asteroids.
The largest concentration of asteroids is in the range of 2 to 3.5 AU, placing
them between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. This is generally called the
asteroid belt. There are two other minor concentrations of asteroids known
as Hildas and Trojans which are located at distances of around 4 and 5 AU
respectively. It is estimated that more than around 100,000 asteroids have
401
comets
9:59
402
Physics of Comets
been seen at least once. The computed orbits are accurately known for
a large number of asteroids. The period for most of the asteroids is in
the range of around 3 to 6 years. They revolve round the Sun in the same
direction as the principal planets. Most of them have orbits which lie nearly
in the plane of the Earths orbit and the average inclination is about 10 .
The average eccentricity of the orbits is around 0.15 with sharp cut offs on
either side.
Observing the light curve, it is possible to determine the rotation period
and shape of asteroids. The rotation period of most of the asteroids is of
the order of a few hours. For example the rotation period of Eros 5h
17m and that of Juno 7h 13m . The deduced mean geometrical albedo
of asteroids is rather low, 0.05 which implies that they are extremely
dark objects. The diameter of asteroids can vary from the lower set limit of
about 100 meters to about 1000 km as seen in the case of Ceres. Most of the
asteroids are found to be extremely irregular in shape. This indicates that
they were most probably produced out of the break up of some parent body.
In addition, the collisions of asteroids within the belt is quite frequent and
this leads to erosion and fragmentation.
Since 1965, space missions such as, the Mariner Series, the Vikings and
the Hubble space telescope have been used for the study of asteroids. The
two Martian satellites, Phobos and Deimos, two likely captured asteroids
have been studied in great detail. They are found to be approximately
elliptical in shape with radii of 13.5 10.8 9.4 km and 7.5 6.2 5.4
km respectively. The mass of Phobos derived from the perturbations of the
spacecraft is around 1.3 1019 gm. The estimated average density of Phobos and Deimos is around 2.0 gm/cm3 and the geometric albedo 0.06.
High resolution observations have shown many surface features, including
large craters. More recent spacecraft missions which passed by closer to
asteroids have given detailed information about their shapes, sizes and surface features. Table 13.1 gives a list of some of the spacecraft missions to
asteroids. The NEAR-shoemaker spacecraft after circling the asteroid 433
Eros for a year landed finally on this asteroid. The ultraviolet observations
carried out with satellites on a large number of asteroids show that the geometrical albedo decreases towards shorter wavelengths. For example, the
geometric albedo for Ceres at wavelengths 4300 and 2600
A is about 0.031
and 0.023 respectively. It is seen that the albedo of asteroids seem to be
almost in the same range as that of cometary nuclei.
comets
9:59
comets
403
Spacecraft to asteroids.
Spacecraft
Name of the
asteroid
Diamension of
the asteroids
(diameter, km)
Remarks
Galileo
Gaspara
19 12 11
56 24 21
Craters present,
S-type
Craters present,
S-type
253 Mathilda
52
433 Eros
(NEA asteroid)
34 13 13
Deep space 1
9969 Braille
2.1 1 1
Detected magnatic
field
Stardust
5535 Annefrank
Hayabusha
NEA 25143
Itokawa
0.5
Appear angular,
flat surfaces
Exhibit rocks
and boulders, smooth
areas, no impact
craters
NEAR-Shoemaker
Large craters
present, density
1.3g/cm3
C-type
Craters present
density 2.7g/cm3
S-type, landed on
Feb. 12, 2001
Infrared observations have given information about the surface composition of asteroids through the detection of characteristic bands of minerals.
The relative abundances of silicates like olivine, pyroxene, feldspar and so
on has been determined. Most of them fall broadly into two types with
respect to their chemical composition: the C type, the darkest asteroids
due to the presence of carbonaceous material and the S type which has silicates like olivine and pyroxene. The C type asteroids are more numerous
comprising around 60% of the observed asteroids.
The emission spectra of Trojan asteroid (624) Hektor is compared with
the spectra of cometary dust in Fig. 13.1. This emission spectra is similar
to the spectra of Comets Hale-Bopp and Schwassman-Wachmann.
The origin of asteroids is still not known but they could be of cometary
origin. The short-period comets after many revolutions could become inactive as most of the volatiles would have vapourized. Depending on the
presence or absence of volatiles, comets are called Dormant (the volatiles
are not coming out due to mantle formation) or Extinct (when volatiles
9:59
404
Physics of Comets
comets
9:59
comets
405
shown that the orbit of comets can evolve into asteroid orbits. Therefore
some of the asteroids can be extinct or dormant comets. It is likely that
the Earth-crossing asteroids are old and non-active comets. In fact, the
traditional distinction between asteroids and comets is becoming nebulous
at the present time, as some of the asteroids with comet like orbits could
be dormant comets. There are some asteroids which appear to be parent
objects to some meteor streams, for example the orbit of (3200) Phaeton
coincides with that of the Geminid Stream.
There could be comets which orbit in the main asteroid belt. An interesting example of this type is the Shoemaker-Levy 9 prior to its capture
by Jupiter. Before it was captured by Jupiter, it was located in the Hilda
asteroid zone. There could be other comets, in the Hilda group of asteroids.
The object 2060 Chiron discovered in 1977 was classified as an asteroid.
It has an orbital period of 51 years and eccentricity of 0.38. It has a semimajor axis of 13.7 AU which lies in between Saturn and Neptune. Suddenly
in 1988, brightness variations were seen and coma was formed and it was
detected. The emission bands of CN were also detected in 1990. Extensive
observations of this object indicated that Chiron is a comet. Calculations
based on the cometary nucleus model as discussed earlier (see Sec. 11.2)
can explain the observed out-gassing and indicated that it will last for a
long period of time.
The asteroid 4015 is an interesting object in which a comet nucleus has
become an asteroidal object. This object was discovered in 1979 and was
classified as an asteroid. When the accurate orbit of this object became
available, it was possible to identify an object during its earlier time in its
orbit. The object which had the same orbit as that of asteroid 4015 and
was identified in the Palomer sky survey images taken in 1949 was actually
a comet and called Wilson-Harrington. It had plasma tail at that time.
This is an example of a comet turning into an asteroid. This is now called
4015 Wilson-Harrington.
The other example is the object 7968 Elst-Pizarro (133/E-P) which
resides in the main asteroid belt but show recurrent comet-like activity,
such as showing temporary dust tail etc. The cause of such activity could
be that volatile regions may be located near one of the rotational poles of the
nucleus. When this region tilts towards sun, it is exposed to solar radiation.
This sublimes volatiles leading to comet-like activities. The cases of such
unusual behaviour could arise from population of asteroid-comet transition
objects. Therefore there may be large number of comets posing as asteroids
in the asteroidal belt. They could be there in dormant or extinct state. It
9:59
406
Physics of Comets
13.2.
Meteorites
comets
9:59
comets
407
9:59
408
Physics of Comets
position considerably from that of the sun. The percentage fall of these
types of meteorites are around 94% stony (chondrites, 86%; achondrites,
8%), 5% iron and 1% stony-iron.
Table 13.2
Group
Main Characterization
Main Components
Iron meteorites
Nickel-Iron
Stony meteorites:
(i) chondrites
chondrules
Silicates, solar
in composition except
volatile elements
(ii) Achondrites
No chondrules
Silicates, differ
from solar
composition
Olivine in Fe-Ni
alloy network
Olivine, metal
silicate, metal
Stony-Iron meteorites:
(i) Pallasites
(ii) Mesosiderites
comets
9:59
comets
409
9:59
410
Physics of Comets
Fig. 13.2 Shows the distribution of the isotopic ratio 12 C/13 C in the atmosphere of
Carbon Stars and presolar SiC and graphite grains seen in meteorites. The dashed line
refers to the solar system value of 89. The source of presolar SiC grains is consistent
with that of carbon stars. The presolar graphite grains appear to come from various
sources (Whittet, D.C.B. 2003. Dust in the Galactic Environment, Institute of Physics
Publishing, Bristol).
comets
August 4, 2010
11:23
comets
411
Composition
Diameter (m)
Origin
C(diamond)
SiC
C(graphite)
SiC (type X)
Al2 O3 (corundum)
Si3 N4
0.002
0.3 - 20
1 - 20
1-5
0.5 - 3
1
SN
AGB, Nova
AGB, SNII, Nova
SN
RG,AGB
SN II
the planetary bodies of the solar system were formed. The volatiles of the
pre-solar inclusions could have been lost during the process of accretion
into the bodies.
Comets can in principle, explain the origin of primitive meteorites, but
not the processed mateorites which have gone through thermal evolution.
Hence fragements of asteroids may be a better source of observed meteorites.
The similarity between the meteorites and asteriods comes primarily
from their composition, which is reflected in their emission spectrum of
these objects. Figure 13.4 shows the emission spectrum of Trojan asteroid Hektor and two meteorites ALH 77003 and Tagish Lake. There is a
great similarity between Hektor and Comets Hale-Bopp and SchwassmannWachmann 1. These studies indicate that C type asteroids could possibly
be the source of carbonaceous chondrites while S type asteroids may be the
source of some stony meteorites.
13.3.
Meteor Streams
9:59
412
Physics of Comets
Fig. 13.3 A transmission electron micrograph of a thin section of presolar graphite grain
from Murchison meteorite. The long nucleus at its centre is in TiC crystal of 0.07 m in
size. This must have acted as a nucleation centre for graphite to condense (Bernatowicz,
T.J. 1997, In From Stardust to planetesimals, eds. Pendleton Y.J. and Tielens A.G.G.M.,
ASP Conf. Ser., 122, p. 227: By kind permission of the Astronomical society of the
Pacific Conference services).
the present time several hundred meteor streams exist in the solar system.
What is of interest of course is the orbital characteristics of these meteors.
From the observed direction and velocity, it is possible to get the orbit of
the individual meteors in the Swarm.
It has been found that the elements of orbits of many of the meteor
comets
9:59
comets
413
showers are very similar to those of the orbits of the known comets. In
1866, Schiaparelli showed that the Perseids shower had the same orbit as
the Comet Swift-Tuttle. The showers Eta Aquarids and Orionids have the
same orbit as Comet Halley and can be seen during the months of May and
October. Of course, not all the meteor showers have been identified with
the individual comets. Conversely, not all the known comets are associated
with the corresponding meteor streams. Since the association between the
two is well established only for a few cases out of a large number of known
comets (Table 13.4) and meteor streams, at first sight these results might
cast some doubt on the real association between the two. This could arise
partly due to inaccuracies in the measured parameters of the orbit of the
meteor stream. A more important reason could be that the dynamical
evolution of the meteor stream could have modified the orbit such that it is
different from that of the parent comet. Therefore a simple comparison of
the two orbits may not be appropriate. On the other hand, the position of
the perihelion of the comet and the meteor shower is a better indication of
the real association as has been shown to be true for a large number of cases.
Therefore, on a closer examination, the association between the comets and
9:59
414
Physics of Comets
Fig. 13.5 A typical hourly rate of meteors seen throughout the year as observed by
the Ottawa Meteor radar. The top figure represents total echo count and the bottom
curve is for echos having duration 8 secs. The peaks represent showers corresponding
to Q (Quadrantid), Y(Lyrid), E( Aquarid), AZ (Arietid-Zeta-Perseid Complex), D(
Aquarid), P (Perseid), O (Orionid), L(Leonid), G(Geminid) and U(Ursid) (McIntosh,
B.A. 1991. Comets in post-Halley Eta, eds. R.L. Newburn, Jr., Kluwer Academic
Publishers, p 557).
the meteor showers seems to be real. Let us first examine the formation
of a Swarm of particles from a comet in a qualitative manner. The dust
particles coming out of the nucleus are carried away by the gas. Since
the flow of the dust from the nucleus is maximum near about the time of
perihelion passage, it is also the place where most of the dust is introduced
into the meteor stream. Each of these dust particles becomes independent
and the orbit of these particles differs from that of a comet. The orbit of the
dust particles depends upon its velocity and the effect of radiation pressure.
This varies with the size of the particles and their physical properties. Very
small size particles are blown out of the system. The particles both lead and
lag behind the comet and eventually lead to a continuous belt within a few
revolutions of the period of the comet. The various particles in the meteor
stream are subjected to various dispersive and degenerative effects, like
gravitational perturbation by the planets, collisions and radiation pressure
and so on. Therefore the orbit of these particles evolves into orbits which
are difficult to predict. This may result in the orbit of particles in the
meteor stream quite different from that of the orbit of the parent body. In
fact the perturbations could disrupt the orbits of the particles such that it
may make them sway away for crossing the Earths orbit. This can possibly
comets
9:59
comets
415
explain rather poor association between the comets and the meteor showers.
But from the good correlation between the perihelion, it can be inferred
that the meteor streams are of cometary origin.
Table 13.4
Comet
Associated shower
period of
visibility
1P/Halley
Aquarids
Orionids
Perseids
Draconids
Leonids
Ursids
Lyrids
April 19 - May 28
Oct.2- Nov.7
July 17 - Aug.24
Oct 6 - 10
Nov 14 - 21
Dec 17 - 26
April 16 - 25
109P/Swift-Tuttle
21P/Giacobini-Zinner
55P/Tempel-Tuttle
8P/Tuttle
1861 G1
It is interesting to see from Fig. 13.5 that some profiles have two maxima and others have one. This could be related to the fact that the orbital
parameters of the particles released from the comet before and after perihelion passage could differ slightly, which is a function of the mass and
ejection velocity of the particles. This difference increases with time possibly leading to two streams close to each other.
A very interesting study pertains to Comet Tempel-Tuttle and its associated Leonid meteor streams covering the meteor data over the period 902
to 1969. The comet and the meteor showers have roughly the same period
of about 33 years. The comet itself does not appear to have been observed
prior to 1366, although the Leonid meteors have been recorded even upto
the year 902 A.D. From the presently known orbit of the Comet TempelTuttle, the orbit could be extrapolated backwards in time and the dates
around which the meteor showers must have taken place can be calculated.
A comparison of the calculated and the observed dates for the period between 902 to 1997 is shown in Table 13.5. The agreement between the two
suggests that most of the particles of Leonid showers are from the Comet
Tempel-Tuttle.
9:59
416
Physics of Comets
Table 13.5 Computed and observed dates of Leonid
Meteor Showers.
Computed
(Based on Tempel-Tuttle orbit)
Shower maximum
time (observed)
Oct 13
Oct 14
Oct 18
Oct 21,22,23
Oct 26
Nov 4,5,6
Nov 11,12
Nov 14.1
Nov 15-16
Nov 16-17
Nov 17.4
13.4.
Particle collection at high altitudes of the Earths atmosphere is another way of studying extraterrestrial dust particles and their possible origin. Various methods have been used for the collection of particles based
on recoverable rockets, balloons and aircraft. These particles are generally called Interplanetary dust particles (IDPs). The extensive collection
of IDPs from the rarefied air in the stratosphere is carried out with NASA
U2 aircraft, which flies at a height of about 20 km. The particles collected
from these flights are subjected to a thorough laboratory investigation, not
only to isolate the terrestrial contamination but also to study the morphological, structural and chemical properties of individual IDPs, in spite of
their small size. Large number of the particles can be attributed either
to rocket exhaust or to other known particle types. Many other particles
cannot be explained as contamination from known causes and they could
be extraterrestrial in origin. Roughly all these particles can be classified
into three categories; 60% as chondritic, 30% as iron-sulfur-nickel and 10%
as mafic silicate types. The chondritic particles are aggregates of small size
grains of about 1000
A. The size of the particles varies from 4 to 25. The
grains are highly porous as well as compact. The elemental abundances
of Fe, Mg, Si, C, S, Ca, Ni, Al, Cr, Mn and Ti in the first category of
particles are in close agreement with the bulk compositions of chondritic
meteorites. The abundances of C, S, Na and Mn indicate that the particles
comets
9:59
comets
417
are volatile rich in composition and also have a black appearance because
of the high content of carbon. The composition of iron-sulphur-nickel type
of particles is similar to that of meteoritic triolite. The silicates are olivines
and pyroxene. Evidence for the extraterrestrial origin of these dust particles comes from several sources. The direct proof for the extraterrestrial
nature comes from the observations of the presence of solar noble gases, the
deuterium enrichment (i.e. large D/H ratio) and the presence of solar flare
tracks in mineral grains within the particles. Their extraterrestrial nature
is also indicated by the presence of 10 Be, which is produced by cosmic ray
bombardment.
The infrared transmission spectra between 2.5 and 25 m of a large
number of chondrites type of IDPs shows the presence of a strong 10 m
silicate absorption feature and possibly the 3.4 m feature. They can be
classified into three groups as olivines, pyroxene and layer-lattice silicates.
Particles in the olivine and pyroxene group are mostly crystalline in nature
rather than amorphous. The carbonaceous material typically present is
around 28% of the particle by mass. Carbonates are the important secondary material in layer-lattice-silicate IDPs, due to the presence of their
characteristic feature at 6.8 m. The Raman spectra of several IDPs show
double peaks at 1360 cm1 and 1600 cm1 , (7.38 and 6.25 m). These
are due to C - C vibrations of carbon. They are characteristic of aromatic
molecular units smaller than 25A. This indicates the presence of PAHs of
some kind.
The infrared spectra of two Pyrrhotite - rich grains from IDPs are shown
in Fig. 13.6. They show a strong and broad feature around 23.5 m which is
identified with FeS stretch feature (troilite). This is similar to circumstellar
feature. Iron sulphide was also identified in the dust component of Comet
Halley during the spacecraft encounters.
The major form of non-crystalline silicate in IDPs are the GEMS (Glass
with Embedded Metal and Sulphides). The sizes of GEMS is around 0.1
to 0.5 m in diameter. It contains nanometer sized FeNi metal and Fe rich sulphide grain embedded in silicate grains. The bulk composition of
GEMS are approximately chondritic for the major rock forming elements.
The chemical and mineralogical information indicate that pyroxene-rich
IDPs and olivine IDPs are from comets (Fig. 13.7). The overall properties
pertaining to the physical and chemical nature of these particles strongly
suggest that many of them are of cometary origin containing possibly some
component of presolar origin. Supporting evidence comes from the presence
of meteor showers as well as the factual information that the vapourized
9:59
418
Physics of Comets
Fig. 13.6 Infrared Spectra of IDPs (U2012A-2J and L 2011 B6), Herbig Ae/Be stars
(AB Aur and HD 163296) and FeS (troilite). The residual spectra for AB Aur and
HD 163296 is shown after subtracting the best model fit from the observed spectra. The
dust components used in the model are, glassy silicate, forsterite, carbonaceous material,
metallic iron and water ice. The mineral of U2012A-2J is dominated by pyrrhotite and
that of L2011 B6 by low-NiFi-Sulphides (Keller, L.P., Hony, S., Bradley, J.P. et al. 2002.
Nature, 417, 148).
comets
9:59
comets
419
13.5.
Primordial Material
The material out of which the Sun and the planets were formed does not
refer to the original material present at the time of formation of the universe
about 13 109 years ago, but rather to the modified material which existed
around 4.5 109 years ago. During all these times, the interstellar material
was being constantly enriched with heavier elements through the element
building in stars followed by ejection of this material into the interstellar
9:59
420
Physics of Comets
medium. The same process has been happening since the formation of the
solar system to the present time. It is not clear at present at what time in
the history of the universe the Oort cloud was formed and hence its chemical composition is also not known. This will in turn be reflected on the
original chemical composition of comets. For example, if the comets were
formed along with other solar system bodies about 4.5109 years ago, they
would have the same composition as that of the solar system material. But
on the other hand, if they were formed more recently they would have a
different composition reflecting the contemporary interstellar abundances.
One method to get information about the possible nature of the primordial
cometary material and hence the time scale or the age is through the study
of the isotopic ratios of various elements. As is well known, the relative
abundances of various isotopes preserve the life history of the formation
process and hence help in understanding the nature of the original material. The isotopic ratio of several elements has been determined for comets
(Table 5.4). The measured isotopic ratios are 12 C/13 C 90, 14 N/15 N
300, 32 S/34 S 22 and 16 O/18 O 450 and is similar to terrestrial values
of 89, 270, 24 and 500 respectively. Therefore the nature of the material at
the time of formation of the Oort cloud is similar to that of the primordial
cometary material.
13.6.
Chemical Evolution
The origin of life on Earth has intrigued mankind since early times. In
the standard scenario, the production of organics is the starting point of the
whole complex process, as all life on Earth is composed of organic material.
It is remarkable that relatively only a smaller number of organics appears
to have been used in forming life system among a variety of organics that is
possible. The compounds of major interest are those normally associated
with water and organic chemistry in which carbon is bonded to itself and
to other biogenic elements. The biogenic elements, H, C, N, O, S and P,
are generally believed to be essential for all living systems. In 1953, Miller
showed that when gaseous mixture of NH3 , CH4 and H2 O is subjected
to an electrical discharge, it produced various kinds of organic molecules
including amino acids. This remarkable experiment showed for the first
time the possibility of synthesis of organic molecules from a mixture of
simple gases in the presence of an energy source. This led to the suggestion
that a similar type of process could have taken place in the early stages of
comets
9:59
comets
421
the earth leading to organics, the basic ingredient for the formation of life.
However, studies have indicated that these simple molecules are unlikely
to be present as major constituents in the early atmosphere as they are
most probably photolyzed in a time scale of year or so. In addition, other
studies indicate that the early Earths atmosphere contained mostly CO2 ,
H2 O and N2 , which makes it difficult for the formation of organics. The
existing observations show that the amount of organics in the solar system
objects seems to increase with distance from the Sun. Therefore, it is
intriguing that the organics necessary for chemical evolution is found in
the outer solar system, whereas water, an essential ingredient for the life
formation, is found in the inner solar system. This led to the suggestion
that the organics might have been transferred from outer to inner regions
of the solar system by some means, possibly through comets. Therefore
the general conclusion is that it is highly unlikely that the biogenic could
have formed on the Earth itself and therefore it had to be transported to
the Earth through some means. The early chemical evolution was then
believed to be followed by biological evolution, finally leading to life on the
Earth. Even though this scenario is being taken as a working model, it is
not at all known at the present time, how the whole process can take place
in such a manner.
In recent years, the possible role of comets during the early chemical
evolution on the Earth has been put forward. This is basically related to
the fact that molecules of various complexities have been seen in comets.
In particular, observations of Comet Halley showed for the first time the
presence of organics in comets through the detection of CHON particles.
The composition of these grains showed that they are made up of highly
complex organic molecules of various kinds. Comet Halley observations
indicated the possible presence of Phosphorus in the mineral core of the
particles. Therefore, all the biogenic elements (H, C, N, O, P and S), essential for living system, have been detected in comets. The direct evidence
for the existence of building blocks of life in comets came from the detection
of Glycine (an amino acid) for the first time in Comet Wild 2. There are
several ways in which the organic material could have been incorporated
into comets. It could have been incorporated directly at the time of formation from the material in the solar nebula which is a typical interstellar
cloud. More than 150 molecules have been detected in interstellar clouds,
most of which are organic in character. Therefore, organics in comets could
be interstellar in origin.
There are several observations to show that the earth does seem to
9:59
422
Physics of Comets
comets
9:59
comets
423
Element
Bacteria
Mammals
Comets
Hydrogen
Oxygen
Carbon
Nitrogen
Sulphur
Phosphorous
Calcium
63.1
29.0
6.4
1.4
0.06
0.12
-
61.0
26.0
10.5
2.4
0.13
0.13
0.23
56
31
10
2.7
0.3
0.08b
-
a. In %
b. (0.08) is the cosmic abundance.
Delsemme, A.H. 2000. Icarus, 146, 313.
13.7.
Terrestrial Water
9:59
424
Physics of Comets
ratio (1.5 104 ). Several laboratory studies have shown that D/H ratio
in sublimating ice can increase or decrease with time depending upon the
fractionation process (such as ion-molecule reaction etc) and on the nature
of the material. It is possible that comets which contributed water to earth
may be different from the comets for which D/H ratio has been measured.
13.8.
comets
9:59
comets
425
the earths surface. Two well known meteorites of this type are the Murchison and Allende meteorites. Before they could reach the earths surface,
they exploded and shattered into pieces whose remnants were recovered.
Both the meteorites are carbonaceous chondrites.
As mentioned already, fossil records suggest the presence of biological
extinction event repeating on the earth with a period of around 26 my. It is
suggested that cometary showers impinging on the earth could have caused
such phenomena.
The credibility for the hypothesis that outside bodies impinge on the
earth came when 20 pieces of Comet shoemaker-Levy 9 pierced through
Jupiters atmosphere during the period from July 17 to 22, 1994. This
is indeed an historical event that was witnessed from earth. Therefore it
is possible that such an event can happen on the earth in the future and
hence poses danger to earth. Therefore efforts are made to see how to
prevent such an event taking place on the earth. For this purpose the sky
is being monitored continuously to look for objects which might come close
to the earth, catalogue them and keep track of these objects. Some of them
are Near-Earth Object Survey, the Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking. The
Near-Earth objects (NEOs) are defined as asteroids and comets which have
perihelion distances of 1.3 AU or less. The total number of NEOs/NEAs is
estimated to be around 7001300.
The only way to avoid the collison is to destroy the object or change
its track. Several suggestions have been put forward which can achieve
these objectives. One suggestion is to explode the object. But one problem
with this approach is that it would shatter the body into pieces, some of
which might still head towards the earth. This is blast-and-hope strategy
i.e. nothing comes towards the earth. Another way is to land a spacecraft
on the surface of the object in order to gently push it off the course. This
involves a rather complicated manovering. Another suggestion is to push a
heavy object near the incoming object for long enough time that it could
produce sufficient gravitational tug to change its orbit. Similarly, solar
radiation pressure beaming on the object may be used to alter the orbit of
the incoming object.
All these suggestions require a spacecraft to be put out there at the
right time, but it requires lot of advance planning. Hopefully with mans
inguenity backed by sophisticated technology, it is possible to come out
with a simpler way of tackling this problem.
9:39
426
13.9.
Physics of Comets
Overview
The nature of the original material of the solar nebula (a typical interstellar cloud) and its relation to comets and other objects in the solar system
and their inter-relationship is of great interest. This is shown schematically
in Fig. 13.8.
Condensation Process
Interstellar Matter
(Gas and Dust)
Stars
(Element Synthesis)
Explosion Process
(Nova and Supernova)
Solar Nebula
Comets
Asteroids
IDPs
Meteor Streams
Meteorites
Fig. 13.8 A Schematic representation showing the comets formed out of a typical interstellar cloud (solar nebula) containing presolar grains emitted from stars, novae and
supernovae and its relation to other objects in the solar system.
The observed silicate dust mineralogy is quite similar among IDPs, meteorites, asteroids, comets and in circumstellar shell of stars. The high value
of the isotopic ratio of several elements observed in some of these objects
as compared to solar system value indicate the presence of presolar grains.
In particular, the presolar grains with high value of 12 C/13 C ratio, contribution must have came from various stellar sources such as Wolf-Rayet
stars, novae, supernovae, AGB atmospheres etc. The source of IDPs rich
in deuterium is attributed to molecular clouds. Similarly FeS grains have
been seen in IDPs, meteorites, comets and from young and old stars. The
presence of FeS grains in all these kinds of objects give a direct link between
comets
9:59
comets
427
9:59
428
19:31
432
comets
Physics of Comets
Physics of Comets
Table 13.7
Table 13.7
Diatomic
Tri-atomic
4-atom
5-atom
H2a HCI ?
COa PN
CSa NaCIb
NO AICIb
NS KCIb
SiOa AIFb
SiSa
H2 Oa
H2 S a
SO2a
OCS
NH3a
SiH4b
Acids
CH3 OH methanol
EtOH ethanol
H2 CO
CH3 CHO
H2 CCO
(CH3 )2 CO?
HCNa
HCOOH
HNCO
Amides
NH2 CHO
NH2 CN
NH2 CH3
Hydrocarbons
hydrocyanic
formic
isocyanic
C2 H2b acetylene
C2 H4b ethylene
CH4 methane
Organo-sulfur
formamide
cyanamide
melthylamine
CH3 OCHO
(CH3 )2 O
H2 CS
HNCS
CH3 SH
Acetylene derivatives
Other
methyl cyanide
ethyl cyanide
HC3 Na
CH3 C2 H
CH2 NH
CH2 CHCNa
methylenimine
vinyl cyanide
Radicals
Ions
Rings
Carbon
chains
Isomers
CH C3 Ha,c
CNa C3 Na
OHa C3 Na
SOa C4 Ha
HCO C5 H
C 2b C 6 H
C2 Ha C2 Sa
C2b CH2 CN
CH+
HCO+
N2 H+
HOCO+
HCS+
H3 O+?
HCNH+
H2 D+?
SiC2b
C3 H2a
Ca
3
C3 Sa
HC5 Na
HC7 Na
HC9 Na
HC11 Na
CH3 C3 N
CH3 C4 H
CH3 C5 N?
HNCa
CH3 NC
Parafin derivatives
CH3 CNc
EtCN
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
ketene
acetone
methy formate
dimethy ether
cyanoacetylene
methylacetylene
thioformaldehyde
isothiocyanic acid
methyl mercaptan
comets
9:59
Table 13.8
comets
429
9:59
430
Physics of Comets
ceous chondrites seems to be primitive in the sense that they have not altered much their state from the time of formation. The organic material
found in carbonaceous chondrites is highly complex. In Murchison meteorite, different amino acids have been identified. Many of them occur on
earth biologically. A few of the different compounds seen are the following:
Carboxylic acids, aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, amines and amides,
alcohols, ketones, purines, pyrimidine etc. The organic matter found in
meteorites probably existed in the solar system a billion years before the
appearance of life on the Earth. There are many similarities between the
organic compounds in dust in comets and chondrites. The carbon content
in carbonaceous chondrites is 3 to 5%, which is low by almost an order
of magnitude compared to cometary dust. There is also an indication that
they must have passed through a high temperature phase as well ( 400 K)
in order to explain some of the compounds present in them. Therefore it is
unlikely that comets are the source of meteorites as they remained at low
temperature. Hence asteroids is most likely the source of meteorites. Observations show similarities between asteroids and meteorites. The isotopic
anomaly seen in chondrules in meteorites is attributed to outside material
survived and accreted and are therefore pre-solar grains.
Many of the IDPs which are thought to be of cometary origin is carbonaceous in character.
The various objects in the solar system are generally believed to have
been formed as a by product of the formation of the Sun. The Sun was
formed out of a typical interstellar cloud referred to as the primitive solar
nebula. Model studies have shown that when contraction of the cloud takes
place, the material will form a disk around a central core due to conservation of angular momentum. This material composed of gas and dust will
accumulate in increasing numbers and form a thin disk of particles. This
will then become unstable against gravitational forces and separate out
from the system. These rings then clump together and form planetesimals
and move in circular orbits around the centre of the nebula. These planetesimals act as nuclei for the formation of planets. This is also responsible
for the nearly coplanar arrangement of planets and for a common direction
of revolution of the planets around the Sun.
Condensation model calculations have shown that different types of material condense out of different temperature and densities, which imply different distances from the Sun. So there could be materials of high temperature phase, low temperature phase as well as a mixture of the two in the
solar system objects. Carbon compounds can be vapourized upto around 2
comets
9:59
comets
431
to 3 AU and water upto around 5 AU. Therefore terrestrial planet zones will
be rocky and the outer planet zones will be made up of water, methane, ammonia and CO2 -ice. This is in rough accordance with the gross properties
of objects seen in the solar system. However, the detailed understanding
of the whole problem is far from clear. The exact nature of compound
produced depend upon various factors such as temperature, density, chemical composition of the constituents and various physical processes such as
heating, cooling, annealing, selective evaporation, fractionation and so on.
It is found from laboratory experiments that all the compounds seen in carbonaceous chondrites can be produced from CO, H2 and NH3 on a Fe2 O3
or clay catalyst at a temperature of around 400 to 430 K. Hence it is not
surprising that there is a systematic change in composition going outwards
from the Sun. Comets are produced in a cold temperature phase in the
outskirt of the Solar System and so it has kept most of the molecules it had
from the original material.
During the time interval of the formation of the Solar System, materials
could have been injected into the solar system from outside (like from a
supernova explosion). Some of this material may be preserved in the solar
system objects as inclusions etc. In addition, comets colliding with Earth
during the early stages of the formation could have deposited organic material, which might have started the chemical evolution on the Earth. Comets
could also account for the biosphere on the Earth.
Therefore the organic material present in interstellar clouds and in solar
system objects are the same material to start with but may look different in
some of the solar system objects at the present time due to variable thermal
evolution in these objects depending on their radial distance from the Sun
(Cosmic Evolution).
So far we have been discussing the possible interrelationship between
various solar system objects and comets. In certain cases the relationship
to comets is more direct than in others. This is partly due to lack of good
data as well as to the inadequacy in our present understanding of the nature
of these objects. With further studies, it is hoped to understand the origin
of the solar system itself and possibly even the origin of life on the Earth.
Problems
1. In the study of the origin of life, one deals mainly with the elements
H,C, N and O. Explain.
2. Is there evidence of life beyond the Earth? If the answer is negative,
9:59
432
Physics of Comets
discuss why?
3. Explain how the number of planetary systems in the Galaxy, with life,
like on the Earth can be estimated
4. The meteor streams seen in the sky appear to diverge from a point in
the sky. Explain.
5. What is the range of velocities at which meteors encounter the Earth?
What is the explanation for the limiting values?
6. What has Titus-Bodes law to do with the question of asteroid belt?
7. Meteorites are said to act as beacons to the past. Explain.
References
The following reference gives a good account of asteroids
1. Bottke, W.F.Jr., Cellino A., Paolicchi, P. and Binel, R.P. (eds). 2003.
Asteroids III, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson.
The following reference gives a good description of meteorites
2. Lauretta, D.S. and McSween, H.Y. Jr. (eds.) 2006. Meteorites and the
Early Solar System II, Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson.
For Presolar grains reference may be made to
3. Lugaro, M. 1995. Stardust from Meteorites, World Scientific, Singapore.
The technique of particle collection at high altitudes and the results of such
studies are given in the following review articles.
4. Brownlee, D.E. 1978. In Cosmic Dust. ed. McDonnell, J.A.M. New
York: John Wiley and Sons. p. 295.
5. Sandford. S.A. 1987. Fund. Cosmic Phys. 12, 1.
The early work on the various processes leading to element building in stars
is discussed in the classic paper:
6. Burbidge, E.M., Burbidge, G.R., Fowler, W.A. and Hoyle, F. 1957.
Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 547.
For more discussion reference may be made to
7. Prantzos, N., Vangioni-Flam, E. and Casse, M. (eds.) 1993. Origin and
Evolution of the Elements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Oparin-Haldane hypothesis of the Origin of Life can be found in
8. Ponnamperuma, C. 1982. Extraterrestrials: Where are they? eds.
Hart. M.H. and Zuckerman, B. New York: Pergamon Press, p. 87.
The other view point of cometary origin can be found in the following references.
comets
9:59
comets
433
9:59
CHAPTER 14
14.1.
Epilogue
435
comets
9:59
436
Physics of Comets
Fig. 14.1 The various processes arising out of the interaction of solar radiation and
solar wind with a comet, which result in the observed features in a comet are shown in a
block diagram (Report of the Science Working Group, The International Halley Watch,
July 1980).
close to the nucleus. This was achieved with remarkable success for the
first time during the apparition of Comet Halley in 1986. A target for
space missions has to satisfy several requirements. First, the comets orbit
should be predicted accurately. This means that the arrival time of the
comet can be predicted well in advance. This is very essential because of
large time periods that are involved for developing experimental packages
and the necessary preparations for making space flights. The comet should
be bright, as well as exhibit as far as possible all the observed phenomena
for the maximum scientific return. The condition that the orbit should be
well known mean that the comet should have returned at least a few times
comets
9:59
comets
437
and this eliminates new comets. It leaves only the short-period and the
intermediate-period comets as potential candidates. Comet Halley satisfied
all the requirements for a space mission and is also the most famous of the
known comets, which has been observed for the last 2000 years (Table 14.1).
Table 14.1
240 B.C.
164
87
12
66 A.D.
141
218
295
374
451
530
607
684
760
837
912
989
1066
1145
1222
1301
1378
1456
1531
1607
1682
1759
1835
1910
1986
Jul 19
Sep 6
Mar 21
Apr 19
Sep 29
Oct 26
Nov 11
Jun 10
Aug 26
Oct 27
Sep 15
Mar 13
Nov 16
Apr 20
Feb 10
14.2.
Future studies
9:59
438
Physics of Comets
comets
9:59
comets
439
9:59
Index
comets
9:59
442
Physics of Comets
comets
9:59
Index
comets
443
Morphology, 339
Morse potential, 63
multi-component models, 297
9:59
444
Physics of Comets
splitting, 14, 15
stardust, 22, 31, 287
statistical equilibrium, 98, 101, 103,
105, 111, 114, 137
streamers, 310, 324, 325
structure, 24, 29, 56, 57, 63, 67, 68,
72, 73, 96, 97, 110, 113
sun-grazing comets, 7, 8, 27, 77, 89
surface brightness, 144, 145, 147, 150,
170, 203, 207, 208, 253255
surface gravity, 353
Swan band sequence, 180
Swings effect, 96, 119, 121, 155
Syndyname, 186, 187, 214
Syndyne, 214, 218, 222
synthetic profile, 102, 108, 114
tails, 9, 10, 17, 18, 22, 323326, 328,
331, 336
Taxonomy, 396
Tempel 1, 22, 25, 28, 29, 85, 174, 284,
289, 290, 355, 375
temperature, 270, 271, 273, 274, 277,
279, 282, 283, 285, 290, 298, 392,
396
terminal speed, 216, 225
terrestrial water, 423
theory of vapourization, 340
tidal force, 17
time evolution, 108
Tunguska event, 2, 424
turbulence, 303, 320, 322, 335
ultraviolet, 21, 22, 79, 81, 143, 144,
155, 156, 167, 181, 183, 204, 205
ultraviolet coma, 26
vapourization theory, 344
velocities in the coma, 155
vibrational structure, 101
vibrational temperature, 109, 111,
128
vibrational transitions, 61
visible coma, 82
waves, 303, 314, 319325, 335
comets
9:59
Index
comets
445