101 Questions For Jehovah
101 Questions For Jehovah
specifically for Muslim readership. It even takes on a Muslim appearance with a picture of a mihrab (an
architectural design favoured by Muslims). In short, Jehovah's Witnesses have gone to great lengths to
convey their religion to Muslims. The time is now ripe for Muslims to repay that kindness by offering them
the chance to understand the religion of God. The series of questions in here are designed to help the
Witnesses to think more deeply about some of the matters they may have taken for granted. The idea is
to ask the right questions to help them reach the right conclusions. This booklet does not encourage a
hostile attitude in dealing with people. The idea is not to bombard them with hard facts or dazzle them
with puzzling questions, but rather to lead them gently to the truth. Most of the questions in this booklet
may be asked of any Bible teacher, not just Jehovah's Witnesses. However, this booklet is designed
specifically for use with Jehovah's Witnesses. Although most of the points relating to the Bible apply to
almost any Bible, the points are being made specifically for the benefit of Jehovah's Witnesses, and all
the Bible quotations are taken from the Jehovah's Witnesses' own Bible. The reason I make this
distinction is that the Jehovah's Witnesses have their own distinctive set of beliefs and this requires a
different approach in dealing with them. Other Christians, for example do not need to hear from Muslims
that the Bible contains mistakes. They may already know that for themselves. Now, if you go out of your
way to show people what they already know they may take offence to it. With other Christians, therefore,
the general approach should be to emphasize common beliefs and to explore differences in an extremely
gentle fashion. Better still, you would leave aside differences and show a person the true teachings from
God right in the Qur'an, God's final revealed Book. However, such an approach does not work with the
Jehovah's Witnesses. They are too overly confident that their belief is the only correct one. Any attempt to
lead them to something else fails unless you can first get their attention and help them to rethink their
present position. Jehovah's Witnesses feel that their belief system is rock solid because of two reasons.
Firstly, because it is based on the Bible which is the inerrant Word of Jehovah. Secondly, because
Jehovah guides them to the correct interpretation of that book. So, we may as well start by discussing that
book if we hope to get anywhere with them.
C
message. But persevere. Read below what Allah says: See how We make the revelations clear to them,
and see how they are turned away! (Qur'an 5:75) You see? Even the Words of Allah, plain as they are,
will not convince everyone. Much less the humble attempts we make. If you keep this in mind you will
save yourself a lot of frustration and be in a better position to apply the techniques described in this
booklet. Now, the questions given here are to be used in a particular way for maximum success. Don't
use them as sledgehammers to clobber your opponents. Use them as fly-swats to sting them a little and
wake them up. In other words, use them gently. Give your visitors time to adjust to the new information
you are offering them. You will open up new horizons in their thinking with the questions you ask them. Be
patient with them while they take time to overcome information-shock. At first they will resist any
information coming from you as being from the devil. After all, how could you know anything more about
the Bible than they and their Bible teachers? So rather than give them the information in the form of
statements of your own, ask them a question to stimulate their thoughts. For example, instead of saying
"A is true," say, "Suppose someone says that A is true. How would you react to that?" This shifts the focus
away from you and allows your visitors to think only about the question. As they struggle to come up with
an answer they will convince themselves of what you wanted them to learn. Your disposition toward them
is very important. You must show them that you have compassion for them, and you really want to help
them. You must avoid every chance to ridicule them or their faith. So, do not take on the attitude of a
prosecutor obviously trying to tie them up in verbal knots or to prove them guilty. Take the attitude of a
sympathetic news reporter who is sincerely trying to understand the case for fair reporting. Here is how
this works. They say, "A is true." They are accustomed to hearing their opponents saying, "No, A cannot
be true." But you are not their average prospect. You must rise above the situation by saying something
like this, "If you say A is true, that leads me to conclude that B is also true since A implies B. Do you also
believe B?" Now, if they are unable say, "Yes!" quickly, know that they are struggling to make sense of
their own contradictions. There are many examples of A and B in the questions that follow. Here is
another pattern. Say, for example, "Previously you told me C and I understood you. Now that you are
saying D, I would also like to understand, but since C and D are opposites I cannot believe them both.
How do you explain this?" Let them deal with the contradictions in their own mind. What you are doing
here is helping them to save face by allowing them to think for themselves. Don't tell them they are wrong.
Show them how to believe in their own minds that they are wrong. They may agree with you and yet not
admit it. Don't worry about that. Remember that they always come in pairs. If one of them shows
inclination to agree with you, the other one will report him back at their kingdom hall as one who is now
wavering in his faith. Even if they both agree with you neither of them dares to make the first move to
reveal it for fear of what the other may think. So both will appear to maintain their position, but you ought
to be satisfied that you did your best in presenting the truth. Rest assured that Allah has imbued these
persons each with a conscience. When they lie in bed at night they may remember your words and
secretly affirm true faith before they fall asleep. Again, keep your discussions cool. When you ask the
following questions ask them politely. The tone of your voice should reflect courtesy. Let me explain it this
way. Imagine for a mo ment that you are a police officer. You have just arrested a dangerous criminal.
Now, in your inner voice hear yourself saying to him, "Drop your weapon." Do you hear the force of your
voice? That's a condescending voice the voice of a powerful individual speaking to a powerless
person. Now for an exercise involving the right use of voice for your situation. Imagine yourself at the
airport. You are ready to board your flight. But you don't know which way to find your gate number 39. So
you approach a clerk and ask her politely, "Can you please tell me where I can find gate number 39?" Do
you hear the sound of that question? That's the tone you should try to maintain when asking the questions
in this booklet. Practice that tone of voice with this question: "What if I show you a verse in the Bible which
claims to be not inspired?" Do the same with all the other questions. May Allah help you and me, and all
those who call to His way.
101 Questions
to Ask Visiting
Jehovah's Witnesses
not read Hebrew to still benefit from the scriptures. This is the version which the early Christians like
Timothy were reading. And Paul was telling him to hold on to that book. But is that a problem? Yes! A
double problem. First, the translation disagrees with the original in many points. Which should we take as
the inspired book the original or the translation? This presents a dilemma. If the Hebrew original is
inspired then the Greek translation is wrong. But if the Greek is wrong then Paul is wrong to call it inspired
unless Paul thinks that a book is still inspired even if it contains mistakes. A second problem is that the
Septuagint Greek version contains seven more books than the Hebrew version. These seven books are
included in the Catholic Bible but not in the Jehovah's Witnesses' Bible. But they were included in the
Scriptures which Timothy knew from childhood. And Paul said all of it is inspired. If Paul is right here, then
Jehovah's Witnesses are wrong. But if Jehovah's Witnesses are right, then Paul's words are wrong even
though they are found in the Jehovah's Witnesses' Bible. The truth is that neither the Old Testament nor
the New Testament is 100% from God. But if you believe Paul, then you have to understand that Paul was
saying only that the Greek Septuagint Old Testament is inspired. Paul did not say more than this, and it
would be wrong to say you believe in the man and then put words into his mouth. Many of Jehovah's
Witnesses unknowingly do exactly that. They believe so much in Watchtower teachings that they assume
those teachings must be found in the Bible. Unfortunately, the Bible often disagrees with Watchtower
teachings. What we are discussing here is one example of this. Although the Watchtower teaches that the
Bible is 100% inspired, the Bible says only that its Old Testament is inspired. The Bible does not say that
its entire New Testament section is inspired. If Jehovah's Witnesses chose to believe what they believe,
they must realise that it is a man-made teaching. The Bible does not teach that the entire New Testament
is inspired. And that is a very significant part of the Bible. Nor does the Bible teach that the Hebrew text of
the Old Testament is inspired. Paul's statement quoted above only proves that the Greek Version is
inspired. But Jehovah's Witnesses do not follow the Greek Version because they realise it would make no
sense to disregard the original and follow a translation. So they rightly choose the Hebrew text. But this
choice disagrees with what Paul says in their Bible! Help them out of this confusion. Tell them about Islam
with love. The Qur'an says that the entire Qur'an is from Allah (see surah 3:7).
2 What if I show you a verse in the Bible that claims to be not inspired?
Their answer:
There is no such verse.
The Truth:
There are many such verses. Here is an example which will become clear after you read the following two
statements found in the Bible in Paul's letter to the Corinthians: "To the married people I give instructions,
yet not I but the Lord . . ." (1 Corinthians 7:10). "But to the others I say, yes, I, not the Lord . . ." (1
Corinthians 7:12). Notice that in the first statement Paul claims that the Lord is speaking. Jehovah's
Witnesses believe Paul was telling the truth. But how about the second statement? Here Paul is saying
that the statement is his very own, and that the Lord does not say it. Would Jehovah's Witnesses please
believe Paul in this statement too? So that would mean that at least one verse of the Bible is not inspired.
Then the Bible cannot be 100% inspired by God. Perhaps 99%, or 99.9% but not 100%. Agreed? There
are many other examples. Some books of the Old Testament claim only to be the words of a man, while
others claim to contain words of God also. Many New Testament passages claim to be the opinion of
men. Check these out: Luke said: "I resolved also . . . to write . . ." (The Gospel According to Luke 1:1-4).
Paul said: "Now concerning virgins I have no command from the Lord, but I give my opinion . . ." (Paul's
First Letter to the Corinthians 7:25). Paul said: "Therefore I think . . ." (1 Corinthians 7:26). Paul said: ". . .
according to my opinion" (1 Corinthians 7:40). Paul said: "I certainly think . . ." (1 Corinthians 7:40). Paul
said: "See! I, Paul, am telling you . . ." (Paul's Letter to the Galatians 5:2). But some people do not want to
see. Here lies the problem. To save space, and to focus on the point we are making, I have not quoted
the above verses in full. But the references are given so that you and your visitors can read them one at a
time from the Bible. The same result will emerge. Many verses of the Bible claim to be from man but not
from God. Do Jehovah's Witnesses believe these verses? If so, then how can they say that the Bible is
100% from God when the Bible itself says it is not? They may say that the fact that the writers gave their
opinion does not make a difference, because their teachings agree with the rest of the Bible. This is not a
good argument, for that would mean that anything that agrees with the Bible is also inspired. There fore if
a Hindu writes a brief poem about the importance of charity that should be taken as inspired Word of God.
Do Jehovah's Witnesses accept this? Our point here is not that the opinions of men are good or bad. Paul
and Luke quoted above may have been teaching even things which Muslims believe in. That does not
make a difference. Many Muslim authors write about teachings which Muslims believe in. We do not call
such writings inspired Word of God, do we? Instead, we must stress with our visitors that if they believe
Paul they must also believe him when Paul said that he was writing his own opinion; they must also
believe Luke when he said that he was writing as a result of his own resolution. Luke did not claim to be
inspired to write. Look again at what he said (quoted above). The point we do make here is that human
writings, no matter how good and how accurate, must not be attrib uted to God. Let us keep the Words of
God separate and distinct from the words of Man. Ask your visitors to read the following verses in their
Bible: "For the thoughts of you people are not my thoughts, not are my ways your ways," is the utterance
of Jehovah. "For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so my ways are higher than your ways, and
my thoughts than your thoughts" (Isaiah 55:8-9). Please, let us not confuse the thoughts of men for the
Words of God. Notice also that the letters which Paul wrote to various churches and individuals are part of
the Bible. Help your visitors to realize that the letters which the prophet Muhammad (on whom be peace,
and blessings of Allah) dictated to various kings and leaders do not appear in the Qur'an. The Qur'an is
the Word of God. It does not contain any human writings, not even the inspired teachings of Muhammad
(pbuh) himself. The inspired teachings of Muhammad (pbuh) are found in separate books called hadith.
3 Was Paul inspired when he said that all scripture is inspired?
Their answer:
Of course!
The truth:
But how do they know? If you ask how they know that the Bible is inspired they say, "Because Paul said
so." Now if you ask how can we trust Paul on this they say "Because Paul's words are in the inspired
Bible and therefore Paul's words are inspired too." This is circular reasoning. It is like a witness who
defends his countryman by saying, "All men from my country are honest." Then, when you ask why you
should believe the witness, the witness replies, "Because I am a man from my country." Obviously, this
circular reasoning will not convince a thinking individual. On the contrary, we have already seen in the
previous question that Paul said many things as his own opinion. When he said that all scriptures are
inspired (2 Timothy 3:16) he may have been right. But how can you say so for sure?
4 Did Paul know that his letters are part of the Word of God?
Their answer:
Well, y-yes (actually, not sure).
The truth:
Most people have not considered this question. The letters of Paul were collected and later made part of
the Bible without consulting Paul (Paul was, of course long dead by this time). But Paul himself was quite
conscious that he often wrote his own opinions (see question 2). In one case, Paul was even aware that
he made an error in one of his letters which is now part of the Bible. Read the following passage: I am
thankful I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius, so that no one may say that you were baptized
in my name. Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas. As for the rest, I do not know whether I
baptized anybody else (1 Corinthians 1:14:16). It should be clear in the above passage that Paul made a
mistake and then a correction. But the mistake and the correction both remain in the Bible, Obviously, we
do not object to the correction, but what about the mistake? Is that the Word of God too? If you look at the
passage again, you will notice that Paul made the following three statements: (a) I baptized no one else
but Crispus and Gaius. (b) Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas. (c) I do not know whether I
baptized anybody else. The mistake Paul made is his first statement that he baptized no one else except
two persons named Crispus and Gaius. Then he recalled that he had also baptized the household of
Stephanas, so he made this slight correction in his next statement. But the mistaken statement is still
there. Is this inspired? Paul's third statement shows that he is not sure of the facts: I do not know whether
I baptized anyone else (1 Corinthians 1:16). You see, Paul is not sure who else he baptized. He cannot
remember. He knows he needs to correct his statement further by adding more names, but he cannot
remember who to mention. So the first statement was a mistake. The second statement is a slight
correction to the first. The third state ment is an admission that the correction is not complete. All three
remain in the Bible. Are these Words of God? Show them the Qur'an: Have they not considered the
Qur'an with care? Had it been from other than Allah they would surely have found therein much
discrepancy (surah 4:82).
5 What happened to Paul's first letter to the Corinthians?
Their answer:
What do you mean? We have it right here in the Bible. Look!
The truth:
They don't have it. What they show you is not the first letter Paul wrote to the Corinthians. In this very
letter, Paul reminds the Corinthians that he had already written to them a letter before this one. Read
verses 9 and 11 in the folowing passage from Paul's so-called first letter to the Corinthians, chapter 5: 9.
In my letter I wrote you to quit mixing in company with fornicators . . . . 11. But now I am writing you to quit
mixing in company with anyone called a brother that is a fornicator . . . . Obviously, in verse 9 above, Paul
is referring to what he had written in a previous letter. In verse 11, Paul is making a change to his previous
instruction. Compare below the following two instructions from Paul's previous letter and his so-called first
letter:
COMPARE BELOW:
What we are discussing here is not the change in instruction issued by Paul. I have spelled out the matter
in detail only to equip you to deal with anyone who tries to say that even in verse 9 Paul is referring to his
current letter. Some people will try to convince you that there was no previous letter. But now you know
how to demonstrate this truth to such a person. So, now, where is that previous letter? Obviously, it is lost.
Now, if someone believes that Paul's letters are the words of God, he or she has to also believe that
some of the Words of God are lost forever. But will Jehovah's Witnesses believe this? Ask them to read
this Bible verse. The green grass has dried up, the blossom has withered; but as for the Word of our God,
it will last to time indefinite (Isaiah 40:8). How does this reconcile with the fact that one letter of Paul has
disappeared? Muslims understand that God can reveal a message and then allow it to be forgotten. But a
Jehovah's Witness does not accept that belief. They think once revealed, always preserved. So they have
to deal with this question. The loss of Paul's letter is a good indication that the recipients of Paul's letter
did not take it as the Word of God. If they did, wouldn't they try to preserve it? Why did they let the Word
of God disappear like that? Now someone may say that the rest of Paul's letter were preserved, and this
proves that the people who preserved them regarded them as the Word of God. Let us not stretch things
so far. Firstly, no one knows how many other letters of Paul are really lost, and we still have no
satisfactory answer for that problem. We have just stumbled upon evidence of one letter being lost. What
other evidence will yet turn up? Secondly, people keep letters and other writings for all kinds of reasons.
Perhaps people thought the letters of Paul contain important things. Others may have kept such letters
with a view to refute the teachings they contain. We have not enough details to settle this mater, but we
can safely conclude that just because someone kept some letters of Paul does not mean they took the
letters as coming from God. They knew the letters were from Paul.
Show them the Qur'an: Surely We have revealed the scripture (the Qur'an) and surely We are its guardian
(surah 15:9).
Gently explain to them that God protects the Qur'an so that none of it will ever be lost.