18 Week14a
18 Week14a
Urban Transportation Planning MIT Course 1.252j/11.380j Fall 2002 Mikel Murga, MIT Research Associate
Dec 6, 2002
Table of Contents
! ! ! ! !
Why traffic calming? Traffic calming, how? Techniques Design Criteria The Process
Fri Dec 6
The faster you go, the higher the probability of an accident, as:
!
Your vision focus narrows with speed For a given reaction time, distance covered is proportional to speed The faster you go, the longer the stopping distance
3
Fri Dec 6
For instance, the kinetic energy of an automobile (1.2 tons at 35 mph) is at least 150 times higher than for a pedestrian (180 pounds) at 3 mph Such a collision at:
!
! !
20 mph, means bone fractures and concussions Between 20-30 mph, medium seriousness More than 30 mph, very high probability of either death or permanent disability
4
Fri Dec 6
To avoid segregation of public spaces and maintain its livability Underpasses, skywalks and other solutions, do not provide eyes on the street
Fri Dec 6
When you drive at 30 mph, you tend to focus your sight far ahead And you narrow the sight area You fail to see the surroundings
6
Fri Dec 6
But if you drive at 20 mph, you start to see what lies on the sides
Fri Dec 6
The basic idea is to change the perceptions of the driver through the introduction of new physical features These self-enforcing features tend to break the infinite continuity that encourages speed with or without speed warnings
Fri Dec 6
Raised crosswalks Narrower pavement widths Chicanes through urban furniture or parking Changes in the pavement texture Mini-roundabouts Cul-de-sacs Eliminating some movements Civilized green waves .
9
Fri Dec 6
Raised crosswalks
! !
7% for 40-45 km/hr 10% for 30 km/hr 12% for 25 km/hr or less
Every 60-100 meters plus proper warning The top needs a minimum width, specially for buses
10
Fri Dec 6
Raised intersections
Fri Dec 6
11
Bulb-outs
Pros:
!
Fri Dec 6
12
Fri Dec 6
13
0,15
2,5
0,3
1,7
0,15
0,15
2,5
0,2
2,5
0,15
4,80
5,5
1,7
0,9
1,7
0,6
5,5 4,80
Fri Dec 6
14
Fri Dec 6
15
Fri Dec 6
16
Fri Dec 6
17
Mini-roundabouts
They work!
Fri Dec 6
18
Fri Dec 6
19
Fri Dec 6
20
Fri Dec 6
They need low cycles to avoid late-comers driving fast (at night)
21
Plus often changes in horizontal alignment, refuge islands, narrowing the road width
Fri Dec 6
22
! !
Longer timing for pedestrians Lower total cycles Green waves for pedestrian movements
Fri Dec 6
23
! !
New urban furniture, including trees New activities Weather shelters to encourage people use of the streets
24
Fri Dec 6
Fri Dec 6
25
Design Criteria
!
Location Self-enforcement Liability Reversibility Public participation Overall traffic scheme Traffic deviated to other areas
26
Fri Dec 6
Location
!
Sensitive areas:
! ! ! !
Schools Transit stations Senior citizens Areas with high accident rates High speeds eg.transition areas from the expressway into the urban network
27
Fri Dec 6
Some Bibliography
!
Canadian Guide to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming TAC-ATC/ITE 1998 Civilised Streets Carmen Hass-Klau et al ET&P, 1992 Guide Les ralentisseurs de type dos dane et trapezoidal CERTU, 1994
! !
Guide Zone 30 CETUR, 1992 Pedestrian and City Traffic Carmen Hass-Klau, 1990 City Routes, City Rights Conserv Law Found, 1998 Reduire la Vitesse en Agglomeration CETUR 1989 Voirie Urbaine CETUR 1988 plus JANE JACOBS, KEVIN LYNCH, WHYTE, etc..
Fri Dec 6
28
Bibliography
http://www.ite.org/traffic/index.htm
Fri Dec 6
29
Bibliography
http://www.trans.ci.portland.or.us/Traffic_Management/Trafficcalming/
Fri Dec 6
30
Fri Dec 6
31
Fri Dec 6
32
There is not enough money to accommodate all the requests The best is the change in behavioral patterns
33
Fri Dec 6
!
Fri Dec 6
! !
Fri Dec 6
Even if you have to cheat a bit like my good friend Jan Gehl
36
Fri Dec 6
37