Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

100% found this document useful (1 vote)
789 views12 pages

Debate Packet

The document provides instructions for adjudicators to follow when judging debates at the World Scholar's Cup. It outlines the process adjudicators should follow which includes attending a training, reviewing the code of conduct, welcoming and providing instructions to teams, running the debate by timing speakers and providing feedback, and scoring the debate using provided criteria. Adjudicators are told not to discuss outcomes with students and to maintain impartiality and respect throughout the process.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
789 views12 pages

Debate Packet

The document provides instructions for adjudicators to follow when judging debates at the World Scholar's Cup. It outlines the process adjudicators should follow which includes attending a training, reviewing the code of conduct, welcoming and providing instructions to teams, running the debate by timing speakers and providing feedback, and scoring the debate using provided criteria. Adjudicators are told not to discuss outcomes with students and to maintain impartiality and respect throughout the process.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Before Judging Your First Debate

Attend a training session Confirm your debate room number Introduce yourself to another adjudicatorour students shouldnt be the only ones making friends at the World Scholars Cup! Review and sign the code of conduct below:

As a WSC debate adjudicator, I, ___________________________, will:


Welcome students with a smile. Remember that many teams are debating for the first time. Judge thoughtfully, fairly, and discreetly. Use this script every time I judge a debate. Not leave the room in the middle of the debate. Allow teams 60 seconds between speakers to prepare. Speak to teams only in English. Never give feedback to a team, even when students ask for it. Not tell a team what they could have done differently or what I would have argued in their place. Not discuss a debates outcome with students, teachers, or parents.
Sign your name here: _______________________________ Please return this code of conduct before adjudicating. If you are unable to sign it in good conscience, please excuse yourself from adjudication. Thank you so much for volunteering at the World Scholars Cup!

Starting the Debate


1. Welcome teams in a friendly way. Teams are often very nervous! 2. Seat the affirmative team to your left, the negative team to your right. 3. When both teams are seated, proclaim, in an epic way:

"Welcome to the Team Debate event of the World Scholar's Cup!"


4. Return to your non-epic voice and read these instructions aloud:

TO STUDENTS: "As soon as I have read the motion, you will have 15 minutes to prepare. You may use any notes, books, or devices you find helpful. Once the debate begins, you must close your laptops. Each of you should then speak for up to four minutes. You may never interrupt the speaker. I will knock once when you have one minute left and twice when you are out of time. At that point, you may finish your sentence, but after that you must sit down. Please be respectful while others are speaking. You may pass notes, but not talk aloud. You will have 60 seconds between speakers to work with your team. As you listen to your opponents, keep in mind that, after the debate, you will be giving them up to 90 seconds of feedback on how to become better debaters. TO THE AUDIENCE: Again, welcome. We are so glad to have you here! Out of respect to the teams, you may not leave or enter while a student is speaking. You may not communicate with the teams at any time.
5. Hand out the debate motion, read it aloud, and start a timer. 6. Leave the door open during the prep period. 7. If you have a conflict of interest, step out and switch with a judge in another room during the prep period. 8. Warn students when there is one minute left in the prep period. 9. When time is up, close the door. 10. Invite one speaker from each team to fill out the teams ID numbers in the appropriate order on your score sheet.

Move to the next page: Running the Debate

Running the Debate


The students speak in this order: Affirmative Speaker 1 Negative Speaker 1 Affirmative Speaker 2 Negative Speaker 2 Affirmative Speaker 3 Negative Speaker 3
Some teams have only two members. On these teams, one speaker will speak twice. Please score him or her both times. Reminder: there are no points of information and no required speaker roles.

1. Call the speakers up one at a time. Speakers should stand in front of the room, not at their desks. 2. Instruct each speaker:

"Speaker [#] for the [Affirmative/Negative], you will have four minutes to speak. Please approach the front of the room, introduce yourself, and begin."
3. Begin timing when the student begins speaking. 4. You may choose to take notes as each student speaks. Space is provided on a separate sheet. Notes will never be shared with the students. 5. Knock once when the speaker has one minute left. 6. Knock twice when the speaker is out of time. 7. If the speaker continues another 15 seconds, knock steadily to bring him or her to a stop. 8. Once the speaker is seated, instruct both teams:

You now have 60 seconds to prepare before the next speaker.


9. During this time, score the student who just presented. 10. Repeat these steps for all six students.

Move to the next page: After the Debate

After the Debate


1. After all six speakers have taken their turns, remind them that in a few minutes the peer feedback session will begin. 2. Score each speaker individually and then each team for its teamwork. 3. Mark the best speaker on each team and decide whether to recommend one or more speakers for a special showcase of top debaters. 4. Take time to weigh the debates outcome. If there are other judges, you may step outside to discuss your decision. Ties are not allowed. 5. Once you have decided the winner, call the teams to order. When both teams are seated, read the following:

"Before I announce the winner, each team will now give up to 90 seconds of suggestions and advice to the other team. You can distribute these 90 seconds however youd like. I will score your feedback, but it will not affect which team won the debate. Do not use this time to continue arguing the motion: focus on how your opponents could become better debaters. You may speak from your seats. I will stop you when your 90 seconds are done. Negative team, you will go first. Remember to be courteous, constructive, and kind.
6. Once both teams have given feedback, thank them, then announce the winning team. Do not announce your best speaker selections.

"This round goes to the [Affirmative/Negative] team. Congratulations! Now: please cross the bench and shake hands.
7. Do not give any feedback on the debate, even if students request it. Feedba at the World Scholars Cup is given by teams to one another. 8. Do not tell students their scores, and never continue to discuss the debate with participants or with their teachers or parents. 9. Before releasing teams, ask each if it knows where to go next. If there is another round, winners go to one room, non-winners to another. 10. Hand scores to a designated runner or dropbox, not to wandering staff.

Scoring the Debate


NeedsWork
1

Acceptable Average
2 3

Strong
4

Exceptional
5

Manner Manner refers to presentation and appearance. Speaking: How clearly did the student speak? Did he use notes effectively, or read an entire speech off cards? Did she finish her sentences decisively, or frequently trail off? Did her tone vary? Do not penalize students for their accents. You are listening for fluent arguments, not fluent English. Presence: Did she look at ease, using hand gestures and making eye contact? Did he treat his opponents and adjudicator respectfully? Does he seem poised, like someone who has practiced? Method Method refers to the students use of rhetoric and organization. Organization: Did the speaker clearly organize her ideas? Did those ideas flow logically? Did they support a central argument? Did the speaker make good use of time? Rhetoric: Did the speaker effectively use the language of persuasion to enhance the impact of his argument or to diminish and discredit the other team? Examples of good rhetoric include powerful metaphors, inversions, and groups of three; there are many others. Material Material refers to the content of the speech. Evidence: Did the speaker find and make good use of information related to the motion? Did she make creative arguments and draw on fresh evidence and points, or did she rely on predictable, generic ideas? Did she provide enough context for you to follow her argument? Rebuttal (or Prebuttal): Did he present evidence against or otherwise discredit the other teams argument? Did she address counterarguments? If the first speaker, does he do a good job protecting against possible arguments, and of defining terms in a way favorable to his or her team? Teamwork Teamwork refers to collaboration. All three teammates receive the same teamwork score. Cohesiveness: Did the teammates speeches fit together to form an effective argument? Behavior: Did teammates work well together during the event? Were they respectful listeners? Peer Feedback Helpfulness: Did the students offer their opponents constructive suggestions and advice? Respectfulness: Did the students share this feedback with kindness and courtesy?

Cautions: Do not give all the speakers on a team similar scores unless they are truly similar speakers. Please use the full score range. All scores are scaled.

Team Debate Score Sheet


Your Name ________________________________________ Round: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (circle one) Debate Room #_____ Resolved Select one best speaker per team. Switch rooms if you have a conflict of interest.

________________________________________

AFFIRMATIVE Team: _____


Speaker Name
st

ID #
Speaking

Individual Scores 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5
Presence Rhetoric Prebuttal Presence Rhetoric Rebuttal Presence Rhetoric Rebuttal

Teamwork 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

Feedback

Subtotal

Best speaker? Yes No Yes No Yes No

Organization Evidence Speaking

1 2 3 4 5

2nd

Organization Evidence Speaking

3rd

Organization Evidence

Would you nominate the teams best speaker for the Debate Showcase?
Yes! He or she would amaze an audience of hundreds. Not this time.

Winning Team? Next Room

Yes!

No!

NEGATIVE Team #:_______


Speaker Name
st

ID #
Speaking

Individual Scores 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5
Presence Rhetoric Prebuttal Presence Rhetoric Rebuttal Presence Rhetoric Rebuttal

Teamwork 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

Feedback

Subtotal

Best speaker? Yes No Yes No Yes No

Organization Evidence Speaking

1 2 3 4 5

2nd

Organization Evidence Speaking

3rd

Organization Evidence

Would you nominate the teams best speaker for the Debate Showcase?
Yes! He or she would amaze an audience of hundreds. Not this time.
]

Winning Team? Next Room

Yes!

No!

Thank you for volunteering! Please sign below before returning these scores:

I have followed the script and upheld the Debate Adjudication Code of Conduct. Your name __________________________ Your signature __________________________

USE THIS PAGE TO TAKE NOTES ON SPEAKERS

Affirmative Speaker 1

Negative Speaker 1

Affirmative Speaker 2

Negative Speaker 2

Affirmative Speaker 3

Negative Speaker 3

Team Debate Score Sheet


Your Name ________________________________________ Round: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (circle one) Debate Room #_____ Resolved Select one best speaker per team. Switch rooms if you have a conflict of interest.

________________________________________

AFFIRMATIVE Team: _____


Speaker Name
st

ID #
Speaking

Individual Scores 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5
Presence Rhetoric Prebuttal Presence Rhetoric Rebuttal Presence Rhetoric Rebuttal

Teamwork 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

Feedback

Subtotal

Best speaker? Yes No Yes No Yes No

Organization Evidence Speaking

1 2 3 4 5

2nd

Organization Evidence Speaking

3rd

Organization Evidence

Would you nominate the teams best speaker for the Debate Showcase?
Yes! He or she would amaze an audience of hundreds. Not this time.

Winning Team? Next Room

Yes!

No!

NEGATIVE Team #:_______


Speaker Name
st

ID #
Speaking

Individual Scores 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5
Presence Rhetoric Prebuttal Presence Rhetoric Rebuttal Presence Rhetoric Rebuttal

Teamwork 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

Feedback

Subtotal

Best speaker? Yes No Yes No Yes No

Organization Evidence Speaking

1 2 3 4 5

2nd

Organization Evidence Speaking

3rd

Organization Evidence

Would you nominate the teams best speaker for the Debate Showcase?
Yes! He or she would amaze an audience of hundreds. Not this time.
]

Winning Team? Next Room

Yes!

No!

Thank you for volunteering! Please sign below before returning these scores:

I have followed the script and upheld the Debate Adjudication Code of Conduct. Your name __________________________ Your signature __________________________

USE THIS PAGE TO TAKE NOTES ON SPEAKERS

Affirmative Speaker 1

Negative Speaker 1

Affirmative Speaker 2

Negative Speaker 2

Affirmative Speaker 3

Negative Speaker 3

Team Debate Score Sheet


Your Name ________________________________________ Round: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (circle one) Debate Room #_____ Resolved Select one best speaker per team. Switch rooms if you have a conflict of interest.

________________________________________

AFFIRMATIVE Team: _____


Speaker Name
st

ID #
Speaking

Individual Scores 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5
Presence Rhetoric Prebuttal Presence Rhetoric Rebuttal Presence Rhetoric Rebuttal

Teamwork 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

Feedback

Subtotal

Best speaker? Yes No Yes No Yes No

Organization Evidence Speaking

1 2 3 4 5

2nd

Organization Evidence Speaking

3rd

Organization Evidence

Would you nominate the teams best speaker for the Debate Showcase?
Yes! He or she would amaze an audience of hundreds. Not this time.

Winning Team? Next Room

Yes!

No!

NEGATIVE Team #:_______


Speaker Name
st

ID #
Speaking

Individual Scores 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5
Presence Rhetoric Prebuttal Presence Rhetoric Rebuttal Presence Rhetoric Rebuttal

Teamwork 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

Feedback

Subtotal

Best speaker? Yes No Yes No Yes No

Organization Evidence Speaking

1 2 3 4 5

2nd

Organization Evidence Speaking

3rd

Organization Evidence

Would you nominate the teams best speaker for the Debate Showcase?
Yes! He or she would amaze an audience of hundreds. Not this time.
]

Winning Team? Next Room

Yes!

No!

Thank you for volunteering! Please sign below before returning these scores:

I have followed the script and upheld the Debate Adjudication Code of Conduct. Your name __________________________ Your signature __________________________

USE THIS PAGE TO TAKE NOTES ON SPEAKERS

Affirmative Speaker 1

Negative Speaker 1

Affirmative Speaker 2

Negative Speaker 2

Affirmative Speaker 3

Negative Speaker 3

You might also like