Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

100% found this document useful (1 vote)
91 views38 pages

Lecture8 Interpolationf 2011

Spatial interpolation is the estimation the value of properties at unsampled sites within the area covered by existing observations

Uploaded by

sam13scribd
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
91 views38 pages

Lecture8 Interpolationf 2011

Spatial interpolation is the estimation the value of properties at unsampled sites within the area covered by existing observations

Uploaded by

sam13scribd
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 38

Spatial Interpolation

GEOS 5350 Demers, M.N., Geographic Information Systems Chang, Kang-tsung, Introduction to geographic information systems

Spatial interpolation is the estimation the value of properties at unsampled sites within the area covered by existing observations (control points). Calculates some property of the surface at a given point

Classifications of interpolations
1- Global & Local interpolation 2- Exact interpolation & Inexact Interpolation 3 - Deterministic and Stochastic

1 - Global and Local Interpolation


Global interpolation: uses all available control points Adequate for terraines that do not show abrupt variations Assumes good spatial autocorrelation on regional scales More generalized estimations Local interpolation: uses a sample of control points Adequate for terraines that show abrupt variations Assumes good spatial autocorrelation on local scales More local estimations

2 - Exact interpolation & Inexact Interpolation

Exact interpolation Predicts a value at control points that is the same as the observed values. The interpolation produces a surface that passes by the control points

Continue

Inexact Interpolation Predicts a value for the control points that differ from the observed value

3 - Deterministic and Stochastic


Deterministic interpolation No assessment of errors with the predicted values Stochastic interpolation Offers assessment of errors with predicted values. These methods assume random errors

Examples

I - Global (a) First-order trend surface


First-order trend surface (polynomial)

Example
(1) Set up 3 equations

(2) Re-write in matrix format (3) Calculate


X = 377 Y = 318 X2 = 29007 Y2 = 20714 XY = 23862 YZ = 4445.8 XZ = 5044
X 69 59 75 86 88 Y 76 64 52 73 53 Z 20.82 10.91 10.38 14.6 10.56 X2 4761 3481 5625 7396 7744 Y2 5776 4096 2704 5329 2809 XY 5244 3776 3900 6278 4664 XZ 1437 643.7 778.5 1256 929.3 YZ 1582.32 698.24 539.76 1065.8 559.68

377

318

67.27

29007

20714

23862

5044

4445.8

Continue
(4) Plug in values for 5 points

(5) Solve for b coefficients: Multiply inverse of left matrix by right matrix

(6) Use the b coefficients to calculate z for any point (X,Y) (69, 67)

(b) Higher-order trend surface


First order polynomials (inclined surface) can not represent the complex natural surfaces. A cubic or third order models can better represent such surfaces (e.g., hills, valleys)

Third-order trend surface (nine coefficients)

Example

II - Local
It is all about mechanisms for the selection of a suite of control points

Closest points

Points within a certain radius

(a) - Trends (polynomials) could be local


Local polynomials as opposed to global polynomials could be used as well for better representation of surfaces

(b) - Theissen Polygons


Also called proximal method Attempts to weight data points by area Commonly used for precipitation data

Continue
Triangles are drawn connecting control points (e.g., stations) using the Delaunay triangulation technique (also used for TIN) Lines are drawn perpendicular to sides of triangles at their midpoints Polygons are defined by intersections of these lines Values for control points are assigned to enclosing polygons

(c)- Density Estimation


Simple density functions: Number of points/cell size (e.g., 10,000 m2)(shown in shades of grey) Size of circle centered at center of cell size Other methods include Kernel density estimation Kernel density function is a commonly used alternative

(d)- Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) Interpolation

Estimated value at point 0 Is the z value at control point i Distance between point I and point 0 The larger the k, the greater the influence of neighboring points. S number of used points

Continue
Zi 20.82 10.91 10.38 14.6 10.56 di 18 20.88 32.31 36.05 47.2 di2 324 435.97 1043.9 1299.6 2227.8 1/(di2) 0.0031 0.0023 0.0010 0.0008 0.0004 Zi x 1/(di2) 0.06426 0.02502 0.00994 0.01123 0.00474

SUM

0.0076

0.11520

zi 20.82 10.91 10.38 14.6 10.56

Between Distance points (di) 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 18 20.88 32.31 36.05 47.20

Example
Assuming k=2

Annual precipitation surface created by inverse distance squared


All values are within the maximum & minimum values of known points Small enclosed isolines are typical of this method

(e) - Radial Basis Functions (RBF)

Splines
A large group of interpolation methods Exact interpolators The difference between them is how the surface fits between the control points Each RBF also has a parameter that controls the smoothness of generated surface Differences between the outputs of these methods are small

Continue

Exact Function Good for large smoother surfaces Doesnt work well with abrupt changes

Continue
Creates a surface passing by control point and has the least possible change in slope at all points Unlike the IDW method, predicted values are not limited to the Max and Min dictated by data.

Kriging Next Lecture


Geostatistical Methods
Ordinary Kriging Simple Kriging Universal Kriging Indicator Kriging Probability Kriging Disjunctive Kriging Cokriging

Integrated Seismic Risk Map of Egypt


Generate Egypts first seismic risk map using a GIS approach

Red Sea-related Seismicity

Seismic Risks & Hazards


Seismic hazard --- Strength and frequency of shaking from earthquakes, Seismic risk ---- The chance of losing human life and/or property because of earthquake ground shaking.

Maps in the GIS


Seismic hazard map ---- Probability of occurrence of seismic ground shaking within a certain time frame Fault hazard map -- Surface & subsurface fault zones subject to re-activation, Amplification map -- Distribution of alluvium deposits that amplify ground shaking, Liquefaction map --- Areas susceptible (shallow groundwater, seismically active) to soil (sand/silt) liquefaction, Population density map --- Areas subject to increased risk of loss in human life and property.

Seismic Hazard Map

Probability of occurrence of seismic ground shaking of a certain intensity (peak ground acceleration PGA) in a specified time interval (250 years)

Distribution Map

Frequency Map # of earthquakes/cell

Hazard Fault Map


Faults proximal to earthquake epicenters & could be reactivated under current stress regimes

Hazard Fault Map


Intersection of the fault & distribution maps

Amplification Map
Earthquake ground motions are amplified by alluvium soil deposits

Soil Hazard Liquefaction Map


Intersection of earthquake coverage map with coverage map for soils that are saturated, porous, and have shallow water table (i.e., Nile deposits)

Population Risk Map


Highly populated areas affected by seismicity (low to high PGA)

You might also like