Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
170 views8 pages

5.61 Physical Chemistry 24 Pauli Spin Matrices

The document discusses the representation of spin operators using matrix mechanics. It begins by introducing the abstract spin states α and β that represent the two possible orientations of electron spin. It then explains that operators in wave mechanics turn wavefunctions into other wavefunctions, so in matrix mechanics operators must be represented by matrices that turn vectors into vectors. The key points are: 1) Spin states can be written as linear combinations of α and β and represented by vectors. 2) Integrals of wavefunctions become dot products of vectors. Complex conjugation of wavefunctions becomes taking the adjoint of a vector. 3) Operators are represented by matrices such that vectors are mapped to vectors. As an example, it derives
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
170 views8 pages

5.61 Physical Chemistry 24 Pauli Spin Matrices

The document discusses the representation of spin operators using matrix mechanics. It begins by introducing the abstract spin states α and β that represent the two possible orientations of electron spin. It then explains that operators in wave mechanics turn wavefunctions into other wavefunctions, so in matrix mechanics operators must be represented by matrices that turn vectors into vectors. The key points are: 1) Spin states can be written as linear combinations of α and β and represented by vectors. 2) Integrals of wavefunctions become dot products of vectors. Complex conjugation of wavefunctions becomes taking the adjoint of a vector. 3) Operators are represented by matrices such that vectors are mapped to vectors. As an example, it derives
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

5.

61PhysicalChemistry 24PauliSpinMatrices Page 1


PauliSpinMatrices
Itisabitawkwardtopicturethewavefunctionsforelectronspinbecause
theelectronisntspinninginnormal3Dspace,butinsomeinternaldimension
thatisrolledupinsidetheelectron. Wehaveinventedabstractstates
andthatrepresentthetwopossibleorientationsoftheelectronspin,
butbecausethereisntaclassicalanalogforspinwecantdrawand
wavefunctions. Thissituationcomesupfrequentlyinchemistry. Wewill
oftendealwithmoleculesthatarelargeandinvolvemanyatoms,eachof
whichhasanucleusandmanyelectronsanditwillsimplybeimpossiblefor
ustopicturethewavefunctiondescribingalltheparticlesatonce.
Visualizingone-particlehasbeenhardenough!Inthesesituations,itismost
usefultohaveanabstract wayofmanipulatingoperatorsandwavefunctions
withoutlookingexplicitlyatwhatthewavefunctionoroperatorlookslikein
realspace. ThewonderfultoolthatweusetodothisiscalledMatrix
Mechanics(asopposedtothewavemechanicswehavebeenusingsofar).
Wewillusethesimpleexampleofspintoillustratehowmatrixmechanics
works.
Thebasicideaisthatwecanwriteanyelectronspinstateasalinear
combinationofthetwostatesand:
c

+c

Notethat,fornow,weareignoringthespatialpartoftheelectron
wavefunction(e.g.theangularandradialpartsof).You mightaskhowwe
canbesurethateverystatecanbewritteninthisfashion.Toassure
yourselfthatthisistrue,notethatforthisstate,theprobabilityoffinding
2
2
theelectronwithspinup(down)is c

(c

). Iftherewasastatethat
couldnotbewritteninthisfashion,therewouldhavetobesomeotherspin
state,,sothat
c

+c

+c

2
Inthiscase,however,therewouldbeaprobability c

ofobservingthe
electronwithspin whichweknowexperimentallyisimpossible,asthe
electrononlyhastwoobservablespinstates.
Thebasicideaofmatrixmechanicsisthentoreplace the wavefunction
with a vector:
1
5.61PhysicalChemistry 24PauliSpinMatrices Page 2
|c

|
c

+c


|
\
c

Notethatthisisnotavectorinphysical(x,y,z)spacebutjustaconvenient
waytoarrangethecoefficientsthatdefine. Inparticular,thisisanice
waytoputawavefunctionintoacomputer,ascomputersareveryadeptat
dealingwithvectors.
Now,ourgoalistotranslateeverythingthatwemightwanttodowiththe
wavefunctionintosomethingwecandotothevector . Bygoingthrough
thisstep-by-step,wearriveatafewrules
Integrals are replaced with dot products.Wenotethattheoverlap
betweenanytwowavefunctionscanbewrittenasamodifieddotproduct
betweenthevectors. Forexample,if d

+d

then:
1 0 0 1

* *

* *

* *

* *

*
d =d

d +d

d +d

d +d

d
* *
=d

+d

|c |
=
(
d
*
d
*
)

|

\
c

i
Where,onthelastline,wedefinedtheadjointofavector:

|x
1
|
* *
|

(
x
1
x
2
)
.
\
x
2
Thus, complex conjugation of the wavefunction is replaced by taking the
adjoint of a vector. Notethatwemusttakethetransposeofthevector
andnotjustitscomplexconjugate.Otherwisewhenwetooktheoverlapwe
wouldhave(column)x(column)andthenumberofrowsandcolumnswould
notmatch.
Theserulesleadustonaturaldefinitionsofnormalizationandorthogonality
ofthewavefunctionsintermsofthevectors:
2

*
(

*
)
|
c
c

|
|
d =1 i = c c = c

+ c

=1
\

and
2
5.61PhysicalChemistry 24PauliSpinMatrices Page 3
|c |
d =0 =
(
d d
) |
=d c +d c =0 i

*
c

*

*

Finally,wedliketobeabletoactoperatorsonourstatesinmatrix
mechanics,sothatwecancomputeaveragevalues,solveeigenvalue
equations,etc. Tounderstandhowweshouldrepresentoperators,wenote
thatinwavemechanicsoperatorsturnawavefunctionintoanother
wavefunction. Forexample,themomentumoperatortakesonewavefunction
andreturnsanewwavefunctionthatisthederivativeoftheoriginalone:
x x ( )
p

d
( )
dx
Thus,inorderforoperatorstohavetheanalogousbehaviorinmatrix
mechanics,operatorsmustturnvectorsintovectors. Asitturnsoutthisis
themostbasicpropertyofamatrix:itturnsvectorsintovectors. Thuswe
haveourfinalrule:Operators are represented by matrices.
Asanillustration,the S

z
operatorwillberepresentedbya2x2matrixin
spinspace:
|? ?|
S

z
S
z

|
\
? ?

Wehaveyettodeterminewhattheelementsofthismatrixare(hencethe
questionmarks)butwecanseethatthishasalltherightproperties:vectors
aremappedintovectors:
|? ?|
|c

| |c

' |
S

z
=
|
|
=
|
\
? ?

\
c

\
c

'

andaveragevaluesaremappedintonumbers

*
S

z
d
(
c

*
c

*
)
|? ?
|
|

|
c
c

|
|

\
? ?

Now,theonechallengeisthatwehavetodeterminewhichmatrixbelongsto
agivenoperatorthatis,weneedtofillinthequestionmarksabove. Asan
exercise,wewillshowhowthisisdonebyworkingoutthematrix
representationsof S

2
,S

z
, S

x
and S

y
.
Wellstartwith S

2
. Weknowhow S

2
actsontheandwavefunctions:
3 3
S

2
=
2
S

2
=
2

4 4

5.61PhysicalChemistry 24PauliSpinMatrices Page 4


Nowrepresent S

2
asamatrixwithunknownelements.
|c d|
S
2
=
|
\
e f

Inwavemechanics,operating S

2
ongivesusaneigenvalueback,because
isandeigenfunctionof S

2
(witheigenvalue
4
3

2
). Translatingthisintomatrix
mechanics,whenwemultiplythematrix S
2
timesthevector

,weshould
getthesameeigenvaluebacktimes :
S

2
=
3

2
S
2

=
3

4 4
Inthisway,insteadoftalkingabouteigenfunctions,inmatrixmechanicswe
talkabouteigenvectorsandwesaythat

is an eigenvector of S
2
.
Wecanusethisinformationtoobtaintheunknownconstantsinthematrix
S
2
:
2
3
2 2
3
2
|c d| |1|
2
|1|
S

= S =
| |
=
4
3

|
4 4
\
e f
\
0
\
0

|c| |
3

2
|

|
=

4
|
e
\ \
0

so
c=
3

2
e=0
4
Operatingon
3 3
2
|c d||0|
3
2
|0|
S

2
=
2
S
2
=
| |
=
4

|
4 4
\
e f
\
1
\
1

|d| | 0 |

|
=

3
2 |
\
f
\4

Thus:
d=0 f =
3

2
4
Sofor S
2
wehave
S
2
=
3

2
|

1 0|
|
4
\
0 1

Wecanderive S
z
inasimilarmanner.Weknowitseigenstatesaswell:
S

z 2 z 2
Sothatthematrixmustsatisfy:

5.61PhysicalChemistry 24PauliSpinMatrices Page 5


|c d| |1| |1|
S

z
=
| |
=
2 |
2
\
e f
\
0
\
0

|c| |
2

|
=
|
\
e
\
0

whichgivesus
c= e=0
2
Analogousoperationsongive
|c d| |0| |0|
S

z
=
| |
=
2 |
2
\
e f
\
1
\
1

|d| | 0 |

|
=

|
\
f
\

2
d=0 f =
2
Compilingtheseresults,wearriveatthematrixrepresentationof S :
z
|1 0 |
S
z
=
|
2
\
0 1

Now,weneedtoobtain S
x
and S
y
,whichturnsouttobeabitmoretricky.
Werememberfromouroperatorderivationofangularmomentumthatwe
canre-writethe S and S intermsofraisingandloweringoperators:
x y
1 1
S
x
= (S
+
+S
-
) S
y
= (S
+
S
-
)
2 2i
whereweknowthat
S

=c S

=0 and S

=c S

=0
+ + +
wherec
+
andc
-
areconstantstobedetermined.Thereforefortheraising
operatorwehave
S

=c
|c d||0|
=
|c
+
|
S

=0
|c d||1|
=
|0|
+ + | | | + | | |
\
e f
\
1
\
0
\
e f
\
0
\
0

d=c f =0 c=0 e=0


+
Andfortheloweringoperator
|c d| |1| |0| |c d||0| |0|
S

=c


| |
=
|
S

=0
| |
=
|
\
e f
\
0
\
c
\
e f
\
1
\
0

c=0 e=c d=0 f =0

Thus
|0 1| |0 0|
S
+
=c
+ |
S
-
=c
|
\
0 0
\
1 0

=
5.61PhysicalChemistry 24PauliSpinMatrices Page 6
Thereforewefindfor S and S
x y
1|0 c | 1| 0 ic |
S
x
=
1
2
(S
+
+S

) =

+
|
S
y
=
2
1
i
(S
+
S

) =

+
|
2
\
c

2
\
ic

Thus,wejustneedtodeterminetheconstants:c
+
andc
-
. Wedothisby
usingtwobitsofinformation. First,wenotethat S
x
and S
y
areobservable,
sotheymustbeHermitian.Thus,
*
1 1
*
| 0 c | |0|
| | 0 c ||1|
|

*S

x
d =
(

*S

x
d
)
(1 0)

1
c
2
0
+
|
1
|
=

(0 1)

1
c
2
0
+
|
0
|
|
\2 \
\ \2 \

*
c =c
+
Thisresultreducesourworktofindingoneconstant(c
+
)intermsofwhich
wehave
1| 0 c
+
| 1| 0 ic
+
|
S
x
=
* |
S
y
=
* |
2
\
c
+
0

2
\
ic
+
0

Notethat S and S havetheinterestingpropertythattheyareequalto


x y
theiradjoints:

1| 0 c | 1| 0 c |
S
x

=
*
+
|
=
*
+
|
=S
x
2
\
c
+
0

2
\
c
+
0

1| 0 ic | 1| 0 ic |
S
y

=
*
+
|
=
*
+
|
=S
y
2
\
ic
+
0

2
\
ic
+
0

Thispropertyturnsouttobetrueingeneral:Hermitian operators are


represented by matrices that are equal to their own adjoint. Theseself-
adjointmatricesaretypicallycalledHermitianmatricesforthisreason,and
theadjointoperationissometimescalledHermitianconjugation.
Todeterminetheremainingconstant,weusethefactthat S
2
= S
x
2
+S
y
2
+S
z
2
.
Plugginginourmatrixrepresentationsfor S
x
, S
y
, S
z
and S
2
wefind:
3
2
|1 0|
2
|1 0 | |1 0 | 1| 0 c
+
| | 0 c
+
| 1| 0 ic
+
| | 0 ic
+
|
=
| | |
+
* | * |
+
* | * |
4
\
0 1

4
\
0 1
\
0 1

4
\
c
+
0
\
c
+
0

4
\
ic
+
0
\
ic
+
0

2 2

2
|1 0| c |1 0| c |1 0|
+ +
=
|
+
|
+
|
4
\
0 1

4
\
0 1

4
\
0 1

2 2
3
2

2
c
+
c
+
= + +
4 4 4 4
2
2
c
+
c =
+
5.61PhysicalChemistry 24PauliSpinMatrices Page 7
whereonthelastline,wehavemadeanarbitrarychoiceofthesignofc
+
.
Thuswearriveatthefinalexpressionsfor S and S
x y
|0 1| |0 i |
S
x
=
|
S
y
=
|
2
\
1 0

2
\
i 0

Insummary,then,thematrixrepresentationsofourspinoperatorsare:
|0 1| |0 i| |1 0 |
2
3
2
|1 0|
S
x
=
|
S
y
=
|
S
z
=
|
S =
|
2
\
1 0

2
\
i 0

2
\
0 1

4
\
0 1

Givenourrepresentationsof S
x
, S
y
and S
z
nowwecanwork outanyproperty
welikebydoingsomelinearalgebra. Forexample,wecanworkoutthe
commutatorof S and S :
x y
|0 1||0 i| |0 i||0 1|
S , S (=S S S S =

x y

x y y x | |

| |
2
\
1 0

2
\
i 0

2
\
i 0

2
\
1 0

2
|0 1||0 i| |0 i | |0 1|(
=
| |

| |(
4
\
1 0
\
i 0
\
i 0
\
1 0

|i 0| |i 0|
(

2
|i 0|
=
|

|(
=
|
4
\
0 i
\
0 i

2
\
0 i

S
x
, S
y

(=iS
z
Itiscomfortingtoseethatthematricesthatrepresenttheangular
momentumoperatorsobeythecommutationrelationsforangularmomentum!
Itissimilarlypossibletoworkouttheeigenvaluesof S

2
,S

z
and S

x
by
computingtheeigenvaluesof S
x
, S
y
and S
z
;averagevaluescanbeobtained
bytaking(row)*x(matrix)x(column)products. Wearethusinapositionto
computeanythingwewantfortheseoperators.Asitturnsout,anyoperator
inthis2x2spacecanbewrittenasalinearcombinationof S
x
, S
y
, S
z
and S
2
.
So,insomesense,wenowhavealltheinformationwecouldpossiblywant
aboutspin-systems.
InhonorofPauli,itisconventionaltodefinethedimensionlessversionsof
S
x
, S
y
, S
z
(i.e.matriceswithouttheleadingfactorof / 2)asPauliSpin
matrices:
|0 1| |0 i| |1 0|

|
\
1 0
\
i 0
\
0 1

OneofthereasonsthePaulispinmatricesareuseful(orequivalentlythe
matrixrepresentationsof S
x
, S
y
and S
z
)isthattheyarethesimplest
5.61PhysicalChemistry 24PauliSpinMatrices Page 8
possibleplacetopracticeourskillsatusingmatrixmechanics. Wewillsee
lateronthatmorecomplicatedsystemscanalsobedescribedbymatrix-
vectoroperations. However,inthesecasesthematriceswillhavemany
moreelementssometimeseveninfinitenumbersofelements! Therefore,it
isbesttogetsomepracticeonthesesimple2x2matricesbeforetakingon
themorecomplicatedcases.

You might also like