Boj 091030
Boj 091030
Minutes of the
Monetary Policy Meeting
on October 30, 2009
(English translation prepared by the Bank's staff based on the Japanese original)
Please contact the Bank of Japan at the address below in advance to request permission
when reproducing or copying the content of this document for commercial purposes.
Please credit the source when quoting, reproducing, or copying the content of this
document.
A Monetary Policy Meeting of the Bank of Japan Policy Board was held in the
Head Office of the Bank of Japan in Tokyo on Friday, October 30, 2009, from 9:00 a.m. to
1:00 p.m.1
Reporting Staff
Mr. A. Horii, Executive Director (Assistant Governor)
Mr. K. Ido, Executive Director
Mr. H. Nakaso, Executive Director
Mr. M. Amamiya, Director-General, Monetary Affairs Department
Mr. T. Kato, Associate Director-General, Monetary Affairs Department
Mr. H. Toyama, Director-General, Financial Markets Department
Mr. K. Momma, Director-General, Research and Statistics Department
Mr. T. Sekine, Associate Director-General, Research and Statistics Department
Mr. H. Ono, Director-General, International Department
1
The minutes of this meeting were approved by the Policy Board at the Monetary Policy Meeting
held on November 19 and 20, 2009 as "a document describing an outline of the discussion at the
meeting" stipulated in Article 20, paragraph 1 of the Bank of Japan Act of 1997. Those present are
referred to by their titles at the time of the meeting.
1
Secretariat of the Monetary Policy Meeting
Mr. Y. Iino, Director-General, Secretariat of the Policy Board
Mr. T. Tachibana, Director, Deputy Head of Secretarial Services for the Board,
Secretariat of the Policy Board
Mr. T. Sakamoto, Associate Director-General, Monetary Affairs Department2
Mr. K. Nakamura, Senior Economist, Monetary Affairs Department
Mr. K. Nishizaki, Senior Economist, Monetary Affairs Department
2
Mr. T. Sakamoto was present from 11:25 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
2
I. Summary of Staff Reports on Economic and Financial Developments3
A. Money Market Operations in the Intermeeting Period
The Bank conducted money market operations in accordance with the guideline
decided at the previous meeting on October 13 and 14, 2009.4 The uncollateralized
overnight call rate had been at around 0.1 percent.
With a view to ensuring market stability, the Bank continued to conduct money
market operations in a flexible manner in response to changes in the market situation, as
evidenced by its continued provision of ample funds and its active purchases of Japanese
government securities (JGSs) and CP under repurchase agreements. The Bank also
continued to conduct outright purchases of CP, special funds-supplying operations to
facilitate corporate financing, and U.S. dollar funds-supplying operations against pooled
collateral. In outright purchases of CP and U.S. dollar funds-supplying operations against
pooled collateral, the bidding amounts had decreased further, as financial institutions'
demand for liquidity had declined reflecting a recovery in market functioning. In
particular, there was no bidding in three recently conducted outright purchases of CP.
3
Reports were made based on information available at the time of the meeting.
4
The guideline was as follows:
The Bank of Japan will encourage the uncollateralized overnight call rate to remain at
around 0.1 percent.
3
moving at around 10,000 yen, roughly the same level observed at the time of the previous
meeting. Long-term interest rates in Japan had risen slightly, partly because of the rise in
U.S. and European long-term interest rates. The benchmark rate had recently been at
around 1.4 percent.
The yen had depreciated slightly against the U.S. dollar and had recently been
traded at around 91 yen to the dollar.
4
United States and Europe, stock prices had been more or less flat, while long-term interest
rates had risen somewhat.
2. Financial environment
The financial environment, with some lingering severity, was increasingly
showing signs of improvement.
According to the indicators that had become available since the previous meeting
held on October 13 and 14, issuance spreads on low-rated CP had declined to a level below
those seen just before the failure of Lehman Brothers, and the number of firms issuing
corporate bonds had continued to increase. Issuing conditions for CP and corporate bonds
had remained favorable, except for low-rated corporate bonds. Meanwhile, financial
positions at small firms had remained weak.
5
II. Summary of Discussions by the Policy Board on Economic and Financial
Developments
A. Economic Developments
Members shared the view that overseas economies had picked up, mainly
reflecting the positive effects of policy measures taken around the world, and were likely to
continue improving.
Many members said that the state of global financial markets had been improving.
A few members said that spreads on U.S. dollar-denominated term instruments had been
stable, at around the level seen just before the BNP Paribas shock. Some members,
however, were of the view that global financial markets remained somewhat unstable, since
U.S. and European financial institutions still held significant amounts of impaired assets
and the outlook for the world economy was highly uncertain.
Members concurred that U.S. economic activity had started to pick up and was
likely to continue improving. Many members, noting that the real GDP growth rate
became positive in the July-September quarter for the first time in five quarters, pointed to
the evident positive effects of the government's car sales promotion measures and the tax
credit for first-time homebuyers. As for the outlook, some members said that, although
economic activity was likely to continue improving, mainly as a result of the progress in
inventory adjustments and the positive policy effects, the pace of economic recovery was
likely to be only moderate since the policy effects were expected to abate in a situation
where balance-sheet adjustments had been weighing on the economy.
With regard to the economy of the euro area, members shared the view that
economic conditions were showing signs of recovery due to an increase in exports to
outside the euro area and a rise in production, and were likely to continue improving, albeit
at a moderate pace.
As for emerging economies, many members said that the Chinese economy had
continued to grow at a relatively rapid pace, led mainly by domestic demand, and economic
conditions in the NIEs and the ASEAN countries were improving reflecting the increase in
exports to China. One member attributed the favorable economic conditions in China
partly to the success of the measures taken by the government in recent years to redistribute
income from urban areas to agricultural areas. Some other members said that there might
be an overheating in the Chinese economy, as exemplified by a significant surge in asset
6
prices and robust growth in fixed asset investment.
Based on the above discussions on economic and financial conditions abroad,
members discussed the state of Japan's economy. They concurred that, as with other
economies, it had moved out of the phase of rapid and significant deterioration observed in
the second half of fiscal 2008, and had started to pick up on the back of increases in exports
and production. Many members, however, referred to the fact that domestic private
demand continued to be weak, due in particular to the continued severity in the employment
and income situation. Some members commented that, although the economy had started
to pick up, it should be borne in mind that the level of economic activity was still low.
Regarding developments in each demand component, many members said that
exports had been rising, mainly due to the improvement in overseas economic conditions,
and were likely to continue increasing. A few members, however, raised the possibility
that abatement of the policy effects abroad might adversely affect exports, especially of
automobiles and automobile-related goods.
Members shared the view that public investment had been increasing, albeit with
some fluctuations, but was expected to level off and start decreasing gradually.
Many members were of the view that the decline in business fixed investment,
which mainly reflected weak corporate profits, had been moderating. A few members
added that the pick-up in shipments of capital goods in the July-September quarter
supported such a view. One member, however, highlighted the fact that domestic orders
for machine tools in September were less than half of the year-earlier level, and expressed
the opinion that the level of business fixed investment remained very low.
Most members expressed the view that private consumption had remained
generally weak, although sales of some durable consumer goods had continued to rise
primarily as a result of the positive effects of various policy measures.
Members agreed that production had been rising, reflecting progress in inventory
adjustments and policy effects both at home and abroad. As for the outlook, they shared
the view that production was likely to continue increasing for the time being, mainly due to
the policy effects and overseas economic improvement. Some members said that firms
were still cautious regarding future developments with respect to production in 2010
onward because developments in final demand remained highly uncertain.
Members concurred that the employment and income situation had remained
7
severe. Some members, noting that the number of workers deemed more than necessary
was increasing at firms, expressed the opinion that firms' perception of excess labor
remained strong.
Many members said that the year-on-year decline in the CPI (excluding fresh
food) moderated slightly in September, after accelerating somewhat mainly due to the
prices of petroleum products, which were lower than their high levels of a year before, in
addition to the substantial slack persisting in the economy as a whole.
B. Financial Developments
Members agreed that the financial environment, with some lingering severity, was
increasingly showing signs of improvement.
Members concurred that issuing conditions for CP and corporate bonds had been
favorable, except for low-rated corporate bonds. Many members were of the view that
issuing conditions for CP had been favorable on the whole, as reflected in the fact that the
issuance spreads on CP of all ratings, including those rated a-2, had narrowed to levels seen
just before the failure of Lehman Brothers in autumn 2008. Regarding issuing conditions
for corporate bonds, some members commented that there seemed to be some overheating
in the market because investors had continued to be willing to purchase bonds rated A or
higher, as evidenced by many cases in which bonds were issued at the bottom of the
marketing range and those in which bond issuance exceeded the initially planned amount.
Many members expressed the view that the continued sluggish issuance of low-rated
corporate bonds was mainly attributable to the increase in credit risk due to weak business
performance and also to structural factors -- such as weak demand by Japanese firms with
low credit ratings for bond issuance -- rather than the market dysfunction. Based on this
discussion, most members agreed that functioning of the CP and corporate bond markets
taken as a whole had improved greatly. One member, however, expressed the opinion that
the corporate bond market would likely continue to be nervous, given that the possibility of
firms' downgradings could not be dismissed as there remained uncertainty about
developments in corporate profits in the period approaching spring 2010, and that the
Alternative Dispute Resolution -- a system that could be used for the revitalization and/or
reorganization of firms -- was likely to be increasingly adopted by large firms.
As for firms' financial positions, members agreed that it had become much easier
8
for large firms to satisfy their funding needs, while small firms had continued to have
difficulty in doing so. A few members, referring to the fact that some firms had reduced
the on-hand liquidity that they had accumulated for unexpected events, expressed the view
that funding, not only for the run-up to the calendar year-end but also the fiscal year-end,
had mostly been completed, at least among large firms. Some other members commented
that uncertainty about corporate financing had decreased as Japan's economy had started to
pick up. These members added that, nevertheless, attention should be paid to the fact that
firms were still concerned about their cash availability -- especially during the run-up to the
fiscal year-end, when credit demand increased -- partly because of their experience of the
financial crisis since autumn 2008.
9
in economic indicators.
Regarding the outlook for prices, members agreed on the following assessment.
While the domestic corporate goods price index (CGPI) was expected to continue declining
on a year-on-year basis in the second half of fiscal 2009 due to the deterioration in the
aggregate supply and demand balance, the pace of decline would likely slow down
reflecting the earlier rise in commodity prices. The rate of decline in the CGPI was likely
to gradually moderate from fiscal 2010 onward as the slack in the economy dissipated.
The year-on-year rate of decline in the CPI (excluding fresh food) was expected to slow
down significantly in the second half of fiscal 2009, reflecting the waning effects of the
drop in the prices of petroleum products from a year before. From fiscal 2010 onward,
with medium- to long-term inflation expectations likely to remain stable, the rate of decline
in the CPI (excluding fresh food) was likely to continue to moderate as the aggregate supply
and demand balance improved.
Members shared the view that the upside and downside risks that could be
anticipated at present were as follows. In relation to economic activity, they were (1) the
possible consequences of balance-sheet adjustments in the United States and Europe, (2)
developments in emerging and commodity-exporting economies, (3) future developments in
the various policy measures taken by countries around the globe, and (4) firms' medium- to
long-term expectations of future economic growth. In relation to the outlook for prices,
such risks were (1) firms' and households' medium- to long-term inflation expectations, (2)
uncertainty with respect to gauging the degree of slack in the economy or the state of
utilization of labor and production capacity, and (3) developments in import prices.
With regard to the possible consequences of balance-sheet adjustments in the
United States and Europe, many members noted the possibility that adjustment pressures
might constrain households' and firms' spending more than expected and lead to
weaker-than-projected growth of these economies. Some members, raising the possibility
that further deterioration in the quality of commercial real estate loans might delay disposal
of impaired assets at banks, said that the risk that an adverse feedback loop between
financial and economic activity might reintensify had decreased but could not be ruled out
yet. On the other hand, one member said that the recent recovery in profits of major
overseas financial institutions and firms suggested that balance-sheet adjustments might
progress faster than expected.
10
Many members expressed the view that developments in emerging and
commodity-exporting economies and future developments in the various policy measures
taken by countries around the globe were closely related to each other. On this point,
some members commented that emerging and commodity-exporting economies might grow
at a faster rate than expected as a result of large-scale stimulus measures taken in these
economies coupled with capital inflow from advanced economies reflecting monetary
easing there. These members added that an overheating in emerging and
commodity-exporting economies was likely to induce a rise in commodity prices, which
would in turn bring about a worsening of Japan's terms of trade and pose a downside risk to
the country's economy.
As for firms' medium- to long-term expectations of future economic growth, many
members said that it was possible that economic activity, particularly business fixed
investment, might deviate downward from the projected growth path if there was a decline
in such expectations, triggered for example by a decline in overseas economies. Some
members commented that, if the growth rate gap between Japan and emerging economies
widened, Japanese firms might accelerate their shift to overseas production and domestic
business fixed investment consequently might become weaker than projected. One
member said that some firms' revisions to their sales projections -- upward for the first half
of fiscal 2009 but downward for the full fiscal year -- suggested that the risk of a decline in
firms' medium- to long-term growth expectations might have increased. Meanwhile, a
different member expressed the view that there was also a possibility that such expectations
would increase if new policy measures to be taken by the new administration produced
positive effects.
Regarding upside and downside risks to prices, many members said that attention
should continue to be paid to the risk that, in a situation where the substantial slack in the
economy was likely to persist, prices might become weaker than expected if firms' and
households' medium- to long-term inflation expectations declined. On the other hand,
some members expressed the opinion that an overheating in emerging economies and the
resultant rise in commodity prices might cause prices to become stronger than expected
through an increase in import prices.
Based on the above considerations, members assessed the economic and price
situation from two perspectives.
11
Members made an assessment in terms of the first perspective, that is to say, they
assessed the most likely outlook for economic activity and prices through fiscal 2011.
They agreed that Japan's economy was likely to continue improving and the decline in
prices was likely to moderate gradually. They shared the view that, if these developments
continued, there were prospects for the economy to return to a sustainable growth path with
price stability in the longer term.
Members then made an assessment in terms of the second perspective, that is to
say, they examined the risks that they considered most relevant to the conduct of monetary
policy, including risks that had a longer time horizon than the first perspective. In the area
of economic activity, members shared the view that, while there were some upside risk
factors, such as economic developments in emerging and commodity-exporting economies,
there were still downside risk factors, although somewhat diminished, such as the possible
negative consequences of balance-sheet adjustments in the United States and Europe or
potential changes in firms' medium- to long-term growth expectations. Regarding the
outlook for prices, they concurred that, while there was a possibility that inflation would
rise more than expected due to an increase in commodity prices brought about by higher
growth rates in emerging and commodity-exporting economies, there was a risk that the rate
of inflation might fall due, for example, to a decline in medium- to long-term inflation
expectations.
With regard to the balance of upside and downside risks to economic activity,
many members expressed the view that they were generally more balanced compared with
the time when the April 2009 Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (hereafter the
Outlook Report) was released. However, one member commented that, in assessing the
balance of the risks, not only a comparison with the previous assessment but also
examination from various aspects was necessary, citing the following examples of such
aspects: the distinction between the short-term and long-term risk balances, a comparison
between the periods of large economic swings and ordinary economic cycles, and a
comparison of views with those of the overseas authorities. A few members followed this
argument with their view that -- while seeing risks as tilted to the downside in the short term,
especially taking into account the possible negative consequences of balance-sheet
adjustments in the United States and Europe -- they saw risks as somewhat tilted to the
upside in the longer term in view of the strength in emerging and commodity-exporting
12
economies. On this point, some other members said that they viewed risks as balanced or
somewhat tilted to the downside even in the latter half of the projection period.
13
contraction in the period immediately after autumn 2008, and had been highly effective in
securing market stability. Some members said that the effects of the conventional
funds-supplying operations against pooled collateral and the temporary special
funds-supplying operations to facilitate corporate financing were becoming less different as
financial markets stabilized and the bid rates in the former declined to about the same level
as the fixed rate of 0.1 percent applied to the latter. These members expressed the opinion
that this special measure had largely served its intended purpose, but the Bank nevertheless
should continue with its implementation through the fiscal year-end to fully ensure market
stability. Based on this discussion, members agreed that the effective period of this special
measure should be extended to March 2010.
Members also exchanged views on the way to conduct market operations from
April 2010 onward. Some members said that the special funds-supplying operations to
facilitate corporate financing had produced a negative side effect, in that issuance rates on
some high-rated CP were below yields on government bills. Some members, in view of
this side effect, were of the opinion that, with less of a difference in the impact between the
conventional funds-supplying operations against pooled collateral and the temporary special
funds-supplying operations to facilitate corporate financing, using the former was more
appropriate than the latter for the purpose of ensuring market stability and facilitating
corporate financing. In their view, this was because for the former the range of eligible
collateral was wider and the maturity could be changed more flexibly to meet liquidity
demand in financial markets. Based on this discussion, most members shared the view
that the special funds-supplying operations to facilitate corporate financing should be
completed at the end of March 2010, and that from April 2010 onward, in place of this
special measure, the Bank should make full use of conventional operation tools such as the
funds-supplying operations against pooled collateral -- for which a wider range of collateral
was eligible -- to provide ample liquidity. One member added that, during this transition,
the Bank should make efforts to curb interest rates on term instruments. Subsequently,
most members said that providing advance notice about the completion of the special
measure and the Bank's thinking on its conduct of market operations thereafter would
increase the predictability in the markets of the future course of market operations, and
thereby alleviate market anxiety. Counter to this view, one member said that announcing
the future completion of the special measure at this point entailed the risks of impacting
14
market stability and undermining the clarity of the Bank's stance to maintain the
accommodative financial environment. Meanwhile, a different member expressed the
view that, when judged necessary, the Bank should employ appropriate measures --
including reutilization of the special funds-supplying operations to facilitate corporate
financing -- in a flexible and timely manner. All other members agreed with this view.
Some members were of the opinion that the expansion in the range of corporate
debt and asset-backed CP (ABCP) eligible as collateral had contributed to a certain extent
in relieving concerns about corporate financing, given that a considerable amount of such
debt had still been pledged as collateral for the Bank's funds-supplying operations. Some
other members expressed the view that, because most of the underlying assets of ABCP
were of types such as firms' receivables and credits extended by firms, the expansion in the
range of eligible collateral was also contributing to the facilitation of financing of small
firms. Based on this discussion, many members said that, in view of some lingering
severity in overall corporate financing conditions, the expansion in the range of eligible
collateral should be extended through the end of 2010 so that the Bank could provide
longer-term funds maturing beyond end-September 2010 -- the end of a semiannual book
closing period for many Japanese firms.
Many members expressed the view that the complementary deposit facility had
been effective in controlling interest rates while also providing ample liquidity. Members
concurred that the facility should remain in effect for the time being, because it was
necessary in order to provide ample funds sufficient to meet liquidity demand in financial
markets for securing market stability.
After examining and discussing the impact and necessity of individual temporary
measures comprehensively, members concurred that, for the purpose of increasing
predictability in the markets, it was desirable to make decisions on individual temporary
measures concurrently at this meeting and make them public immediately thereafter.
Some members were of the view that, if the Bank were to make public decisions
on individual temporary measures immediately after this meeting, it would have to clearly
explain to the markets that any announced changes regarding such measures did not indicate
a shift in its monetary easing stance. Following this suggestion, members agreed to clearly
decide the future course of monetary policy and announce it together with decisions on
temporary measures.
15
As for the future conduct of monetary policy, members said that there were
prospects for Japan's economy to return to a sustainable growth path with price stability in
the longer term, but noted that the economy at this point was still on its way toward such a
path. They also said that it was important to acknowledge that, while there were some
upside risk factors to the economy, such as economic developments in emerging economies,
there still were downside risk factors, such as the possible negative consequences of
balance-sheet adjustments in the United States and Europe. Based on this view, they
concurred that, in the conduct of monetary policy, the Bank would aim to maintain the
extremely accommodative financial environment and also provide steady support for
Japan's economy to return to a sustainable growth path with price stability, and that this
consensus view would be presented in the October Outlook Report. With respect to the
conduct of monetary policy for some time ahead, members agreed that the Bank should
maintain the extremely accommodative financial environment by holding interest rates at
their current low levels and providing ample funds sufficient to meet demand in financial
markets, and that this consensus view would be presented in the statement to be released
immediately after the meeting.
16
on the manner of dealing with special funds-supplying operations to facilitate corporate
financing by taking into account firms' concerns about their cash availability toward the
fiscal year-end and the need for the Bank's provision of ample funds.
(3) In a situation where the manner of dealing with unconventional policy measures by
central banks around the world was drawing attention, the government expected the
Bank to clearly explain the consistency between the Bank's judgment regarding the
manner of dealing with various temporary measures and its cautious outlook for
economic activity and prices, which would be presented in the October Outlook Report,
such that the Bank's intention and thinking would be communicated accurately.
The representative from the Cabinet Office made the following remarks.
(1) In the government's assessment, the Japanese economy had been picking up but the
recovery was not autonomous, and the situation remained difficult as evidenced by the
high unemployment rate. The government believed that this was broadly in line with
the Bank's assessment to be presented in the Outlook Report, and thus there was a
generally shared understanding about the economic conditions between the government
and the Bank.
(2) As the Prime Minister stated in his policy speech on October 26, 2009, the government
considered the following challenges to be of importance: (1) to put the Japanese
economy on a recovery track driven by autonomous private-sector demand, while
paying careful attention to economic trends and addressing such issues as the further
deterioration of the employment situation, stagnant consumption, and the severe
difficulties faced by local economies and cash-strapped small and medium-sized
enterprises; and (2) to ensure sustainable growth while heeding the need for
international policy coordination. The government would swiftly implement the
"Emergency Employment Measures" announced on October 23, 2009, continue to pay
attention to economic developments and the employment situation, and take decisive
actions, using political leadership, in response to these developments.
(3) The government expected the Bank to pay attention to the risk of deflation and continue
to support the economy through the conduct of monetary policy. It also expected the
Bank to carefully examine market developments and take appropriate measures in order
to facilitate flow of funds to firms, because they continued to face a severe business
17
environment and difficulty in funding.
(4) It was important that the Bank and the government frequently exchange views
regarding economic and financial developments in order to appropriately conduct their
respective policies. The government would like to propose that the two entities hold
meetings, in view of Article 4 of the Bank of Japan Act of 1997.
In response to the remarks made by the representative from the Cabinet Office, the
chairman expressed the following view with regard to the Bank's communication with the
government: (1) in accordance with the Bank of Japan Act, the Bank had been engaged in
exchanging views in an appropriate manner with the government and would continue to do
so; and (2) the conduct of monetary policy would ultimately be discussed and decided by
the Bank's Policy Board at the Monetary Policy Meetings pursuant to the Bank of Japan Act,
but the Bank would like to continue engaging in an appropriate exchange of views with the
government, as part of the basis for discussions at the Monetary Policy Meetings, regarding
assessment of economic and financial developments.
V. Votes
A. Vote on the Guideline for Money Market Operations
Based on the above discussions, members agreed that it was appropriate to
maintain the current guideline for money market operations, which encouraged the
uncollateralized overnight call rate to remain at around 0.1 percent.
To reflect this view, the chairman formulated the following proposal and put it to a
vote.
The Chairman's Policy Proposal on the Guideline for Money Market Operations:
1. The guideline for money market operations for the intermeeting period ahead will be as
follows.
The Bank of Japan will encourage the uncollateralized overnight call rate
to remain at around 0.1 percent.
18
Votes for the proposal: Mr. M. Shirakawa, Mr. H. Yamaguchi, Mr. K. G. Nishimura,
Ms. M. Suda, Mr. A. Mizuno, Mr. T. Noda, Mr. S. Nakamura, and Mr. H.
Kamezaki.
Votes against the proposal: None.
19
Votes for the proposal: Mr. A. Mizuno.
Votes against the proposal: Mr. M. Shirakawa, Mr. H. Yamaguchi, Mr. K. G.
Nishimura, Ms. M. Suda, Mr. T. Noda, Mr. S. Nakamura, and Mr. H. Kamezaki.
Votes for the proposal: Mr. M. Shirakawa, Mr. H. Yamaguchi, Mr. K. G. Nishimura,
Ms. M. Suda, Mr. A. Mizuno, Mr. T. Noda, Mr. S. Nakamura, and Mr. H.
Kamezaki.
Votes against the proposal: None.
20
Attachment
At the Monetary Policy Meeting held today, the Policy Board of the Bank of Japan made
the following decisions on the future conduct of monetary policy and various temporary
measures regarding money market operations.
1. Monetary policy
The Bank will maintain the extremely accommodative financial environment for some
time by holding interest rates at their current low levels and providing ample funds
sufficient to meet demand in financial markets.
The Policy Board decided, by a unanimous vote,5 to set the following guideline for
money market operations for the intermeeting period:
The Bank of Japan will encourage the uncollateralized overnight call rate
to remain at around 0.1 percent.
5
Voting for the action: Mr. M. Shirakawa, Mr. H. Yamaguchi, Mr. K. G. Nishimura, Ms. M. Suda,
Mr. A. Mizuno, Mr. T. Noda, Mr. S. Nakamura, and Mr. H. Kamezaki.
Voting against the action: None.
6
Mr. A. Mizuno voted against the expiration of special funds-supplying operations to facilitate
corporate financing at the end of March 2010 and that of outright purchases of corporate bonds at
the end of 2009.
21
outright purchases of CP and corporate bonds, since the autumn of 2008. Japan's
financial environment, with some lingering severity, has been increasingly showing
signs of improvement, particularly in the CP and corporate bond markets. Going
forward, in order to ensure financial market stability and thereby facilitate corporate
financing, it becomes necessary to adopt the most effective method for money market
operations that conforms to changes in financial markets. Based on this
understanding, the Bank made the following decisions on the temporary measures.
22