LKMT
Industry Academia Workshop on Design of Refinery Distillation Columns
October23rd 24th 2013
Di till ti Equipment
Distillation
E i
t Design
D i
: Methodology
M th d l
and
d Practices
P
ti
S.K.
S
K Saxena
Saxena, AGM
EIL, New Delhi
Selection of contacting device for Columns
The selection process for tower internals can be
straightforward for some designs, but it could be
difficult for others as It depends on various
factors like whether its a Grass root design or a
revamp activity.
21 October 2013
Choices Available (Contacting Devices)
There are two broad categories of contacting devices:
Trays (Vales/Sieves/Bubble Caps etc.)
Packed Beds (Structured or Random Packing)
21 October 2013
Contacting Devices:
Trays
Packing
21 October 2013
Selection of contacting device depends upon
Operating pressure
Turndown Ratio
Foaming Tendency
Solids present, dirty or polymerized solution handling
Heat removal requirements
q
21 October 2013
A Typical Tray column :
21 October 2013
Types of Trays
Trays with Down comer
Valve
Sieve
Bubble Cap
Trays without Down comer
Shed Deck
ShedDual Flow
Baffle
Disc & Donut
Ri l
Ripple
High capacity Trays (Proprietary Design)
Multi down comer trays
Pro valve, Triton, Nye, SuperFrac, MVG
Collector/ Chimney Trays
Non Fractionation Trays
Non21 October 2013
Valve Trays:
Vapor and Liquid Contacting Mechanism in Valve Trays
A li ti
Applications:
Offer high capacity & good efficiency
Good turndown characteristics
Maximum application-widely used in almost all applications.
Cheaper and simple in fabrication.
21 October 2013
Sieve Trays:
Vapor and Liquid Contacting Mechanism in Sieves
Applications:
System where high capacity near design are to be maintained in
continuous service.
Poor turndown characteristics as compared to valve trays
Suitable for Liquid-liquid
q
q
extraction applications
pp
21 October 2013
Bubble Caps:
Vapor and Liquid Contacting Mechanism in Bubble
Caps
A li ti
Applications:
Suitable for all services, except extremely coking, polymer formation
or other high fouling conditions.
conditions
Used for extremely low flow conditions i.e. good turndown characteristics
& offer maximum flexibility in flow range.
21 October 2013
10
Advantages of Trays
Tray columns exhibit wider operating range than
packed columns i.e. having Potential to handle vapor &
liquid loadings
Very low liquid rates leads to incomplete wetting of
packing as compared to trays thus having higher
contacting efficiency
High residence time provided for liquid on trays
If solids are present in the fluid, tray columns can be
designed
g
to permit
p
easier cleaning.
g
21 October 2013
11
Comparison of Commonly Used Trays
Parameters
Bubble*
Sieve
Valve
Capacity %
100
120-150
120-150
Efficiency %
100
105 115
105-115
105 115
105-115
Flexibility or
turndown
10:1
20:1 (possible)
2:1
3:1 ( possible)
4:1
6:1 (possible)
Entrainment
300
100
Least
Cost %
100
70-85
70
Fouling service
suitability
Fair
Good (for large
holes)
Good
Tray spacing
24-36
20-30
18-30
*With bubble cap trays as base case
21 October 2013
12
OTHER TYPE OF TRAYS:
1. Baffle Trays / Shed deck
2. Ripple Tray
3 Disc and Donut tray
3.
4. Dual Flow tray
21 October 2013
13
Applications Other Types of Trays
Type
Applications
Dual flow /Ripple
trays
Same as for sieve trays.
trays
Higher capacity but low efficiency
Poor turndown characteristics
Baffle trays / shed
deck/ Disc & Donut
Good for heat transfer applications
Can handle coke & solids.
21 October 2013
14
CLASSIFICATION OF TRAYS
Based on Liquid Flow Paths:
Single Pass
Two Pass
21 October 2013
15
CLASSIFICATION OF TRAYS
Three Pass
Four Pass
21 October 2013
16
High Capacity Trays (HCT)
HCT
21 October 2013
17
Difference in Configuration:
Major difference in Conventional & High capacity
trays are due to modification in the type/
construction of the internals :
Modification in active area
Modification in down comer area
Reduction
R d ti
in
i Tray
T
Spacing
S
i
21 October 2013
18
Types of HCT :
By modifying Active Area
By Modifying Down Comer Area
Bifrac & Superfrac (M/s Koch)
Maxfrac (M/s Koch)
Provalve ((M/s Norton))
Triton ((M/s Norton))
MVG (M/s Nutter)
MD, ECMD & VGMD (M/s UOP)
Hi Fi (M/s
Hi-Fi
(M/ Sulzer)
S l )
Nye (M/s Glitch)
21 October 2013
19
Claims by HCT Vendors:
Vendor
Tray
Capacity increase
(Upto)
Koch-Glitsch
Norton
Nye
Bifrac
Maxfrac
Superfrac
Triton
Provalve
15-20%
25%
25%
30%
25%
20%
UOP
ECMD
VGMD
20%
30%
Sulzer
MVG
20%
21 October 2013
20
Various types of High Capacity Valves
MVG (MINI V
V-GRID)
GRID)
PROVALVE
21 October 2013
21
Continuation.
MD Trays by UOP
O
Hi Fi Trays
Hi-Fi
T
by
b Sulzer
S l
21 October 2013
22
Continuation.
ECMD Trays by UOP
21 October 2013
23
Comparison between various types of Trays
Tray Type
Capacity
Efficiency
Cost / unit
area
Flexibility Remarks
Bubble Cap
p
Med. to High except
low to med. @ high
liquid rates
Med. To High
High ( almost
twice the cost of
sieve trays)
3/1 to 4/1
Use for high flexibility
Sieves
Med. to High
High, Equal to or
better than others
Lowest of all trays
2/1 to 3/1
First choice for most
applications;
Valves
Med. to High
High, as good as
sieves
Medium (About
110% of sieve
trays)
High.
Possibly up to
5/1.
Not recommended for
fouling services.
UOP MD,
UOP-MD,
UOP-ECMD,
Sulzer Hi-Fi
Veryy High,
g , estimated
to be 30-40% than a
conventional sieve
trays for high liq.
rates
Low to Medium
Higher
g
than valve
trays
Low. ((< 2/1))
Consider for revamps
p
where no other device
is acceptable. Low
Tray Spacing, Nonfouling services
SuperFrac,
SuperFrac
MVG,
ProValve,
Triton
Very High
High, estimated
to be 10-15 % than a
conventional sieve
trays for high liq.
rates
Medium
More than 105%
of sieve trays
Medium.
Medium
Slightly higher
than sieve
trays.
Good alternative to
sieve
trays at low liquid rate
where higher capacity
is needed.
21 October 2013
24
Packed Column
Liquid Distributor
Packing
Support Plate
Liquid Collector/ Re-distributor
Bed Limiter
S
Support
t Pl
Plate
t
21 October 2013
25
Applicability of Packed Columns in a Refinery:
For column < 900 mm I.D: Packing are usually cheaper
than trays.
Acids & many other corrosive materials can be readily
handled in packed column. Because materials like
ceramic, carbon or other acid resistant material can be
used in packed beds.
Hold-up
p of liquid
q
can be quite
q
low in packed
p
column,, an
advantage when liquid is thermally sensitive.
Liquid tending to foam may be handled more readily in
packed column because of relatively low degree of liquid
agitation by gas.
21 October 2013
26
Contd.
Potential to handle high throughput at high efficiency.
Packing itself acts as a foam breaker.
Extensive use in revamp application. However. acceptable in
grass-root design also
Offer low P/ unit theoretical stage.
21 October 2013
27
Historical Generation of Packing in Industries
Packing
g
1st Generation
2nd Generation
Raschig Rings
Pall Rings
Lessing Rings
HyPak
Cross Partition Rings
Berl Saddles
IMTP
CMR
N tt Ri
Nutter
Rings
3rd Generation
FlexiPak
GemPak
MellaPak
ParlPak
21 October 2013
28
Types of Random Packing
IMTP
PALL RING
INTALOX SADDLE
RASCHIG RING
21 October 2013
29
Structured Packings
EILs Parlpak
21 October 2013
30
Comparison between various types of Packings
Packing
Type
Capacity
Efficiency
Random
Packing
(Pall ings, Metal
Intalox, etc.)
Medium
Medium
Structured
Packing
(FlexiPac
(FlexiPac,
GemPak,
MellaPak etc.)
Grid
(FLexiGrid,
Intalox Grid,
etc.)
Cost / unit
area
Medium to Low
Flexibility
> 3/1
Remarks
- Good efficiency per
unit of pressure drop.
- Mainly used in
Absorbers where liquid
loads are high
High to Very High
High
Very High
Good in
Entrainment
removal & Heat
Transfer
applications
only.
Medium
(Varies with
Metallurgy)
eta u gy)
>3/1
Best efficiency per unit
of pressure drop.
Medium to High
< 2/1
-Good
Good for high vapor &
low liquid service .
- Used in wash zones
of HC fractionators
where Coking formation
predominates
21 October 2013
31
Criteria for Internal selection:
Following criterions help the designer in selecting the best
internal for a given application
application, depends upon the various
factors but primarily on whether its a :
-
A Grass Root Design, or
A Revamp
p Activity
y
21 October 2013
32
Internal Selection for New tower (Table-1):
21 October 2013
33
Internal Selection for New tower (Table-2) :
21 October 2013
34
Internal Selection for a Revamp service (Table -3):
21 October 2013
35
Internal Selection for a Revamp service (Table-4):
21 October 2013
36
Comparison between Trays & Packing
Parameters
Trays
Packed column
Random
Service
Capacity
-Process
reactions
- Fouled service
- High no. of liquid withdrawals
- High turndown & low liquid
rates
rates.
1.0
Pressure Drop
(P)
1.0
Column size
1.0
Cost
Internals
Columns
with exothermic
1.0
1.0
Structured
HP Absorbers
- Pump
P
Around
A
d (HT)
- Vacuum services
-Vacuum
service
-Revamps
R
-High no. Of stages.
-H.P absorbers
1.0-1.15
1.2-1.3
1/3-1/5
1/5-1/10
0.9
0.8
1.2
0.9
1.5*
0.9
21 October 2013
37
Focus on Design of Trays
Before proceeding for the design of a tray tower, the Design
Specialist needs the following data from his process counterpart:
a. Vapor Loads entering the trays and its properties viz. temperature,
pressure, mol. wt. & compressibility factor.
b. Liquid
q
Loads leaving
g the tray
y and its p
properties
p
viz. density,
y,
viscosity, surface tension etc.
c. Allowable pressure drop per tray.
d. Turn down/ turn up requirement
e. Foaming tendency
f. Material of construction
g. Fouling
g
g Characteristics
h. Any special requirements like heat transfer etc.
21 October 2013
38
Tray Geometry: Major Components
Following are the major components of the tray :
No. of Passes
No
Active Area
Down comers
Number of valves
Pitch/Layout
Calming zone
Inlet & Outlet Weir
Tray Spacing
Under Down comer Flow Clearance (UDFC)
Column Diameter
Column Height
Other additional features like chimney tray, distributors etc.
21 October 2013
39
Typical Tray Layout
Plan View
Elevation View
21 October 2013
40
Tray design :
Following are the 3 broad categories that influence the
design of the tray:
a. Parameters affecting
g vapor
p capacity
p
y
b. Parameters affecting liquid capacity
c. Other Important parameters
The same can be shown clearly from this graph..
21 October 2013
41
Va
apor Rate
Typical Performance Diagram
Area of Normal Operation
Moderate Weeping
Heavy Weeping
Liquid Rate
21 October 2013
42
Tray design : Effect of Vapor Loadings
There are certain limitations on the vapor handling
capacity of the column about which the designer shall
be fully aware of before finalizing the configuration of
the Column:
The main controlling/limiting
/
factors
f
are :
Jet Flood
Flow Regimes
Entrainment
21 October 2013
43
Parameters affecting Vapor Loadings:
Jet flood
Jet Flood is the state of entrainment when the down comers can't
handle adequate liquid flow and liquid backs up and fills the trays
& the vapor-liquid
p
q
contacting
g mass of a tray
y reaches the one tray
y
above, resulting in massive entrainment and liquid recycling which
eventually affects the distillation and overloads the down comers.
Effect of Jet Flood on Column performance:
This can result in loss of bottoms level,
level low tray efficiency
efficiency, high tower pressure
drop, control problems, etc.
If the down comer is too small or tray pressure drop is too high,
high flooding can be
caused by down comer backup even if entrainment is small.
21 October 2013
44
Jet Flood Vs Column Efficiency
21 October 2013
45
Parameters affecting Vapor Loadings: Flow Regimes
Different flow regimes can occur on a tray in a column.
Following are the prominent flow regimes that can be encountered in a
column depending on Vapor-liquid flow rates:
E
Emulsion
l i
regime
i
operation
ti occurs primarily
i
il att llow vapor velocities
l iti and
d
high liquid rates i.e. the liquid phase is continuous
Froth regimes occurs primarily when vapor passes through the liquid
on the tray as discrete bubbles of irregular shape, formed at the tray
perforations and are swept away by the froth
Spray regime operation occurs primarily at high vapor velocities and
low liquid rates i.e. In the spray regime, the vapor phase is continuous.
21 October 2013
46
Flow Regime within Normal Operating Range
21 October 2013
47
Effect on Efficiency:
From the above graph it is clear that:
Froth regime is the most desirable operating regime for an efficient
performance of a column.
Operation in the Spray regime can be very detrimental to good tower
performance as tray efficiency dropping sharply
sharply.
21 October 2013
48
Parameters affecting Vapor Loadings: Entrainment
Entrainment occurs because of inadequate vapor space above the
vapor-liquid contacting zone on a tray. Liquid doesn't fully disengage
from the vapor, and is carried to the tray above.
Eff t off E
Effect
Entrainment
t i
t on a Column
C l
Performance:
P f
Entrainment becomes more pprevalent when tower vapor
p loads increase.
Massive entrainment leads to jet flooding.
21 October 2013
49
Entrainment in a Column:
21 October 2013
50
Tray design : Effect of Liquid Loadings
Similar to vapor loadings, there are certain limitations on
the liquid handling capacity of the column as well:
Liquid loading effect the following parameters :
Down comer Flood
Under Down Comer Velocity
Down Comer Back
Back-Up
Up limits
21 October 2013
51
Liquid Handling Limitations: Down Comer Flood
Down Comer Flood is the criterion that determines how close a
tower is to flooding as a result of excessive liquid height in the
down comer.
or,
Percent down comer flood represents the ratio of the actual
vapor
p and liquid
q
feed rates to the feed rates that would result in
100% down comer froth backup.
21 October 2013
52
Down Comer Filling in a Column
Down comer filling (Hd) is defined as the clear liquid height in the down comer.
Hd = Ht + Hud + Hi + Hdc
And, Dry Tray Pressure drop (Ht) is given by :
Ht = Hed + Hc
where;
Hd
Ht
Hud
Hi
Hdc
Hed
Hc
Down Comer Filling
Tray pressure drop,
Head loss under the down comer,
Inlet head on the tray,
Head loss due to flow through the down Comer
Dry tray pressure drop
Clear liquid height
Each head is expressed in inches (mm) of hot clear liquid.
21 October 2013
53
Typical in a down comer
21 October 2013
54
DC Back Up:
This is the measure of the aerated liquid in the down comer,
calculated in terms of clear liquid height.
Backup is a function of dry and wet tray pressure drop and head loss under the
down comer.
If the restrictions to flow are too large and/or a foamy system is involved, the
aerated liquid in the down comer can backup to the level of the outlet weir and
cause tower flooding.
Calculated backup should generally not exceed about half of the tray spacing
Lower
L
backups
b k
should
h ld be
b used
d ffor ffoamy systems
t
21 October 2013
55
Other Important Parameters:
There are many other important parameters which shall
be satisfied or shall be taken care of in the design viz.
Tray Area & Efficiency
Tray Spacing
Turn-down Ratio / weeping
Tray pressure Drop
Fouling
F li
Foaming
Others
21 October 2013
56
Tray Area:
Mainly 2 Components ascertain Tray Area:
1) Calming Area : This is an area preserved for vapor
disengagement prior to liquid entering a down comer. The unperforated narrow strip of active area next to the outlet weir is
considered to be calming area.
2) Active
Acti e Area : This is the tray deck area enclosed by the tower
wall, the outlet weirs, and the edges of the inlet areas. Valves or
sieve holes are located in the active area
21 October 2013
57
Tray capacity & Tray efficiency:
Tray capacity and tray efficiency are the two most important
criteria in tray design:
Diameter of a tower is mainly determined by capacity
considerations,
Tray efficiency determines the number of actual trays,
trays and
therefore the height, of the tower.
To achieve g
good efficiency,
y, the designer
g
must optimize
p
the weir height, open area, bubble area, liquid flow path
length, number of liquid passes, and other variables.
21 October 2013
58
Tray Spacing:
Tray spacing along with Column Diameter is an important
parameter that set the capacity of the tower.
As the distance between trays is increased, the tower capacity will
increase and the column diameter could be reduced.
Low tray spacing can also be used
used, but this increases the column
diameter as to handle a given set of vapor and liquid loadings. Also,
such low spacing may lead to difficult maintenance.
Typically
T i ll , a ttray spacing
i off 24 iinches
h iis preferred.
f
d
Therefore, Selection of optimum tray spacing is a function of
column diameter and service (clean or fouled) and most
importantly depends upon the experience of the equipment
designer/databank
designer/databank.
21 October 2013
59
Turndown Ratio :
Turndown Ratio is the term used to define the range of
loadings over which acceptable tray performance is achieved.
This usually means the range over which the tray efficiency
stays
y at or above the design
g value.
Note : While deciding the turndown ratio, a specialist must check
the weeping efficiency curve that how much design efficiency is
obtained at turn down.
21 October 2013
60
Effect of Weeping:
This is the passage of liquid through the tray deck seams,
and valve or sieve holes.
It occurs more when vapor rates are low, and is the primary
reason sieve trays lose efficiency at turndown operation.
When 25% of the liquid load weeps through the tray, one
should expect significant loss of tray efficiency
21 October 2013
61
Effect of weeping on Efficiency:
21 October 2013
62
Foaming Factor:
Foaming can occur in distillation towers via several different
mechanisms including:
Presence of surface active materials.
Presence of solids.
Entrainment of HCs liquids into aqueous systems.
Condensation of HCs vapors into aqueous systems.
To design for foaming, the tray is usually oversized by using a lower
percent of jet flooding and down comer flood, a low dry tray pressure
drop a low down comer entrance velocity,
drop,
velocity and a reduced allowable
down comer filling.
21 October 2013
63
Packed Column Design :
Following are the major parameters that influence the
design of the packed columns :
a.
b.
c.
d.
Vapor
p & Liquid
q
Capacity
p
y limitations
Efficiency & Turn down
Heat Transfer
Other considerations
21 October 2013
64
Packed Column Design: Effect of Vapor/Liq
Vapor/Liq Capacity
Phenomena of Flooding in Packed Beds
(In both Random Packing or Structured
Str ct red Packing)
Flooding occurs when liquid begins to accumulate in the
packing and the pressure drop begins to rise more sharply.
p rate, the p
pressure drop
p rises
With further increases in vapor
almost vertically and liquid begins to pile up on the top of
the packing.
21 October 2013
65
Packed Column Design: Efficiency & Turn Down
For most applications, random packing should be
considered first because they are lower cost.
cost
If a low pressure drop per theoretical stage and/or a short
column height
g is required,
q
, then structured p
packing
g should
be evaluated as an option.
To ensure optimum efficiency at all rates, a high quality
li id distributor
liquid
di t ib t mustt be
b used.
d
The selection of a liquid distributor is critical in the design of
a packed bed
21 October 2013
66
Packed Column Design: Other
Factors
There are various parameters that also influence the
Design of the packed columns, for instance:
a. Heat transfer Requirement
q
b. Vapor & Liquid distribution
c. Fouling , etc.
21 October 2013
67
Future Challenge & Trends
Challenges lying ahead for this industry:
Lower capital cost & optimized design
Energy efficient hardware
Higher continuous run length
Flexibility to handle wide variations in loads.
21 October 2013
68
21 October 2013
69
21 October 2013
70
