,

EPIC FOR GAS SWEETENING FACILITIES PROJECT (GSF)

AT MESAIEED 8: DUKHAN
PART-2 AGRP (OUKHAN)

QP CONTRACT NO. GC08110400

PETROFAC JOB NO. JI-2001

LOGIC CHECKING I FUNCTIONAL CHECKING PROCEDURE

Jgfi-.,JJ~ ~~,!

Qatar Petroleum

Petrofac ~

TITLE:
/1

ll~

A
1
0

REV

Approved for

Construction
Issued for
Information
Issued for
information

DESCRIPTION

,lIZ

LOGIC CHECKING I FUNCTIONAL CHECKING

PROCEDURE

fB

KZ

ZD

02106111

SM

KZ

MD

ZD

DOC SIZE: A4

10/05/11

KZ

BK

MD

ZD

QP PROJECT NO. 2971 (AGRP)

DATE

PRPD

CHKD

APPD

APPD

11/10/11(,

. r DOC. CLASS: 3

Pagel of 15
Rev.

DOCUMENT NO.

2971-0-05-0071

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed &: Oukhan

Part2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc. No.: 29710050071

Rev: A

Date: 11/10/11
Page: 2 of 15

Petrofac

Title: Logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure

1.
Rev. ...

. Para.

o
1
A

I' .Hold No.

11.1,11.2

REVISION DESCRIPTION SHEET

. ......

~ RevisionD~scription

Issued for information

Issued for Information
Approvro for Construction

.....

Iii

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed & Dukhan

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc. No.: 2971-0-05-0071

Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11

Page: 3 of 15

Petrofac

tJ

Title: Logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure

CONTENTS

1.0

PURPOSE. ......................................................................................................... 4

2.0

SCOPE ............................................................................................................. 4

3.0

REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 4

4.0

DEFINITIONS ..................................................................................................... 5

5.0

ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................. 5

6.0

ROLES AND RESPONSiBILITIES ................................................................................ 6

6.1

QP COMMISSIONING TEAM ..................................................................................................6

6.2

CONTRACTOR COMMISSIONING TEAM ..................................................................................... 6

7.0

HEALTH SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENT .................................................. 6

8.0

PRE-REQUiSiTES ................................................................................................. 7

9.0

PROCEDURE ...................................................................................................... 7

9.1

CAUSE AND EFFECT TESTS FIRE AND GAS ...............................................

9.2

CAUSE & EFFECT CHECKS- ESD ............................................................................................ 9

9.2.1
9.2.2
9.2.3
9.2.4
9.2.5

Phase 1 - Testing
Phase 2 - Testing
Phase 3 - Testing
Phase 4 - Testing
Phase 5 - Testing

.. ........................... 7

of Level 4 Shutdown ............................................................................. 10

of Level 3 Shutdown ............................................................................. 10
of Yellow Shutdown (Level 2) .................................................................. 10
of Orange Shutdown (Level 1) .................................................................. 11
of Red Shutdown (Level 0) ..................................................................... 11

9.3

FUNCTION CONTROL LOOP NARRATIVES ............................................................................... 12

10.0

RECORDS AND FORMS ........................................................................................ 13

11.0

ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................................ 13

11.1

ATTACHMENT 1 - FUNCTION CONTROL LOOP NARRATIVES & LOGIC SEQUENCE TEST ......................... 14

11.2

ATTACHMENT 2 - CAUSE & EFFECT DRAWING VERIFICATION CHECK SHEET ..................................... 15

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed & Dukhan

J5fi-,JJ~ ~
Qatar Petroleum

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc. No.: 2971-0-05-0071

Rev: A

Date: 11/10/11
Page: 4 of 15

Petrofac

&

Title: Logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure

1.0

PURPOSE

The purpose of this procedure is to describe the minimum applicable requirements and
acceptance criteria for the logic / function testing activities on the Gas Sweetening Facilities
Project (GSF) at Mesaieed & Dukhan. It describes the method for performing the tests that will
demonstrate that the Cause and Effects - F&G, Cause and Effects - ESD and function control
narratives meet the design intent and the project specifications.
2.0

SCOPE
This procedure applies to the plant process and safeguarding, F&G detection equipment and
plant process equipments including all vendor supplied packages at the Acid Gas Removal Plant
Part-2 (AGRP).

3.0

REFERENCES

Scope of Work

Appendix A Part" - AGR, Contract

GC08110400

Commissioning Execution Plan

Doc. No. 2971-0-04-0031

Project's HSSE Plan

Doc. No. 2971-0-04-0015

Emergency Shutdown Philosophy

Doc. No. 2971-6-03-0004

HSE Design Philosophy

Doc. No. 2971-3-03-0001

Cause & Effect Chart - ESD AGRP

Doc. No. 2971-3-55-0003

Cause & Effect Chart - ESD Station N

Doc. No. 2971-3-55-0002

Cause & Effect Chart - FGS AGRP

Doc. No. 2971-3-56-0003

Cause & Effect Chart - FGS Station N

Doc. No. 2971-3-56-0002

QP Corporate Philosophy for Fi re and

Safety

Doc. No. QP-S-PHL-001

Control Narrative

Doc. No. 2971-4-11-0001

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed &: Dukhan

J5fi-,JJ~ -=
~

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc_ No_: 2971-0-05-0071

Qatar Petroleum

Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 5 of 15

Petrofac

Title: Logic Checking / Functional Checking Procedure

4_0

DEFINITIONS

Commissioning

CONTRACTOR

5.0

Commissioning comprises those activities undertaken after PreCommissioning to verify that the dynamic functioning of
systems and subsystems is in accordance with specified
requirements, and to verify as accurately as possible that the
system is "Ready for Start-Up"_

Equipment

Petrofac International Ltd_ (PILl

All the components other than piping and pipelines and field
instruments_

PetroPCS

Petrofac's Project Completion System

Pre-Commissioning

Pre-Commissioning activities are intended to verify that pieces

of equipment and the associated control loops, shutdown
systems, utility supplies, etc., and equipment alignment are in
the required state of readiness for full dynamic testing_

QP

Qatar Petroleum

Vendor

The supplier of equipments and packages_

ABBREVIATIONS

AGRP

Acid Gas Removal Plant

BGU

Break Glass Unit

CaE

Cause and Effects

ESD

Emergency Shutdown

faG

Fire and Gas

FAT

Factory Acceptance Test

FCN

Function Control Narratives

FGS

Fire, Gas and Smoke

H2 S

Hydrogen Sulphide Gas

HMI

Human Machine Interface

IPS

Instrumented Protective System

LEL

Lower Explosive Limit

JHA

Job Hazard Analysis

MCC

Motor Control Centre

MOS

Maintenance Override Switch

paiD

Piping a Instrument Diagram

PB

Push Button

PPM

Parts Per Million

PTW

Permit to Work

J9fi-.,JJ~ ~
Qatar Petroleum -=
6.0

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed &: Dukhan

Part2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc. No.: 29710050071

Title: logic Checking / Functional Checking Procedure

Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 6 of 15

Petrofac

&

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

6.1

QP Commissioning Team

Responsible for witnessing the logic / functional checking activities.

Responsible for accepting or rejecting the logic / functional checking results.

6.2

CONTRACTOR Commissioning Team

Commissioning Manager / Coordinator

Overall control of CONTRACTOR Commissioning team during the execution of the logic /
functional checking activities.

Liaison with QP Commissioning representatives for executing the logic / functional

checking activities.

Commissioning Engineer

Responsible for the safety of all personnel assigned to him, ensuring that the JHA,
applicable permits and control measures are in place prior to applying the procedure.

Responsible for supporting the testing team and for setting all applicable test
requirements and conditions.

Responsible for coordinatingCthe works with other parties that may be required and parties
affected by executing the procedure.

Responsible for the overall quality of the activities.

Plans the logic / functional checking activities.

Responsible for ensuring QP representative (s) is notified and is at the test site as
required.

Responsible for applying all necessary forces and overrides to reset all executive actions to
a healthy condition and keeping the required records.

Responsible for initiating the change request form in case of any required software
modification such as alarms / trips set points.

Instruments and Controls Technicians

7.0

Responsible for ensuring that the work as outlined in this procedure is performed safely
and all safeguards and controls are complied with.

Responsible for preparing the equipment or system for the activities outlined in this
procedure.

Responsible for executing the tests/activities as outlined in this procedure and as

instructed by the Lead Instruments & Control Commissioning Engineer and/or vendor
representative where applicable.

HEALTH SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENT

All works executed under this procedure shall be performed in accordance with the project's
HSSE Plan.

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed & Dukhan

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc_ No.: 2971005-0071

Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 7 of 15

Petrofac

iJ

Title: logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure

A Risk Assessment is to be carried out for the all the activities involved with Logic checking
a Functional Checking of the plant.

The Risk Assessment should identify the hazards, persons involved, the risk associated with
the specific activities and the mitigating measures required to reduce the risk and
hazards.

Conduct a 'tool box talk' prior to start of logic checking / functional checking activity to
review Risk Assessment, safety considerations, potential hazards and mitigating measures
for conducting the activity.

8.0

PRE-REQUISITES

Identify the priority systems/sub-systems.

Verify the completion of the duly signed PetroPCS 'A' check sheets as per the system list.

Verify the completion of the duly signed PetroPCS 'B' check sheets as per the system list.
This corresponds to 5-point Instrument Loop check (include FCS alarms and IPS trip set
points) completion ('B' check sheets) duly witnessed and signed off by QP.

Identify the various vendor engineers' involvement during the execution of the work.

Review electrical isolations and equipments preservation status.

Hold a tool box talk involving all concerned parties / members about the testing and test
activities.

Plan the interface with the Vendor, Process, Mechanical and Commissioning teams and QP.

9.0

9.1

PROCEDURE

Ensure all safeguards and controls / isolations / de-isolations are in place before
proceeding with the instructions in the procedure.

Establish the required communication among the relevant teams / crew members.

Complete the Fire a Gas Cause a Effect checks for the specified process area as per
section 9.1.

Complete the ESD Cause a Effect checks for the specified process area as per section 9.2.

Complete the function control narratives checks for the specified process area as per
section 9.3.

CAUSE AND EFFECT TESTS- FIRE AND GAS

Prior to starting the FaG caE checks (while testing individual detectors), Orange ESD
(Level 1) of the respective process area shall be in the 'Off state' (inhibited from
Software).

The Software inhibits on the Orange ESD shall be removed prior to the testing of the voting
logic (Confirmed gas and confirmed fire). At the same time, the effects of the respective
process equipments, blowdown and shutdown valves trip / open / close commands must
be inhibited.

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed ft Dukhan

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc_ No.: 2971-0-05-0071

Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 8 of 15

Petrofac

Title: Logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure

All applicable test equipments / test gases, recommended by the vendor (s), must be
made available.

Prior to starting the FaG caE tests, all detectors and associated alarms / indications on
the remote FCS HMI Mimic panel must have been tested as part of the instruments loop
checks (Effects)_

Test Sequence
The testing is in 2 steps.

Testing of individual detectors against low level and high level alarms and their respective
effects.

Testing of the voting logic (2 out of the total number of detectors in a zone / process
area) and verifying the effects_

Testing of Individual detectors and voting logic

Testing of individual detectors and the voting logic verification will be in accordance with the
Cause and Effects matrix_ The following active alarms will be used to verify the plant shutdown
as part of the ESD Cause and Effects tests:

Confirmed flammable gas detection

Confi rmed toxic gas detection

Confirmed heat and flame detectjpn

Confirmed smoke detection

Break glass unit detection

Confirmed Flammable Gas Detection

Individual Flammable gas detectors in all zones will be tested by applying test gas to generate
low level and high level flammable gas alarm indications and check the effects as per the CaE
charts_
The low level alarm settings are as follows:

20% LEL of methane in air for the process areas

10% LEL of methane in air for HVAC air intakes at battery rooms, LER and substation

15% LEL for ventilation and combustion air intakes at EDG and Hot Oil Heater

The high level alarm settings are as follows:

50% LEL of methane in air for the process areas

20% LEL of methane in air for HVAC air intakes at battery rooms, LER and substation

25% LEL for ventilation and combustion air intakes at EDG and Hot Oil Heater

Finally, the voting logic will be tested by applying test gas (60% LEL) to any 2 out of the total
numbers of flammable gas detectors (zone wise) to generate a confirmed gas detection and
the effects will be checked as per the CaE charts.

J9JL,JJ~ ~
Qatar PEtroleum - . :

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed & Dukhan

Part2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc. No.: 29710050071

Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11

Page: 9 of 15

Petrofac

Ii;;

Title: Logic Checking / Functional Checking Procedure

Two more '2 00 N' combinations shall be tested to give more assurance. This will not include
the two detectors tested earlier. (One test carried out with sample gas and the other test by
simulation from the marshalling cabinets.)
Confirmed Toxic Gas Detection
Individual HzS detectors in all zones will be tested by applying test gas to generate 10 ppm
indications and the respective high toxic gas alarm effects will be checked as per the CaE
charts.
Finally, the voting logic will be tested by applying test gas to any 2 out of total numbers of HzS
detectors (Process area wise for all zones) to generate confirmed toxic gas detection and the
effects will be checked as per the CaE charts.
Two more '2 00 N' combinations shall be tested to give more assurance. This will not include
the two detectors tested earlier. (One test carried out with sample gas and the other test by
simulation from the marshalling cabinets.)
Confirmed Fire Detection
Individual flame and smoke detectors in all zones will be tested with the use of test
equipments to generate a fire detection (Fire alarm) indication and the respective effects will
be checked as per the CaE charts.

.'

After verification of all the flame and smoke detectors, the voting logic will be testing by
activating '2 00 N' detectors in each Fire Zone to generate a confirmed fire detection alarm and
the effects will be checked as per the CaE charts.
f'"
Two more '2 00 N' combinations shall be tested to give more assurance. This will not include
the two detectors tested earlier. (One test carried out with test equipment and the other test
by simulation from the marshalling cabinets.)

Break Glass Unit Activation

Individual break glass units (Manual alarm call points) in all zones will be tested by removing
the glass to generate a BGU activated alarm indication and the respective effects will be
checked as per the CaE charts.
CAUSE & EFFECT CHECKS- ESD

9.2

Pre-requisites

Verification of all documentation such as, 'B' checks sheets for instrument loop checks of
shutdown valves, blowdown valves, buttons, ESD reset PB, remote ESD PB, all MOS enable
key switches and MOS lamps on the ESD Matrix Panel, all MCC interface signals to FCS/IPS,
in all SUb-systems in a priority turnover system.

Identification of all active components belonging to a particular subsystem I unit

safeguarding such as transmitters, switches, shutdown I blowdown valves, motors etc. and
ensuring that they are in a normal condition.

All applicable test equipments (for simulation of trip alarms) recommended by the vendor
must be made available.

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed a: Dukhan

Part2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc. No.: 29710050071

Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 10 of 15

Petrofac

&

Title: Logic Checking / Functional Checking Procedure

Execution
All ESDCaE will be completed in 5 phases in a sequential manner. Against a specific Cause, all
associated Effects ('X' marks) mentioned on the Cause a Effects chart will be verified.
ESD Cause a Effects test will be carried out plant area wise based on the priorities sequence
determined by the project schedule.
This will facilitate turning over the priority process systems for Nitrogen leak test and
subsequent Commissioning activities.
All motors (uncoupled) will be kept in 'test mode' (on the MCC feeder) to ensure no physical
run of the motors. All motors' remote run command I feedback should have been already
tested as part of loop testing.
Except the Effects which are to be tested on the priority Cause a Effects testing system,
remaining all Effects will be inhibited and recorded as per section 10.0 of this document.
9.2.1

Phase 1 - Testing of Level 4 Shutdown

Simulate Plant StartUp on the HMI graphics sheets and confirm that all parameters are
healthy. The technical write of the Start Up sequence, tested as part of the software FAT,
shall be made available during the testing operation.

Individual process IPS trip alarms and machine health monitoring protection trip alarms
will be initiated and the effects will be checked as per the CaE charts (process
equipments trip and shutdown)

9.2.2

Phase 2 - Testing of Level 3 Shutdown

Simulate Plant StartUp on the HMI graphics sheets and confirm that all parameters are
healthy. The technical write of the StartUp sequence, tested as part of the software FAT,
shall be made available during the testing operation.

Initiate a process Level 3 ESD as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as per the CaE
charts.

Bring into normal condition by enabling the level 3 ESD reset.

Start the plant up again.

Initiate a Level 3 ESD field PB as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as per the caE
charts.

Bring into normal condition by enabling the level 3 ESD reset.

9.2.3

Phase 3 - Testing of Yellow Shutdown (Level 2)

Simulate Plant StartUp on the HMI graphics sheets and confirm that all parameters are
healthy. The technical write of the StartUp sequence, tested as part of the software FAT,
shall be made available during the testing operation.

Initiate a process Yellow ESD as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as per the caE
charts.

Bring into normal condition by enabling the Yellow ESD reset.

Start the plant up again.

Initiate Yellow ESD control room PB (Yellow) as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as
per the CaE charts.

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed & Dukhan

J~~~

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Qatar Petroleum _

Doc_ No_: 2971-0-05-0071

Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page:110f15

Petrofac

61

Title: Logic Checking / Functional Checking Procedure

Bring into normal condition by enabling the Yellow ESD reset_

Start the plant up again_

Initiate Yellow ESD field PB as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as per the CaE
charts_

Bring into normal condition by enabling the Yellow ESD Reset_

Initiate confirmed fire and flammable gas signals from the respective fire zone (which
covers the respective process equipment area) and verify that a Yellow ESD is enabled as
Effect.

Reset the Plant_

9.2.4

Phase 4 - Testing of Orange Shutdown (Level 1)

Simulate Plant Start-Up on the HMI graphics sheets and confirm that all parameters are
healthy. The technical write of the Start-Up sequence, tested as part of the software FAT,
shall be made available during the testing operation.

Initiate Orange ESD control room PB (Orange) as a Cause and verify all associated Effects
as per the CaE charts.

Bring into normal condition by enabling the Orange ESD reset.

Start the plant up again_

Initiate confirmed fire and flammable gas signals from the respective fire zone (which
covers the respective process equipment area) and verify that an Orange ESD is enabled as
Effect.

Reset the Plant.

Initiate toxic gas from the respective fire zone (which covers the respective process
equipment area) and verify that an Orange ESD is enabled as Effect.

Reset the Plant.

9.2.5

Phase 5 - Testing of Red Shutdown (Level 0)

Simulate Plant Start-Up on the HMI graphics sheets and confirm that all parameters are
healthy. The technical write of the Start-Up sequence, tested as part of the software FAT,
shall be made available during the testing operation.

Initiate Red ESD control room PB (Red) as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as per
the CaE charts.

Bring into normal condition by enabling the Red ESD reset.

Start the plant up again.

Initiate Red ESD main gate PB as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as per the CaE
charts.

Bring into normal condition by enabling the Red ESD reset.

Notes:

Effects against a cause which was earlier an Effect itself will not be repeated_

In a process system where multiple sets of equipments are present, ESD caE checks will be

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed Dukhan

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc_ No_: 2971-0-05-0071

Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 120115

Petrofac

Title: Logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure

completed by grouping the equipments_ None associated equipments / valves (not part
of the test) shutdowns will be inhibited in the software and recorded as per section 10_0_
These will be removed at the end of the test_

All Cause 8: Effects checks will be tested by keeping the MCC feeders in 'test mode' to
avoid the unnecessary actual runs_ Equipments will be simulated as in normal running
condition (Ex: motor available status healthy condition)_ During the C8:E checks, it shall be
verified that the activation of a respective Cause will result in the motor's available status
turning into trip status without having to physically trip the motor.

A complete EsD C8:E test post Start Up will also be carried out allowing for all cause 8:
effect to take effect_

9_3

FUNCTION CONTROL LOOP NARRATIVES

Pre-requisites

Identification of the priority turnover system/sub-systems since FCN checks will be carried
out on a system/sub-system level or on a group of systems/sub-systems together_

Completion of all field instrument loop checks of shutdown valves, blowdown valves,
control valves, vendor packages instruments, FCs and IPS transmitters, EsD push buttons,
EsD reset push buttons, remote EsD PB, all MOs enable key switches on the hard wired
console, MOs lamps on the local panels, all MCC interface signals to FCs/ IPS and
verification of the check sheets have been completed and loaded into PetroPCs_

Identification of all the active components belonging to a particular system/sub-system_

Initially all the necessary controllers (Pressure, level, temperature) actions (direct or
reverse) will be verified as in the control narrative document_

All applicable test equipments (for simulation of trip alarms) recommended by the vendors
must be made available_

At any stage 5-point instrument checks will not be repeated_

Prior to FCN, all the controllers will be confirmed in Manual mode and all the valves will
be opened manually from respective controller.

Execution

The control narrative shall be verified, line by line to ensure that the correct
implementation of the program_

Air fails action to be verified in the field as per the control narrative document.

For controllers working in Manual, Auto or Cascade, the applicable mode will be checked_
Controllers action in Auto mode, Cascade mode, Ratio mode as applicable are tested on
the FCs HMI by varying (rising / decreasing) the process value the software simulation
blocks_
Direct / reverse action will also be confirmed in the manner described above_
Split range control action will also be confirmed in the manner described above_
All these are confirmed during the software FAT and will be tested again during SIT and
subsequently signed off by QP_

Notes:

Jgfi-.,JJ~ ~
Qatar Petroleum -==

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc_ No.: 2971-0-05-0071

Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 13 of 15

Petrofac

Title: Logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure

Simulation of the process alarms mentioned in the control narrative will be with test
equipments from the marshalling cabinets, wherever possible.

Possible simulation of process input values will be completed from the software by
changing the values (rising / decreasing) to avoid the use of 2 or more communicators.

All the process input signals from the field instrument are already tested as part of the
instrument loop checks.

Any deviations from the control narrative shall be recorded on the punch list and
corrected at a later stage under the control of a software change request.

10.0

11.0

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed & Dukhan

RECORDS AND FORMS

A 'overrides, inhibits and forced signals' log book shall be maintained inline with the
requirements of the procedure for control of overrides, inhibits and forced signals (Doc.
No. 2971-4-05-0005) to record/track the various bypasses installation/removal.

A Master copy of the caE-ESD, CaE-FaG, Function control narratives will be made
available in Control room HMPS and all tests will be recorded on it. These copies will be
later signed off by CONTRACTOR and QP for record keeping.

A detailed log book (Engineering deviations) will be maintained inline with the software
change control procedure (Doc. No. 2971-4-05-0002) to record the deviations of configured
alarms and trip set points on the graphics and on the project's 'Alarm, Trip a Set-point
schedule' .

"The PetroPCS check sheets attached in section 11.0 of this document are applicable for
this procedure

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1 - Function Control Loop Narratives a Logic Sequence Test

Attachment 2 - Cause a Effect Drawing Verification Check Sheet

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed & Dukhan

J9~~~

Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc. No.: 29710050071

Qatar PEtroleum _

Page: 14 of 15

Petrofac

Title: Logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure

Attachment 1 - Function Control Loop Narratives 8: Logic Sequence Test

11.1

("

FUNCI ~~~~~~~~ LOOP

J9Ji-,JJ~ ~f1l,!
Qatar PEtroleum
Petrofac ~

TAG

rrR tlo:

Project No: SubProj4tCt.~

LOGIC / SEQUENCE TEST

BarcodeIte
m

Record Ho~

SUS-SYSTEM Ho.

No.

DRAWING
Cu\'A "un

I-0105C

Rev. : 1

DATA SHEET No.

No.

~~::g~.NO:

I AREA

LooP
Sht. N6.

, ~'Q""' No.

SHT. NO.

Rev. No.

Equipment mentioned in Control Narrative:

Instrument Tag Nos. mentioned in Control Narrative:
Control Narrative Description:

..

,-

I OF TEST

TEST RESULTS

NOTE: Associated 'Control loop Narratives 'Document is to be attached.

REMARKS:

COMPLETED BY
Signature
Name
Date

APPROVED BY

ACCEPTED BY

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed a: Dukhan

J~fl--,JJ~ ~~

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc_ No.: 2971-0-05-0071

Qatar Petroleum

Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 15 of 15

Petrofac

Title: Logic Checking / Functional Checking Procedure

Attachment 2 - Cause & Effect Drawing Verification Check Sheet

11.2

Commissioning Check Sheet

Cause & Effect Drawing
Verification Check Sheet

J~jL,JJ~ ~
Qatar PetrolEum' ~

Petrofac ~

ITR No: 1-0106C

Rev.: 1
Project No:

~SubProjact~

BarcodeIte
Record No:

m
TAG No.

SUB-SYSTEM No.

DRAWING No.

DATA SHEET No_

Control I Safeguarding System Site Acceptance Shall be in accordance with the manufacturers
recommendations and with the factory acceptance test Procedures and results

Item

1.

2.
3.

Description of check

Result

All items shown on Cause a Effect Drawings shaU be proven during precommissioning
Causes andJ,ffect aGtions checked and confirmed as per the Cause a Effect
Drawinll Data
Attach As built CaE Drawinll sil/ned by company as witnessed for full or part CaE
test from field input to field output
REMARKS/OBSERVATIONS:

COMPLETED BY
Signature
Name
Date

APPROVED BY

ACCEPTED BY