Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views9 pages

Statistical Analysis For Analytical Methods Validations: Authors

This document discusses statistical analysis methods for validating analytical chemistry methods. It presents an overview of a validation process for new analytical methods that evaluates precision, accuracy, linearity, and other method parameters. The validation process is regulated by international guidelines and aims to define the analytical limits and quality of results from a given method. Specific statistical studies and data analysis are used to validate the method's performance.

Uploaded by

windli2014
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views9 pages

Statistical Analysis For Analytical Methods Validations: Authors

This document discusses statistical analysis methods for validating analytical chemistry methods. It presents an overview of a validation process for new analytical methods that evaluates precision, accuracy, linearity, and other method parameters. The validation process is regulated by international guidelines and aims to define the analytical limits and quality of results from a given method. Specific statistical studies and data analysis are used to validate the method's performance.

Uploaded by

windli2014
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Statistical analysis for analytical methods validations

AUTHORS:
Corneo R - Nanni V - Tizzani E
Nguyen Van Danh - Vanasia A

ASTRAZENECA SPA ITALY


A.VANASIA Srl

INTRODUCTION

In analytical chemistry every new analytical method, after the development step, must be
validated before routine use.
The validation process consist to evaluate the method results obtained with some statistical
approaches in order to define the systematic errors and application limits.
SCOPE OF VALIDATION PROCESS

The principal aim of the validation process is to discover the analytical limits, precision
and accuracy grade in order to evaluate the future analytical data obtained using the
method.
A full validation process should permit to verify if an anomalous result should be refused
or accepted. In this way we can maintain a constant analytical quality of results.
METHODOLOGY AND CONTENTS

In analytical chemistry there is a variety of analytical methods classified by analytical


methodology:
1. manual method (every operation is performed manually by analysts
2. automatic method (some or totally operation is performed by instrument).
For both these categories we will perform analytical validation. Obviously for the
automatic method the validation process is more complex and detailed because we have to
consider not only the systematic error of manual operations bur also the systematic errors
of every single part of automatic systems used. Actually in modern laboratories we
increase the automatic analysis therefore we need more efficiency for validation exercise.
The validation process is regulated by an International Guidelines or by the International
Pharmacopoeias (USP or PhEur).

Generally a validation process consist of the following study:


Linearity
Method or/and System Repeatability
Accuracy
Intermediate Precision
Quantification Limit
Detection Limit
Robustness
All the data series produced with these studies should be evaluated with a specific program
in order to apply the same approach and elaboration. Moreover it is evident that every
calculation approach must be validated before the use.
For these reasons we choose the standard SAS statistical applications. In particular we
used the GLM REG Proc. with relative output files and options statistical evaluation for
various model acceptability limits (e.g. intercept calculation and relative confidence
limits).
Some models are correlate with automated graphics procedures.
This program is divided in:
easier data entry
pick list menu
automated output
automated graphics

Main Menu

Insert new Test

Select Test

Select existing Test

Modify Tests Title

Screen of Test

Screen Accuracy of Data Entry/Modify


Accuracy
Title

TEST OF UK1 (FIRST)

Test Date
1.00)

__________

Analist
Content

Level

(%)

0.05

(0.05

____________________
(%)

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

87.03

Degrado (%)

0.684

Weight mg

% Theoric

% Practic

6.29
8.15
7.56
8.05
7.93
8.26
7.44
7.26
____________
____________

0.04271
0.05535
0.05134
0.05467
0.05385
0.05609
0.05052
0.0493
____________
____________

0.042
0.052
0.048
0.052
0.051
0.053
0.047
0.046
____________
____________

0.10

0.25

0.50

Screen Linearity of Data Entry/Modify


Linearity Title TEST OF UK1 (FIRST)
Test Date __________ Level (%) _____ Analist
% Theoric
Weight Mg
Items : 1
0.05
10.13
1
0.05
9.98

____________________ Unit MCG/ML


X Value
Y Area
2.12302
11280
2.09159
11051

2
2

0.1
0.1

19.98
20.18

4.18737
4.22929

22764
23546

3
3

0.2
0.2

40.34
40.38

8.45438
8.46277

47523
47341

4
4

0.4
0.4

80.75
80.8

16.92344
16.93395

96199
96140

5
5

0.5
0.5

101.05
100.7

21.17788
21.10453

120200
118552

6
6

0.6
0.6

121.54
121.25

25.47214
25.41137

145930
145243

7
7

0.8
0.8

161.52
161.58

33.85108
33.86366

196441
193612

8
8

1
1

202.08
201.92

42.35158
42.31805

242366
242741

9
9

____________
____________

____________
____________

____________
____________

____________
____________

10
10

____________
____________

____________
____________

____________
____________

____________
____________

Screen System Repeatability of Data Entry/Modify


System Repeatability (Precisione del Sistema)
Title

TEST OF UK1 (FIRST)

Test Date
Analist

04/08/2000
____________________
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Area
2150570
2147458
2147478
2147382
2145879
2144850
2142292
2142521
2144085
2141689

Level (%)
Weight mg

90
____________

( B=Before

A=After )

Screen Intermediate Precision of Data Entry/Modify


Title
Date
Name :

Intermediate Precision
TEST OF UK1 (FIRST)

18/11/1999

18/11/1999

19/11/1999

19/11/1999

Analist 1

Analist 2

Analist 3

Analist 4

LOCATELLI

COLOMBO

Order :
1.
0.113
2.
0.107
3.
0.11
4.
0.107
5.
0.107
6.
0.11
7.
0.115
8.
0.109
9. ____________
10 ____________

0.213
0.203
0.21
0.202
0.214
0.205
0.214
0.202
____________
____________

LOCATELLI
0.108
0.111
0.109
0.111
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.115
____________
____________

COLOMBO
0.203
0.204
0.205
0.209
0.206
0.205
0.204
0.212
____________
____________

Screen Quantification Limit of Data Entry/Modify


Quantification Limit
Title
TEST OF UK1 (FIRST)
Test Date
Injection

Level

__________

Analist
p/p mg

____________________
Area

1
2
3
4

0.05
0.05
0.05
____________

7.54
7.15
8.02
____________

10932
9996
11773
____________

1
2
3
4

0.025
0.025
0.025
____________

4.17
3.65
3.96
____________

5975
5076
5813
____________

1
2
3
4

0.01
0.01
0.01
____________

1.8
2.03
3.15
____________

2168
2772
4570
____________

1
2
3
4

0.005
0.005
0.005
____________

2.48
1.86
1.57
____________

1458
1374
973
____________

1
2
3
4

____________
____________
____________
____________

____________
____________
____________
____________

____________
____________
____________
____________

Examples : Output of Linearitys Test


Assay=TEST OF UK1 (FIRST)
Model: MODEL1
Dependent Variable: YAREA
Analysis of Variance
Source

DF

Sum of
Squares

Mean
Square

Model
Error
C Total

1 95135853350
14 11297249.362
15 95147150599

95135853350
806946.383

Root MSE
Dep Mean
C.V.

898.30194
110058.06250
0.81621

R-square
Adj R-sq

F Value

Prob>F

117896.127

0.0001

0.9999
0.9999

Parameter Estimates
Variable

DF

Parameter
Estimate

Standard
Error

T for H0:
Parameter=0

Prob > |T|

INTERCEP
XVALUE

1
1

-1305.874836
5767.236825

394.49692146
16.79646991

-3.310
343.360

0.0052
0.0001

Linearity
Confidence Limit 95% of Intercept * Y = -1305.874836 +
5767.2368255 X
Assay

Lower
95th

Upper
95th

Degrees T_student Sqrt Xvalue


Freedom 97.5(%)DF Number Unit

YAREA

XVALUE

11280
11051
22764
23546
47523
47341
96199
96140
120200
118552
145930
145243
196441
193612
242366
242741

2.1230
2.0916
4.1874
4.2293
8.4544
8.4628
16.9234
16.9340
21.1779
21.1045
25.4721
25.4114
33.8511
33.8637
42.3516
42.3181

THEORY
TEST OF UK1 (FIRST) -2151.99 -459.763

14

2.14479

MCG/ML

0.05
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.50
0.60
0.60
0.80
0.80
1.00
1.00

You might also like