Assignment
DEFENCE PURCHASING & SUPPLY
MANAGEMENT
By: -
The Main Issues and Drivers for
Change in the Defence Environment
Since the inception of modern India, it always been surrounded by enemy
states like Pakistan, China, etc. In the spam of 70 years, India fought 5
wars with its neighbors.
All of these have major impact on the Foreign and Defense policy of
India. The various governments led by leaders with various personalities,
outlook and aspirations also had visible impact on these policies.
The developments in Indias immediate neighborhood over the past
decade have led India to take a close look at her foreign and security
policies. There is a widely-sensed need for the rapid modernisation of the
Indian armed forces, which is being reflected in some of the key initiatives
that have been taken up by the Indian government so far (such as Make in
India), so as to address the complex security challenges that emanate
from its hostile neighborhood.
However, the pace of modernisation of the Indian armed forces over the
years has been rather slow, and technologically, they are not where they
should have been. Indigenous development of modern defense hardware
continues to remain a concern and Indian policy aspiration for defense
self-sufficiency remains largely elusive. The Indian defence industry
suffers from major policy, structural, and cultural challenges that beset a
military-industrial complex that continues to struggle in terms of
delivering modern defence hardware that could have added to the greater
Indian defence indigenisation and production.
Experts see a number of systemic flaws in the Indian defence
establishment and civil-military relations, which present major challenges
for Indias military modernisation aspirations. As Indias defence
PAGE 1
requirements are likely to increase in the foreseeable future because of
the dynamic security environment, indigenous development of modern
defence hardware and technology is likely to remain a top priority.
As India is an aspiring great power (and it is believed that great powers
have great arms industries), its ability to acquire autarky and self-
sufficiency in terms of the development of advanced defence hardware
and technology to fulfill the requirements of its armed forces would be
crucial so as to address to its national security concerns.
Modernisation of the IAF
Though we are a fairly balanced force they also have shortages,
reducing force-levels and gaps in our inventory, which are being
addressed with all urgency and governmental support. IAFs
modernisation plan, aims to sustain and enhance its operational potential
and consolidate the specified force levels through judicious and cost-
effective replacements and up gradation of existing resources. It is a
gradual, but transformational modernisation. The approach is three-
pronged preserve upgrade and acquire. All fleets, including transport
and helicopters, with residual life, are being upgraded to contemporary
standards; so also is operational and maintenance infrastructure and
logistic tools. The planned acquisitions are across-the-board and include
PAGE 2
platforms, weapons, sensors, and equipment; spread over the next 10-15
years.
To run through some of our programs, the MiG-27 and Jaguar upgrades are
almost done; the MiG 29, Mirage 2000 are being negotiated and the IL-76,
AN-32, and the helicopter fleets will follow. Capabilities of UAVs will also
be enhanced. Airfield and maintenance infrastructure are also being
enhanced in a phased manner.
The response to RFP for the MMRCA is expected soon. The Hawk AJTs have
been inducted. The first AWACS will be with us this year end. Additional
Dorniers, Boeings and upgraded Cheetah will soon join the fleet. The
contract for C-130Js has already been signed and contracts will soon be
signed for Mi-17 1Vs, ALHs, armed ALHs and additional FRA. The 1st LCA
Sqn may be operational in IOC configuration by 2010. IAF also seeks new
helicopters to replace the Chetaks and a new heavy-lift heptr. Inter-
Government Agreements have been signed for the 5th Generation Fighter
and Medium Transport Aircraft with the Russian Govt.
Air defence will be significantly strengthened with modern weapon-
systems and sensors, including the AWACS & Aerostats. Integration of civil
radars will commence this year, for gap-free surveillance of the entire
Indian airspace. Force-multipliers, air dominance fighters and a
converged, secure Combat Communications Network including the
IACCS and later the ODL will fundamentally alter the IAFs Air Defence
PAGE 3
doctrine. For effective command & control, extended reach and to reduce
the sensors-to-shooter loop, we are laying due emphasis on Networks and
Space, which are essential next steps.
Challenges
The Hardware Technological Challenges
Technology is at the core of an air force acquiring and assimilating it is
our primary challenge. The lack of it curtails national options, impacting
postures and doctrines. Denial and selective availability of technology are
all enmeshed in international relations. As long as operationally feasible,
the IAF supports the national quest for indigenisation. So it is
recommended that acquisition of core-technologies and core-
competencies and developing emerging technologies. Also recommend a
collaborative and participative approach of partnerships between users,
DRDO, the Industry, the Government and foreign vendors. In these
multiple partnerships, we believe that the user must be the captain. We
strongly support the Governments endeavor to transform our current
buyer-seller relationships to joint-ventures, co-development, and co-
production.
Maintenance Challenges
While our response to technological challenges will determine the shape
of things to come, maintenance challenges determine how long they last
PAGE 4
and their cost-effectiveness. Maintainability, which includes logistical
issues, is, therefore, crucial. IAF is proactive on this and has energized
interaction with vendors and entered into long-term spares and repair
contracts. We have also put our materials management and equipment
accounting on-line.
The People and Organisation
While the hardware is important, it is converted into capabilities by
people. Aerospace power requires highly-skilled and impeccably trained
personnel. Also, in aviation, optimum performance usually lies close to
safety margins, which brings in the concern of costs both in human and
material terms. Attracting quality youth, training and retaining them is
another of IAFs challenges. Inculcating qualities of leadership and
innovativeness and ushering in meritocracy and productivity are
important on our agenda. However, the expanding civil aviation sector
exerts a huge pull on this resource and we are doing our best to blend
personal aspirations with organizational compulsions. We need
Government support to make this happen. Updating of skills is an
associated challenge, for which international exposure has been very
useful. But in the long run we might need an Air University. Again, if our
manning is adequate, we would be able to send our people on sabbaticals
of higher learning.
PAGE 5
As the hardware changes, new capacities and capabilities are generated
that sometimes radically alter the way we do business. And it is hard to do
things differently with the old processes, interfaces and organisational
structures. Keeping pace and adapting to the changes, as an organisation,
is another challenge.
Future Opportunities
Shape of Things to Come
Ideally, modernisation should be evolutionary and continuous. Yet, for a
variety of reasons the IAF has in the past modernised in spurts, often as a
reaction to circumstances. Today, the IAF is in throes of a most
comprehensive modernisation, as I described earlier. We call it
transformational, for it will change everything dramatically. Being based
on long-term perspective plans, most of it is already crystallised. Yet, a lot
remains to be determined; many new capabilities are still short of the
decision stage. At this juncture, if we are able to synchronise these plans
with national security objectives, we would really have utilised this
opportunity well. From that arises another opportunity that must be seized
and that is the formal enunciation of long-term national security
objectives, strategies, as well as technology roadmap and indigenisation
strategies.
PAGE 6
Much also depends upon the way aerospace power will develop in the
future. Beyond the MMRCA and FGFA, with their 40-year lives, we are at
2060. It is not easy to guess the shape of aerospace power then. Would
the accent shift to unmanned flight, to missiles; or would air be more of
space. Technological advances are sure to revolutionise military affairs in
future too. Despite the unpredictabilities, it is certain that the need for
application and transportability of national power hard and soft and
thus for aerospace power, with enhanced fundamentals, would remain.
Nations that lack it will seek it, as also will non-state agencies. Aerospace
power is bound to proliferate. We also expect aerospace power to
permeate the national security apparatus more completely, including for
homeland security. IAF foresees greater specialisation; tailored capabilities
for each occasion; an increased dependence on unmanned vehicles;
greater accent on force enhancers; particularly the intangible ones, such
as quality of people and their skills.
Networking and assimilation of space, both interdependent, are already
the way forward and can tilt the balance considerably. A quiet space race
is the current reality and weaponisation, a distinct possibility. Perhaps
more than any other, it is air power that is most significantly enhanced by
the integration of space-enabled capabilities, for there are essential
similarities. Evolving into an aerospace force is thus a logical progression.
But, it is getting crowded up there and we need to act fast. Certainly,
space empowers all, and the IAF supports tri-service initiatives. Yet, any
PAGE 7
fledgling capability requires residing in an appropriate parent capability.
Air Power, or the IAF, are the closest such capability, or organisation
suitable to host and nurture military space. Indias rising status and
acceptability are an opportunity for us to push for creating an adequate
military space capability.
Since IAF requires a comprehensive capability, its future in the long-term,
will largely mirror the future of aerospace power itself. Though this path is
invariably influenced by leading nations, India and countries like it, must
be selective and seek creative variations, both in terms of hardware and
doctrine.
Outward Orientation
We find that our international interactions are increasing. Leading nations
want to engage us and probably seek to include us in their calculations.
Smaller nations look up to us for support, assistance and training. UN
commitments are also considerable. We could ignore these opportunities,
or we could use them to build Indian influence, generate goodwill and
reap multiple dividends.
Synergies
Just as every tool has a place in the toolbox, every discipline too has its
own niche. At the edges of our competencies in complex tasks we often
confront impossibilities or failure. If we traverse the boundaries of our
PAGE 8
discipline into neighbouring or related ones, we can, in concert with them,
achieve our aims. In other words, there are other organs of national power
and we must learn to use them and interface with them effectively. Such
synergy creates desired effects, perhaps at lesser cost and in quicker
time. This calls for wisdom, knowledge of other disciplines and lack of
parochialism. The future also brings with it the opportunity for creating
synergies and national capabilities.
I feel, therefore, that the trick lies in perfecting internal core-
competencies, identifying complimentary capabilities in other
organisations, developing effective interfaces and training to create and
employ a new, enhanced hybrid. We are convinced that such jointness is
the way forward and that core competencies of each Service, indeed of all
organs of national power, must be synergised to generate the required
effect and capability. A capability-based approach from development to
employment will encourage an inter-disciplinary integration and the
coming together of all organs of national power. At the end, it is people
that make an institution or system work. The best ones can be rendered
ineffective for want of skills and commitment and vice-versa. Essentially,
we believe jointness and synergy have less to do with new structures and
ownership, but depends upon joint thinkers, planning, capability creations,
as well as joint training and execution. Perhaps it is better to grow in an
evolutionary manner.
PAGE 9
Similarly, it is also imperative that military and civil aviation integrate, to
take advantage of each others capacities, for better efficiency, cost-
effectiveness and for greater options. We have already made available 19
of our front-line air fields for civil air traffic and also allowed transit
through Air Force controlled air space, to save time and fuel. IAF has also
proposed the flexible use of air space; and the process for integration of
civil and AF radars has begun.
Beyond generating national synergies, aerospace technologies are so
expensive, cutting-edge and hard to develop, that I dare say, our quest of
these increasingly encourages joint-ventures and sharing of knowledge &
resources between nations, and accord opportunity to forge international
synergies.
PAGE 10