Unit 15 Large Scale Structure and The Expanding Universe
Unit 15 Large Scale Structure and The Expanding Universe
15.1 INTRODUCTION
In previous units you have learnt about stars and galaxies and their properties. You
have learnt that there are billions of galaxies in the universe. It is now time to estimate
the size of the universe and discuss the current ideas about its major components and
its origin. The science which deals with the origin of the universe is called cosmology.
In this unit, we discuss some aspects of cosmology. First we learn how distances of
distant objects can be estimated so that we can get an idea of the size of the universe.
Estimation of distances is a very tricky problem because there is no way of verifying
these distances directly. So, we look for internal consistency in various methods,
which means that the distance estimates given by them agree with one another.
In this unit we discuss the distribution of matter on very large scales also called the
large scale structure of the universe. We also look at the kind of matter that may be
forming the bulk of the universe. This matter is not visible and is called the dark
matter. It shows itself up only through its gravitational effect.
Objectives
35
Galaxies and the
Universe 15.2 COSMIC DISTANCE LADDER
An important step in this direction is to estimate the physical size of distant objects
and their distances from us. You know that to specify the position of an object in
three-dimensional space, we need 3 coordinates. Since we are observing from the
Earth (or its vicinity from satellites), it is best to use spherical polar coordinate system
with us as the origin. Two of the coordinates, namely, and (which are related to
the declination and right ascension, respectively) are easily fixed by pointing a
telescope in the direction of the object. Fixing the distance to an astronomical object is
relatively trickier.
In this section, we give an introduction to the basic principles that are used to measure
distances. The basic principle involved is to use the properties of the nearby objects
and deduce distances of similar objects farther off using these properties. Then we use
the latter objects to deduce the distances to objects still farther, and so on. This series
of steps which takes us from one step (in terms of distances) to the next step (in terms
of distances even farther) is termed the Cosmic Distance Ladder.
All this is best understood through an example of estimating distances on the Earth.
Consider the following situation. You are in a house and there are small plants around
the lawn in your house. Outside the house also there are similar plants and in addition
there are also some trees. We do not know the height of these trees. Very far away
there is the sea and on the beach also there are a number of such trees. The problem is
to estimate the distance of the sea from your house. To begin with we do not know
about the height of the trees.
The obvious thing would be to walk down to the sea (keeping in mind that all the
steps should approximately be of the same size) and count the number of steps. The
length of the step multiplied by the number of steps gives us the distance to the beach.
But you cannot use this method if you are not allowed to, or are unable to come out of
the house and go to the beach. The situation is more like this in the context of distance
measurement in astronomy. We can make direct measurement only on the Earths
surface. Since it will take about 1,00,000 years, even to reach the other end of the
galaxy by moving at the speed of light, we need to devise a better strategy.
Let us come back to our problem of measuring the distance to the sea beach. We will
put an extra condition that we are not allowed to come out of the gates of the house.
With this constraint we can proceed in the following way.
We first measure the heights h of the plants inside the garden of the house. Next we
measure the angle subtended by similar plants outside which are in the vicinity of
h
the trees. The distance of these plants from us equals d = . Since the trees are in the
vicinity of these plants we know that their distance from us is also d. Further, we can
measure the angle 1 subtended by the heights of these trees. The height h1 of these
trees is now given by h1 = d 1. In this way we have achieved the first step in the
ladder of finding distances. We next use this information to estimate the distance to
the trees near the seaside. Since the trees near the beach are similar to the ones nearby,
we assume that their height is also h1. By measuring the angle subtended by these
trees we can compute the distance of these trees from us. Because of the physical
association of these trees with the sea side we know the distance of the sea from your
house. This is the second step of the ladder. Like this we can add more steps and go
on to estimate the distances of far off objects.
36
15.2.2 Distance Measurement using Cepheid Variables Large Scale Structure and
the Expanding Universe
3.0
Visual Magnitude
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
0 5 10
Days
(a) (b)
Fig.15.1: a) Cepheid variable stars in NGC 300; b) the brightness of Cepheid stars as a function of time
We have a large number of such stars in our neighbourhood. Their distances can be
measured by the parallax method. From these distances and from their observed
apparent magnitudes, their absolute magnitudes and luminosities can be calculated. It
turns out that their absolute magnitudes are directly proportional to their periods
(Fig. 15.2). This is called the period-luminosity relation for the Cepheids.
8
6
Absolute magnitude
0
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
M = m + 5 5 log r, (15.1)
we can find the distance of this star. In this way, the Cepheid variable stars have been
used to find distances of nearby galaxies. Used in this manner, Cepheids are called
standard candles.
We can now use Cepheids to define some other objects, such as supernovae, to act as
standard candles to estimate even larger distances.
What is the result of these investigations? We find that distant galaxies are rushing
away from us with velocities which are proportional to their distances. This is called
Hubbles law.
Spend SAQ 1
5 min.
Explain the concept of a distance ladder.
300,000
250,000
200,000
Velocity (km s )
1
150,000
100,000
50,000
Distance (Mpc)
Fig.15.3: Hubbles law
The velocity of any object can be split into a component that is along the line-of-sight
and another component that is transverse (perpendicular to) the line-of-sight. The line-
of-sight component of the velocity can be determined very accurately by Doppler shift
of the light that we received from the object. Hence this gives the velocity with which
38 the object is coming towards us or receding away from us. Let us look at this process.
15.3.1 Distance-Velocity Relation Large Scale Structure and
the Expanding Universe
Using the methods similar to those mentioned above, Hubble estimated the distances
and velocities of a set of galaxies and plotted them. He found that the galaxies in
general seem to be receding away from us. This is popularly known as the expanding
universe. Further, the velocities with which they are receding away, are directly
proportional to their distances from us (Fig. 15.3). This prompted him to propose a
law, now known by his name.
Hubbles law
v = Hr, (15.2)
where v is the line-of-sight velocity of an object, r its distance from us and the
proportionality constant H is called the Hubble constant.
The importance of this relation is that, once we know the velocity of a galaxy (by red
shift measurement), we can calculate the distance at which it is located. It is important
to point out here that Hubbles law holds even if we were on some other galaxy. Our
location in the universe does not have any special importance.
Notice that in the above relation H is the slope of the curve shown in Fig. 15.3. Notice
also that 1/H has the dimensions of time. In a very simple picture, we can imagine that
all the galaxies which are today moving away from one another were at some time in
the past together at one point. Some event occurred at that time which triggered the
expansion of the universe. This event is usually called the Big Bang. The quantity 1/H
measures the time since that even, or the age of the universe.
SAQ 2 Spend
5 min.
In astronomy, the velocity is measured in km s1. The distance of galaxies is measured
in Mpc or million parsec. Find the dimensions of H.
Unfortunately the measured value of H has lots of errors. But we know today that it is
roughly 70 km s1/Mpc1. Estimate the age of the universe.
These conditions need not be the same at all points at a given time. Let us illustrate
this situation in the following manner:
Alternatively, if we find that they look similar today, we may naively think that they
must have got created at the same time, so that they have had the same time for
evolution. For the systems under consideration, namely, the clusters of galaxies, we
know that they look similar but at the same time we have reasons to believe that they
started their evolution at different times.
Our simple-minded reasoning leads to the suggestion that they may have been created
at different times but they have reached some kind of steady state today. Such systems
have a simple, but important relationship for their kinematic parameters such as their
mass and velocity. This relationship is called the virial theorem which we now
describe.
The virial theorem says that if a system is bounded and is in equilibrium, then its
moment of inertia does not change with time. Such a system will have the following
relation between its total kinetic and potential energies:
2T + V = 0, (15.3)
where T is the total kinetic and V is the total potential energy of the system.
1
i=1 vi2 .
N
T= m (15.4)
2
The total potential energy is obtained by summing over the potential energy of all the
pairs. We have
Gmi m j
V= i> j ri r j (15.5)
40
For a spherically symmetric distribution, V will come out to be proportional to Large Scale Structure and
1 the Expanding Universe
M (R) R , where R is the radius of the system and M the total mass enclosed in a
sphere of radius R. The total kinetic energy can be estimated in the following manner.
If the velocities are in random directions, some of the particles of the system will
contribute a blue shift and some red shift. This will result in broadening of the spectral
lines. Hence, from the width of the spectral lines we can estimate the root mean
square (rms) velocity. This gives the total kinetic energy. If the system is in
equilibrium, we should have
T = V/2 (15.6)
or
2
v rms R 1 . (15.7)
When one tries to estimate the mass of the system in the above manner, one finds that
there is much more mass in the system as compared to that suggested by the luminous
mass alone. Hence, it is postulated that there should be a significant fraction of mass
in the form of dark matter. What form this dark matter takes, we do not yet know.
One possibility is that it consists of cold, burnt out stars which emit very little
radiation. Another possibility is that it is in the form of particles which interact very
weakly with normal matter. It is a very active area of research at present.
To set up the basic equations governing the evolution of the universe as a whole,
Newtonian theory of gravity is inadequate and is, rigorously speaking, inapplicable.
The correct theory to use is Einsteins General Theory of Relativity. This, however, is
outside the scope of this course. All is, however, not lost. It so happens that if we go
ahead and apply Newtons laws (which strictly speaking is not the correct thing to do)
the final equations which we get are the same equations that result from the correct
theory, namely, the General Theory of Relativity.
The aim of this Section is to study the evolution of the Universe using these equations.
Hence, we will not be disturbed by the fact that the derivation of these is not rigorous.
We will happily go ahead and use these equations since we are aware that the final
equations are the correct ones.
We know that over a variety of scales the universe is not homogeneous. We have
planets, stars, galaxies and clusters of galaxies, which indicate that the universe is far
from being homogeneous. However, if we consider the universe as a whole, then at
large enough scales the universe seems to be homogeneous and isotropic. This last
point needs some explanation.
Consider a well maintained lawn. From a distance, the lawn appears uniformly green.
But as we start analysing the lawn on smaller scales, it begins to lose its homogeneity.
Consider a grass hopper sitting in the lawn. It observes the lawn at a scale which is
about the blade of grass. Clearly it will notice that the lawn is not at all homogeneous.
This means that the lawn is homogeneously green over distance scales which are
much bigger than the size of a blade of grass. In a similar way, we say that over scales
of sizes, much bigger than the size of galaxies, the universe is homogeneous.
41
Galaxies and the The equations that we now derive are the equations that govern the overall evolution
Universe
of a homogeneous universe. Consider two points A and O. With O as centre, and AO
as radius, draw a sphere. The force with which a test particle at A is gravitationally
pulled towards O can be calculated by just using the mass enclosed by the sphere. As
we know, the mass outside the sphere will not exert any net force on A.
Let the density of matter be . Notice that density does not depend upon space. This is
because of our condition of homogeneity. However, there is no such restriction on
time dependence. So we will include time dependence for generality. The mass of the
sphere of radius R = OA is
4
M= (t ) R 3 (t ), (15.8)
3
& be the
The gravitational potential at A due to this sphere is GM/R. Further, let v = R
velocity with which A is moving with respect to O. Depending on the magnitudes of
the kinetic energy and the potential energy, the particle at point A may keep moving
away from O or may turn back and fall towards O. This is the well known condition
for escape velocity.
GM v2
E= + (15.9)
R 2
or
2GM
R& 2 2 E = (15.10)
R
If the energy E is positive, then the distance between A and O will keep increasing and
if E is negative, A will attain a maximum distance from O and then begin to fall
towards O.
2GM
R& 2 + k .2 E = (15.11)
R
Dividing both sides by R 2 and expressing the mass M in terms of the density as
4 3
M= R
3
we get,
R& 2 k .2 E 8G
+ = (15.12)
2 2 3
R R
a& 2 k 8G
+ = (15.13)
a2 a2 3
We get the same equation from the general theory of relativity. The parameter k then
signifies the curvature of space. In the general theory of relativity, the effect of the
gravitational field is to make the space curved. The curvature of space is denoted by k,
which can take values +1, 0 or 1, depending on the overall density of the universe.
The quantity a is called the scale factor and the nature of a as function of t indicates
the nature of the expansion of the universe.
Fig. 15.5 shows the behaviour of a as a function of t for the three values of k, i.e., +1,
0 and 1. These curves are the solutions of the Friedmann equation. We see that
when k = 1 (which according to general theory of relativity implies that the overall
density of the universe is less than a certain critical density), or k = 0 (the overall
density of the universe equals the critical density), the universe keeps expanding.
When k = +1 (the overall density of the universe is greater than the critical density),
the universe expands up to a point and then starts contracting. Present observations
indicate that the universe will keep expanding, and its expansion will not be followed
by contraction.
In the early phase of the universe, the curvature must have been small, so it is
sufficient to consider the case of k = 0. The solution of the Friedmann equations, of
course, depends on the nature of energy density. If an, the equation can be solved
for k = 0 and the result comes out to be
a ( n / 2) 2 / n t 2 / n (15.14)
k<0
k =0
a(t)
k>0
t
Fig.15.5: The variation of a with time
43
Galaxies and the SAQ 3
Universe Spend
5 min.
n
Verify that Eq. (15.14) is a solution of Eq. (15.13) when a .
Time-temperature Relationship
We know from the thermodynamics of radiation that it has pressure and energy
density which we denote by prad and rad, respectively. They are related to each other
through the relation,
where c is the speed of light. The distance between points increases as R which, in
3
turn, is proportional to a. Hence, the volume increases as a and the energy contained
3
in it as a . Now, using the first law of thermodynamics, dU + pdV = 0, we have
d [ c 2 a 3 ] + pd [a 3 ] = 0. (15.16)
rad a 4 (15.17)
Using this relation in the expression for derived in the last section (with n = 4) we
get,
a t (15.18)
At the same time we know that the temperature of radiation is related to its energy-
density by
rad T 4 (15.19)
From the last three equations, we get the relationship of temperature with time as
T 1/ t (15.20)
We see that t = 0 is both interesting as well as disturbing. This is because at that point
of time, the temperature shoots to infinity and so does the energy density. It is this
epoch which is termed as the Big Bang.
An important class of reactions at high energy is those which lead to the synthesis of
nuclei of elements. Very early on, there were no complex nuclei. The only ones were
the hydrogen nuclei, i.e., protons. At those energies, even if the protons and neutrons
combined to form higher atomic number nuclei (e.g., the Helium nucleus), the kinetic
energies of the particles were so high that the collisions would have immediately
disintegrated them.
As the universe cools, a certain temperature is reached when the energies are low
enough that this backward reaction (namely disintegration) begins to get suppressed.
Hence, stable helium nucleus begins to get formed. As the temperature lowers further,
we expect that higher atomic number nuclei will begin to get synthesized. So the
question is, Can we proceed in this way and synthesize all the naturally occurring
nuclei? The answer unfortunately is no!
This line of reasoning works for only the elements with first few atomic numbers. As
the temperature decreases, we can form Lithium and some Boron. The problem comes
up when we need to form Beryllium. In the process of the formation of the stable
Beryllium nucleus, one passes through an intermediate stage where, spontaneous
disintegration is faster than the fusion. So even before there can be fusion the nucleus
which is supposed to participate in the fusion, disintegrates. Hence one cannot form
Beryllium by this procedure. Only after the formation of Beryllium, can the nuclei of
higher atomic numbers be formed. Hence this is called the Beryllium Bottleneck.
The universe has to wait for a very long time, namely, till stars form, in order to
synthesize elements of atomic number 5 and higher. (Refer to Unit 10 for details of
nucleo-synthesis inside the stars).
The discovery of the CMBR has great significance for cosmology. (The discoverers of
the radiation were awarded the Nobel Prize for their work.) It shows that the universe
was once very hot and dense. This lends great support to theories of the universe
which maintain that the universe is changing with time, that is, it is evolving. Its
existence is a very powerful argument against theories which propose that the
universe is steady, that is, it is unchanging. In the theories of the latter type, it is
extremely hard to produce such a radiation.
Yet there is a set of scientists who believe in a steady state universe, a universe
which has no beginning and no end, which appears the same at all points in space and
at all times. Historically, the steady state theory emerged in the1940s and 1950s, when
observational techniques were not much developed, and so the Hubble constant H
could not be measured accurately. Recall that 1/H gives a rough time scale of the age
of the universe. So, the age of the universe inferred from the value of H at that time
turned out to be less than the age of some fossils on the Earth. This was quite
embarrassing. To overcome this age problem, the scientists proposed the steady state
universe. However, CMBR and synthesis of light elements in the early universe are
very powerful arguments against this theory and in favour of the hot Big Bang theory.
With this we come to an end of this unit in which you have studied about the large
scale structure of the universe. We now present its summary.
15.7 SUMMARY
Distances of far-off objects inform us about the large scale structure of the
universe. To find distances of other galaxies we employ the concept of the
distance ladder. The first step of the ladder is the Cepheid variable stars found in
nearly galaxies. Subsequent steps include objects such as supernovae which can
be detected even in galaxies which are very far off.
The outcome of the exploration of the universe is that the galaxies are rushing
away from one another and the universe is expanding.
The expansion of the universe is in accordance with Hubbles law, v = Hr, so that
1/H gives a rough estimate of the age of the universe.
The behaviour of the universe is governed by the Friedmann equation:
a& 2 k 8G
+ =
a2 a2 3
The need for a hot and dense early universe can be explained in connection with
the synthesis of light elements and the existence of the cosmic microwave
background radiation.
The present understanding is that if the universe was once hot and dense, then it
must be an evolving universe, and not a steady state universe.
2. State Hubbles law. How can this be used to get an estimate of the age of the
universe?
3. Explain why at one time, the steady state theory appeared necessary. What is its
46 status now?
Large Scale Structure and
15.9 SOLUTIONS AND ANSWERS the Expanding Universe
= 70 10 5 cm s 1 / 3 1018 10 6 cm
7 10 6
= s 1
24
3 10
1 3 10 24
Age of the universe = = s
H 7 10 6
3 10 24
= yr
7 10 6 3 10 7
a& 2 8G
3. Eq. (15.13) =
a2 3
a& 2 8G
Since = Ca n = C a n [C is a constant]
2 3
a
n
a& 8GC n da 1 8GC
= a 2 a& = = Aa 2 A =
a 3 dt 3
n2 n
a 2
a 2 da = A dt
n t a n ( 2) 2n . t 2n .
2
Hence, proved.
Terminal Questions
1. See Text.
2. See Text.
3. See Text.
47