Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
16K views2 pages

Validation Form

The document provides a scale for rating the validity of a questionnaire being used to gather data for a research investigation. It rates the questionnaire's validity on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being "Very High Valid" and 1 being "Not valid at all". It then lists 7 indicators for evaluating the questionnaire and asks the validator to rate each indicator from 1 to 5 based on how well the questionnaire demonstrates that indicator. Space is also provided for comments and suggestions from the validator.

Uploaded by

Joselle
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
16K views2 pages

Validation Form

The document provides a scale for rating the validity of a questionnaire being used to gather data for a research investigation. It rates the questionnaire's validity on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being "Very High Valid" and 1 being "Not valid at all". It then lists 7 indicators for evaluating the questionnaire and asks the validator to rate each indicator from 1 to 5 based on how well the questionnaire demonstrates that indicator. Space is also provided for comments and suggestions from the validator.

Uploaded by

Joselle
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Research Title:

Direction: This tool asks for your evaluation of the instruments to be used in the data gathering
for the investigation above, to establish validity. You are requested to give as much as possible
honest response or assessment based on our criteria provided below. Please check (/) only one
from the selection.
Scale Interpretation Range Description
5 Very High Valid 4.1 5.0 The questionnaire is valid and can provide unbiased
data for the investigation, allowing only 0 5%
error.
4 High Valid 3.1 4.0 The questionnaire is valid and can provide unbiased
data for the investigation, allowing only 6 10%
error.
3 Valid 2.1 3.0 The questionnaire is valid and can provide unbiased
data for the investigation, allowing only 11 15%
error.
2 Less Valid 1.1 2.0 The questionnaire is valid and can provide unbiased
data for the investigation, allowing only 16 20%
error.
1 Not valid at all 01 The questionnaire is valid and can provide unbiased
data for the investigation, allowing only 20 25%
error.

INDICATORS RATING
5 4 3 2 1
1. The indicators in the instruments
consistently and accurately measure
each variables of the investigation.
2. The instruments fit the variables under
investigation, thus measuring what it
tends to measure.
3. The instruments have the capability to
measure items of variables within a
given time frame.
4. The instruments have the ability to
distinguish the characteristics or the
allowed data to obtain.
5. The instruments have no influence on
the variables being measured
6. The instruments are framed in clear and
simple, to avoid risk of error.
7. The instruments are capable of
generating data that will be of value and
practical use to the sectors concerned in
the investigation.
Comments and Suggestions:
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________
Signature over printed name of the validator

You might also like