SI 3211 - Lecture 11
SI 3211 - Lecture 11
SI 3211 - LECTURE 11
SUBJECT OUTLINE
semester 2 - 2010
LECTURE OUTLINE
FRAME ELEMENT
What are the DOF of a FRAME ELEMENT?
DOF at each NODE END correspond to TRANSLATION ALONG THE
VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL LOCAL AXES and ROTATION ABOUT THE
END NODES YL
f1y ,u1y f2z ,u2z f2y ,u2y
SIGN CONVENTION: 1 2 XL
Anti-clockwise rotations are f1x ,u1x f2x ,u2x
assumed to be positive. f1z ,u1z
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
Using the concept of NEAR and FAR nodes, the DOF can be referred to
as: YL
fNy ,uNy fFz ,uFz fFy ,uFy
1 2 XL
fFx ,uFxfNx ,uNx fFx ,uFx
fNz ,uNz
YL
and the relevant DOF would 2 6 5
1 2 XL
be as follows:
1 4
Z,ZL
3
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
STIFFNESS MATRIX
The stiffness relationship for a frame element expressed in local
coordinates is defined below as: 1 2 3 4 5 6
YL f2y ,u2y EA
EA
f1y ,u1y f2z ,u2z
L
0 0
L
0 0
6 EI u
1 2 X f 0
L 1x
12 EI 6 EI
0
12 EI
1x 1
u
3 2 3 2
f L L L L
1y 6 EI 4 EI 6 EI 2 EI 1y 2
f1x ,u1x f 0 L 2
L
0
L L u
2
1z 3
EA
1z
u
f1z ,u1z f ,u
2x 2x f
2x 0 0
EA
0 0 2x 4
f L L u
2y 5
6 EI
2y
12 EI 6 EI 12 EI
which can be written as: f 0
2z
L
L3
0 2
L 3
L
u2 2z
6
f k e u
0
6 EI
L 2
2 EI
L
0
6 EI
L
4 EI
L
2
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
TRANSFORMATION MATRIX
The frame element is a very generic element and we want to be able
to use it for generic frame analysis, where the elements axes are
located at different angles relative to the global coordinate system.
TRANSFORMATION MATRIX
Following the procedure utilized to obtain the TRANSFORMATION
MATRIX for the truss element, the required rotation matrix R for the
frame element is now derived.
The rotation matrix which relates a generic vector in the GLOBAL
COORDINATES of to those expressed in the LOCAL AXES is first
derived.
The same procedure is then applied to relate a generic vector in the
LOCAL COORDINATES to those in the GLOBAL ONES.
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
Y V B Y B
Yl V
Vy vx Xl
vy
A Vx A
X X
Z,ZL Z,ZL
ZL- and Z-axes are
coming out of the page
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
Then,
vx R11 R12 R13 Vx R11 R12 R13 1 R11 c
v y R21 R22 R23 Vy R21 R22 R23 0 R21 s
v R R33 R33
z 31 R32 Vz R31 R32 0 R31 0
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
Z,ZL
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
Vx 0 XL
V y 0 q
X
V 1
z
Vz=1
Z,ZL
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
collecting the previous results we can write the rotation matrix as follows:
The ROTATION MATRIX [R] which relates a vector in local & global
coordinates looks as:
v R V
where,
v x R11 R12 R13 Vx
v v y R R21 R22 R23 V Vx
v R31 R32 R33 V
z x
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
TRANSFORMATION MATRIX:
FROM LOCAL TO GLOBAL COORDINATES
Let’s assume to have a vector V expressed in local coordinate system.
In the following we will derive the transformation matrix required to
convert its coordinates in terms of the global coordinate system.
Z,ZL
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
v x 0 XL
v y 0 q
X
v 1
z
vz=1
Z,ZL
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
collecting the previous results we can write the rotation matrix as follows:
The ROTATION MATRIX [r] which relates a vector in global & local
coordinates looks as:
V r v
where,
Vx r11 r12 r13 vx
V Vy r r21 r22 r23 v vx
V r31 r32 r33 v
z x
2
Y Y 4
YL YL 2
X X
1
f k e u F K e U
where the subscript e highlights that the stiffness relationship is
written for 1 element in global coordinates
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
u1x c s 0 0 0 0 U1x
u s c 0 0 0 0 U1 y
1y
u1z 0
0 1 0 0 0 U1z
Or: u T U
u2 x 0 0 0 c s 0 U 2 x
u2 y 0 0 0 s c 0 U 2 y
u2 z 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 2 z
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
f1x c s 0 F1x f 2 x c s 0 F2 x
f1 y s c 0 F1 y f2 y s c 0 F2 y
f 0 0 1 f 0 0 1
1z F1z 2z F2 z
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
f1x c s 0 0 0 0 F1x
f s c 0 0 0 0 F1 y
1y
f1z 0
0 1 0 0 0 F1z
Or: f T T F
f 2 x 0 0 0 c s 0 F2 x
f 2 y 0 0 0 s c 0 F2 y
f 2 z 0 0 0 0 0 1 F2 z
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
3 3 2 3 3 2
L L L L L L L L
c 2
EA 12 EI EA 12 EI 6 EI EA 12 EI EA 12 EI 6 EI
cs
2
s 2
c cs
2
s 2
c
L L
3
L
3
L
2
L L
3
L L
3
L 2
L
2 EI
3
6 EI 6 EI 4 EI 6 EI 6 EI
s c s c
K EA
2 2 2 2
L L L L L L
12 EI EA 12 EI EA 12 EI EA 12 EI 6 EI
e
s 4
6 EI
L c L s cs s c cs
2 2 2 2
s
3
L 3
L 2
L L 3
L L 3
L 2
L
EA 12 EI cs EA s 12 EI c 6 EI c EA 12 EI EA 12 EI
L 5
6 EI
2 2
cs
2
s 2
c c
L L
3
L
3
L 2
L L
3
L L
3
L 2
4 EI
6
6 EI 6 EI 2 EI 6 EI 6 EI
s c s c
L2 2
L L 2
L 2
L L
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
MEMBER LOADS
Loads applied in the member span w
are referred to as MEMBER LOADS.
1 2
Let’s first consider the common case L
of a Uniformly Distributed Load w
(or UDL). NOTE: thanks to the PRINCIPLE OF
SUPERPOSITION we know that THE
FOLLOWING EQUALITIES ARE POSSIBLE
w
1 2 Actual loading
L
w
Actual loading and reactions
1 wL2 wL2
2 of a fixed-fixed member
wL 12 L
12 wL
2 2
wL wL Opposite reactions of a
fixed-fixed member subjected
2 2
1 wL2 wL2
2
12
L 12 to UDL
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
L L L
1 4 1 4 1 4
L L L
STRUCTURE S1 STRUCTURE S2 STRUCTURE S3
We will now see how the results from structures S1, S2 and S3 relate
to each other.
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
S1 S3 S2
2 3 COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS
S1, S3 The COMPARISON OF THE
RESULTS for S1, S2 and S3 is
carried out with L=10m and
S2 w=500kN/m
1 4
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
U1 U 2 U 3
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
F1 F2 F3
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
w=500kN/m L=10m
2 3
4167
4167
1 4 2 3
2083
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
YL f2y ,u2y
f1y ,u1y f2z ,u2z
2 XL f1 f 2 f 3
1
f1x ,u1x
f1z ,u1z f2x ,u2x f1, S1 f1, S 2 f1, S 3
Yl f f f
f2 f5 2, S 1 2, S 2 2, S 3
f6 f 3, S1 f 3, S 2 f 3, S 3
2 Xl
1 f f
4, S 1 4, S 2 4, S 3 f
f1 f4 f 5, S 1 f 5, S 2 f 5, S 3
f3
f 6, S1 f 6, S 2 f 6, S 3
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
NOTE:
SIMILAR CONSIDERATIONS APPLY TO THE CASE OF A BEAM ELEMENT
3
1 Yl 4
1 2
2 Xl
wL wL Opposite of reactions of a
fixed-fixed member subjected
2 2
1 wL2 wL2
2
12
L 12 to UDL
STIFFNESS METHOD : FRAME ELEMENT
In matrix form:
f FEM k e u
Or:
f FEM k e T U
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
4m
3
5m
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
In order to solve this problem we will use the frame element.
Before we start let’s number the DOF of the frame:
8 2
1 1 3 2
9 7 300 kNm 1 Once we have numbered the DOF
2 we can draw a FBD of the frame.
4 6
3
5
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
5 2
6 3
4 1 DOF in global
DOF in local
2 coordinate 2 coordinate
2 4 6
3 1 5
5 2
6 3
4 1
2 2
6
2
3 1 4 5
5 6 4 1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6
11,250 0 22,500 11,250 0 22,500 1 5
0 1 ,050 ,000 0 0 1,050, 000 0 2 6
22,500 0 60,000 22,500 0 30,000 3 4
K2
11,250 0 22,500 11,250 0 22,500 4 1
0 1,050,000 0 0 1,050,000 0 5 2
22,500 0 30,000 22,500 0 60,000 6 3
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
For member 2:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1
2
3
4
[K]= 5
6
7
8
9
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
We will see how each element would contribute with its terms
to [K]. Once the contribution of each element has been
identified individually, then we will add them together in the
[K] matrix.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
84,000 0 0 0 0 0 -84,000 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
[K]= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
-840,000 0 0 0 0 0 840,000 0 0 7
0 -1,050,000 0 0 0 1,050,000 0 0 0 6
-840,000 0 0 0 0 0 840,000 0 0 7
0 -1,050,000 0 0 0 1,050,000 0 0 0 6
-840,000 0 0 0 0 0 840,000 0 0 7
F 46.37 46.37 0
y
4m
36.30 kN 3
5m 46.37 kN
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
w
1 2
L
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
1 2 1 2
2 L 1 4 P2
2
1 4 P3
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
The uniformly distributed load is now replaced by its equivalent nodal
loads as shown.
1 w 3 wL
2
w wL
P wL 2
wL
2 2
4 12 12
1 2 1 2
P2 1 4 P3
2
f FEM k e U 1
wL
2
wL
2
3P
2 wL2
4
Or: 12
2
f FEM k e U P2
1
wL2 1
12 4 P3
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
wL wL
The vectors of known
1
2
2 wL2
2
3P displacements and actions
4
12 can then be expressed as:
1 2 0 2
P2 1 Pk wL U k 0
2
wL
4 P3 1 3
12 2 0
4
wL2
while the vectors of unknown P2 2
12
displacements and actions: Pu P3 wL 3 U u U1 1
2
2
P wL
4 12 4
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
1 2 3 4
The stiffness relationship
wL 12 EI 6 EI
12 EI 6 EI
2
can then be written as: 2
L3 L2 L3 L2
U1 1
P2 wL 6 EI 4 EI 6 EI
2
2 EI
0 2
12 L2 L L L
wL 12 EI
0 3
6 EI 12 EI 6 EI
P3 3 2 2
2 L L L3 L 0 4
wL
2 6 EI 2 EI 6 EI 4 EI
4 12
P 2
L2 L L L
P3 3 wL 2
P 2 2 L 24 EI 2 2 2 2 wL
4 wL 6 EI
wL wL 3
12 L2 12 4
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
wL2
6 w
Check for equilibrium
1 2
F y wL wL 0
wL wL2 wL2 wL2
w 3 z
M wL L
6
3
wL
L
2
0
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
2 20 kN
9
3 2 3
1 2 4 8
12 kN/m
4m
7 1
5
1
6
3m 2m 2m
Let’s draw a FBD of our structure to highlight the reactions
of the problem. 2 20 kN
9
2 3
3 1 2 P8 4 8
P9
12 kN/m
4m
7 1
1
P6 5 6 3m 2m 2m
P7
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
3
3
6.720 106 N / m 28.00 106 Nm
L 5 L 5
6 EI 6 200 109 350 10 6
2
2
16.80 106 N
L 5
2
2
1
3
12 kN/m
7 1
1 6 7 5 1 2 3
292.30 13.44 292.30 380.77 13.44
P6 5 6
380.77 6
380.77 514.42 10.08 380.77 514.42 10.08 7
P7
13.44 10.08 56.00 13.44 10.08 28.00 5
K1 106
292.30 380.77 13.44 292.30 380.77 13.44 1
380.77 514.42 10.08 380.77 514.42 10.08 2
13.44 10.08 28.00 13.44 10.08 56.00 3
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
For member 1:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1
2
3
4
[K]= 5
6
7
8
9
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
For member 2: q= 0º c = 1; s = 0
3
3
13.125 106 N / m 35.00 106 Nm
L 4 L 4
6 EI 6 200 109 350 10 6
2
2
26.25 106 N
L 4
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
2 20 kN
9
2 3
3 1 2 P8 4 8
P9
1 2 3 8 9 4
1000.00 0 0 1000.00 0 0 1
0 13 .125 26 . 25 0 13.125 26.25 2
0 26.25 70.00 0 26.25 35.00 3
K 2 106
1000. 00 0 0 1000 . 00 0 0 8
0 13.125 26.25 0 13.125 26.25 9
0 26.25 35.00 0 26.25 70.00 4
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
For member 2:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1
2
3
4
[K]= 5
6
7
8
9
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1292.30 380.77 13.44 0 13.44 292.30 380.77 1000.00 0 1
380.77 527.54 16.17 26.25 10.08 380.77 514.42 0 13.125 2
13.44 16.17 126.00 35.00 28.00 13.44 10.08 0 26.25 3
0 26 .25 35 .00 70 .00 0 0 0 0 26 .25 4
K 106 13.44 10.08 28.00 0 56.00 13.44 10.08 0 0 5
292.3 380.77 13.44 0 13.44 292.30 380.77 0 0 6
380.77 514.42 10.08 0 10.08 380.77 514.42 0 0 7
1000 .00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 .00 0 8
13.125 26.55 26.55 13.125 9
0 0 0 0 0
EXAMPLE 5 (from Hibbeler)
Determine the support reactions at 1 and 3 of the previous
example. 2 20 kN
9
2 3
1 2 4 8
3
12 kN/m
4m
7 1
1
6
5 3m 2m 2m
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
By considering the equivalent nodal loads for the structure:
For member 1: 2 0 kN
2 -25 kNm
30 kN
12 kN/m 12 kN/m
25 kNm
1 1
30 kN
0 kN
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
For member 2:
20 kN
10 kNm -10 kNm
0 kN 2 3
0 kN
10 kN 10 kN
10 kN 10 kN
30 kN 10 kNm 9
3 2 1 4 3
25 kNm P8 8
2
-10 kNm P9
30 kN 7 1 f FEM k e u
Or:
P6 5
1 6 F T T FEM T T k e T U
-25 kNm
P7 F T T FEM K e U
The vectors of displacements & actions can be determined as:
10 kN 10 kN
303/5=18 kN
30 kN 2 10 kNm
30 kN 9
2 4 3
304/5=24 kN 3 1 P8 8
-10 kNm 2 P9
25 kNm U1 24000
U 28000
2
30 kN 7 1 U 3
15000
U4 10000
U u Pu
-25 kNm U 5
U k 0
25000
Pk P 24000
6
P6 1 6 0 7P 18000
5
0
P5
P7 0 P6 10000
The stiffness relationship for the whole structure can then be
written as:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
24000 1292.30 380.77 13.44 0 13.44 292.30 380.77 1000.00 0 U1
28000 380 .77 527 .54 16 . 17 26.25 10.08 380 .77 514 .42 0 13.125 U
2
15000 13.44 16.17 126.00 35.00 28.00 13.44 10.08 0 26.25 U 3
10000 0 26.25 35.00 70.00 0 0 0 0 26.25 U 4
25000 10 10.08 13.44 0 U 5
6
13.44 28.00 0 56.00 10.08 0
P 24000
292.3 380.77 13.44 0 13.44 292.30 380.77 0 0 0
6
P7 18000 380.77 514.42 10.08 0 10.08 380.77 514.42 0 0 0
P8 1000 .00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 . 00 0 0
P9 10000 13.125 26.55 26.55 13.125 0
0 0 0 0 0
and solving for the unknown displacements: U1 56.50 m
U 116.06 m
2
6
U 3 10 244.01 rad
U 64.38 rad
4
U 5 602.90 rad
Once the unknown displacements are
determined, the unknown actions can be calculated as:
56.50
P6 24000 292.30 380.77 13.44 0 13.44 116.60
P 18000 380.77 514.42
7 10.08 0 10.08 6
10 6
10 244.01
P8 1000.00 0 0 0 0 64.38
P9 10000
0 13.125 26.55 26.55 0
602.90
P6 24000 8.50 kN
P 18000 52.60 kN
7
P8 0 56.50 kN
P9 10000 3.43 kN
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 6
Select the appropriate element to use for the analysis (among the truss,
beam and frame elements) and determine the displacements of the
100 mm
following structure. Take E = 200 GPa for each member.
5 kN/m
2
200 mm
190 mm
1 3
10m 10m
90 mm
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
Obviously, the truss element is not appropriate as the
element needs to resist the load in flexure. The truss element
can resist only axial forces.
Both beam and frame elements can be used for the analysis
of this structure as both can be used to model the member
which is loaded in flexure.
5 kN/m
2 3
1
1 2
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
1 1 2
1
41.67 kNm -41.67 kNm
10m
-25 kN -25 kN
2
1 2
1 41.67 kNm
-41.67 kNm
-25 kN -25 kN
5 3 8
6 41.67 kNm 9
P4 1 2 P7 3
4 1 1 2 7
P6 2 P9 P
-41.67 kNm P3 8
P5
0 3
0 4
Let’s now specify the vectors of 0 1
0 5
Pk U k 0 6
known actions and displacements: 41.67 2 0 7
0 8
0 9
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
Noting that ALL KNOWN DISPLACEMENTS are zero, the system of
equations to be solved changes from:
5 3 8
6 41.67 kNm 9
P4 1 2 P7 3
4 1 1 2 7
P6 2 P9 P
-41.67 kNm P3
P5 8
5 kN/m
2 3
1
1 2
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
1 1 2
1
41.67 kNm -41.67 kNm
10m
-25 kN -25 kN
1 2
1 41.67 kNm
-41.67 kNm
-25 kN -25 kN
3 2 5
4 41.67 kNm 6
1 2 3
1 1 2
P4 -41.67 kNm P6 P
P2 5
P3
0 2
0 3
Let’s now specify the vectors of Pk 41.67 1 U k 0 4
known actions and displacements: 0 5
0 6
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
Noting that ALL KNOWN DISPLACEMENTS are zero, the system of
equations to be solved changes from:
3 3 5
4 41.67 kNm 6
1 2 3
1 1 2
P6 -41.67 kNm P9 P
P5 P3 8
5 kN/m
2
200 mm
190 mm
1 3
300 kN
10m 10m
90 mm
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
5 3 8
6 41.67 kNm 9
P4 1 300 kN 2 P7 3
4 1 1 2 7
P6 2 P9 P
-41.67 kNm P3 8
P5
0 3
0 4
Let’s now specify the vectors of 300.00 1
0 5
Pk U k 0 6
known actions and displacements: 41.67 2 0 7
0 8
0 9
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
Noting that ALL KNOWN DISPLACEMENTS are zero, the system of
equations to be solved changes from:
50 kN/m
2 3
4.5 m
1
6m 6m
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
2 8
2 9 3
3 1 2 7
5 1
6
1 4
50 kN/m 50 kN/m
2 3 2 3
1 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
378.46 95.39 2.88 128.46 95.39 2.88 250.00 0 0 1
95.39 75.32 3.66 95.39 72.82 3.84 0 2.50 7.50 2
2.88 3.66 54.00 2.88 3.84 12.00 0 7.50 15.00 3
128.46 95.39 2.88 128.46 95.39 2.88 0 0 0 4
K 103 95.39 72.82 3.84 95.39 72.82 3.84 0 0 0 5
2.88 3.84 12.00 2.88 3.84 24.00 0 0 0 6
250.00 0 0 0 0 0 250.00 0 0 7
0 2.50 7.50 0 0 0 0 2.50 7.50 8
7.50 15.00 7.50 30.00
0 0 0 0 0 9
STIFFNESS METHOD : EXAMPLES
The stiffness relationship for the whole structure can then be
written as:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0 378.46 95.39 2.88 128.46 95.39 2.88 250.00 0 0 U1 1
150 95.39 75.32 3.66 95.39 72.82 3.84 0 2.50 7.50 U 2 2
150 2.88 3.66 54.00 2.88 3.84 12.00 0 7.50 15.00 U 3 3
P4 128.46 95.39 2.88 128.46 95.39 2.88 0 0 0 0 4
P5 10 95.39 72.82 0 0 5
3
3.84 95.39 72.82 3.84 0 0
P
2.88 3.84 12.00 2.88 3.84 24.00 0 0 0 0 6
6
P7 250.00 0 0 0 0 0 250.00 0 0 0 7
P 150
8 0 2.50 7.50 0 0 0 0 2.50 7.50 0 8
P9 150 7.50 30.00 0 9
0 7.50 15.00 0 0 0 0
The hand calculations could have been
reduced by noting that: K11 required to determine
the unknown displacements Uu
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0 378.46 95.39 2.88 128.46 95.39 2.88 250.00 0 0 U1 1
150 95.39 75.32 3.66 95.39 72.82 3.84 0 2.50 7.50 U 2 2
150 2.88 3.66 54.00 2.88 3.84 12.00 0 7.50 15.00 U 3 3
P4 128.46 95.39 2.88 128.46 95.39 2.88 0 0 0 0 4
P5 10 95.39 72.82 0 0 5
3
3.84 95.39 72.82 3.84 0 0
P
2.88 3.84 12.00 2.88 3.84 24.00 0 0 0 0 6
6
P7 250.00 0 0 0 0 0 250.00 0 0 0 7
P 150
8 0 2.50 7.50 0 0 0 0 2.50 7.50 0 8
P9 150 7.50 30.00 0 9
0 7.50 15.00 0 0 0 0
4.5 m
1
-18.8kNm
1
-9.22kN
217.80kN 6m Checking equilibrium on local axes:
F 217.8 217.8 0
x
F 9.22 9.22 0
y