DATA ANALYSIS AND INFERENCE
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
The first question in the survey was to find out how many people were
aware of the recruitment policy of the organization. And this is the
result as shown below.
As shown in the pie graph above(in percentage) most of the
people who said yes make up 97% of the total people shown in.
While 3% of the total people said they have no idea of the
recruitment policy of their organization.
Most of the employees are aware of the recruitment policy of
their organization i.e.
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
There are different ways by which organizations recruit their
employees. And an analysis was made according to this after taking
the surveys.
The x-axis shows different ways, the company use to recruit their
employees.
The y-axis shows numbers (not in percentage) of how employees
get recruited in .
29 respondents said their immediate boss recruits them , 22
respondents said it was the recruitment agency, 21 respondents
said it was a consultancy firm and 12 said it was the panel of
directors who recruits them.
Only 1 respondent specified others i.e. he was the person
responsible for recruiting employees .
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
The next question deals with the accuracy of the recruitment and
selection policy in the company.
This was split up into three different sectors--- 45%-50% ---- 55%-
75% ----- 75%>
An accuracy of 75% was registered by 43% of the respondents
which came in top.
An accuracy of between 55%-75% was registered by 20% of the
respondents.
An accuracy of between 45%-50% was registered by 37% of the
respondents.
This shows that the compny accuracy in their recruitment and
retention process is more than 75% by majority (43%).
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
The next question deals with the different methods by which
employees are retained in the company.
The bar graph shows that most of thecompany go for increasing the salary
annually.
The next popular one refers to the company perks.
The third one is the frequent job rotations.
The fouth one is bonuses.
The fifth one is giving training to employees.
The least popular among the 40 respondents working in different company were
methods like incentives and appraisals used in order to retain their employees.
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
The next question was asked to find out whether the employees
working in the company think that the recruitment and retention
policy are interrelated.
As indicated by the pie chart 77% of the total respondents said
“yes, the recruitment and retention policy were indeed
interrelated”.
But 23% of the total respondents said “recruitment and retention
policy were not interrelated”.
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
Next the respondents was asked to rate their organizations
retention policy as compared to the industry.
40% agreed that it was about 60%
52% agreed that it was about 50%
And 8% agreed that it was rated above 70%
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
Next the respondents were asked how successful the retention
policy is in their organization.
Most of the respondents said that their retention policy were
satisfactory as opposed to it being good and very good.
52% of the people said it(i.e. the retention policy) was
satisfactory.
43% of the people said it(i.e. the retention policy) was good.
5% of the people said it(i.e. the retention policy) was very good.
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
Next we asked respondents whether their recruitment system
was centralized or was it local.
55% of the total respondents said the recruitment system is
local.
45% of the total respondents said the recruitment system is
centralized.
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
IS THE WORKING ENVIRONMENTGOOD ?
FEEDBACK BEFORE AFTER
RECRUITMENT RECRUITMENT
AVERAGE 16 18
GOOD 22 16
POOR 12 16
TOTAL 50 50
Analysis
The above table shows that out of 50 respondents 16 told that the working environment
before Recruitment is average and 22 said it was good and remaining 12 said it was poor
after Recruitment only 16 respondents said that working environment in the company is
good.
INFERENCE
It can be observed that working environment was good before Recruitment, but the
difference is not much.
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
IS THE JOBS ARE HAVING THE WORK LOAD ?
BEFORE
FEEDBACK AFTER RECRUITMENT
RECRUITMENT
HEAVY 26 29
NORMAL 24 21
TOTAL 50 50
ANALYSIS
The above table shows that out of 50 respondents 26 told that the workload before
Recruitment was heavy and 24said that it was normal.
After Recruitment 29 respondents said that workload in the company is heavy.
INFERENCE:
It can be observed that there is no much change workload after Recruitment
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
THE SATISFACTION REGARDING WELFARE ACTIVITIES IS
CONSIDERD ?
FEEDBACK BEFORE AFTER
RECRUITMENT RECRUITMENT
YES 17 27
NO 33 23
TOTAL 50 50
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows that out of 50 respondents 17 were satisfied & 33 were not
satisfied regarding welfare activities before Recruitment.
After Recruitment 27 respondents said that they are satisfied and remaining are not
satisfied.
INFERENCE:
It can be observed that the satisfaction regarding the welfare activities is more after
Recruitment.46%of employees after Recruitment are satisfied.
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
Is there the changes in terms of authority & freedom ?
FEEDBACK NO. OF
RESPONDENTS
YES 39
NO 11
TOTAL 50
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows that out of 50 respondents 39 told that the authority & freedom is
changed.
Only 11 respondents said that authority and freedom in the company is changed.
INFERENCE:
It can be observed that there is a change in authority & freedom after Recruitment
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
Is there changes in symbol of status
TABLE SHOWING THE CHANGES IN SYMBOL OF STATUS:
FEEDBACK NO. OF
RESPONDENTS
YES 28
NO 22
TOTAL 50
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows that out of 50 respondents 28 told that the symbol of status is
changed. Only 22 respondents said that the symbol of status is not changed.
INFERENCE:
Regarding status symbol 44%of employees are felt that there is no change in it after
Recruitment.
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
Are extra benefits enjoyed by the employees after recruitment?
table showing extra benefits enjoyed by the employees after
recruitment
FEEDBACK NO. OF
RESPONDENTS
YES 32
NO 18
TOTAL 50
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows that out of 50 respondents 32 told that they are enjoying extra
benefits
Only 22 respondents said that they are not getting any extra benefits.
INFERENCE:
64% employees said that they are benefited with the Recruitment. It means Recruitment
brought some extra benefits to the major portion of the employees.
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
Do you have the eligibility age?
AGE QUALIFICAITON:
6%
20%
39% 18-25 age group
25 – 35 age group
35 – 45 age group
Above 45 age group
35%
INFERENCE:
Further, the age qualification for agency recruitment, it was found
that 39% respondents were belonging to 18 – 25 age group, 35%
were belonging to 25 – 35 age group where as 20% to 35 -45 age
group and remaining 6% to above 45 age group. Also depicted in the
following tale mentioned below: -
18-25 age group 41
25 – 35 age group 37
35 – 45 age group 21
Above 45 age group 6
ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETATION
What dissatisfied you most in your occupation?
CAUSES OF DISSATISFACTION
10%
23%
Low employment
16%
Low earning / income
Low status
17%
34% Huge capital investment
All of the above
INFERENCE:
Respondents had different views about the dissatisfaction from the
present status of working or occupation. Dissatisfaction has been
depicted in a table below and graphically above:
Low earning 3
Low employment 24 6 Huge capital investment 17
1
Low status 18 All of the above 0
