Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
69 views3 pages

Regression: Descriptive Statistics

A multiple linear regression was conducted to predict customer satisfaction based on time required, taste, and price of a product. Time required, taste, and price together explained 17% of the variance in satisfaction. In the model, only taste approached statistical significance as a predictor of satisfaction. Collinearity diagnostics indicated no problematic multicollinearity among the predictor variables.

Uploaded by

Siddharth Shah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
69 views3 pages

Regression: Descriptive Statistics

A multiple linear regression was conducted to predict customer satisfaction based on time required, taste, and price of a product. Time required, taste, and price together explained 17% of the variance in satisfaction. In the model, only taste approached statistical significance as a predictor of satisfaction. Collinearity diagnostics indicated no problematic multicollinearity among the predictor variables.

Uploaded by

Siddharth Shah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

REGRESSION

/DESCRIPTIVES MEAN STDDEV CORR SIG N


/MISSING LISTWISE
/STATISTICS COEFF OUTS R ANOVA COLLIN TOL CHANGE
/CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10)
/NOORIGIN
/DEPENDENT satisfaction
/METHOD=ENTER timeconsuming taste price
/SAVE PRED ZPRED RESID ZRESID.

Regression

[DataSet0]

Descriptive Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

satisfaction 3.7917 .84949 48


timeconsuming 3.8333 1.03827 48
taste 4.0000 .61885 48
price 3.6875 .82916 48

Correlations

satisfaction timeconsuming taste price

satisfaction 1.000 -.281 .283 -.125

timeconsuming -.281 1.000 -.132 -.012


Pearson Correlation
taste .283 -.132 1.000 .166

price -.125 -.012 .166 1.000


satisfaction . .026 .026 .199
timeconsuming .026 . .185 .467
Sig. (1-tailed)
taste .026 .185 . .130
price .199 .467 .130 .
satisfaction 48 48 48 48

N timeconsuming 48 48 48 48
taste 48 48 48 48
price 48 48 48 48

Variables Entered/Removeda

Model Variables Variables Method


Entered Removed

price,
1 timeconsuming, . Enter
tasteb

a. Dependent Variable: satisfaction


b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summaryb

Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the Change Statistics


Square Estimate R Square F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
Change

1 .413a .170 .114 .79974 .170 3.010 3 44 .040

a. Predictors: (Constant), price, timeconsuming, taste


b. Dependent Variable: satisfaction

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Regression 5.775 3 1.925 3.010 .040b


1 Residual 28.142 44 .640

Total 33.917 47

a. Dependent Variable: satisfaction


b. Predictors: (Constant), price, timeconsuming, taste

Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig. Collinearity Statistics


Coefficients

B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF

(Constant) 3.688 1.012 3.645 .001


1
timeconsuming -.202 .113 -.247 -1.780 .082 .982 1.018
taste .384 .193 .280 1.990 .053 .955 1.047

price -.178 .143 -.174 -1.250 .218 .972 1.028

a. Dependent Variable: satisfaction

Collinearity Diagnosticsa

Model Dimension Eigenvalue Condition Index Variance Proportions

(Constant) timeconsuming taste price

1 3.896 1.000 .00 .00 .00 .00

2 .063 7.849 .00 .73 .03 .15


1
3 .031 11.160 .03 .05 .26 .78

4 .009 20.842 .97 .22 .71 .07

a. Dependent Variable: satisfaction

Residuals Statisticsa

Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N

Predicted Value 2.9350 4.8460 3.7917 .35052 48


Residual -2.67888 1.29767 .00000 .77380 48
Std. Predicted Value -2.444 3.008 .000 1.000 48
Std. Residual -3.350 1.623 .000 .968 48

a. Dependent Variable: satisfaction

You might also like