NAME: VIJAY ROHAN KRISHNA
SEMESTER: V’ A
ROLL NUMBER: 543
NATURE OF COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Abstract
This paper discusses the nature of the offence of copyright infringement, as defined under
Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957, in light of the provisions of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973. The Code of Criminal Procedure, under Part II of the First Schedule,
classifies offences under two categories, namely, the cognizability of an offence and whether
bail can be granted for a particular offence. Part II to the Schedule deals with offences that
have defined in enactments apart from the Indian Penal Code, 1860. This classification is
made of the basis of term of imprisonment specified by the statute for the offence. Under
Section 63, the prescribed punishment for the offence of copyright infringement is specified
as being not less than six months and may extend up to three years. The phrase “may extend
up to three years” is the root cause of the problem in classifying the offence under the Code.
This is because under Part II, if an offence is punishable with imprisonment for 3 years, and
upwards but not more than 7 years, the offence is classified as cognizable and non-bailable.
Whereas, if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for less than 3 years or with Fine
only, the offence is bailable and non-cognizable. The object of the present paper is to analyse
the judicial trends classifying the offence of copyright infringement under these categories
along with the recent judgement of the Delhi High Court in State Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi
vs Naresh Kumar Garg.