Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
481 views2 pages

Stat Con Case Assignment Part 2

This document outlines intrinsic and extrinsic aids used in statutory construction and interpretation, as well as presumptions applied. Intrinsic aids include the text of the statute and preamble. Extrinsic aids refer to legislative history, circumstances surrounding enactment, and subsequent treatment. Presumptions applied are against unconstitutionality, injustice, implied repeals, ineffectiveness, and absurdity. Numerous cases are cited as examples.

Uploaded by

Quiqui
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
481 views2 pages

Stat Con Case Assignment Part 2

This document outlines intrinsic and extrinsic aids used in statutory construction and interpretation, as well as presumptions applied. Intrinsic aids include the text of the statute and preamble. Extrinsic aids refer to legislative history, circumstances surrounding enactment, and subsequent treatment. Presumptions applied are against unconstitutionality, injustice, implied repeals, ineffectiveness, and absurdity. Numerous cases are cited as examples.

Uploaded by

Quiqui
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Case Assignments for Statutory Construction:

Part 2:

1. INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC AIDS

Intrinsic Aids in Construction and Interpretation


a. Text of the Statute as Intrinsic Aid
 Miriam Defensor Santiago, et. al. vs. COMELEC, Jesus Delfin, Alberto Pedrosa and
Lorna Pedrosa, G.R. No. 127325, March 19, 1997
 Rafael Gonzales et al v. CA et al –GR No. 187919, Asia United Bank vs. Gilbert Guy,
et. al - GR No.187979, Gilbert Guy, et. al. vs. Asia United Bank – GR No. 188030 (PD
1689 re: syndicated estafa)
 US vs. Hart, et al (26 Phil 149) – RA 519 (vagrancy)
b. Preamble as Intrinsic Aid
 Florencio Eugenio vs. Executive Secretary Franklin M. Drilon, Housing and Land Use
Regulatory Board and Prospero Palmiano, G.R. No. 109404, January 22, 1996
 The People of the Philippines vs. Hon. Vicente B. Echavez, Jr. et. al, G.R. Nos. L-
47757-61, January 28m, 1980
 People vs. Purisima – GR No. L-420050-66 (PD 9 carrying deadly weapon)

 Association of Small Landowners in the Philippines vs. Secretary of Agrarian Reform


(GR No. 78742)
 Pascual vs. Provincial Board or Nueva Ecija, 106 Phil 466
 Aguinaldo vs. Santos, 212 SCRA 768 (doctrine of forgiveness or condonation)
 Garcia-Padilla vs. Enrile, et.al. – GR No. 61388, April 20, 1983 (suspension of the writ
of habeas corpus)
 Joseph Estrada vs. Aniano Desierto, et. al. – GR Nos. 146710-15, March 2, 2001
(cases vs. Estrada after he left Malacanang)
 Celso Halili and Arthur Halili vs. CA and Helen Meyers Guzman et.al GR No. 113539,
March 12, 1998 (redemption of agri lands)
 Emilio Osmena and Pablo Garcia vs. COMELEC – GR No. 132231, March 31,1998
(Electoral Reform Law)
 Agabon vs. NLRC 442 SCRA 573 (2004)
 Joker Arroyo et. al. vs. Jose de Venecia, et.al. GR No. 127255, June 26, 1998. (if
passage of RA 8240 violated internal rules of procedure of the House)
Extrinsic Aids in Construction and Interpretation
 Commissioner of Customs vs. Esso Standard Eastern, Inc. G.R. No. l-28329, August 7,
1975
 Misael P. Vera as CIR and Fair Trade Board vs. Hon. Serafin Cuevas, Judge of CGI
Manila, et. al, G.R. No. L-33693-94 May 31, 1979
 Philippine Association of Free Labor Union vs. BLR, et.al. G.R. No. L-43760, August
21, 1976
 Cecilio de Villa vs. CA, G.R. No. 87416, April 8m 1991
 National Police Commission vs. Hon. Judge Salvador de Guzman, Jr. et. al. G.R. No.
106724, February 9, 1994
 CASCO Philippine Chemical Co. Inc. vs. Hon. Pedro Gimenez, GR. No. L-17931,
February 28, 1963

2. PRESUMPTIONS

Presumption against unconstitutionality


 Aris (Phils) Inc. vs. NLRC, GR No. 90501, August 5, 1991
 Hon. Alfredo S. Lim vs. Hon. Felipe G. Pacquing and Associated Development
Corporation, G.R. No. 115044, January 27, 1995
 Teofisto Guingona Jr. and Dominador Cepeda Jr. vs. Hon. Vetino Reyes and
Associated Development Corporation, G.R. No. 117263, January 27, 1995 (same as
Lim)
 Jovencio Lim and Teresita Lim, petitioners vs. The People of the Philippines, The
RTC Quezon City, Branch 217, the City Prosecution of Quezon City and Wilsom
Cham, G.R. No. 149276, September 27, 2002
Presumption against Injustice
 Karen E. Salvacion vs. Central Bank of the Philippines, G.R. No. 94723, August 21,
1997
 Carlos Alonzo and Casimira Alonzo vs. IAC and Tecla Padua, G.R. No. L-72873, May
28, 1987
Presumption against implied repeals
 Achilles C. Berces, Jr. vs. Hon. Executive Secretary Teofisto Guingona Jr. et. al., G.R.
No. 112099, February 21, 1995
 Antonio A. Mecano vs. Commission on Audit, G.R. No. 103982, December 11, 1992
 GSIS vs. City Assessor of IloIlo City et. al. G.R. No. 147192, June 27, 2006
Presumption against Ineffectiveness
 Danilo E. Paras vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. 123169, November 4, 1996
Presumption Against Absurdity
 Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Esso Standard Eastern Inc. and the Court of
Tax Appeals, G.R. Nos. 28502-03, April 18, 1989
 Cesario Ursua vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 112170, April 10, 1996
Others
 De Guia v. Guingona, et.al. GR No. 119525, April 18, 1995
 US vs Ten Yu, 24 Phil 1
 Benguet Exploration Inc. vs. DENR – GR No. L-29534, February 23, 1977)
 Cesario Ursua vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 112170, April 10, 1996
 People vs. Malabanan GR No. L-16478 Aug. 31, 1961
 Uytengsu vs. Republic 95 Phil 890
 US vs. Palacio GR No. L-41001, September 30, 1976

You might also like