The Chart Clinic - Ninth in A Series: Vors For Direct Route Navigation
The Chart Clinic - Ninth in A Series: Vors For Direct Route Navigation
which has a latitude and longitude is plotted at database, leaving a few miles as a buffer will
precisely the exact location where it exists on ensure that you stay away from protected
the earth. airspace.
So-called “attribute” information about a In the illustration below, a straight line from the
facility, such as frequencies, identifiers and Paris Municipal (Arkansas) Airport to the Fort
names, are moved away from the VOR so that Smith Regional Airport will pass just north of
the attributes can easily be read. Other excep- restricted area R-2401A and B and R-2402.
tions? When the missed approach point is on Since both airports and the restricted areas are
the end of the runway, the small triangle used precisely plotted, there is an assurance that you
BY JAMES E. TERPSTRA to depict the MAP in the plan view will be will stay north of the restricted areas. From a
SR. CORPORATE VICE PRESIDENT, JEPPESEN moved slightly toward the FAF so it can be practical standpoint, it might be smart to go
read. Otherwise, the runway symbol would cut direct from Paris to the Wizer NDB. This route
I t’s pretty obvious that the shortest distance up the triangle so badly that it wouldn’t be will go even further north of the restricted areas
between two points is a straight line. When easily discernible. and place you over the final approach fix to
flying, one can argue whether that is a runway 25 at Fort Smith.
What all this accuracy really means is that a
geodesic line, a great circle line, and whether
straight line drawn on a Jeppesen chart can be
or not either one of those is accomplished by
drawing a straight line on a piece of paper. And
used to determine if a direct route will avoid VORs for Direct Route
airspace such as Class B airspace, restricted
when that flat piece of paper represents a
areas, prohibited areas, etc. Because Jeppesen
Navigation
portion of our round world, it becomes even One of the most common means for flying
uses the Lambert Conformal Conic projection
more interesting – and maybe a bit confusing. direct routes is to use conventional navigation
for the enroute charts, a straight line is as close
But the real challenge is to make the shortest such as VORs. When flying direct off-airway
as possible to a geodesic line (better than a
distance a reality – in a world of airways that zig routes, remember to apply the FAA distance
great circle route.) The closer that your route is
zag across the country. limitations. The FAA has established an opera-
to the two standard parallels of 33° and 45° on
tional service volume for each class of VHF
Do you have to fly the airways? What about the chart, the better your straight line. There
navaid to ensure adequate signal coverage and
altitudes on your own direct routes? What are cautions, however. Placing our round earth
frequency protection from other navaids on
about radar coverage? What about communi- on a flat piece of paper will cause distortions,
the same frequency. The maximum distances
cations coverage? What about GPS? particularly on long east-west routes. If your
vary with the altitudes to be flown. When using
route is 180° or 360°, there is virtually no
VORs for direct route navigation, the maximum
Off-Airway Navigation distortion in the course line.
distances between navaids specified with the
There are a number of ways to create shorter About the only way to precisely determine if appropriate altitudes are as follows:
routes and fly off the airways. Two series of you have accurately flown adjacent to the
Jeppesen charts can be used to draw direct restricted airspace is by the use of some of the Below 18,000’ 800NM
routes. The easiest is the RNAV enroute series airborne Jeppesen GPS databases which 14,500’ to 17,999’ using H class navaids 200NM
which uses 11 charts to cover the entire U.S. In include a graphic display of the airspace on the 18,000’ to FL450 260NM
the next article, we will discuss the RNAV GPS receiver display. But, from a practical Above FL450 200NM
enroute charts and concentrate this month on standpoint when not using an airborne
the conventional IFR charts.
The Jeppesen low and high altitude enroute
charts can also be used to create direct routes.
However, many of the charts do not share the
same scale as the adjacent chart, so a straight
line is virtually impossible to use as a direct
route for long distances. On the high altitude
charts, the west half of the U.S. is charted at the
same scale of 40 nautical miles to the inch. In
the east half, the scale is 25 miles to the inch so
it is possible to plot longer distances on the
high charts.
Precision Plotting
Are Jeppesen charts plotted accurately enough
to draw a direct route that can be flown?
Generally speaking, yes. If the charts were not
plotted accurately, a straight line drawn adja-
cent to a restricted area may in fact penetrate
the restricted area. Jeppesen uses a computer
graphic system which generates and maintains
the charts. The computer graphic system uses
the same navigation database that is the basis
for most airborne FMS and GPS databases.
Because of this compatibility, all information
There are times when ATC will initiate a direct
route that exceeds the stated distances. When
that happens, ATC will provide radar monitor-
No More Games.
ing and navigational assistance as necessary.