1
Chapter I
INTRODUCTION
Background of the study
As time goes by, human civilization is continuously becoming
more industrialized. More factories are built, and buildings were built
all around. One of the most important materials in building
construction is the concrete hollow blocks. They are used as part of
building walls covered by plaster of concrete mixture.
There are so many researches regarding on how to develop
further analysis on the load bearing capacity of concrete hollow blocks.
One of it is this research work studying the effects of Sugar Palm black
fiber or gomuti on the load bearing capacity of concrete.
Since 1960s, research works on fiber-reinforced concrete have
been carried out extensively leading to a wide range of practical
applications. As a result, there exists today a wide range of fiber types
available for use as fibers in concrete. These include steel, asbestos,
glass, ceramic, polymer, and natural fibers such as hemp, sisal, cotton,
coconut, and palm. Many research works have been carried out using
steel, polymer, and glass. However, investigations on the use of
natural fiber are rather limited and surely reported in the literature
compared to non-natural fibers such as steel and plastic. Principally,
the sources of natural fiber are found in several plants, but not all are
2
suitable for use as fibers in concrete. The advantage of using natural
fibers is that they are readily available, environment-friendly, and
cheap since the production cost is lower than non-natural fibers. The
major problems associated with the use of natural fibers are due to
poor durability, low modulus of elasticity, poor bonding, and poor fire
resistance. Natural fibers have been used in soil cement construction
but their application is mainly in non-structural components such as
roofing tiles, concrete masonry blocks, slab for roofing, and
construction of water tanks. Recent studies using natural fibers such
as sugarcane bagasse and cellulose fiber have shown that
incorporation of these fibers enhanced the compressive strength,
tensile strength, flexure strength, toughness, and impact resistance.
On this research we are using concrete hollow blocks. Hollow
blocks are precast masonry units made of fly ash and are intended to
be used in most of the construction. These hollow blocks can be used
as a load bearing wall or a non-load bearing wall. The use of hollow
blocks is most common in places where soil bricks are costly, poor
strength and unavailable. In the Philippines, using hollow blocks is the
cheapest way to build a house. Hollow blocks are commonly reinforced
with steel bars to induce its strength especially for load-bearing walls.
Hollow blocks were also used in sound-proofing a room. On the other
hand, steels are generally used worldwide as reinforcing bars due to its
availability, affordability and quality. Due to high costs of steel bars,
3
substandard bars develop and reproduce vastly in construction stores
and hardware, leading to the suburban and rural construction resulting
to a low quality type of structure. This predicament leads the
researcher to look for possible partial replacement of cement by
investigating the potential use of Black sugar palm fiber. (Mapúa
Institute of Technology)
Statement of the problem
This study aimed to determine the effects of sugar palm black
fiber or gomuti on the load bearing capacity of concrete hollow blocks.
Specifically, it sought to answer the following questions:
1. What is load bearing capacity of CHB with 25 grams, 50
grams, and 100 grams as additive on the concrete hollow
blocks at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days?
2. Is there a significant difference in the load bearing capacity of
CHB with 25 g, 50 g, and 100 g of black fiber as additive on
the concrete hollow blocks at 28 days?
3. Is there a significant difference in the load bearing capacity of
CHB between the 25gram black fiber additive and the regular
concrete hollow blocks at 28 days?
4. Is there a significant difference in the load bearing capacity of
CHB between the 50gram black fiber additive and the regular
concrete hollow blocks at 28 days?
4
5. Is there a significant difference in the load bearing capacity of
CHB between the 100gram black fiber additive and the
regular concrete hollow blocks at 28 days?
Hypothesis of the study
1. There is no significant difference in the load bearing capacity
of CHB with 25 g, 50 g, and 100 g of black fiber as additive on
the concrete hollow blocks at 28 days?
2. There is no significant difference in the load bearing capacity
of CHB between the 25gram black fiber additive and the
regular concrete hollow blocks at 28 days?
3. There is no significant difference in the load bearing capacity
of CHB between the 50gram black fiber additive and the
regular concrete hollow blocks at 28 days?
4. There is no significant difference in the load bearing capacity
of CHB between the 100gram black fiber additive and the
regular concrete hollow blocks at 28 days?
Theoretical Framework
Concrete Masonry Units In the design and construction of
masonry structures, engineers consider the compressive strength of
the masonry used as an important performance characteristic. These
concrete masonry units come as hollow or solid, but in this study, the
5
concrete masonry units to be considered are hollow ones. In
constructing concrete masonry units, you need binding material,
aggregates and water. The binding material is your hydraulic cement
while your aggregates could be sand, gravel, clay or crushed stones.
This comes in different proportions and mixed together to form a
masonry mix. These are cured and tested at 28-day age to determine
its compressive strength. From strength of materials, the compressive
strength of the material is the ratio between the applied compressive
force and the net area of the unit. The compressive force shall be
applied parallel to the cores or cells of the unit. For compressive
testing, ASTM C140 or the Standard Test Methods for Sampling and
Testing Concrete Masonry Units and Related Units will be used as the
guide. The finished product’s compressive capacity is totally
dependent on different factors like the quality of materials used,
workmanship, curing and the method used in determining its
compressive strength.
This study is based on the theory of McGregor (1997) which
states that the compressive strength is one important property of any
material that determines its capacity and rigidity to compression forces
acting through the body. The Testing sample must be required to
choose a very careful mix design. This is necessary of relative effect on
the compressive strength of the sample, however the strength of
concrete vary on the proportions of cement, fine aggregate, coarse
6
aggregates and water. Over the past decade the presence of mineral
admixtures in construction materials has been observed to impart
significant improvement on the strength, durability and workability of
cementations products. However, additive can be used to produce
much cheaper concrete products, and one of this is Black Fiber.
The Sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) can reach a height of 12 to 15
m and a diameter of 40 cm upon reaching the maturity age (more than
15 years). It has long ascending pinnate leaves up to 8.5 m in length
with 100 or more pairs of linear leaflets. Once maturity is reached,
huge fruit clusters begin to appear.
The most important industrial yield of this palm is the black,
tough fiber locally known as bagatbat (Negros Oriental); cabo negro
(Spanish-Filipino); black rope; hebiok (Capiz); hidiok (Camarines, Albay,
Capiz, Antique); ibiok (Capiz, Negros Occ., Bohol); igok (Antique); irok
(Zambales, Cavite,Tayabas, Mindoro); kaong (Manila, Rizal, Cavite,
Laguna); kauing (Bataan); onau-onau (Misamis, Surigao); rapitan
(Ilocos province),(commercially known as gomuti fibers). This is found
at the base of the petioles and is manufactured into sea water-resistant
rope, cleaning brushes, filters and thatching materials. It is known for
its durability and can stand long exposure to either fresh or salt water
and is also fire resistant. As early as 1821, it was reported that 439,450
sugar palms were harvested for the fiber in Indonesia, yielding as
much as 300,000 ropes from a single factory in one month.
7
Conceptual Framework
Independent Variable Dependent Variable
EXPERIMENTAL
SAMPLES
CHB with
25 g
Black Fibre
CHB with
50 g Black
Fibre
CHB with
CONTROL
100 g Black
SAMPLE
Fibre
Regular
COMPRESSIVE
Commercial
Concrete
STRENGHT
Hollow
Blocks
8
Figure 1.0 Schematic Diagram showing the Framework of the study.
9
Significance of the study
This study will surely help future students in performing research
studies in the future. Furthermore, it could help such individuals’
involve having relation to this study especially:
Concrete Hollow Blocks Suppliers. This study will sure be a
great help to these suppliers because it could encourage more
costumers to avail these stronger CHB than the regular one for a
cheaper price.
Construction Industry. It will enable innovation in the use of
organic fibers in making CHB that will hold greater loading than the
regular mixture.
School, the School Administration and Instructors. It could
help students and instructors in doing research regarding the use of
other materials such as organic fibers in innovating construction
elements. By understanding the needs of the students and benefits of
quality education, these instructors and students are assured of a
competitive advantage.
Future Researches. It can be a guide for future researches,
results of this study can be used as basis for their study or option for
further studies on any beneficial way to use natural organic material.
10
Scope and Delimitations
This study generally deals with the construction of concrete
hollow blocks (CHB) through the inclusion of stripped sugar palm black
fiber in the masonry mix, to be tested for the acquisition of engineering
properties especially the compressive strength. The study makes use
of plain hollow blocks and hollow blocks mixed with stripped sugar
palm black fiber having length of 1.5 inches that will serve as
additional and reinforcing materials for the material of interest. The
properties that are determined in this study include the compressive
strengths of both plain and mixed CHB’s. And it was focused on the
effects in compressive strength of the concrete hollow blocks with 25
g, 50 g, 100 g Sugar Palm Black Fiber and compressive strength of the
regular commercial hollow blocks.
The samples were made using a concrete hollow block mold with
16” x 8” x 4” dimensions subject for non-load bearing concrete hollow
blocks. The cement aggregate proportion is 1:3 ratio, it means that one
part of cement is to three parts of fine aggregate.
The time series experimental design was used in this study to
examine the effects in the compressive strength of hollow blocks with
specified mixtures of gomuti/black fiber. The concrete hollow blocks
were done using a mechanical device so those mixtures were
compacted enough, resulting to a desirable compressive strength. The
11
compression testing was conducted at an interval of 7, 14, 21, and 28
days and the average compressive strength were taken from samples
at 28 days curing period.
Statistical tools were limited to mean and T-test, and the level of
significance was set at alpha 0.05.
The cost for the manufacturing of CHB with black fiber was not
covered in this study for it only focuses in the effects in compressive
strength of CHB.
Technical persons with specializations in Civil Engineering are
included in the panel of examiners to check the appropriateness of the
study.
Definition of terms
These terms are defined conceptually and operationally.
Gomuti fiber/Black Fiber is the black tough part under the
leaves of sugar palm tree. This is found at the base of the petioles and
is manufactured into sea water-resistant rope, cleaning brushes, filters
and thatching materials. It is known for its durability and can stand
long exposure to either fresh or salt water and is also fire resistant. In
this study it is the primary ingredient in testing the compressive
strength of the CHB.
12
Fine Aggregate It is generally consists of natural sand or
crushed stone with most particles passing through a 3/8 inch sieve
(http://www.cement.org). In this study, we used fine aggregates only to
lessen the roughness of the finished CHB unlike the common regular
mixture.
Concrete Hollow Blocks (CHB) is one of the most extensively
used walling materials in the Philippines (sheltercluster.org). In this
study, CHB’s we made with 25 g, 50 g, and 100 of black fibers.
Compressive Strength is calculated by dividing the maximum
loads by the original cross-section are of a specimen in a compression
test (http://www.instron.com). The samples in this research study are
subject for compressive testing to determine the capacity of CHB to
resist loadings.
7, 14, 21, and 28 days it is the required number of days that
concrete reached its maximum compressive strength (Construction
Materials and Testing, Max Fajardo). In this study, this is the curing
days of our samples.
1:3 ratio is the proportion used in this study to gain higher load
bearing capacity. It is 1 part cement and 3 parts sand.
Chapter II
13
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This chapter deals with the various literature related to the use
of Black fiber in making concrete hollow blocks and what are the
benefits in can give.
Organic fibers
Organic fibers can be produced from a number of solid wastes
such as bamboo, coconut, date palm, oil palm, sugar palm, sugarcane,
and vegetable wastes. Some of these fibers are chemically more inert
than either steel and glass fibers. They are also cheaper and more
importantly most of them can be natural. Bamboo fibers can be
extracted from the bamboo wastes. This kind of fibers is useful to
produce polymeric composites such as bamboo fiber reinforced plastic
and polyester composites (Jain and Kumar, 1994; Deshpande et al.,
2000). Jain and Kumar (1994) reported that bamboo fiber reinforced
plastic composite can be used in a number of applications as a suitable
replacement for the commercially available glass fiber reinforced
plastic (GFRP) composite. Coconut fibers can be used with portland
cement to manufacture fiber cement board. In a recent research,
coconut fibers were used in reinforced concrete beam along with rice
husk and sugarcane waste fibers (Sivaraja and Kandasamy, 2009). The
performance of composite beam was evaluated under monotonic
loading and compared with conventional concrete beam. It was found
that the beam’s resistance to cracking due to seismic load improved in
14
structural systems. Date palm has a fibrous structure consisting of four
types of fiber. They are leaf fibers in the peduncle; baste fibers in the
stem, wood fibers in the trunk and surface fibers around the trunk,
which can be utilized to produce construction products. It was
observed that the flexural strength and toughness improve whereas
the compressive strength decreases with the increased length and
percentage of date palm fibers (Kriker et al., 2005). Oil palm fiber is a
non hazardous biodegradable material extracted from oil palm's empty
fruit bunch through decoration process. The palm fibers are clean, non-
carcinogenic, and free from pesticides and soft parenchyma cells.
These fibers are versatile as well as stable and can be processed into
various dimensional grades to suit specific applications such as erosion
control, 1958 Int. J. Phys. Sci.
Uses of Gomuti fiber/Black fiber
The leaf sheath is a source of a tough, black fibre (gomuti or
yonot fibre). It is used chiefly for a durable rope tolerant of both fresh
and salt water and of fire; it is used for marine work, thatching and
brushes. The split petioles are used for basketry and a form of
marquetry.
Rope/sea water-resistant rope. A construction of twisted
fibers, as of hemp, cotton, flax, etc., so intertwined in several strands
to form a thick cord.
15
Cleaning Brush/Broom. A brush used by local people in the
Philippines in cleaning the house.
Filters. A meshed by product used in screening of stopping
small particles commonly on liquid to another surface.
Decoration. These black fibers are somehow used as a
decoration as an indigenous material.
MIXTURE PROPORTION 1:3
This method is less used as compared to those mixture used
commercially showing the amount of cement and san aggregates in
CHB. The specification should also say if those proportions are by
weight or volume.
If the proportions are based on weight, use 3 parts of fine
aggregates for every part of cement. To make the concrete, though,
you still need to know the required water-cement ratio.
If the proportions are based on volume, use three shovelfuls of
fine aggregates for every shovelful of cement.
(concreteconstruction.net,1997)
MATERIALS AND ITS PROPERTIES
Portland Cement Portland cement is the basic ingredient of
concrete. Concrete is formed when Portland cement creates a paste
with water that binds with sand and rock to harden.
16
Cement is manufactured through a closely controlled chemical
combination of calcium, silicon, aluminum, iron and other ingredients.
Common materials used to manufacture cement include
limestone, shells, and chalk or marl combined with shale, clay, slate,
blast furnace slag, silica sand, and iron ore. These ingredients, when
heated at high temperatures form a rock-like substance that is ground
into the fine powder that we commonly think of as cement.
Bricklayer Joseph Aspdin of Leeds, England first made Portland
cement early in the 19th century by burning powdered limestone and
clay in his kitchen stove. With this crude method, he laid the
foundation for an industry that annually processes literally mountains
of limestone, clay, cement rock, and other materials into a powder so
fine it will pass through a sieve capable of holding water.
Cement plant laboratories check each step in the manufacture of
Portland cement by frequent chemical and physical tests. The labs also
analyze and test the finished product to ensure that it complies with all
industry specifications.
The most common way to manufacture Portland cement is
through a dry method. The first step is to quarry the principal raw
materials, mainly limestone, clay, and other materials. After quarrying
the rock is crushed. This involves several stages. The first crushing
17
reduces the rock to a maximum size of about 6 inches. The rock then
goes to secondary crushers or hammer mills for reduction to about 3
inches or smaller. (http://www.cement.org)
CHAPTER IV
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter discusses the findings on the effects of untreated
sugar palm black fiber on the compressive strength of commercial
hollow blocks. The gathered data were presented, analyzed and
interpreted in this chapter. The data presented in each table were
preceded by a textual discussion.
18
Compressive Strength of RegularCommercial Hollow Blocks
(CHB), CHB with 25g, CHB with 50g and CHB with 100g
Additives
The compressive strength of Regular Commercial Hollow Blocks
(CHB), CHB with 25g, CHB with 50g and CHB with 100g Additives after
7 days, 14 days, 21 days and 28 days curing period are shown in Table
1 in the succeeding page.
The compressive strength of Regular Commercial Hollow Blocks
(CHB), CHB with 25g, CHB with 50g and CHB with 100g Additives after
7 days are 1.65 MPa, 2.29 MPa, 2.15MPa and 2.15 MPa, respectively.
The compressive strength of Regular Commercial Hollow Blocks
(CHB), CHB with 25g, CHB with 50g and CHB with 100g Additives after
14 days are 1.98 MPa, 2.83 MPa, 2.44 MPa and 2.32 MPa, respectively.
The compressive strength of RegularCommercial Hollow Blocks
(CHB), CHB with 25g, CHB with 50g and CHB with 100g Additives after
21 days are 2.29 MPa, 3.92 MPa, 3.13 MPa and 2.75 MPa, respectively.
The compressive strength of Regular Commercial Hollow Blocks
(CHB), CHB with 25g, CHB with 50g and CHB with 100g Additives after
28 days are 2.69 MPa, 5.09 MPa, 3.94 MPa and 3.34 MPa, respectively.
Furthermore, it was found out that all compressive strength
values for all mixtures after 28 days curing period have passed the
standard values for commercial hollow blocks.
19
Table 1. Differences in the Compressive Strength of Regular
Commercial Hollow Blocks (CHB), CHB with 25g, CHB with 50g and
CHB with 100g Additives
Mixture Compressive strength (in MPa)
7 days 14 days 21 days 28 days
CHB 1.65 1.98 2.29 2.69
25g 2.29 2.83 3.92 5.09
50g 2.15 2.44 3.13 3.94
100g 2.15 2.32 2.75 3.34
The results further revealed that there was an increase in the
compressive strength for all mixtures for each week. The weekly
development of compressive strength for Regular Commercial Hollow
Blocks, CHB with 25g, CHB with 50g and CHB with 100g Additives is
shown in Figure 2.
On the 7th day, CHB with 25g additives had the highest
compressive strength (2.29 MPa) followed by CHB with 50g additives
and CHB with 100g additives with equal compressive strength (2.15
MPa). Regular CHB registered the lowest compressive strength (1.65
MPa).
On the 14th day, CHB with 25g additives had the highest
compressive strength (2.83 MPa) followed by CHB with 50g additives
(2.44 MPa), CHB with 100g additives (2.32 MPa). Regular CHB
registered the lowest compressive strength (1.98 MPa).
20
On the 21st day, CHB with 25g additives had the highest
compressive strength (3.92 MPa) followed by CHB with 50g additives
(3.13 MPa), CHB with 100g additives (2.75 MPa). Regular CHB
registered the lowest compressive strength (2.29 MPa).
On the 28th day, the CHB with 25g additives had the highest
compressive strength (5.09 MPa) followed by CHB with 50g additives
(3.94 MPa), CHB with 100g additives. Regular CHB registered the
lowest compressive strength (2.69 MPa).
21
Figure 2. Comparison and Development of Compressive Strengths of
Concrete Samples.
Differences in the Compressive Strength of Regular
Commercial Hollow Blocks (CHB), CHB with 25g, CHB with 50g
and CHB with 100g Additives
The results of the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) showed that
there were significant differences in the compressive strength of CHB,
CHB with 25g, CHB with 50g and CHB with 100g additives as shown in
Table 2 with p-value=0.000. This result implies that the compressive
strength is different with different composition of the mixture
depending on the amount of additives for hollow blocks and regular
commercial hollow blocks.
Table 1. Differences in the Compressive Strength of Regular
Commercial Hollow Blocks (CHB), CHB with 25g, CHB with 50g and
CHB with 100g Additives
22
Source of Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig
Prob
Variation (p)
Between Groups 6.245 3 2.082 151.95 .000
s.
Within Groups .055 4 .014
Total 6.300 7
______________________________________________________________________________________
p<.05 – significant at 5% level; p>.05 – not significant
Differences in the Compressive Strength of Regular
Commercial Hollow Blocks (CHB) and CHB with 25g Additives
The result of T-Test showed that there was a significant difference
in the compressive strength of Regular CHB and CHB with 25g
additives as shown in Table 2 with p-value=0.000. This result implies
that the compressive strength different of regular CHB is not the same
as the compressive strength of CHB with 25g additives. Furthermore, it
was found out that CHB with 25g additives has a higher compressive
strength than the regular CHB with a mean difference of 2.4 MPa.
Table 2. Differences in the Compressive Strength of Regular
Commercial Hollow Blocks (CHB) and CHB with 25g Additives
Source Mean Mean df t-value Sig Prob
Variation Difference (p)
Regular CHB 2.690
2.40 2 -80.0 .000
s.
25g 5.090
p<.05 – significant at 5% level; p>.05 – not significant
Differences in the Compressive Strength of Regular
Commercial Hollow Blocks (CHB) and CHB with 50g Additives
23
The result of T-Test showed that there was a significant difference
in the compressive strength of Regular CHB and CHB with 50g
additives as shown in Table 3 with p=0.009. This result implies that the
compressive strength is different for regular CHB and CHB with 50g
additives. Furthermore, it was found out that CHB with 50g additives
has a higher compressive strength than the regular CHB with a mean
difference of 1.25 Mpa.
Table 3. Differences in the Compressive Strength of Regular
Commercial Hollow Blocks (CHB) and CHB with 50g Additives
Source Mean Mean df t-value Sig Prob
Variation Difference (p)
Regular CHB 2.690
1.25 2 -10.417 .009
s.
50g 3.940
p<.05 – significant at 5% level; p>.05 – not significant
Differences in the Compressive Strength of Regular
Commercial Hollow Blocks (CHB) and CHB with 100g Additives
The result of T-Test showed that there was a significant difference
in the compressive strength of Regular CHB and CHB with 50g
additives as shown in Table 4 with p=0.027 This result implies that the
compressive strength is not the same for CHB and CHB with 100g
24
additives. Furthermore, it was found out that CHB with 100g additives
has a higher compressive strength than the regular CHB with a mean
difference of 0.65 Mpa.
Tablexxx. Differences in the Compressive Strength of Regular
Commercial Hollow Blocks (CHB) and CHB with 100g Additives
Source Mean Mean df t-value Sig Prob
Variation Difference (p)
Regular CHB 2.690
0.650 2 -5.909 .027
s.
50g 3.34
p<.05 – significant at 5% level; p>.05 – not significant