AN OBSERVATION REPORT

FOR

MICRO-TECHING

SUBMITTED TO

Md. MUKIBUZZAMAN KHAN

ASSISTANT PROCTOR AND ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

M.A IN ELT PROGRAM

OF

EASTERN UNIVERSITY

BY

MD. FORHAD KHAN

STUDENT ID- 182500002

MAY 2019
 OBSERVATION REPORTS-

SELF OBSERVATION DURING MICROTEACHING CLASS

AT EASTERN UNIVERSITY
Average Age: 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Writing- report writing
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality My voice was loud, clear with a high tone which was enough for audible.
b. ability to The way I started my class showed that I had a very good affiliation with my
establish rapport students.
c. personality I was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature.I taught the students with a
very encouraging body movement. I had an excellent teaching personality.
Command over I had a good control over language.
language
Fluency It was not good because I made a lot of grammatical mistake.
Ability to explain After the students have finished, I explained the answers and even before I had
handed out the texts to the students I explained with a very cordial voice that
what to be done after the reading andeven I asked each individual student whether
I had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of It was suitable for the secondary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials I provied in the class for the students which I was not presented in
materials smartly.
Ability to make I tried to make the class interactive by my applying technique. But it is seen some
students students were inattentive in my class.
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok.
and other I tried to cover all the points writing in the whiteboard.
teaching aids
Correction of I made correction whenever the students asked me in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects I was monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. I gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects I was disorganised a little bit.
of the class
Overall Need to improve a lot but it was not so bad at all
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Average Age 32+
Class Size 11
Level of the class Primary Secondary Tertiary
Level of Elementary Intermediate Advanced
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Speaking- debate
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality My voice was loud, clear with a high tone which was enough for audible.
b. ability to The way I started my class showed that I had a very good affiliation with my
establish rapport students.
c. personality I was very confident of his class. I was a calm type of teacher as well as smart.
Command over I had a good control over language. It seemed that I had a good knowledge of
language English.
Fluency My fluency in lanuage was in mid level. But I managed himself wuite well.
Ability to explain I explained a lot of things based on the topic at the feedback session.
Suitability of It was suitable for the secondary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials I provied in the class for the students which I presented in smartly.
materials
Ability to make I was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials I was very positive
students about the students emotions and attitudes. I made groups and make students was
interactive involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard I used whiteboard as the aids for teaching as well as many banners where there
and other were many pictures because the class was debateand I think it was quite ok.
teaching aids
Correction of I made correction whenever the students asked I in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects I was monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. I gave more
of the class time in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects Have to work for speaking skill. Speaking is very mid level.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Average Age 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Primary Secondary Tertiary
Level of Elementary Intermediate Advanced
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Reading- skimming
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality My voice was loud, clear with a high tone which was enough for audible.
b. ability to The way I started my class showed that I had a very good affiliation with my
establish rapport students.
c. personality I was very confident of his class. I was a calm type of teacher as well as smart.
Command over I had a good control over language. It seemed that I had a good knowledge of
language English.
Fluency My fluency in lanuage was in mid level. But I managed himself wuite well.
Ability to explain After the students have finished, he explained the answers and even before I had
handed out the texts to the students I explained with a very cordial voice that
what to be done after the reading andeven I asked each individual student whether
they had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials he provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make I was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials I was very positive
students about the students emotions and attitudes. I made groups and make students was
interactive involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of I made correction whenever the students asked me in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects I monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. I gave moretime
of the class in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects Something disorganized
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Average Age: 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Primary Secondary Tertiary
Level of Elementary Intermediate Advanced
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Listening
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality My voice was loud, clear with a high tone which was enough for audible.
b. ability to The way I started my class showed that I had a very good affiliation with my
establish rapport students.
c. personality I was very confident of his class. I was a calm type of teacher as well as smart.
Command over I had a good control over language. It seemed that I had a good knowledge of
language English.
Fluency My fluency in lanuage was in mid level. But I managed himself wuite well.
Ability to explain After the students have finished, he explained the answers and even before I had
handed out the texts to the students I explained with a very cordial voice that
what to be done after the reading andeven I asked each individual student whether
they had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of It was suitable for the secondary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials I provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make I was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials I was very positive
students about the students emotions and attitudes. I made pairs and make each students
interactive was involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching along with multimedia. I think it
and other was quite ok.
teaching aids
Correction of I made correction whenever the students asked me in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects I monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. I gave moretime
of the class in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects Something disorganized
of the class
Overall Good
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Average Age 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Primary Secondary Tertiary
Level of Elementary Intermediate Advanced
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Grammar- noun
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality My voice was loud, clear with a high tone which was enough for audible.
b. ability to The way I started his class showed that I had a very good affiliation with my
establish rapport students.
c. personality I was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature but I presents myself
differently something like casual which is a obstacle to be a good teaches and it
looks odd..I taught the students with a very encouraging body movement.
Command over I had a good control over language. I made very little grammatical mistake.
language Otherwise my knowledge in english was good.
Fluency It was good that I spoke fluently though grammatical mistake. I did not look for
continuous word stopping in the middle of the sentence.
Ability to explain In the way I explain the topic it seemed to me that I had a good knowledge on the
topic but somethig disorganized and I take more time to make the students
understood.
Suitability of The material was enough suitable for the class. It was suitable for the secondary
materials for the level students and the teaching of the materials were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials I provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make I was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials I was very positive
students about the students emotions and attitudes. I made pairs and make each students
interactive was involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a grammar class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of I made correction whenever the students asked me in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects I monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. I gave moretime
of the class in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects I talks much that’s why students get less time to answer the question. As a result
of the class practive time got come down. I also took more time than the given time.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
 OBSERVATION REPORTS-

PEER OBSERVATION DURING MICROTEACHING CLASS

AT EASTERN UNIVERSITY
Name of teacher Nazlin Average Age: 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Describing a picture
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was not loud and attactive also. She spoke in a way that it seemed very
much gloomy.
b. ability to The teacher could not clear the task what the students actually do. She was not
establish rapport jolly and seemed she was in fear which did not make her able to establish rapport
and her silent movement and some uninteractive plans failed the session.
c. personality She was not jolly, interactive, lively and attractive in her atitudes in the class .
Even she always in a fear.
Command over She had a medium type of command over the language that she often made
language mistakes in grammatical and also pronunciation. Sometimes she read out from her
material.
Fluency Not so good fluency in English but she could speak in the language and finish the
class without using mother tounge.
Ability to explain Her ability to explanation was poor. From previous class her ability to
exaplanation was seemed downward. May be she was not enough prepared for
her class as a result she was confused and did not explained the necessary
information. Her instruction was also not clear.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make Her presentation was not much attractive so the interaction with the students was
students very poor.
interactive
Use Blackboard He used whiteboard as the aids for teaching as well as many banners where there
and other were many pictures because the class was debateand I think it was quite ok
teaching aids because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects She was not enough prepared for taking class. Also low confidence was seen.
of the class
Overall Good
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Mehedi Average Age: 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Argumentative writing
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to The way he started his class showed that he had a very good affiliation with his
establish rapport students.
c. personality He was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. He taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. He had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over He had a good control over language. It seemed that he had good knowledge of
language English. His pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake. I did not
see him looking for any word stopping in the middle of the sentence.
Ability to explain His ability to explain was fantastic. When he was explaining his topic it was
showing his professionalism for teaching. After the students have finished, he
explained the answers and even before he had handed out the texts to the
students he explained with a very cordial voice that what to be done after the
reading and even he asked each individual student whether he had any problem
to understand or not.
Suitability of He provided in the class was very much suitable because this material suits in
materials for the this stage of study.
class
Presentation of The materials he provides in the class for the students and he presented the
materials material attractively and the same students grasped it quickly. In the way he
presented that’s why students felt interesting.
Ability to make His ability to make the students understanding is so skillful and this is why could
students make them interactive in his class and also giving them tasks.
interactive
Use Blackboard Both multimedia and whiteboard were used as a teaching aid and he used it very
and other professionally.
teaching aids
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was good. As she was teaching, it seemed to me that it
Technique was reflecting her professionalism.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class more time in feedback session. The class was actually live.
Negative aspects Any negative aspect was not seen while he was teaching in the class because he
of the class showed his full professionalism.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Sabrina Average Age: 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Narrative a real event
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She was able to establish the rapport as he gave the students individual works for
establish rapport this and the tasks got easy as his instruction was very clear and easy manner.
c. personality She was smart enough to handle the class even when the students asked different
questions about the differences and the use or various clues. She was also very
much sincere and softly behaved and confident about thetopic.
Command over She had a very good command on the language. She did not make any
language grammatical mistake.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
her looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain After the students have finished, he explained the answers and even before he had
handed out the texts to the students he explained with a very cordial voice that
what to be done. She asked each individual student whether he hadanyproblem to
understand or not.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students for writing a story. She
materials described in all aspects and it was very helpful for learners’ that how a story to
write.
Ability to make Students were very interactive because she distributed individual task. She
students briefed at first what will they do so they ware aware what they are going to do
interactive and this he made students interactive.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching. As she started and given
and other the task no other teaching aid need to use.
teaching aids
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class and duly she
errors corrected. It means she had a lot of prepation for taking the class.
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Positive aspects were many things but here only one thing can be mentioned that
of the class her depth of knowledge was vast.
Negative aspects Nothing noticed as remarkebly.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Rishti Average Age: 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Comparative writing
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She was able to establish the rapport as she gave the students individual works for
establish rapport this and the tasks got easy as her instruction was very clear and easy manner.
c. personality She was smart enough to handle the class even when the students asked different
questions about the differences and the use or various clues. She was also very
much sincere and softly behaved and confident about the topic.
Command over She had a very good command on the language. She did not make any
language grammatical mistake.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
her looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain As this was a listening class so learners’ ability to listen and comprehend is the
main issue. So the way he explained I think almost everyone got the point.
Suitability of The audio clip which she played in the class that was very suitable because this
materials for the audio matches the level of students and the considering time limitation.
class
Presentation of Before playing the audio clip she briefed what to do for the students. After
materials listening the audio the students understood and asnwered it means she presented
well.
Ability to make Students were very interactive becausehe played the audio clip and given the task,
students they understood and given the answer. It was possible only when they were
interactive interactive with lesson.
Use Blackboard Only the multimedia was used as the aids for teaching. As this was a lisening
and other class so listening was the main issue and for this she played an audio clip for the
teaching aids students.

Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class and duly she
errors corrected. It means she had a lot of prepation for taking the class.
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Positive aspects were many things but here only one thing can be mentioned that
of the class her depth of knowledge was vast.
Negative aspects Nothing noticed as remarkebly.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Chishti Average Age:32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson How to write a paragraph
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to He was able to establish the rapport as he gave the students individual works for
establish rapport this and the tasks got easy as his instruction was very clear and easy manner.
c. personality He was smart enough to handle the class even when the students asked
differentquestionsabout the differencesandtheuseor various clues. He was also
very much sincere andsoftlybehaved and confident about thetopic.
Command over He had a very good command on the language. He did not make any
language grammatical mistake. His speech in English so smart and he is so expert in
speaking without making any mistakes.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain After the students have finished, he explained the answers and even before he
had handed out the texts to the students he explained with a very cordial voice
that what to be done after the reading andeven he asked each individual
student whether he hadanyproblem to understand or not.
Suitability of The material was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials he provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials he was
students very positive about the students emotions and attitudes. He made pairs and
interactive make each students was involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects One negative aspect was seen in the class while feedback session he answered
of the class the questions without giving no time to solve the problems by the students of
their own.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Sajia Average Age: 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Story writing
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality She voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She was able to establish the rapport as he gave the students individual works for
establish rapport this and the tasks got easy as her instruction was very clear and easy manner.
c. personality She was smart enough to handle the class even when the students asked
differentquestionsabout the differencesandtheuseor various clues. She was also
very much sincere andsoftlybehaved and confident about thetopic.
Command over She had a very good command on the language. She did not make any
language grammatical mistake.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
her looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain Her ability to make the students understanding is so skillfull and this is why could
make them interactive in his class and also giving them tasks.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials he provied in the class for the students which he presented in easy
materials way and the students got it quickly
Ability to make Students were very interactive for giving them individual tasks
students
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok.
and other Enough handouts were provided for the students so it covered all the gaps.
teaching aids
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching Teaching technique was good as professional teacher and ut reflects his
Technique professionalism
Positive aspects Her ability to make the students unnderstand is a positive side.
of the class
Negative aspects One negative aspect was seen in the class while feedback session she answered
of the class the questions without giving no time to solve the problems by the students of their
own.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Fossih Average Age: 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Comparative writing
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to He was able to establish the rapport as he gave the students group works for
establish rapport this and the tasks got easy as his instruction was very clear and easy manner. He
divided two groups for debating and all through this activities he established
rapport in good manner.
c. personality He was smart enough to handle the class even and also his get up was showing
about his strong personality.
Command over He had a very good command on the language. He did not make any
language grammatical mistake and given any pause while delivering his speech.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain His explanation ability was very nice and and also tactful. He used some banner
where some pictures. Actually he wanted to explain what the pictures say about
debating. This outstanding idea reflects his ability to explain.
Suitability of The material he provided in the class was enough suitable to conduct a debating
materials for the session and his material helped the participants of the debate competition.
class
Presentation of The material he presented in the class was good enough. Not only he presented
materials the handout but also he he presented some pictures relating to debate which
given extra shape of his presentation.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful. He was very positive about the students
students emotions and attitudes. He made groups for making a successful debate
interactive competition and in this way all students were interactive.
Use Blackboard He used whiteboard as the aids for teaching as well as many banners where
and other there were many pictures because the class was debateand I think it was quite
teaching aids ok because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the
students so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching How to conduct a debate competition he organised it in well manner but he
Technique took more time to give instruction for debate and it consumes time so the
debating time for the two groups were limited and he took ten minutes extra
time and as a result all his technique failed. Above all, his teaching technique is
praised by all.
Positive aspects There were many positive aspects in his class. One of them can be mentioned
of the class here that he used banners and posters in his class for giving example and these
cane be a nice example he proved it.
Negative aspects One negative aspect was seen in the class he took extra ten minutes to complete
of the class his session.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Fahmida Average Age: 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Procedural writing
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice quality was good. It is enough loud and clear voice
b. ability to She started her class with asking the stuednts about the topic that they have any
establish rapport idea about it. As well, she kept on talking relating to her lesson plan and the topic
of the day in order to keep their concentration to her even while she was serving
the handouts.
c. personality In the class she was smiling face and was helpful but she could not avoid her
nervousness. She was well dressed in the class which expressed her personality.
Command over He had a good control over language. It seemed that he had good knowledge of
language English. His pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency Her fluency was also good. She completed her instruction to the students in
English with smartly.
Ability to explain Explanation ability was good enough. The material she provided to the students
she explained that clearly.
Suitability of The material she provided in the class which was suitable for the class. She
materials for the provided the material on how to note making extracting salient feature which
class was helpful for the learners’. But one problem noted that the material too long
cosidering the class time.
Presentation of The materials she provided and presented that was fantastic. She had properly
materials explained all the directions as well as the topic of the task.
Ability to make Though the activity was interesting students were less interactive in class. Some
students of the students were only active. All were not equally interactive.
interactive
Use Blackboard Both multimedia and whiteboards were used in her class. But multimedia was
and other used extensively and it used throught the class,.
teaching aids
Correction of She corrected students error.
errors
Teaching Teaching technique was also excellent because the way she made the students
Technique understood was brilliant.
Positive aspects Her warm-up session was good. Her discussion about the topic and explanations
of the class was excellent although the topic was not so interesting. She also gave a good
feedback.
Negative aspects Negative aspects of her class was not highlighted remarkebly.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Trisha Average Age: 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Descriptive writing
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She was able to establish the rapport as he gave the students individual works for
establish rapport this and the tasks got easy as his instruction was very clear and easy manner.
c. personality She was smart enough to handle the class even when the students asked different
questions about the differences.She was well dressed as she looked smart and
reflected her personality.
Command over He had a very good command over the language. She may have some
language grammatical mistakes sometimes but she has a good knowledge in English
Fluency Also she is fluent in English except some grammatical mistakes. As she taking a
demo class that’s why she was little nervous and hampered her fluency.
Ability to explain Explanation ability was good enough. The material she provided to the students
she explained that clearly.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials she provided and presented that was fantastic. She had properly
materials explained all the directions as well as the topic of the task.
Ability to make Students were interactive in her lesson because the topic was interesting that’s
students why students got the point that what they have to do. In this way she made them
interactive interactive intensivly.
Use Blackboard She used multimedia as a way of teaching aid and she presented her material in
and other good manner.
teaching aids
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Positive aspectect was that students were interactive and they enjoyed the class.
of the class One thing can be mentioned that this class was very helpful for me.
Negative aspects Not anything which has been observed remarkebly.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Sabina Average Age: 32+
Class Size 12
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Comparative writing
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She was able to establish the rapport as he gave the students individual works for
establish rapport this and the tasks got easy as his instruction was very clear and easy manner.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Ability to explain Explanation ability was good enough. The material she provided to the students
she explained that clearly.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class.
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects No negative aspects were seen in her class.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Rimi Average Age: 32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Comparative writing
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was not loud and attactive also. She spoke in a way that it seemed very
much gloomy.
b. ability to The teacher was able to establish the rapport as she gave the students individual
establish rapport works for this and the task was easy to complete.
c. personality She was not jolly, interactive, lively and attractive in her atitudes in the class .
Even she always in a fear.
Command over She had a medium type of command over the language that she often made
language mistakes in grammatical and also pronunciation. Sometimes she read out from her
material.
Fluency Not so good fluency in English but she could speak in the language and finish the
class without using mother tounge.
Ability to explain She was little success to give explanation what she is going to teach. As the topic
was easy and also the material so she explained easily.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented was
materials not attractively. But she managed herself
Ability to make Her presentation was not much attractive so the interaction with the students was
students very poor.
interactive
Use Blackboard She used multimedia extensively also used whiteboard but very little.
and other
teaching aids
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects It seemed to me that she did not enough preparation for the class. While lecturing
of the class she read out the script instead of freely delivering speech. Also she made
mistakes in the grammar and also I thought she was not well organized.
Overall Good
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Asma Average Age: 32+
Class Size 14
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Argumentative writing
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She well established rapport because it seemed that she had a good understanding
establish rapport with the students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency She had a good fluency in English
Ability to explain Explanation ability was good enough. The material she provided to the students
she explained that clearly.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class..
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the multimedia was used as the aids for teaching. As this was a lisening
and other class so listening was the main issue and for this she played an audio clip for the
teaching aids students.
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects No negative aspects were seen in her class.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Momin Average Age: 32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Summary writing
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was loud and clear with a high tone which was audible from the very
last bench but one thing is that he speaks like native speakers which creat
monotonous.
b. ability to The way he started his class showed that he had a very good affiliation with his
establish rapport students.
c. personality He was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature but he presents himself
differently something like casual which is a obstacle to be a good teaches and it
looks odd..He taught the students with a very encouraging body movement.
Command over He had a good control over language. He made very little grammatical mistake.
language Otherwise his knowledge in english was good.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently though grammatical mistake. I did not see him
looking for continuous word stopping in the middle of the sentence.
Ability to explain In the way he explain the topic it seemed to me that he had a good knowledge on
the topic but somethig disorganized and he take more time to make the students
understood.
Suitability of The materia was enough suitable for the class. It was suitable for the tertiary level
materials for the students and the teaching of the materials were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials he provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials he was
students very positive about the students emotions and attitudes. He made pairs and make
interactive each students was involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects He talks much that’s why students get less time to answer the question. As a
of the class result practive time got come down. He also took more time than the given time.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Sabina Average Age: 32+
Class Size 14
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Inferring information
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to The way she started her class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature.She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency It was good that she spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake. I did not
see her looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain She was able to give all the necessary information to her students. Her
instructions were also very straight and clear.
Suitability of Materials were suitable for this particular leve.
materials for the
class
Presentation of She presented her material smartly. She presented the material in such a way that
materials are traditionally used in our context.
Ability to make She tried utmost to make them interactive in the class. She asked the answer to
students almost everyone.
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a speakingclass. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects She created a non-threatening atmosphere in class. Materials were suitable
of the class according to the topic. She was friendly, cooperative and polite with the students.
The class was actually live.
Negative aspects Not observed remarebly
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Rishti Average Age: 32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Scanning for specific purpose
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench
b. ability to The way she started her class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature.She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency It was good that she spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake. I did not
see her looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain After finishing the practice session she explained the answers and even before she
had handed out the materials to the students she explained with a very cordial
voice that what to be doneafter the reading and even she asked each individual
students whether he/she had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class.
interactive
Use Blackboard He used whiteboard only as the aids for teaching.Since this was a speaking class
and other so other teaching like; multimedia, poster, banner were not used.
teaching aids
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects She created a non-threatening atmosphere in class. Materials were suitable
of the class according to the topic. She was friendly, cooperative and polite with the students.
The class was actually live. The class was actually live.
Negative aspects Not observed remarebly.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Momin Average Age: 32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Report writing
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was loud and clear with a high tone which was audible from the very
last bench but one thing is that he speaks like native speakers which creat
monotonous.
b. ability to The way he started his class showed that he had a very good affiliation with his
establish rapport students.
c. personality He was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature but he presents himself
differently something like casual which is a obstacle to be a good teaches and it
looks odd..He taught the students with a very encouraging body movement.
Command over He had a good control over language. He made very little grammatical mistake.
language Otherwise his knowledge in english was good.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently though grammatical mistake. I did not see him
looking for continuous word stopping in the middle of the sentence.
Ability to explain In the way he explain the topic it seemed to me that he had a good knowledge on
the topic but somethig disorganized and he take more time to make the students
understood.
Suitability of The materia was enough suitable for the class. It was suitable for the tertiary level
materials for the students and the teaching of the materials were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials he provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials he was
students very positive about the students emotions and attitudes. He made pairs and make
interactive each students was involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects He talks much that’s why students get less time to answer the question. As a
of the class result practive time got come down. He also took more time than the given time.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Chishti Average Age: 32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Describing past event
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to He was able to establish the rapport as he gave the students group works for this
establish rapport and the tasks got easy as his instruction was very clear and easy manner. He
divided two groups for debating and all through this activities he established
rapport in good manner.
c. personality He was smart enough to handle the class even and also his get up was showing
about his strong personality.
Command over He had a very good command on the language. He did not make any grammatical
language mistake and given any pause while delivering his speech.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.

Ability to explain His explanation ability was very nice and and also tactful. He used some banner
where some pictures. Actually he wanted to explain what the pictures say about
debating. This outstanding idea reflects his ability to explain.
Suitability of The material he provided in the class was enough suitable to conduct a debating
materials for the session and his material helped the participants of the debate competition.
class
Presentation of The material he presented in the class was good enough. Not only he presented
materials the handout but also he he presented some pictures relating to debate which given
extra shape of his presentation.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful. He was very positive about the students
students emotions and attitudes. He made groups for making a successful debate
interactive competition and in this way all students were interactive.
Use Blackboard He used whiteboard as the aids for teaching as well as many banners where there
and other were many pictures because the class was debateand I think it was quite ok
teaching aids because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching How to conduct a debate competition he organised it in well manner but he took
Technique more time to give instruction for debate and it consumes time so the debating
time for the two groups were limited and he took ten minutes extra time and as a
result all his technique failed. Above all, his teaching technique is praised by all.
Positive aspects There were many positive aspects in his class. One of them can be mentioned
of the class here that he used banners and posters in his class for giving example and these
cane be a nice example he proved it.
Negative aspects One negative aspect was seen in the class he took extra ten minutes to complete
of the class his session.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Sajia Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Skimming
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench
b. ability to The way she started her class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature.She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency It was good that she spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake. I did not
see her looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain After finishing the practice session she explained the answers and even before she
had handed out the materials to the students she explained with a very cordial
voice that what to be doneafter the reading and even she asked each individual
students whether he/she had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class.
interactive
Use Blackboard He used whiteboard only as the aids for teaching.Since this was a speaking class
and other so other teaching like; multimedia, poster, banner were not used.
teaching aids
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects She created a non-threatening atmosphere in class. Materials were suitable
of the class according to the topic. She was friendly, cooperative and polite with the students.
The class was actually live. The class was actually live.
Negative aspects Not observed remarebly.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Fossih Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Information transfer
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to He was able to establish the rapport as he gave the students individual works for
establish rapport this and the tasks got easy as his instruction was very clear and easy manner.
c. personality He was smart enough to handle the class even when the students asked different
questions about the differences and the use or various clues. He was also very
much sincere and softly behaved and confident about the topic.
Command over He had a very good command on the language. He did not make any grammatical
language mistake.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain As this was a listening class so learners’ ability to listen and comprehend is the
main issue. So the way he explained I think almost everyone got the point.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials he provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials he was
students very positive about the students emotions and attitudes. He made pairs and make
interactive each students was involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects One negative aspect was seen in the class while feedback session he answered the
of the class questions without giving no time to solve the problems by the students of their
own.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Trisha Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Asking question
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench
b. ability to The way she started her class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature.She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency It was good that she spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake. I did not
see her looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain After finishing the practice session she explained the answers and even before she
had handed out the materials to the students she explained with a very cordial
voice that what to be doneafter the reading and even she asked each individual
students whether he/she had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class.
interactive
Use Blackboard He used whiteboard only as the aids for teaching.Since this was a speaking class
and other so other teaching like; multimedia, poster, banner were not used.
teaching aids
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects She created a non-threatening atmosphere in class. Materials were suitable
of the class according to the topic. She was friendly, cooperative and polite with the students.
The class was actually live. The class was actually live.
Negative aspects Not observed remarebly.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Asma Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Giving direction
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She established rapport as she gave the students individual works for this and the
establish rapport task was very much enjoyable for the students
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Ability to explain After finishing the practice session she explained the answers and even before she
had handed out the materials to the students she explained with a very cordial
voice that what to be doneafter the reading and even she asked each individual
students whether he/she had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class.
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was good. As she was teaching, it seemed to me that it
Technique was reflecting her professionalism.
Positive aspects She entered into the class with nice greeting which had broken down the
of the class thretening situation of the class. Students became contended to respond in the
class. She also spoke althrough the class in English. No mother tounge is used for
a single time.
Negative aspects As she taught in the class, no negative things were seen. It seemed that she is
of the class teaching in the real class.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Mehedi Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Skimming
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was low but clear.As the class size was small so it was ok but in the big
size class room his tone must be high
b. ability to The way he started his class showed that he had a very good affiliation with his
establish rapport students.
c. personality He was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature.He taught the students with
a very encouraging body movement. He had an excellent teaching personality.
Command over He had a good control over language. It seemed that he had good knowledge of
language English. His pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain His ability to explain is good. When he explains his topic it seemed to me that he
realy knows the matter in detailed. So, personally I enjoyed his class.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were enough good for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials he provied in the class for the students which he presented in his
materials natural way.
Ability to make Students were interactive while giving individual works for the students.
students
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class. But one
errors question he answered wrong.
Teaching Teaching technique was good. It seemed that he was a professional teacher.
Technique
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects One negative aspect was seen in the class while using multimediahe had to face
of the class dificulty and at last he could not make it. So, some times he lost without
producing anything and for this he took some extra time.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Nazlin Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Introduce yourself
Personal Her voice was not loud and attactive also. She spoke in a way that it seemed very
Qualities of the much gloomy.
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was not loud and attactive also. She spoke in a way that it seemed very
much gloomy.
b. ability to The teacher could not clear the task what the students actually do. She was not
establish rapport jolly and seemed she was in fear which did not make her able to establish rapport
and her silent movement and some uninteractive plans failed the session.
c. personality She was not jolly, interactive, lively and attractive in her atitudes in the class .
Even she always in a fear.
Command over She had a medium type of command over the language that she often made
language mistakes in grammatical and also pronunciation. Sometimes she read out from her
material.
Fluency Not so good fluency in English but she could speak in the language and finish the
class without using mother tounge.
Ability to explain Her ability to explanation was poor. From the very beginning class her ability to
exaplanation was seemed downward. May be she was not enough prepared for
her class as a result she was confused and did not explained the necessary
information. Her instruction was also not clear.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials he provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials he was
students very positive about the students emotions and attitudes. He made pairs and make
interactive each students was involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects I found nothing so good in her session that day. The material she designed for
of the class her session was below standard; very easy for the students. There was no
challenge in her material. Her starting was not so good. She herself was not
confident about her material. Somehow she engaged the students. There were
no pre and post activities in her material.
Overall She could improve her week aspects by synchronizing her teaching materials.
impression She should be conscious about time management.
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Sabrina Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Speaking- past event
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She well established rapport because it seemed that she had a good understanding
establish rapport with the students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency She had a good fluency in English
Ability to explain After finishing the practice session she explained the answers and even before she
had handed out the materials to the students she explained with a very cordial
voice that what to be doneafter the reading and even she asked each individual
students whether he/she had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class.
interactive
Use Blackboard She used whiteboard only as the aids for teaching.Since this was a speaking class
and other so other teaching like; multimedia, poster, banner were not used.
teaching aids
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects No negative aspects were seen in her class.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Rimi Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Describing future event
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She well established rapport because it seemed that she had a good understanding
establish rapport with the students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency She had a good fluency in English
Ability to explain After finishing the practice session she explained the answers and even before she
had handed out the materials to the students she explained with a very cordial
voice that what to be doneafter the reading and even she asked each individual
students whether he/she had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which was enough good for
materials a listening class.
Ability to make Students were very much interactive in her class because her class was going as
students she planned. Question and answering seesion was more interactive.
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the multimedia was used as the aids for listening a audio clip by which she
and other gave the students individual tasks and feedback also.
teaching aids
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. She gave
of the class more time in feedback session. The class was actually live.
Negative aspects One negative aspect was seen in her clas that she was little nervous when she was
of the class giving answer and while answering one question she was confused about write
answer. Another thing is that her eye contact is one sided.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Sajia Average Age:
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Speaking- role play
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She well established rapport because it seemed that she had a good understanding
establish rapport with the students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency She had a good fluency in English
Ability to explain After finishing the practice session she explained the answers and even before she
had handed out the materials to the students she explained with a very cordial
voice that what to be doneafter the reading and even she asked each individual
students whether he/she had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of The audio clip which he played in the class that was very suitable because this
materials for the audio matches the level of students and the considering time limitation.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make Students were very interactive because he played the audio clip and given the
students task, they understood and given the answer. It was possible only when they were
interactive interactive with lesson.
Use Blackboard Only the multimedia was used as the aids for teaching. As this was a lisening
and other class so listening was the main issue and for this she played an audio clip for the
teaching aids students.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. She gave
of the class more time in feedback session. The class was actually live.
Negative aspects No negative aspects were seen in her class.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Trisha Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Listening- detail information
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She established rapport as she gave the students individual works for this and the
establish rapport task was very much enjoyable for the students
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Ability to explain After finishing the practice session she explained the answers and even before she
had handed out the materials to the students she explained with a very cordial
voice that what to be doneafter the reading and even she asked each individual
students whether he/she had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class.
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was good. As she was teaching, it seemed to me that it
Technique was reflecting her professionalism.
Positive aspects She entered into the class with nice greeting which had broken down the
of the class thretening situation of the class. Students became contended to respond in the
class. She also spoke althrough the class in English. No mother tounge is used for
a single time.
Negative aspects As she taught in the class, no negative things were seen. It seemed that she is
of the class teaching in the real class.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Azad Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Reading- transfer inferring information
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to He was able to establish the rapport as he gave the students individual works for
establish rapport this and the tasks got easy as his instruction was very clear and easy manner.
c. personality He was smart enough to handle the class even when the students asked
differentquestionsabout the differencesandtheuseor various clues. He was also
very much sincere andsoftlybehaved and confident about thetopic.
Command over He had a very good command on the language. He did not make any grammatical
language mistake. His speech in English so smart and he is so expert in speaking without
making any mistakes.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain After the students have finished, he explained the answers and even before he had
handed out the texts to the students he explained with a very cordial voice that
what to be done after the reading andeven he asked each individual student
whether he hadanyproblem to understand or not.
Suitability of The material was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials he provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials he was
students very positive about the students emotions and attitudes. He made pairs and make
interactive each students was involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects One negative aspect was seen in the class while feedback session he answered the
of the class questions without giving no time to solve the problems by the students of their
own.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Fossih Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Listening- listening for detail
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to He was able to establish the rapport as he gave the students individual works for
establish rapport this and the tasks got easy as his instruction was very clear and easy manner.
c. personality He was smart enough to handle the class even when the students asked
differentquestionsabout the differencesandtheuseor various clues. He was also
very much sincere andsoftlybehaved and confident about thetopic.
Command over He had a very good command on the language. He did not make any grammatical
language mistake. His speech in English so smart and he is so expert in speaking without
making any mistakes.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain After the students have finished, he explained the answers and even before he had
handed out the texts to the students he explained with a very cordial voice that
what to be done after the reading andeven he asked each individual student
whether he hadanyproblem to understand or not.
Suitability of The audio clip which he played in the class that was very suitable because this
materials for the audio matches the level of students and the considering time limitation.
class
Presentation of Before playing the audio clip he briefed what to do for the students. After
materials listening the audio the students understood and asnwered it means he presented
well.
Ability to make Students were very interactive becausehe played the audio clip and given the task,
students they understood and given the answer. It was possible only when they were
interactive interactive with lesson.
Use Blackboard Only the multimedia was used as the aids for teaching. As this was a lisening
and other class so listening was the main issue and for this he played an audio clip for the
teaching aids students.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class and duly he
errors corrected. It means he had a lot of prepation for taking the class.
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Positive aspects were many things but here only one thing can be mentioned that
of the class his depth of knowledge was vast.
Negative aspects Nothing noticed as remarkebly.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Sabrina Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Reading- scanning
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She well established rapport because it seemed that she had a good understanding
establish rapport with the students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency She had a good fluency in English
Ability to explain After finishing the practice session she explained the answers and even before she
had handed out the materials to the students she explained with a very cordial
voice that what to be doneafter the reading and even she asked each individual
students whether he/she had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which was enough good for
materials a listening class.
Ability to make Students were very much interactive in her class because her class was going as
students she planned. Question and answering seesion was more interactive.
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the multimedia was used as the aids for listening a audio clip by which she
and other gave the students individual tasks and feedback also.
teaching aids
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. She gave
of the class more time in feedback session. The class was actually live.
Negative aspects No negative aspects were seen in her class.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Trisha Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Information transfer
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She well established rapport because it seemed that she had a good understanding
establish rapport with the students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency She had a good fluency in English
Ability to explain After finishing the practice session she explained the answers and even before she
had handed out the materials to the students she explained with a very cordial
voice that what to be doneafter the reading and even she asked each individual
students whether he/she had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class.
interactive
Use Blackboard She used whiteboard only as the aids for teaching.Since this was a speaking class
and other so other teaching like; multimedia, poster, banner were not used.
teaching aids
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects No negative aspects were seen in her class.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Fossih Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Describing past event
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to He was able to establish the rapport as he gave the students individual works for
establish rapport this and the tasks got easy as his instruction was very clear and easy manner.
c. personality He was smart enough to handle the class even when the students asked
differentquestionsabout the differencesandtheuseor various clues. He was also
very much sincere andsoftlybehaved and confident about thetopic.
Command over He had a very good command on the language. He did not make any grammatical
language mistake.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain After the students have finished, he explained the answers and even before he had
handed out the texts to the students he explained with a very cordial voice that
what to be done after the reading andeven he asked each individual student
whether he hadanyproblem to understand or not.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials he provied in the class for the students which was very short but it
materials was very effective because that material covers all the point related to the topic.
Ability to make The way he was taking his class in results all the students understood the main
students point answered the question in feedback session.
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because. Even in the practice session he wrote the question in the whiteboard and
teaching aids it was enough.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching Teaching technique was good as professional teacher and ut reflects his
Technique professionalism
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects One negative aspect was seen in the class while feedback session he answered the
of the class questions without giving no time to solve the problems by the students of their
own.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Rishti Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Listening- find detail information
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She was very much friendly and could follow her lesson plan. So she was able to
establish rapport reach to every student of the class.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake. I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain She explained all the difficult words students faced with problems. She also
explained the related things when the students asked to her.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class.
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the multimedia was used as the aids for teaching. As this was a lisening
and other class so listening was the main issue and for this she played an audio clip for the
teaching aids students.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. She gave
of the class more time in feedback session. The class was actually live.
Negative aspects One negative aspect was seen in her clas that she was little nervous when she was
of the class giving answer and while answering one question she was confused about write
answer. Another thing is that her eye contact is one sided.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Azad Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Listening- for detail information
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to He was able to establish the rapport as he gave the students individual works for
establish rapport this and the tasks got easy as his instruction was very clear and easy manner.
c. personality He was smart enough to handle the class even when the students asked different
questions about the differences and the use or various clues. He was also very
much sincere and softly behaved and confident about the topic.
Command over He had a very good command on the language. He did not make any grammatical
language mistake.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain As this was a listening class so learners’ ability to listen and comprehend is the
main issue. So the way he explained I think almost everyone got the point.
Suitability of The audio clip which he played in the class that was very suitable because this
materials for the audio matches the level of students and the considering time limitation.
class
Presentation of Before playing the audio clip he briefed what to do for the students. After
materials listening the audio the students understood and asnwered it means he presented
well.
Ability to make Students were very interactive becausehe played the audio clip and given the task,
students they understood and given the answer. It was possible only when they were
interactive interactive with lesson.
Use Blackboard Only the multimedia was used as the aids for teaching. As this was a lisening
and other class so listening was the main issue and for this he played an audio clip for the
teaching aids students.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class and duly he
errors corrected. It means he had a lot of prepation for taking the class.
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Positive aspects were many things but here only one thing can be mentioned that
of the class his depth of knowledge was vast.
Negative aspects Nothing noticed as remarkebly.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Sajia Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Listening
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She well established rapport because it seemed that she had a good understanding
establish rapport with the students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency She had a good fluency in English
Ability to explain Explanation ability was good enough. The material she provided to the students
she explained that clearly.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class..
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the multimedia was used as the aids for teaching. As this was a lisening
and other class so listening was the main issue and for this she played an audio clip for the
teaching aids students.
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects No negative aspects were seen in her class.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Rimi Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Describing future event
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Voice qualiy for teaching in the class was not very suitable but it was loud. As
she was speaking it seemed to me that her voice was vibrating which was creating
monotonous.
b. ability to The way she started her class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was not jolly, interactive, lively and attractive in her atitudes in the class .
Even she always in a fear.
Command over She had a medium type of command over the language that she often made
language mistakes in grammatical and also pronunciation. Sometimes she read out from her
material.
Fluency Not so good fluency in English but she could speak in the language and finish the
class without using mother tounge.
Ability to explain She was little success to give explanation what she is going to teach. As the topic
was easy and also the material so she explained easily.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented was
materials not attractively. But she managed herself
Ability to make Her presentation was not much attractive so the interaction with the students was
students very poor.
interactive
Use Blackboard She used multimedia extensively also used whiteboard but very little.
and other
teaching aids
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects It seemed to me that she did not enough preparation for the class. While lecturing
of the class she read out the script instead of freely delivering speech. Also she made
mistakes in the grammar and also I thought she was not well organized.
Overall Good
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Sabina Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Listening
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to She well established rapport because it seemed that she had a good understanding
establish rapport with the students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency She had a good fluency in English
Ability to explain After finishing the practice session she explained the answers and even before she
had handed out the materials to the students she explained with a very cordial
voice that what to be doneafter the reading and even she asked each individual
students whether he/she had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of The audio clip which he played in the class that was very suitable because this
materials for the audio matches the level of students and the considering time limitation.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make Students were very interactive because he played the audio clip and given the
students task, they understood and given the answer. It was possible only when they were
interactive interactive with lesson.
Use Blackboard Only the multimedia was used as the aids for teaching. As this was a lisening
and other class so listening was the main issue and for this she played an audio clip for the
teaching aids students.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. She gave
of the class more time in feedback session. The class was actually live.
Negative aspects One negative aspect was seen in her clas that she was little nervous when she was
of the class giving answer and while answering one question she was confused about write
answer.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Fahmida Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Listening
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench
b. ability to The way she started her class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature.She taught the students
with a very encouraging body movement. She had an excellent teaching
personality.
Command over She had a good control over language. It seemed that she had good knowledge of
language English. Her pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency It was good that she spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake. I did not
see her looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain After finishing the practice session she explained the answers and even before she
had handed out the materials to the students she explained with a very cordial
voice that what to be doneafter the reading and even she asked each individual
students whether he/she had any problem to understand or not.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class.
interactive
Use Blackboard He used whiteboard only as the aids for teaching.Since this was a speaking class
and other so other teaching like; multimedia, poster, banner were not used.
teaching aids
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects She created a non-threatening atmosphere in class. Materials were suitable
of the class according to the topic. She was friendly, cooperative and polite with the students.
The class was actually live. The class was actually live.
Negative aspects Not observed remarebly.
of the class
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Fahmida Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Inferring ideas
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Voice qualiy for teaching in the class was not very suitable but it was loud. As
she was speaking it seemed to me that her voice was vibrating which was creating
monotonous.
b. ability to The way she started her class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was not jolly, interactive, lively and attractive in her atitudes in the class .
Even she always in a fear.
Command over She had a medium type of command over the language that she often made
language mistakes in grammatical and also pronunciation. Sometimes she read out from her
material.
Fluency Not so good fluency in English but she could speak in the language and finish the
class without using mother tounge.
Ability to explain She was little success to give explanation what she is going to teach. As the topic
was easy and also the material so she explained easily.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented was
materials not attractively. But she managed herself
Ability to make Her presentation was not much attractive so the interaction with the students was
students very poor.
interactive
Use Blackboard She used used whiteboard but very little.
and other
teaching aids
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. She gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects It seemed to me that she did not enough preparation for the class. While lecturing
of the class she read out the script instead of freely delivering speech. Also she made
mistakes in the grammar and also I thought she was not well organized.
Overall Good
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Asma Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Reading- inferring idea
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was loud and clear with a high tone which was audible from the very
last bench but one thing is that she speaks like native speakers which create
monotonous.
b. ability to The way she started her class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature but she presents herself
differently something like casual which is a obstacle to be a good teaches and it
looks odd..She taught the students with a very encouraging body movement.
Command over She had a good control over language. She made very little grammatical mistake.
language Otherwise her knowledge in english was good.
Fluency It was good that she spoke fluently though grammatical mistake. I did not see her
looking for continuous word stopping in the middle of the sentence.
Ability to explain In the way she explain the topic it seemed to me that he had a good knowledge on
the topic but somethig disorganized and she take more time to make the students
understood.
Suitability of The materia was enough suitable for the class. It was suitable for the tertiary level
materials for the students and the teaching of the materials were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials he provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials she was
students very positive about the students emotions and attitudes. She made pairs and make
interactive each students was involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. She gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects She talks much that’s why students get less time to answer the question. As a
of the class result practive time got come down. She also took more time than the given time.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Nazlin Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Reading- scanning
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was not loud and attactive also. She spoke in a way that it seemed very
much gloomy.
b. ability to The teacher could not clear the task what the students actually do. She was not
establish rapport jolly and seemed she was in fear which did not make her able to establish rapport
and her silent movement and some uninteractive plans failed the session.
c. personality She was not jolly, interactive, lively and attractive in her atitudes in the class .
Even she always in a fear.
Command over She had a medium type of command over the language that she often made
language mistakes in grammatical and also pronunciation. Sometimes she read out from her
material.
Fluency Not so good fluency in English but she could speak in the language and finish the
class without using mother tounge.
Ability to explain Her ability to explanation was poor. From the very beginning class her ability to
exaplanation was seemed downward. May be she was not enough prepared for
her class as a result she was confused and did not explained the necessary
information. Her instruction was also not clear.
Suitability of The materials were suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the
materials for the materials were interesting also.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented in the
materials right and simple way and so the students got the topic .
Ability to make The activity she given to the students was interesting so the students enjoyed the
students class and interactive. I think most of the students were interactive in her class.
interactive
Use Blackboard Only the multimedia was used as the aids for teaching. As this was a lisening
and other class so listening was the main issue and for this she played an audio clip for the
teaching aids students.
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects No negative aspects were seen in her class.
of the class
Overall Good
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Sabrina Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Listening
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was loud and clear with a high tone which was audible from the very
last bench but one thing is that he speaks like native speakers which creat
monotonous.
b. ability to The way she started his class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature but she presents herself
differently something like casual which is a obstacle to be a good teaches and it
looks odd..She taught the students with a very encouraging body movement.
Command over She had a good control over language. She made very little grammatical mistake.
language Otherwise her knowledge in english was good.
Fluency It was good that she spoke fluently though grammatical mistake. I did not see her
looking for continuous word stopping in the middle of the sentence.
Ability to explain In the way she explain the topic it seemed to me that she had a good knowledge
on the topic but somethig disorganized and she take more time to make the
students understood.
Suitability of The materia was enough suitable for the class. It was suitable for the tertiary level
materials for the students and the teaching of the materials were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials she was
students very positive about the students emotions and attitudes. She made pairs and make
interactive each students was involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. She gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects She talks much that’s why students get less time to answer the question. As a
of the class result practive time got come down. She also took more time than the given time.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Azad Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Grammar- conditional
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to He was very much friendly and could follow her lesson plan arranged. So he was
establish rapport able to reach to every student of the class
c. personality He was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. He taught the students with
a very encouraging body movement. He had an excellent teaching personality.
Command over He had a good control over language. It seemed that he had good knowledge of
language English. His pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake. I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain He explained all the difficult words students faced with problems. He also
explained the related things when the students asked to him.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of He was teaching conditionls but he did not use any traditional grammar book
materials rather he was teaching conditionals through slides. I think it was the right and
creative way to teach conditionals and he presented materials in smartly.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials he was
students very positive about the students emotions and attitudes. He asked different
interactive students about their previous knowledge about conditionals and by doing this he
made interaction with the students.
Use Blackboard Whiteboard and multimedia were used as the aids for teaching and I think it was
and other quite ok because it was a grammar class. Enough handouts were provided for the
teaching aids students so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching He used deductive technique of teaching that he started with examples and
Technique brought rules from students.
Positive aspects The class was very much interactive and live. The learning was facilitated and
of the class methods were modern. The students responded in English.
Negative aspects Negative things have not been observed remarkebly
of the class
Overall Very good
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Fossih Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Grammar- conditional
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was very much charming, loud and clear with a high tone which was
audible from the very last bench.
b. ability to He was very much friendly and could follow her lesson plan. So he was able to
establish rapport reach to every student of the class.
c. personality He was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature. He taught the students with
a very encouraging body movement. He had an excellent teaching personality.
Command over He had a good control over language. It seemed that he had good knowledge of
language English. His pronunciation was excellent as well.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake. I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in the middle of the sentence.
Ability to explain He explained all the difficult words students faced with problems. She also
explained the related things when the students asked to her.
Suitability of It was suitable for the secondary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of Presentation of material was appropriate for the class. He used slide and she gave
materials many example so the students cought it quickly. I think it was the right and
creative way to teach prepositio and he presented materials in smartly.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials he was
students very positive about the students emotions and attitudes. He asked different
interactive students about their previous knowledge about preposition and by doing this he
made interaction with the students.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a grammar class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching He used deductive technique of teaching that she started with examples and
Technique brought rules from students.
Positive aspects The class was very much interactive and live. The learning was facilitated and
of the class methods were modern. The students responded in English.
Negative aspects Negative things have not been observed remarkebly
of the class
Overall Very good
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Asma Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Vocabulary- synonyms & antonyms
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Voice qualiy for teaching in the class was not very suitable but it was loud. As
she was speaking it seemed to me that her voice was vibrating which was creating
monotonous.
b. ability to The way she started her class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was not jolly, interactive, lively and attractive in her atitudes in the class .
Even she always in a fear.
Command over She had a medium type of command over the language that she often made
language mistakes in grammatical and also pronunciation. Sometimes she read out from her
material.
Fluency Not so good fluency in English but she could speak in the language and finish the
class without using mother tounge.
Ability to explain She was little success to give explanation what she is going to teach. As the topic
was easy and also the material so she explained easily.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented was
materials not attractively. But she managed herself
Ability to make Her presentation was not much attractive so the interaction with the students was
students very poor.
interactive
Use Blackboard She used multimedia extensively also used whiteboard but very little.
and other
teaching aids
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. She gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects While playing the audia clip she faced difficulty in playing it. Because the device
of the class was having a problem. That’s why she took extra 3-4 minitues. It seemed to me
that she did not enough preparation for the class. While lecturing she read out the
script instead of freely delivering speech. Also she made mistakes in the grammar
and also I thought she was not well organized.
Overall Good
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Mehedi Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Vocabulary
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality His voice was low but clear.As the class size was small so it was ok but in the big
size class room his tone must be high.
b. ability to The way he started his class showed that he had a very good affiliation with his
establish rapport students.
c. personality He presented good personality in the class which is very necessary for teaching.
He was also smart enough to handle the class even when the students asked
different questions.
Command over He had a very good command on the language. He did not make any grammatical
language mistake.
Fluency It was good that he spoke fluently without any grammatical mistake.I did not see
him looking for any word stopping in themiddle of thesentence.
Ability to explain His ability to explain is good. When he explains his topic it seemed to me that he
realy knows the matter in detailed. So, personally I enjoyed his class.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of While presenting the material using multimedia it seemed to me that he was a
materials little bit disorganized because during feedback session when he was answer the
question he was confused.
Ability to make At the beginning students were interactive but the disorganization his answering
students their interactiveness come down.
interactive
Use Blackboard Whiteboard and was used as teaching aid.
and other
teaching aids
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching His teaching technique was good which can an example and and can follow him.
Technique
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects No massive negative aspects were seen in his delivering lectures without some
of the class disorganization while presenting. Another thing is that he was slow in delivering
speech which was little bit boring.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Rimi Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Vocabulary
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Voice qualiy for teaching in the class was not very suitable but it was loud. As
she was speaking it seemed to me that her voice was vibrating which was creating
monotonous.
b. ability to The way she started her class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was not jolly, interactive, lively and attractive in her atitudes in the class .
Even she always in a fear.
Command over She had a medium type of command over the language that she often made
language mistakes in grammatical and also pronunciation. Sometimes she read out from her
material.
Fluency Not so good fluency in English but she could speak in the language and finish the
class without using mother tounge.
Ability to explain She was little success to give explanation what she is going to teach. As the topic
was easy and also the material so she explained easily.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented was
materials not attractively. But she managed herself
Ability to make Her presentation was not much attractive so the interaction with the students was
students very poor.
interactive
Use Blackboard She used multimedia extensively also used whiteboard but very little.
and other
teaching aids
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects It seemed to me that she did not enough preparation for the class. While lecturing
of the class she read out the script instead of freely delivering speech. Also she made
mistakes in the grammar and also I thought she was not well organized.
Overall Good
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Nazlin Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Grammar- preposition
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Voice qualiy for teaching in the class was not very suitable but it was loud. As
she was speaking it seemed to me that her voice was vibrating which was creating
monotonous.
b. ability to The way she started her class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was not jolly, interactive, lively and attractive in her atitudes in the class .
Even she always in a fear.
Command over She had a medium type of command over the language that she often made
language mistakes in grammatical and also pronunciation. Sometimes she read out from her
material.
Fluency Not so good fluency in English but she could speak in the language and finish the
class without using mother tounge.
Ability to explain She was little success to give explanation what she is going to teach. As the topic
was easy and also the material so she explained easily.
Suitability of It was suitable for the tertiary level students and the teaching of the materials
materials for the were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which she presented was
materials not attractively. But she managed herself
Ability to make Her presentation was not much attractive so the interaction with the students was
students very poor.
interactive
Use Blackboard She used multimedia extensively also used whiteboard but very little.
and other
teaching aids
Correction of He made correction whenever the students asked him in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. He gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects It seemed to me that she did not enough preparation for the class. While lecturing
of the class she read out the script instead of freely delivering speech. Also she made
mistakes in the grammar and also I thought she was not well organized.
Overall Good
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer
Name of teacher Sabrina Average Age:32+
Class Size 13
Level of the class Secondary
Level of Intermediate
Proficiency
Aim of lesson Grammar- noun
Personal
Qualities of the
Teacher
a. voice quality Her voice was loud and clear with a high tone which was audible from the very
last bench but one thing is that she speaks like native speakers which creat
monotonous.
b. ability to The way she started his class showed that she had a very good affiliation with her
establish rapport students.
c. personality She was very enthusiastic as well as friendly in nature but she presents herself
differently something like casual which is a obstacle to be a good teaches and it
looks odd..She taught the students with a very encouraging body movement.
Command over She had a good control over language. She made very little grammatical mistake.
language Otherwise her knowledge in english was good.
Fluency It was good that she spoke fluently though grammatical mistake. I did not see her
looking for continuous word stopping in the middle of the sentence.
Ability to explain In the way she explain the topic it seemed to me that she had a good knowledge
on the topic but somethig disorganized and she take more time to make the
students understood.
Suitability of The materia was enough suitable for the class. It was suitable for the tertiary level
materials for the students and the teaching of the materials were interesting for the level.
class
Presentation of The materials she provied in the class for the students which were very big
materials considering the class time. The passage was very big to find out the meaning
within this short time and alo answering the questions.
Ability to make The teacher was very much tactful and elucidate the teaching materials she was
students very positive about the students emotions and attitudes. She made pairs and make
interactive each students was involvedin S-S interactionsas well as T-S-T interaction.
Use Blackboard Only the whiteboard was used as the aids for teaching and I think it was quite ok
and other because it was a reading class. Enough handouts were provided for the students
teaching aids so it covered all the gaps.
Correction of She made correction whenever the students asked her in the class.
errors
Teaching The teaching technique was interactive and of the styles of CLT because there
Technique was enough question answer session among the students.
Positive aspects Teacher monitored the class and tried to help the students individually. She gave
of the class moretime in feedback session The class was actually live.
Negative aspects She talks much that’s why students get less time to answer the question. As a
of the class result practive time got come down. She also took more time than the given time.
Overall Good and positive
impression
Marks assigned Signature of observer